Deriving and fitting LogN-LogS distributions An Introduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Energy Gamma Ray Group
Advertisements

X-ray Astrostatistics Bayesian Methods in Data Analysis Aneta Siemiginowska Vinay Kashyap and CHASC Jeremy Drake, Nov.2005.
Combined Energy Spectra of Flux and Anisotropy Identifying Anisotropic Source Populations of Gamma-rays or Neutrinos Sheldon Campbell The Ohio State University.
Lwando Kondlo Supervisor: Prof. Chris Koen University of the Western Cape 12/3/2008 SKA SA Postgraduate Bursary Conference Estimation of the parameters.
Deriving and fitting LogN-LogS distributions An Introduction Andreas Zezas University of Crete.
Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Probing the evolution of stellar systems Andreas Zezas Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Constraining Astronomical Populations with Truncated Data Sets Brandon C. Kelly (CfA, Hubble Fellow, 6/11/2015Brandon C. Kelly,
RHESSI/GOES Observations of the Non-flaring Sun from 2002 to J. McTiernan SSL/UCB.
Error Propagation. Uncertainty Uncertainty reflects the knowledge that a measured value is related to the mean. Probable error is the range from the mean.
Bayesian Analysis of X-ray Luminosity Functions A. Ptak (JHU) Abstract Often only a relatively small number of sources of a given class are detected in.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
Deriving and fitting LogN-LogS distributions Andreas Zezas Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
The Near Infrared Background Excess and Star Formation in the HUDF Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Gamma-Ray Luminosity Function of Blazars and the Cosmic Gamma-Ray Background: Evidence for the Luminosity-Dependent Density Evolution Takuro Narumoto (Department.
Advanced Methods for Studying Astronomical Populations: Inferring Distributions and Evolution of Derived (not Measured!) Quantities Brandon C. Kelly (CfA,
Study of NICMOS Non-linearity B. Mobasher, A. Riess, R.de Jong, S.Arribas, E.Bergeron, R.Bohlin, H. Ferguson, A. Koekemoer, K. Noll, S. Malhotra, T. Wiklind.
Naoyuki Tamura (University of Durham) Expected Performance of FMOS ~ Estimation with Spectrum Simulator ~ Introduction of simulators  Examples of calculations.
Hypothesis Testing.
Survey Science Group Workshop 박명구, 한두환 ( 경북대 )
The “probability event horizon” and probing the astrophysical GW background School of Physics University of Western Australia Research is funded by the.
Three data analysis problems Andreas Zezas University of Crete CfA.
X-ray (and multiwavelength) surveys Fabrizio Fiore.
Environmental Properties of a Sample of Starburst Galaxies Selected from the 2dFGRS Matt Owers (UNSW) Warrick Couch (UNSW) Chris Blake (UBC) Michael Pracy.
What can we learn from the luminosity function and color studies? THE SDSS GALAXIES AT REDSHIFT 0.1.
The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University) Fan et al. (2001)
X-ray astronomy 7-11 September 2009, Bologna, Italy XMM-Newton slew survey hard band sources XMM-Newton slew survey hard band sources R.D. Saxton a, A.M.
A statistical test for point source searches - Aart Heijboer - AWG - Cern june 2002 A statistical test for point source searches Aart Heijboer contents:
Binary Pulsar Coalescence Rates and Detection Rates for Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunglee Kim, Vassiliki Kalogera (Northwestern U.), and Duncan R.
Point Source Search with 2007 & 2008 data Claudio Bogazzi AWG videconference 03 / 09 / 2010.
Deciphering the CIB Banyuls 09/10/2012 RESOLVING THE CIB: II) STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF SOURCES RESPONSIBLE FOR CIB FROM OBSERVATIONAL AND MODELING POINT.
Cosmological Evolution of the FSRQ Gamma-ray Luminosity Function and Spectra and the Contribution to the Extragalactic Gamma-ray Background Based on Fermi-LAT.
Zheng Dept. of Astronomy, Ohio State University David Weinberg (Advisor, Ohio State) Andreas Berlind (NYU) Josh Frieman (Chicago) Jeremy Tinker (Ohio State)
Andrii Elyiv and XMM-LSS collaboration The correlation function analysis of AGN in the XMM-LSS survey.
DIJET STATUS Kazim Gumus 30 Aug Our signal is spread over many bins, and the background varies widely over the bins. If we were to simply sum up.
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
Gravitational Lensing
The HerMES SPIRE Submillimeter Luminosity Function Mattia Vaccari & Lucia Marchetti & Alberto Franceschini (University of Padova) Isaac Roseboom (University.
Lecture 8: Measurement Errors 1. Objectives List some sources of measurement errors. Classify measurement errors into systematic and random errors. Study.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
The XMM Distant Cluster Project: Survey limits and Pilot Survey Georg Lamer A. Schwope, V. Hambaryan, M. Godolt (AIP) H. Böhringer, R. Fassbender, P. Schücker,
Star Formation History of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
S TUDY OF THE L OCAL C ORE -C OLLAPSE SN R ATE Kiranjyot (Jasmine) Gill, Dr. Michele Zanolin, Marek Szczepanczyk, Dr. Marica Branchesi, Dr. Giulia Stratta.
Why is the BAT survey for AGN Important? All previous AGN surveys were biased- –Most AGN are ‘obscured’ in the UV/optical –IR properties show wide scatter.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Ch8: Nonparametric Methods
Jean Ballet, CEA Saclay GSFC, 31 May 2006 All-sky source search
Cosmological constraints from tSZ-X cross-correlation
Clustering, Proximity, and Balrog
Dept of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow, UK
Statistical Methods For Engineers
Basics of Photometry.
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
EE513 Audio Signals and Systems
Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
CHAPTER- 3.1 ERROR ANALYSIS.
Yuan Liu and Shuang Nan Zhang
KEK, 阪大RCNPA, 阪大理B, 京大理C, 原研先端研D,
Demographics of SDSS Quasars in Two-Dimension
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-3: Stellar mass function of galaxies Seminar: Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234 Lecture: 2012/01/16.
Cosmological parameters with radio galaxies
Measurement of the Single Top Production Cross Section at CDF
ATLAS full run-2 luminosity combination
Presentation transcript:

Deriving and fitting LogN-LogS distributions An Introduction Andreas Zezas University of Crete

Some definitions D

LogS -logS Definition Cummulative distribution of number of sources per unit intensity Observed intensity (S) : LogN - LogS Corrected for distance (L) : Luminosity function CDF-N Brandt etal, 2003 CDF-N LogN-LogS Bauer etal 2006

LogN-LogS distributions Kong et al, 2003 Definition or

Importance of LogN-LogS distributions Provides overall picture of source populations Compare with models for populations and their evolution populations of black-holes and neutron stars in galaxies, populations of stars in star-custers, distribution of dark matter in the universe Provides picture of their evolution in the Universe

How we do it Start with an image CDF-N Alexander etal 2006; Bauer etal 2006

How we do it Start with an image Run a detection algorithm CDF-N Start with an image Run a detection algorithm Measure source intensity Convert to flux/luminosity (i.e. correct for detector sensitivity, source spectrum, source distance) Alexander etal 2006; Bauer etal 2006

How we do it Start with an image Run a detection algorithm CDF-N Start with an image Run a detection algorithm Measure source intensity Convert to flux/luminosity (i.e. correct for detector sensitivity, source spectrum, source distance) Make cumulative plot Do the fit (somehow) Alexander etal 2006; Bauer etal 2006

Detection Problems Background

Detection Problems Background Confusion Point Spread Function Limited sensitivity

Detection Problems Background Confusion Point Spread Function CDF-N Brandt etal, 2003 Problems Background Confusion Point Spread Function Limited sensitivity

Detection Problems Background Confusion Point Spread Function Limited sensitivity

Detection Statistical issues Source significance : what is the probability that my source is a background fluctuation ? Intensity uncertainty : what is the real intensity (and its uncertainty) of my source given the background and instrumental effects ? Position uncertainty : what is the probability that my source is the same as another source detected 3 pixels away in a different exposure ? what is the probability that my source is associated with sources seen in different bands (e.g. optical, radio) ? Completeness (and other biases) : How many sources are missing from my set ?

Luminosity functions Statistical issues Incompleteness Background PSF

Luminosity functions Statistical issues Incompleteness Eddington bias Background PSF Eddington bias Other sources of uncertainty Spectrum

Luminosity functions Statistical issues Incompleteness Eddington bias Background PSF Eddington bias Other sources of uncertainty Spectrum e.g. (Γ) Fit LogN-LogS and perform non-parametric comparisons taking into account all sources of uncertainty

Fitting methods (Schmitt & Maccacaro 1986) Poisson errors, Poisson source intensity - no incompleteness Probability of detecting source with m counts Prob. of detecting N Sources of m counts Prob. of observing the detected sources Likelihood

Fitting methods Udaltsova & Baines method

Fitting methods (extension SM 86) Poisson errors, Poisson source intensity, incompleteness (Zezas etal 1997) Number of sources with m observed counts Likelihood for total sample (treat each source as independent sample) If we assume a source dependent flux conversion The above formulation can be written in terms of S and 

Fitting methods Or better combine Udaltsova & Baines with BLoCKs or PySALC Advantages: Account for different types of sources Fit directly events datacube Self-consistent calculation of source flux and source count-rate More accurate treatment of background Account naturally for sensitivity variations Combine data from different detectors (VERY complicated now) Disantantage: Computationally intensive ?

Some definitions rmax D

Importance of LogN-LogS distributions Evolution of galaxy formation Why is important ? Provides overall picture of source populations Compare with models for populations and their evolution Applications : populations of black-holes and neutron stars in galaxies, populations of stars in star-custers, distribution of dark matter in the universe Luminosity N(L) Density evolution Luminosity N(L) Luminosity evolution

A brief cosmology primer (I) Imagine a set of sources with the same luminosity within a sphere rmax rmax D

A brief cosmology primer (II) If the sources have a distribution of luminosities Euclidean universe Non Euclidean universe

How we do it Start with an image Run a detection algorithm CDF-N Start with an image Run a detection algorithm Measure source intensity Convert to flux/luminosity (i.e. correct for detector sensitivity, source spectrum, source distance) Make cumulative plot Do the fit (somehow) Alexander etal 2006; Bauer etal 2006

Luminosity functions Statistical issues Incompleteness Eddington bias Background PSF Eddington bias Other sources of uncertainty Spectrum Fit LogN-LogS and perform non-parametric comparisons taking into account all sources of uncertainty