Tender Evaluation Briefing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community Life Choices Procurement Process Paul Large, Category Manager – Social Care Adults.
Advertisements

Office of Purchasing and Contracts Research Funded Procurement Outreach Training Level III Procurements $50,000 and Above.
Definitions Patient Experience Patient experience at NUH results from a range of activities that all impact upon patient care, access, safety and outcomes.
Request for Proposal - Best Value Generally RFP’s are created for large dollar technical purchases, services and consultants.  Consideration in addition.
Technology subjects (7-12) Consistency of moderation.
Assessment Activities
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
1 Project Management Principles Coursework Assignment: Things to pay attention to, for the report and the oral presentation...
COMPULSORY BRIEFING SESSION Maturity Assessment and implementation recommendation for ITIL V3, COBIT 5 and KING III Chapter 5 RAF /2015/00016 Date: 04.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Overview Lifting the Curtain - Debriefings FAI Acquisition Seminar.
Successfully recording Continuing Professional Development.
Case Study Assignment MTT Certification Exam. Graded on four-point scale Purpose – extent to which response addresses the components of the assignment.
Thursday February 7, 2013 ICEL Public Procurement Conference 2013 – “The Duty to Give Reasons, Standstill Letters and De-Briefs” – Focus on Debriefing.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
UNDP Bangladesh Procurement Fair Objectives of the Fair; - UNDP Procurement principles; - Procurement plan ; - UNDP Procurement Roadmap;
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Access Grading Briefing Assessment requirements. Why these requirements? To ensure that: grades, credits and Access to HE Diplomas are awarded on an equivalent.
National PE Cycle of Analysis. Fitness Assessment + Gathering Data Why do we need to asses our fitness levels?? * Strengths + Weeknesses -> Develop Performance.
How to Win Council Business: A Guide to the Procurement Practice in Local Government.
Dr Jane Tonge Senior Examiner
Managing Marketing Andrew Sherratt Senior Examiner Assignment briefing December 2013 / March 2014.
Phase 1 Examination Purpose of the exam Drive factual learning Confirm trainees’ ability to apply learning Assess ability to think on the spot.
true potential An Introduction to the First Line Manager Programme’s CMI Qualifications.
Evaluation. What is important??? Cost Quality Delivery Supplier Expertise Financial Stability Coverage Product Offerings Do you intend to negotiate?
Monday 22 nd October 2012 Principal Moderator Judith Evans.
Practical Application of new opportunities provided by New Regulations Edward Quigg 23 June 2016.
KTP Assessment Criteria May Assessment system changes New system in place for May 2016 KTP close Aligns with other Innovate UK assessment systems.
Unit 2 Controlled Assessment deadline Thursday 26th January 2017
COMPULSORY BRIEFING SESSION Maturity Assessment and implementation recommendation for ITIL V3, COBIT 5 and KING III Chapter 5 RAF /2015/00016 Date:
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
DIVISION OF STATE SERVICES BUREAU OF CONTRACTS
4. Exceeding Expectations
Tender Evaluation and Award Process
Stakeholder Consultation
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
Active Training Awards 2017: Training Provider of the Year
Session 6: TENDER WRITING: HOW TO WRITE A WINNING TENDER
Evaluation training NHS NEW Devon CCG Transforming Community Services
Award Management Services
Implementing and reviewing additional admissions assessments
Evaluation Grids Evaluation Grids.
Project Management Processes
Practical Application of new opportunities provided by New Regulations
How to Communicate Assurance?
In-Service Teacher Training
Request for Proposal - Best Value
Portfolios Digital Electronics © 2014 Project Lead The Way, Inc.
Tips for tenderers Liz Frizi: Head of Procurement
DIVISION OF STATE SERVICES BUREAU OF CONTRACTS
Request for Proposal - Best Value
..
Investor protection and MIFID
THE FINAL MAJOR PROJECT
THE CUSTOMER VOICE IN TRANSFORMING PUBLIC SERVICES
What is the buyer looking for?
In your packs.... Two pieces of Learner work. Note: based on live examples Unit Specification Marking Sheet (blank) Standardisation Activity Unit.
Physiotherapist Level 6 Integrated Degree Apprenticeship
Physiotherapist Level 6 Integrated Degree Apprenticeship
Project Management Processes
Unit 5 – eProject – Starting to look at projects Unit 5
Evaluation by Best Value for Money Methodology
Assessment Literacy: Test Purpose and Use
Portfolios.
ΣΕΜΙΝΑΡΙΟ ΕΠΑΛΗΘΕΥΤΩΝ
Examinations Council of Zambia
HMPPS Innovation Grant Programme (2020 – 2022)
Presentation transcript:

Tender Evaluation Briefing Nikki Hunter MCIPS

Objectives of briefing & Tender Evaluation To brief you regarding the evaluation process To clearly articulate how to evaluate the responses received and the aims of that evaluation To establish the evaluation principles To set out the evaluation roles and responsibilities To explain the reporting requirements and deadlines Evaluation objectives To select the bidder whose proposal offers the Best Value for Money. That is the best composite blend of Technical competence, service delivery and price over the life of the contract.

Evaluation Team Responsibilities What does the Evaluation team need to do? To read the tenders and understand the Bidders’s responses. To identify any need for clarifications and to make this request to [insert name], to contact Bidders To produce an individual set of scores and rationale for each score

Moderation Review Acts as the ultimate evaluation group and will effectively ‘wash up’ the scores Quality review all evaluation processes and provide the necessary challenge to both the rationale and thinking that will be applied to specific bidder scores Provide the evaluation scoring and information to enable an award recommendation to be made and feedback to be provided to all bidders

What is being Evaluated Using the information provided in the Tender you must use your professional judgement to determine what mark is awarded Scores should reflect a logical conclusion of what was requested against what was provided in the response Scorers should provide a clear rationale as to why the score was assigned and should be factual Remember we are assessing the capability of the Bidder to deliver the goods or services - how they will actually deliver the contract.

Evaluation process Each Bidder must be treated equally and evaluation team members must approach the scoring in a consistent, non discriminatory and fair manner Every score for every question must be robust and have a corresponding justification Submissions must only be scored on the information contained within them and any clarifications received (very rarely will we need to ask for clarification). Any other information that may have already been received by other means, including personal experience cannot be taken into account Each evaluation member must produce a completed score sheet for each bidder to be moderated

Marking Scheme All responses to the questions should be assessed and allocated a score ranging from 0 and 10, shown by the table below: Fully meets the requirement and offers added value - The evidence demonstrates that the requirement is fully met and provides deliverable added value. 10 Fully meets the requirement - The evidence demonstrates that the requirement is fully met 7 Almost meets the requirement - Evidence provided shows that the requirement is met but MINOR reservations exist about the quality or extent of the evidence provided 5 Partially meets the requirements - Evidence provided shows that the requirement is met but SIGNIFICANT reservations exist about the quality or extent of the evidence provided 2 Fails to meet the requirements - Failed to demonstrate or provide evidence of an ability to meet the requirement

What is Added Value? Added Value – An improvement or addition to something that makes it worth more. Added Value is an increase in worth of a product or service as a result of a particular activity and should be considered in relation to the end users. i.e. Lower cost for the same functionality or same cost with additional benefits. E.G. We ask for 80% invoice accuracy – the bidder has a system that guarantees 98% accuracy. The system is tried and tested and evidence is provided. Added value is not just a really good answer it should exceed your expectations!

Evaluation & Recommendation Report An evaluation report will be produced following the evaluation. This report will: Set out the evaluation process undertaken Provide the results and evidence of the evaluation for each Bidder based upon the detailed evaluation processes and criteria Make recommendations for the Bidder that should be selected Contain debriefing information as appendices to form the basis of debrief of Bidders