San Luis Drain Shutoff Simulations and Link-Node Recalibration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Using computer simulations to assess energy and carbon reductions in building CDM projects Joe Huang March 14, 2011.
Advertisements

LC TMDL Modeling Strategy W. Walker Walk Thru July 2011 Progress Report Data Strengths & Weaknesses Preliminary Testing Results Dynamic vs. Steady State.
Importance of Land use management on the Flood Management in the Chi River Basin, Thailand Kittiwet Kuntiyawichai Bart Schultz Stefan Uhlenbrook F.X. Suryadi.
 What is a TMDL?  San Joaquin River DO TMDL Overview  TMDL Control Program & Phase II MS4 Permit Sue McConnell (Senior WRCE) (916) Christine.
SWRCB Modeling I Historical Modeling Tara Smith, Delta Modeling Section Department of Water Resources Tara Smith, Delta Modeling Section Department of.
Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Napa River Watershed Group Members Vinod Kella  Rebecca Kwaan  Luke Montague Linsey Shariq  Peng Wang.
METHYL MERCURY IN THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN Chris Foe Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
SJR DO Depletion Modeling: Model Calibration, Adaptive Management, User Guidance Andy Thuman, P.E. (HydroQual) Laurie De.
Rio Blanco Watershed The Rest of the Story. Located Northwest of Guadalajara, Mexico Located Northwest of Guadalajara, Mexico Physical Characteristics.
Effective Policy Based on Sparse Data TMDLs in the San Joaquin River Basin, California Leslie F. Grober.
Reservoir and Diversion Data CBRFC Stakeholder Forum July 31, 2012.
Climate Change and Water Resources Management WEB pages on water management activities Max Campos San Jose – Costa Rica.
DOES WATER = JOBS? Dr. Jeff Michael Director, Business Forecasting Center Eberhardt School of Business.
Impact of SJR & South Delta Flow Diversions on Water Quality Began Review SJR Low-DO Problem Spring 1999 Supported by CVRWQCB & DeltaKeeper Directed Funds.
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
Virtual Weir Phase 5 Investigations (Preliminary Results) Canberra 29 September, 2009.
Searching for Reasonable Solutions to an Imperfect Situation Charles Burt, P.E., Ph.D. March 14, 2005 SWRCB Hearing – SJ River Salinity.
Draft Recommendations of the San Joaquin Water Quality Management Group Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron and DO Objectives Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron.
Local Groundwater Flow Model Addendum Guadalupe Restoration Project San Luis Obispo County October
SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006.
SJR DO Depletion Modeling Progress Update Andy Thuman, P.E. (HydroQual) Laurie De Rosa (HydroQual) Russ Brown, Ph.D. (Jones.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
Review of DWSC Modeling- what should we do next? Russ Brown, Jones & Stokes DO-TMDL Technical Work Group May 16,2006.
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Periodic Review of the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary Deltakeeper Chapter of Baykeeper.
Applying WARMF to the SJR Replaces DSM2 from Bear Creek to Mossdale Replaces DSM2 from Bear Creek to Mossdale Offers expanded model domain, including tributaries.
Findings Is the City of Oberlin a source or a sink for pollutants? Water quality in Plum Creek as a function of urban land cover Jonathan Cummings, Tami.
Our Case Study. Rationale for study The TMDL model assumes that there is no decrease in seepage during low flow conditions, basing its calculations on.
Total Loads and Water Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay System Presented by: Ann Quenzer and Dr. David Maidment Special Thanks: Corpus Christi Bay National.
CALSIM II - San Joaquin River Basin Refinements and Results Presentation by Dan Steiner On behalf of the San Joaquin River Group Authority March 14, 2005.
1 Understanding Sources of Error and Uncertainty NOAA’S COLORADO BASIN RIVER FORECAST CENTER.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
Focus Group Meeting: November 12, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
Changes to the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan Program of Implementation Presented by: Steve Ford Department of Water Resources.
DSM2 Analysis of Water Level and Water Quality in the South Delta Presented to California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum February 26, 2007 Fingerprinting.
M ODESTO I RRIGATION D ISTRICT | T URLOCK I RRIGATION D ISTRICT FERC PROJECT N O Don Pedro Reservoir 3-Dimensional Temperature Model.
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Phosphorus Stressor in Lake Champlain Basin Alison Nord, Anna Speed, Ashley Murphy.
RB-Explorer M7a –Water Quality and Ecology Workgroup WFD-Explorer model wrapup.
San Joaquin River Water Quality Modeling- A Beginning SJR-DO TMDL Technical Work Group Presentation Russ Brown- Jones & Stokes January 20, 2005.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Salt Lake City, Utah 11 The Hydrologic.
Model Description Sample Results Next Steps Monitoring Data (Initial Conditions) Hydrodynamics Water Quality USGS; DWR Monitoring Data (Initial Conditions)
Sacramento: Flood Risk
Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California
CWEMF Annual Meeting March 2005
Forecasting Turbidity in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Long-term Salinity Prediction with Uncertainty Analysis
Firmware Update 29/03/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan.
Planning & Environmental Compliance HYDRAULIC MODELING UPDATE
Forecasting river transmission loss in the Lower Namoi Regulated River
Morphodynamic and Sediment Tracers in One-Dimension
James K Beard, Ph.D. April 20, 2005 SystemView 2005 James K Beard, Ph.D. April 20, 2005 April 122, 2005.
Image courtesy of NASA/GSFC
Sacramento: Flood Risk
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Examples of significant, long-term increases in baseline concentration of chloride for streams and rivers of the northeastern United States. Examples.
Beta Release of Delta Channel Depletion Model (DCD v1
Case Study: Stockton and Houston Ship Channels
Methyl Mercury Concentrations and Loads in the Delta
Laura Bright David Maier Portland State University
Flood Routing.
SJR Technical Working Group March 25, 2004
Open water area Franks Tract
San Joaquin River At Crows Landing 30 June 2010.
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
Tami Thompson - MBK Engineers
Central Valley Salinity Coalition
Implementation of Lower San Joaquin River Flow Objectives
Presentation transcript:

San Luis Drain Shutoff Simulations and Link-Node Recalibration Joel Herr and Katie van Werkhoven Systech Water Resources, Inc. San Joaquin River DO TMDL PI Meeting May 15, 2008

Outline San Luis Drain Shutoff Forecast / Hindcast Model Validation Link-Node Recalibration Conclusion

Simulation Runs Forecast Hindcast Load shifting Do nothing forecast Add flow and loading from off week to week before shutoff No net load reduction, only shift Do nothing forecast Assume flow and loading trends continue Hindcast Actual event: use measured data Do nothing Use measured data except for continuous flow, load from Mud Slough

Load shifting SL Drain shutoff forecast vs Do nothing forecast Forecast Results: EC Load shifting SL Drain shutoff forecast vs Do nothing forecast

Forecast Results: Phytoplankton Load shifting SL Drain shutoff forecast vs Do nothing forecast

Relative Error of Input Projections Mud Slough Salt Slough SJR @ Lander Merced River Tuolumne River Stanislaus River Flow 0% +55% +30% -21% 12% -22% EC -15% -14% -13% +2% +29% -10% Phyto-plankton +250% -5% +8% +601% +57% +525%

Actual SL Drain shutoff event vs Do nothing hindcast Hindcast Results: EC Actual SL Drain shutoff event vs Do nothing hindcast

Hindcast Results: Phytoplankton Actual SL Drain shutoff event vs Do nothing hindcast

Prediction of Flow at Vernalis

Prediction of EC at Vernalis

Phytoplankton at Vernalis

Response at Crows Landing

Response at Vernalis

Response at Brandt Bridge

D.O. at Rough & Ready Island Effect on DO at RRI: Was minimal: ~0.01 mg/l Signal of decreased phytoplankton mostly dispersed by Brandt Bridge Effect spread out over 2-3 weeks What does this mean? Load shifting signal does not transmit well to DWSC Little effect for short-term loading reduction

What did we learn? Reducing Mud Slough phytoplankton load may be effective at reducing phytoplankton at Vernalis & Old River DWSC DO response is small, delayed, and diffused over longer time period

Outline San Luis Drain Shutoff Forecast / Hindcast Model Validation Link-Node Recalibration Conclusion

Validation: Flow at Vernalis

Validation: EC at Vernalis

Validation: Phytoplankton at Vernalis

Phytoplankton Sampling

What’s up with 2007? Flow simulation very accurate Simulated EC ~20% less than observed Simulated Phytoplankton much less than observed Model error or data error? Where are errors originating?

Data status for 2007 Meteorology: complete Tributary inflows: mostly complete Merced River has missing time periods Los Banos Creek flow estimated Less data for agricultural drains Tributary water quality: complete Diversions: 2007 flow data included for 1 of 4 ID’s; estimated for the rest

Possible Sources of Model Error Newman Wasteway DMC Recirculation occurred 8/15-9/12/2007 Salt Slough / Mud Slough / Los Banos Ck Monitoring stations upstream of SJR Phytoplankton growth may occur before entering the SJR Unknown inputs not included in model

Location of EC Error EC is conservative: Calculate mass error (simulated – observed load) at Crows Landing Calculate mass error at Vernalis EC error at Crows Landing accounts for 48% of error at Vernalis

Location of Phytoplankton Error Fixed phytoplankton at Crows Landing: Simulation shows Vernalis is OK

Phytoplankton Growth

Model changes Mud Slough, Salt Slough, Los Banos creek downstream of monitoring stations added to model domain 20-25% phytoplankton growth before reaching SJR Newman Wasteway added to model domain, DMC recirculation of 2004 and 2007 simulated Operational for limited time, dilution effect

Model Changes

Outline San Luis Drain Shutoff Forecast / Hindcast Model Validation Link-Node Recalibration Conclusion

Link-Node Recalibration Goals Improve D.O. simulation from Old River to Channel Point, maintain calibration at Rough & Ready Island Improve phytoplankton simulation, especially from Old River to Channel Point Increase ammonia from Old River to Channel Point

Link-Node Recalibration Method Recalibration attempted with global reaction rates (unsuccessful) Link-Node code upgraded for reaction rates which vary by node Reaction rates recalibrated in two sections: DWSC and elsewhere

Link-Node Recalibration (Live demonstration of simulation results)

Brandt Bridge Phytoplankton (live demonstration of Link-Node output)

Brandt Bridge Dissolved Oxygen

Garwood Bridge Phytoplankton

Garwood Bridge Dissolved Oxygen

Rough & Ready Dissolved Oxygen

What happens now? San Joaquin River Model Interface (WARMF & Link-Node) will continue to be available for download Updates will be available with new projects Users can get technical support from Systech: joel@systechwater.com 925-355-1780