ELENA Overview and Layout Start of ELENA Commissioning Next Steps

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Machine Physics at ISIS Proton Meeting 24 th March 11 Dean Adams (On behalf of ISIS Accelerator Groups)
Advertisements

Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Antiproton Source Capabilities and Issues Keith Gollwitzer & Valeri Lebedev Accelerator Division Fermilab 1.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
RHIC Status: Startup Run 12 V. Schoefer RHIC Spin Collaboration Meeting 1/13/12.
Challenges of Dual Harmonic RF Systems ISIS Synchrotron Group John Thomason.
FFAG-Workshop Dec Kumatori Japan Diagnostics for FFAG- accelerator Takahisa ITAHASHI Department of Physics, Osaka Univ. Toyonaka, Osaka, ,Japan.
EBIS ARR Jim Alessi May 4- 7, 2010 Technical Overview.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Status and Prospects for the AD and ELENA
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
MTE vs CT D.Manglunki for BE/OP - pictures from M.Giovannozzi - details in “Fifty years of the CERN Proton Synchrotron (Vol I)” CERN
Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS S. Persichelli.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
PHYSICAL PROJECT OF BOOSTER FOR NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Alexey Tuzikov, Nikolay Agapov, Andrey Butenko, Alexey Eliseev, Viktor Karpinsky, Hamlet Khodzhibagiyan,
Radioactive Ion Beams CW 0.5 MW (for protons) 1 GeV (for protons) p to U Chiara, Manuel, Adam, HuiMay 2011, CAS, Bilbao.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
ELENA: Commissioning & operation ELENA beam commissioning Operation 12/11/2015T.Eriksson CERN BE/OP/AD1.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Villars, 26 September Extra Low Energy Antiproton Ring (ELENA) for antiproton deceleration after the AD Pavel Belochitskii for the AD team On behalf.
13 January 2005 PS&SPS DAYS How can we restart AD in 2006? Slide 1 How can we restart AD in 2006 ? Tommy Eriksson AB/OP/AD.
Progress of Bunched Beam Electron Cooling Demo L.J.Mao (IMP), H.Zhang (Jlab) On behalf of colleagues from Jlab, BINP and IMP.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Low Energy Antiproton Facility at CERN Christian Carli on behalf of the AD and ELENA team …. with special thanks to P.Beloshitskii, T.Eriksson and S. Maury.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
Slide 1 Overview Introduction Stochastic Cooling History of the Antiproton machines at CERN The AD and ELENA Conclusion.
Particle Physics Group Meeting January 4 th – 5 th 2010 Commissioning EMMA, the Worlds First Non Scaling Fixed Field – Alternating Gradient Accelerator.
ELENA installation progress F. Butin / ELENA collaboration.
HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review
Challenges of Dual Harmonic RF Systems
NICA injection complex status
Parameters of ejected beam
Experience with beam instrumentation at Linac4
Status of HESR 18th March Gießen Dieter Prasuhn.
Overview of Extra Low ENergy Antiproton ring (ELENA) and TE-EPC contribution to the project TE-EPC Group Meeting Michal Dudek 25th June 2015.
A.Sidorin, on behalf of the team PP PAC, JINR, Dubna, 16 January 2017
ELENA installation and commissioning status
Beam based measurements
Installations up to Start of Commissioning
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
First thoughts on ELENA beam impedances
TMCI Observations in AD
WP11: electron and proton beam testing
Siara Fabbri University of Manchester
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
How can we restart AD in 2006 ? Tommy Eriksson AB/OP/AD
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
Accumulation in the LEIR Ring
HESR for SPARC 25th November FAIR MAC Dieter Prasuhn.
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
ELENA beam commissioning
Pulsed electron beam cooling experiments: data & preliminary results
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

ELENA Overview and Layout Start of ELENA Commissioning Next Steps Start of Beam Commissioning of the Extra Low ENergy Antiproton ring (ELENA) C. Carli on behalf of the AD/ELENA team(s) ABP Information Meeting 20th April 2017 ELENA Overview and Layout Start of ELENA Commissioning Next Steps Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

ELENA Overview and Layout High sensitivity magnetic Pick-up (Schottky diagnostics for intensity, LLRF..) Extraction towards new experimental zone (fast deflector) followed by el.-static transfer lines Injection with magnetic septum and kicker Compensation solenoids for (not yet Installed) cooler Wideband RF cavities (very similar to new PSB cavities) Line From AD Extraction towards existing experiments Scraper to measure emittance Deceleration of antiprotons from 5.3 MeV to 100 keV to improve efficiency of experiments Circumference 30.4 m (1/6 the size of the AD), magnetic ring and electrostatic extraction lines Challenges related to low energy as field quality of magnets operated with very low fields Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

Start of ELENA Commissioning – Ion Source Aim: progress as much as possible without taking “expensive” antiprotons Source available and tested well in advance 100 keV (post-acceleration), source a few meters from Faraday cage with HV cables in between First tests with source mounted in Faraday cage Technical issues despite serious preparations Isolation transformer(s) broke several times =>Now running with fixed transformer at 85 keV No beam since last week due to vacuum issues Faraday cage Source Thanks a lot to the team from Jülich providing source as in-kind contribution for all the efforts and flexibility Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

Start of ELENA Commissioning – Transfer line Electro-static line from source to ring Missing monitors (in-kind) make understanding difficult Empirical adjustments allowed bringing the beam to ring within few days, but led to unexpected settings Excellent to see beam on TV station close to ring Recent efforts to be invested to understand did not (yet?) improve Source Profile monitor prototype issues to interpret signals available since ~a month Signals from horizontal wires TV station almost only instrumentation available One of the first acquisitions from November 2016 Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

Start of ELENA Commissioning – Ring Beam observed over several 10s of turns (probably a few ms) in November ‘16 after less than 2 weeks Beam lost quickly or just not visible any more due to debunching? Commissioning of RF system as next under preparation, when source broke (insulation transformer) With 85 keV H- after commissioning of RF system Beam shown to survive at least until start of ramp Only very basic RF functionalities, no phase loop Tunes from injection oscillations using OASIS Synchrotron oscillation, debunching …. Seen with OASIS Position pick-up sum signals 50 ms/div 50 ms/div So far not conclusive – change of quad settings did not shift tunes as expected 1 ms/div About 150 ms after injection ~1.5 106 H- ??? Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

ELENA Commissioning – Next Steps Get ion source up and running again Briefly switch to protons for a test of the profile monitor, then probably 85 keV H- to resume ring commissioning (stay at 85 keV even with new isolation transformer?) Consolidate injection line and injection into ring First: back to injection line setting from 5th and 6th April, when injection was good Further studies to understand and empirically improve line and injection Commissioning of instrumentation and understanding machine at low energy Orbit system – orbit correction and orbit response studies “Tomoscope” – observe bunching (& independent intensity estimate) Tune measurement and correction (first test of pick-up indicated good performance Acceleration (deceleration), injection of antiprotons … setting up of antiproton cycle Requires electron cooler finally to be available and installed Requires profile monitors! First 100 keV beam (probably H- and/or protons) for GBAR Requires profile monitors!! First data from orbit system – looks “credible”, to be understood/consolidated … Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

Thanks for your attention ! Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017 Introduction: Antiproton Decelerator AD – a unique facility providing 5.3 MeV antiprotons (3 107 in <300 ns) ~1.5 1013 protons (26 GeV) on target ~3.5 107 antiprotons captured in AD Acceptances 200 mm and ±30 10-3 Deceleration to the lowest energy 5.3 MeV reachable “safely” (limited by mag. Fields?) Stochastic and electron cooling at four different energies ~3 107 antiprotons extracted per cycle Dense core containing ~70% within <1 mm, often tails up to 10 mm Longitudinal before bunch rotation 95% within 10-4 and 400 ns Cycle length about 100 s Location for future ELENA installation Sketch of the present AD – circumference 182 m - In addition experiment AEGIS installed - Experiment BASE being installed - Gbar approved to receive beam from ELENA Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

Introduction: Efficiency for capturing antiprotons in traps without and with ELENA 5.3 MeV antiprotons a shot every ~ 100 sec to one experiment ~4 keV antiprotons/ ~ 100 sec ~ 3 x 107 Present situation with AD alone: - Most experiments slow antiprotons down by “degrader” => very inefficient – most (>99%) antiprotons lost (one experiment uses an RFQ for deceleration with higher efficiency) 100 keV antiprotons a shot every ~100 sec shared by ~4 experiments ELENA ~ .45 x 107 Future situation with AD and ELENA decelerating to 100 keV: - thinner “degrader” and increased trapping efficiency (some experiments use other means to decelerate the beam) - Intensity shared by four exp’s allows longer periods with beam Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

ELENA Overview and Layout Extraction towards existing experiments (with fast electrostatic deflector) Line from H- and proton source for commissioning Wideband RF cavity Injection with magnetic septum (≈300 mrad) and kicker (84 mrad) Scraper to measure emittances (destructive) Quadrupoles High sensitivity magnetic pick-up for Schottky diagnostic (intensity) and LLRF Electron Cooler and compensation solenoids Extraction towards new exp. zone Deceleration of antiprotons from 5.3 MeV to 100 keV to improve efficiency of experiments Circumference 30.4 m (1/6 the size of the AD) Fits in available space in AD hall and allows installing all equipment without particular efforts Lowest average field (beam rigidity over average radius) Br/R = 94 G (smaller than for AD 115 G) Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017

ELENA Installations (Photos from about two weeks ago) Ring with all dipoles and quadrupoles installed Transfer Lines part required for ring commissioning Start of ELENA Beam Comissioning ABP Meeting, 20th April 2017