Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency November 21, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
Advertisements

Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Chesapeake bay program: Funding & Bay TMDL Midpoint Assessment
Partners in Conservation
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Agriculture Initial Inspections Update
Chesapeake bay program
Jim Edward, Deputy Director – EPA/CBPO
CBP Strategic Communications Plan
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System:
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
West Virginia’s Agriculture Stakeholders Engagement Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
December 14, 2017 Christine brittle, Ph.d.
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Local Planning Process…
2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
Local Government Engagement Initiative January 16, 2018
Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Commonwealth of Virginia
FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Source Water Collaboration Toolkit
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Communicating Credit Where Credit is Due
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
State Agency Perspective of Estuary Program Subcommittees
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Outcomes and Phase III WIPs
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings
LGAC Input on Outcomes.
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Communicating the Midpoint Assessment and Phase III WIPs
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Engaging Local Government in Watershed Protection & Restoration:
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
Overview of Source Protection
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
Citizen Advisory Committee November 30, 2018
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
VIRGINIA’S Phase iii watershed implementation plan
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy Pennsylvania Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy Presented by: Veronica Kasi, Manager Chesapeake Bay Office October 5, 2017 Please enter jurisdiction name (and agency logo/s)

Jurisdiction-specific Considerations Unique Characteristic Number of different types of local governments: Counties, Townships, Cities, Boros, Other Local Government Engagement Urban Sector Loads Local Planning Goals Sector Growth Commit to a Plan that has: Definable Action Items, Responsible Parties Measurable Outputs, Progress What are the unique characteristics of your jurisdiction as it relates to the challenge of effectively engaging local governments in your Phase III WIP development? For example, What is the relative importance of local government in achieving pollutant reduction targets in your jurisdiction? What do you need from local governments during WIP development and implementation? What information do local government officials and staff need to be effective partners in WIP development? Implementation? What is your timeline for communication and engagement? Enter jurisdiction name Pennsylvania Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Jurisdiction-specific Considerations What Information Needs Exist? You tell me Timeline Facilitators Under Contract Starting to Work with Co-Chairs of our 6 Workgroups (October) Developing Matrix for Defining Local Planning Goals (October/November) Revise Communication Strategy to Include Additional Engagement (November/December) Draft PA Planning Goals (December/January) Implementation of Engagement Strategy (Start in January) What are the unique characteristics of your jurisdiction as it relates to the challenge of effectively engaging local governments in your Phase III WIP development? For example, What is the relative importance of local government in achieving pollutant reduction targets in your jurisdiction? What do you need from local governments during WIP development and implementation? What information do local government officials and staff need to be effective partners in WIP development? Implementation? What is your timeline for communication and engagement? Enter jurisdiction name Pennsylvania Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Engagement and Communication Goals Achieve local buy-in and commitment for the implementation of the Phase 3 WIP. Increase awareness of the impact each individual can have on the water quality of their local stream and the actions they can take to improve and protect this resource. Highlight the progress already made; but, more importantly, the work that still needs to be done to protect and restore local streams and habitat, and, subsequently the Chesapeake Bay. Engagement = 2-way exchange; Communication = 1-way What does your jurisdiction hope to achieve by implementing this local engagement strategy? Examples may include: Satisfy EPA Expectations regarding local engagement. Increase public conversation about the need for reduced pollution. Communicate key policy and technical decisions related to the WIPs, including timing and impact of model Raise public awareness of WIP development and Bay restoration efforts Identify what pollution reduction is already being done Identify gaps and strategies to fill gaps that might yield multiple benefits Enter jurisdiction name Pennsylvania Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Target Audiences Pennsylvania farmers Local Government officials County Conservation Districts Leaders of Local Business Business depends on the health of the Bay Others General Public Describe the specific audiences you need to target, e.g. local leaders (officials and other leaders), local government staff (practitioners), associations of municipalities and counties, technical service providers, soil and water conservation districts) Briefly explain the role of each target audience in your process. Enter jurisdiction name Pennsylvania Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Key Messages Communities in Pennsylvania benefit economically and environmentally when their local rivers, streams and lakes are clean and healthy. We are looking for local leaders to step up and take action to help us raise awareness and, ultimately, funding for cleaning up the waters in their communities in Pennsylvania’s Bay Watershed. What are the topics that are most important to communicate in your jurisdiction? Examples may include: Communities benefit economically and environmentally when local waterways are clean Local governments should be actively involved in Phase III WIPs so they can tie-in their own local priorities and constraints Local governments need to identify what resources they need so the Bay Program partnership can help Local governments can take credit for practices and programs they are already doing The Bay Model has improved, reflecting more refined local land use data Tools are available to help implementation planning and decision-making processes for BMP funding, targeting, and implementation Enter jurisdiction name Pennsylvania Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Key Messengers/Trusted Sources Phase 3 WIP Steering Committee Lead State Agencies River Basin Commissions Chesapeake Bay Commission Pennvest Six Workgroups Membership Each Sector = Agriculture, Urban, Wastewater, Forestry Local Planning Goals, Priority Practices Funding Committed Partners -- TBD Peers Additional people willing to take action in partnership with the workgroups List the entities that you will enlist to help you implement this strategy and note whether they’ve committed to assisting with communication and engagement or not. Enter jurisdiction name Pennsylvania Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Roles, Resources, and Capacity Workgroups and Workgroup Co-chairs Writing Specific Sections of the Phase 3 WIP Contracted Facilitators Help with additional outreach, messaging SRBC, USGS Chesapeake Bay Program Office Technical, modeling analyses Communications, messaging LGAC/LGEI Forums, Meetings, Other GAPS: Local Planning Goal Plan Development Sector Growth Briefly describe the role of federal, state, regional and local partners in the development and implementation of your WIP Identify any gaps in resources available to you to implement your local engagement strategy Enter jurisdiction name Pennsylvania Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy

Veronica Kasi Chesapeake Bay Office 717-772-4053 vbkasi@pa.gov Contact Info Veronica Kasi Chesapeake Bay Office 717-772-4053 vbkasi@pa.gov Briefly describe the role of federal, state, regional and local partners in the development and implementation of your WIP Identify any gaps in resources available to you to implement your local engagement strategy Enter jurisdiction name Pennsylvania Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy