Transmission Workgroup 7th July 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Advertisements

“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
Changes to the Network Emergency Co-ordinator (NEC) Safety Case resulting from Exit Reform UNC Workgroup 0412 Meeting – 1 st March 2012.
Information provision for winter 09/10 Jenny Phillips – GNCC Strategy & Support Manager.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Safety Monitor - Winter Reviews Transmission Workstream 5 th July 2007 Chris Logue.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
2005/06 Safety Monitors Presentation to Gas Transmission Workstream, 5 January 2006.
Demand Side Investment Planning Transmission Planning Code Workshop 2 1 st May 2008.
UNC Modification 0050 – Storage Monitor Adjustment.
Stuart Forrest, Network Planning Manager, Scotia Gas Networks 19 th October 2010 MOD Review of Industry Charging & Contractual Arrangements in Relation.
Transmission Workstream 7th Dec 2006 Chris Logue
Distribution workstream 29th January 2009
Transmission Workstream February 2009
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 20/10/16
EU Implementation Programme
Review of System Alerts
Transmission Planning Code – Draft Document
Exit Capacity User Commitment – Transmission Workstream update
Review of UNC Section Q “Emergencies”
UNC Modifications 061 & 062 – An Overview
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Mod 186 Report Assumptions for 2013 DCMF 26 January 2009
Transmission Planning Code
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
UNC Modification Proposal 0373
Energy 2020: A Strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy
UNC Trader User – Licence obligations
Transmission Workgroup – 1st December 2011
UNC 0407 Analysis Scope - Update
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
Review of System Alerts
Amendment to NEA & NExA Measurement Provisions Change Process
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
UNC Mod 273 – Governance of Feasibility Studies
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Publication of Zonal Flex Data
Enduring Offtake Arrangements (Including an alternative daily interruptible capacity release mechanism to facilitate use of spare capacity) Peter Bolitho.
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
Modification 0333A – implementation info
Development of Firm Monitor & GBA
Enhanced information provision and revision of the Gas Balancing Alert for Winter 2009 July 2009.
Modification Proposal 0101 – “Amendment to demand forecasting timings in relation to the Gas Balancing Alert”
Transmission Planning Code Review
Action NTS0504: - Provide comparative demand data over a sample number of years NTS Charging Methodology Forum (NTSCMF) 23rd June 2014.
DN Interruption & Charging
Review Group 0175: DM Supply Point Emergency Arrangements
Long Term Non Firm Capacity Update
Interruptible to Firm – NTS Supply Point Transition
Transmission Workstream 1st September 2005
Richard Fairholme E.ON UK
UNC Transmission Workstream 15th June 2005
Gas Customer Forum DN Interruption Update - Introduction
Mark Freeman 29th January 2007
Entry Overrun Calculation
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Reinstatement of NTS Interruption
Generic Revenue Driver Methodology
SSP – PROVISIONAL LSP – SSP AMENDMENT RULES
GT Response to Action AMR014 Project Nexus AMR Workgroup 20th July | Energy Networks Association.
Information Provision for Transitional Exit Capacity
Transmission Workstream DN Interruption Update - Introduction
Open Letter - Summary of Responses
Review: Entry Capacity Transfer and Trade Methodology Statement
Stefan Leedham Transmission Workstream 2nd November 2006
Proposed Changes to UNC Section Q Emergencies - Mod 035
Transmission Workstream, 1 Mar 07
Entry Capacity Transfers - Constrained Period
Gas Information Review Proposal UNC 0140
Modification 0621 / GB Charging Project DSC Change Management Committee update June 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Transmission Workgroup 7th July 2011 Firm Monitor Transmission Workgroup 7th July 2011

Firm Monitor Meeting Discuss and explain the calculation of the Firm monitor Obligations to publish Firm monitor figure Calculation of Firm and Safety monitors Describe the increase in the Firm Monitor Illustrate how the Firm monitor is likely to increase in the future Discuss what the Firm monitor is used for

Obligations National Grid has an UNC obligation to: Calculate and publish Preliminary Safety & Firm monitors in May Calculate and publish “Final” Safety & Firm monitors by October The Safety Monitor focus is on public safety not security of supply Provides a trigger mechanism for taking direct action to avoid a potential gas supply emergency The Firm Monitor represents the level of storage required to support firm demand in a severe winter Published for information only UNC section Q, 5.2.8 - National Grid shall notify all Users of potential or actual breaches of a Safety Monitor or a Firm Monitor

Change in Firm Monitor Firm monitor considers all ‘Firm’ load Mod90 changed the classification of some DN connected load to ‘Firm’ Including this load in the Firm Monitor changes storage requirement No change in level of security of supply

2011/12 Firm Monitor (for info only) Day 1: 462 mcm Firm demand Firm Monitor storage req’t: 32612 GWh (2964 mcm). 73% of total storage space Higher due implementation of Mod90 2011/12 = 2964 2010/11 = 1643 mcm

Firm Monitor – 2005/6 to 2011/12: % of total storage required

Firm monitor For 2012-2013 the firm monitor is likely to increase again as all NTS Connected demand will be classified as firm Included in Firm Monitor calculation Key questions What do the community use the firm monitor for? Happy to discuss 1-2-1 Is there value in continuing to produce Firm Monitor?

Next Steps Determine need / use of Firm Monitor If no industry requirement, propose to remove Firm Monitor obligation If industry requirement, develop revised methodology (if required)