Diana Chiriacescu HISEE, Belgrade, June 15th 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BSEC Working Group on Institutional Renewal and Good Governance March 26-27, 2007 Istanbul The Black Sea NGOs Network.
Advertisements

Ministry of Labor and Social Policy SOCIAL POLICY COUNCILS Dragica Vlaović-VasiljevićSophia, 2-6th July 2007 Dragica Vlaović-VasiljevićSophia, 2-6th July.
Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Labor and Social Policy GENERAL AND SPECIAL PROTOCOL ON CHILD PROTECTION FROM ABUSE AND NEGLECT.
Design and use of the data base on social services for families and children: regulatory purposes and case follow up Mr. Muhamet Gjocaj Head of the Department.
Good governance for water, sanitation and hygiene services
Public Policy: a key for right based approach to development What role for Handicap International ? Atelier de travail sur la RBA – Handicap International.
Topics addressed by SDCs governance Division decentralization democratization Gender Human Rights; access to justice Economic governance.
Importance of community-based services for persons with disabilities: Availability and quality International frame June 2012,Belgrade Dr.Vasilka.
Public Procurement in Albania in the framework of recent reforms PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
Enhancing Integrity in Public Procurement OECD Recommendation and Toolbox Elodie Beth Administrator Integrity Public Governance and Territorial Development.
1 Workshop on social inclusion of disabled people, Sofia, October 2006 DISABILITY ORGANISATIONS Luk Zelderloo, EASPD.
AfDB - EBRD Joint conference in procurement reform in North Africa and SEMED Countries Marrakech 22 and 23 April 2013 Jordan Delegation 22-23/4/2013.
THE PRESENT EXPERIENCE AND CHALLENGES BEFORE THE BULGARIAN HEALTH INSURANCE SYSTEM IN THE FIELD OF HOSPITAL CARE Jeni Nacheva Director of Department for.
Steering Role Priscilla Rivas-Loría Advisor, Health Sector Reform PAHO/WHO. Washington, D.C.
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN WELFARE MIX MODEL CREATION Best Practice Model Social Center "Home of colors"
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
TQS in SSGI Survey: What do the terms 'general interest' and 'services of general interest' mean in different countries, regions and cities? What does.
Capacity Building Programme of Handicap International in South East Europe Module 4 – Seminar on Quality of Social Services Tirana, December 2008 Michael.
An Overview Presentation to Senate Committee on Human Rights December 13, 2004.
GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA MINISTRY OF PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT FRAMEWORK Evaluation Central Unit Development of the Evaluation.
Handicap-International Challenges of the Sustainability of physical rehabilitation sector Nepal, January 2013.
Future Challenges for Europe in the field of Intellectual Disability Luk Zelderloo, Secretary General EASPD 24 April 2008, Las Palmas.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.
1. Key issues  Definitions of governance  International investments 2. Child rights in governance assessments 3.3. Strategies to ensure governance.
Development with Disabled Network Mainstreaming Disability into Community Governance System Asitha Weweldeniya, Weweldenige, Development with Disabled.
Highlights of Eurodiaconia’s policy messages in 2007.
Employment Research and innovation Climate change and energy Education Fighting poverty.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Mental Health Policy, Human Rights & the Law Mental Disability Advocacy Program Open Society Institute Camilla Parker October 2004.
Introduction to PROGRESS Community programme for Employment and Social Solidarity Finn Ola Jølstad Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Inclusion.
THE NEW DIMENSIONS OF THE EUROPEAN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT POLICY Christian SERVENAY DG MARKT/Unit C1.
1 REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE MINISTRY OF WOMAN AND SOCIAL ACTION “A policy dialogue and a south-south learning event on long term social protection and inclusive.
Permitting and Inspection. 1. When is decentralization effective? Delegate most permit writing and inspection functions to lowest possible level to effectively.
Changes in the context of evaluation and assessment: the impact of the European Lifelong Learning strategy Romuald Normand, Institute of Education Lyon,
Family and Child Support Services Breakout Session 3 Building and Reforming Child Care Systems Bishkek, May 2009.
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON WATER AFFAIRS AND FORESTRY Cindy Damons 28 May 2008 The role of municipalities in managing and giving effect to.
Diversity and continuum of services at community level T.Colin, Chisinau, November 24-26, 2009.
Strategy on creation of the system for continuous professional training of staff employed in social assistance system (for ) draft Ministry of.
Quality Standard Quality standards provide a set of criteria that can be used to monitor the management and provision of services, the quality of services.
Future needs for capacity building and recommendations to the OIE Dr Sarah Kahn Consultant to the OIE
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
How to improve the availability and quality of community-based services? Zagreb,23 November 2010 Dr.Vasilka Dimoska Specialist in social medicine and health.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
1 Microinsurance as a tool to extend Social protection Strengths and weaknesses Future perspectives Valérie Schmitt Diabaté Aly Cissé ILO / STEP, october.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Social entrepreneurship – good practices of social inclusion through development of social economy of the territory of Republic of Bulgaria.
SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.
Inese Vilcane Social inclusion department Senior expert
Engaging Civil Society in Priorities for Strengthening Governance over Public Resources March 5, 2003.
Training and Development Programme for future Structural Funds Trainers February 2006.
MAINSTREAMING OF WOMEN, CHILDREN AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES’ CONSIDERATIONS IN RELATION TO THE ENERGY SECTOR Presentation to the Joint Meeting of the.
CRE8TIVE KO Meeting, Rome Italy Quality Assurance
Business sector engagement and Consumer Awareness October 3rd, 2017
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
EMIN policy coordinator
24 November 2010 Birmingham Silvia Ganzerla
AGE Annual Conference 2018, 6 June Brussels, Belgium
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
…and still actual for a post-2010 strategy!
Governance of social security
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy
National Confederation of Disabled People –N.C.D.P.
TQS Faenza workshop, 5-6 November 2009
Transformation of the National Statistical System: Experience
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
CRISTINA BREDEN – Director ROMANIAN COURT OF ACCOUNTS
How can we make healthcare purchasing in Kenya more strategic?
Presentation transcript:

Diana Chiriacescu HISEE, Belgrade, June 15th 2006 The process of social services delivery and the role of regulatory mechanisms; different national examples Diana Chiriacescu HISEE, Belgrade, June 15th 2006

Social services A large and diversified range of services which are intended to improve the standards of living of the population, especially of individuals and groups in vulnerable situations. They are linked to national welfare schemes and are important tools for the implementation of public policies in the field of social protection, non-discrimination, fight against poverty and exclusion. They are not conditioned by the contribution of the users and enhance capacities of individuals for full inclusion and participation in society. They respond to social needs and social deficits, which cannot be managed by the market, or which can be even generated by the market. The States are responsible for ensuring the access of all citizens to social services (Description based on the perspective of several European platforms that are active in the field of social services - Social Platform, Eurodiaconia, EASPD)

Who can provide social services: Public providers: Central authorities, through their decentralized agencies; Local authorities (departments, municipalities); Private providers: Non-profit NGOs, DPOs, Parents Organizations; For-profit companies Informal providers Volunteers, neighbors, family members

The regulatory mechanisms Regulatory mechanisms in the field of social services are instruments meant to control, coordinate and improve social services, both at macro and micro level. They are a lever for developing quality, accessible, available, accountable, affordable social services for all citizens, including people with disabilities. They are designed to be applied for both public and private provision of social services

The main stakeholders in the process of services provision THE STATE (public authorities, central and local) THE SOCIAL SERVICES PROVIDERS (public and private) THE USERS

PUBLIC AUTHORITIES (CENTRAL LEVEL) They guarantee the access to social services by defining the regulatory mechanisms at national level and evaluating their implementation USERS SOCIAL SERVICES PROVIDERS DEMAND and lobby (expressing the existing needs) PROVISION OF SERVICE OFFER (SUPPLY) PUBLIC AUTHORITIES (LOCAL LEVEL) They implement the national regulatory procedures at local level The responsibility in the definition and implementation of regulatory mechanisms The regulatory mechanisms (the green arrows) are meant to coordinate: the access of users in the system of social services, following their needs and demands, the supply of services according to local needs, as well as the concrete provision of social services, respecting essential principles as quality, accessibility, accountability, affordability for all users who need them. Regulation of the implementation of RM Regulation of the supply Regulation of the access to services Regulation of the provision

The role of the regulatory mechanisms in the social services delivery process To monitor and structure the needs for services, that are expressed at territorial level; To articulate the offer with the demand; To regulate the efficient use of the existing resources; To guarantee the quality of the services for all users They allow the choice of the service and contribute to make the social services: available, affordable, accessible, of good quality

Gate keeping procedures At the system’s level (macro) Needs assessment Territorial maps of needs and services At individual level (micro) Defining access criteria to services Assessment of the individual situation Decision making and orientation to services The need for services is identified and expressed; The criteria for accessing the service are defined adequately; The orientation to services reflects the needs and the choices of users The quality criteria for the provision of services are defined The providers’ offers are assessed according to the needs and to the standards; they are authorized to provide the respective service; They have access to public funds; Both user’s situation and service provision are monitored and evaluated according to the standards and principles of good governance Quality standards 1) General principles 2) Technical standards Contracting procedures: Call for offers/ tender/ applications Licensing (Sub)contracting and Funding Monitoring and Evaluation

Concrete service provision Multi stakeholders assessment of needs for social services, at territorial level Elaboration of the “territorial maps” of services and needs P L A N I G GK macro If the service is needed / required NO Applications registration Assessment of applications (cf.. quality standards) Access criteria for the users of social services If application accepted NO Corrections Licensing Individual situations’ assessment and/or Contracting Funding Concrete service provision Decision making/ Orientation of users towards services Provision Internal regulatory mechanisms Monitoring of the person’s situation Monitoring of the service Monitoring GK micro Evaluation of the service Evaluation If evaluation OK yes NO Corrections NO + severe errors

FRANCE The majority of social services providers are non-profit (NGOs, parents’ organizations, DPOs); They are subcontracted by the State (local authorities) and receive public funds (“public mandate” / “delegation de services publiques”) In order to be subcontracted, the services have to respond to needs (territorial maps of needs) and to comply with quality standards The services are monitored and evaluated (auto-evaluation each 3 years, external evaluation each 5 years); the result of these procedures condition the license.

GREAT BRITAIN All types of service providers exist (non profit, for profit, public, informal); A single « Inspection Commission» is in charge with the majority of the regulatory procedures (CSCI) Personal allowances (budgets) can be used by people with disabilities for the choice of the services that they want to access Collaboration between the social and health service providers; benchmarking (the rating system for local authorities annual performances)

ROMANIA Public and non profit providers; A specific strategy and law for social services, including: compulsory quality principles (9 principles, inspired by the EQRM system) for all social services; detailed technical standards for each specific social service (e.g. standards for case management; for foster care; for day care centres for children with disabilities etc; An “accreditation” procedure for all social services providers; an additional licensing procedure for each specific service; Contracting procedures, monitoring and evaluation (exist in legislation, not yet implemented)

Main recommendations related with the implementation of regulatory mechanisms Internal coherence within the system of procedures; correlation and coordination between the implementation agencies; Training of the stakeholders that will implement these procedures (assessors, contractors, licensing bodies); specific training for services providers; Testing the different scenarios and procedures for the new mechanisms; Involving the users and/or their representatives in the elaboration of the regulatory frame for social services; Introduction of new management and monitoring tools in the social services sector, (e.g. cost-effectiveness analysis, the cost per day per user, annual statistical reporting etc.)