Submission Process Submission Requirements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Advertisements

Starting Planning for the 2010 Policy Key Issues Notes for the TAC Executive Committee April 8, 2009 Phil Hattis, AIAA VP for Public Policy.
AERA Annual Meeting, April 10, 2011 How To Get Published: Guidance From Emerging and Senior Scholars Learning the Language of the Review Process Patricia.
League of Women Voters of New York State Constitutional Convention Delegation Selection Process Position Update Prepared by the League of Women Voters.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Webinar January 30, 2012 Dr. Rhonda Phillips Editor, Community Development.
Publishing Journal Articles Simon Hix Prof. of European & Comparative Politics LSE Government Department My experience How journals work Choosing a journal.
September1999 October 1999 ICML-03 Mini-Tutorial The Three R’s of Publishing Machine Learning Papers: Research, ‘Riting, and Reviews Marie desJardins Rob.
Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements Proceedings and Report of the Expert Meeting: Arrangements.
How to Apply for a College Tech Prep Initiative Visit first. Apply as early as February 4 th, 2014.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
Writing a research paper in science/physics education The first episode! Apisit Tongchai.
Give Your Online Teaching a JOLT Michelle Pilati, PhD Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry, PhD Professor of Mechanical Engineering.
The Online Submission Process: Guidelines and Training for Authors Marlowe H. Smaby, Michael R. Smith, Cleborne D. Maddux.
A Tutorial for Associate Editors (AEs) 5 May 2013.
Passive vs. Active voice Carolyn Brown Taller especializado de inglés científico para publicaciones académicas D.F., México de junio de 2013 UNDERSTANDING.
Pay-what-you-want APC model Bryan Vickery Director, Cogent OA COASP, September 2015.
AERA Annual Meeting, April 16, 2012 How To Get Published: Guidance From Emerging and Senior Scholars Ethical Issues and Understanding the Review Process.
Geant4 Publication Procedures Geant4 Collaboration Meeting 23 September 2013 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING How a manuscript becomes an article.
SCI 论文发表流程 1. 上传或写信或发 投递 Dear Prof. xxx (Editor): Attached (Enclosed) please find the word or PDF version of my paper entitled "xxx" with the kind.
How to Apply for a College Tech Prep or Career Program Visit first. Apply as early as February 6 th, 2013.
Gold for Gold You use an Open Access voucher after peer-review and acceptance. The final article of record is made available to all, immediately, via our.
UOP GEN 201 Week 3 Individual Critical Thinking and Ethics Check this A+ tutorial guideline at individual-critical-thinking-and-ethics.
CMGT 411 Week 5 Learning Team SR-rm-013 Project and Presentation Finalize and submit an 8-10 page Learning Team paper. Prepare a Microsoft ® PowerPoint.
Applying to study in the UK
Finnish Business Review
How to write successfully for IATEFL Conference Selections
Completing Your Technical Paper Submission for SAMPE 2018 – Long Beach
Publishing a paper.
APHE Editorial Process
THE EPQ How will it help you?.
TITLE INTRODUCTION (CLICK TO EDIT) METHODS CONTINUED (CLICK TO EDIT)
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
How to Publish with IEEE
Completing the Master’s Thesis in Biomedical Informatics
ENGL 227 Innovative Education--snaptutorial.com
PRC Information Session
Project Model-Based Systems Engineering: Documentation and Analysis
Information Literacy Peer Reviewed Sources
TITLE INTRODUCTION (CLICK TO EDIT) METHODS CONTINUED (CLICK TO EDIT)
The “Senior Exercise” at Kenyon College Judy Holdener, Professor and Chair of Mathematics Purpose (from a College perspective): To promote coherence.
Procedural review of initial WG ballot on P802.1CF
TITLE INTRODUCTION (CLICK TO EDIT) METHODS CONTINUED (CLICK TO EDIT)
TITLE INTRODUCTION (CLICK TO EDIT) METHODS CONTINUED (CLICK TO EDIT)
Adam J. Gordon, MD MPH FACP DFASAM
Friday September 9th.
CS/SE 4110 Senior Seminar.
Suspension Petition Process
APPLYING FOR A SECONDARY SCHOOL PLACE - SEPTEMBER 2019
CS/SE 4110 Senior Seminar.
The Process of Getting Published: Reviews and Rejection
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Applying to study in the UK
UCAAT 2015, ready for the launch!
Writing an Honors Project Proposal
Introduction to the Research Essay
Living Donor Committee
Ethiopian Journal of Business and Social Science Call for Papers
Advice on getting published
Sophomore Research Paper #1
Applying to study in the UK
TITLE INTRODUCTION (CLICK TO EDIT) METHODS CONTINUED (CLICK TO EDIT)
Completing the Master’s Thesis in Biomedical Informatics
TITLE INTRODUCTION (CLICK TO EDIT) METHODS CONTINUED (CLICK TO EDIT)
Completing the Master’s Thesis in Biomedical Informatics
Dr John Corbett USP-CAPES International Fellow
Admission to Secondary School in Kent September 2020
Presentation transcript:

Submission Process Submission Requirements   Submission Requirements Those wishing to submit must be a Teachership Academy Graduate. To join the academy please visit http://www.epcc.edu/TeachershipAcademy and download an application. For more information please feel free to contact any of our TA committee members. Publication cycle Submission cycle – May (during the TA graduations, so a formal announcement can be made) – September 1. Review cycle - September 2 – February 1 (this will give the reviewers time to review papers and return for a chance to re- submit with corrections if needed. Submitters will only be allowed to re-submit one time.   Publication cycle – February 2 – April 1 (papers will be returned to TAJSC for final review and a decision will be made which papers make it to final publication. TAJSC feels that in order to control cost and time a cap will be placed on papers submitted and published. We are thinking that 10 papers per journal is a good number. If we receive more submissions, they will be moved for next year’s publication. Edit/Publication Process: Requirements All reports must be typed and double spaced, font will be Times New Roman, font size 12, APA style bibliography. Length minimum 6 pages maximum 15. (Suggestion). Review Process All reports will be peer reviewed by independent reviewers. Reports will be edited by the TA Steering Committee, however it is highly encouraged that authors review and edit their work before submitting. Selection Process All reports will be considered for publication. Independent Reviewers will recommend reports for publication to the TA Steering Committee. Those reports not recommended will be returned to the author for review and corrections. The author may re-submit their report to the TA Steering Committee for publication consideration. The author will have 2 weeks after report is handed back to re-submit. If the report is not recommended a second time, the author will have a chance to re-submit for the next publication and will follow the same submission process. Note: We need to discuss how many reviewers we will have and how the reports will be managed. For example if I submit a report and three reviewers look it over and two recommend for publication, while the other reviewer does not, how will we decide. Also is each report going to be reviewed by two reviewers, three etc. The reviewer’s will recommend to TA Steering Committee whether or not the paper should be published. The pass or fail notion will be as follows: Accept, Accept with Revisions and Decline. TAJSC is still working on the details of this process. Directions for submitting Only graduates of the TA Academy can submit reports for publication. Author submits report to TA Steering Committee TA Steering Committee will do minor edits and ensure report meets requirements. The TA Steering Committee will forward reports to Independent Reviewers. TA Steering Committee holds the right to not recommend and send report back to author for editing. Authors are allowed to re-submit.