Maureen Perkins Impaired Driving Division

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ignition Interlock Devices: An Overview John M. Priester NHTSA/ABA Judicial Fellow Administrative Law Judge Iowa Dept. of Inspections & Appeals.
Advertisements

IIHS Adrian Lund, President National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Meeting on Use of Alcohol Ignition Interlocks for Reducing Impaired Driving.
TRAFFIC INJURY RESEARCH FOUNDATION A DRIVING FORCE FOR SAFETY Status and Vision of Ignition Interlock Use Robyn Robertson, M.C.A. Traffic Injury Research.
NM Statewide Traffic Records System Ignition Interlock Data Analysis Application System Project Certification Overview Prepared by: NM-DOT Traffic Safety.
TRAFFIC SAFETY BUREAU – PROGRAMS DIVISION Ignition Interlock Data Analysis Project (IIDA) Project Closeout Presentation January 27, 2010.
Richard Roth, PhD. Executive Director, Impact DWI Research Supported By NM TSB, PIRE, NHTSA, and RWJ 4/14/2008New Mexico Interlock Program Dick Roth1.
Richard Roth, PhD. Executive Director, Impact DWI Research Supported By NM TSB, PIRE, NHTSA, and RWJ Revised 10/27/08New Mexico Interlock Program Dick.
 Comprehensive review of DWI administrative license sanctions  Project Goal – Recommend effective sanctions that: › Reduce alcohol-related fatalities.
Closing the “No Car” Loophole In Ignition Interlock Legislation Research and Recommendations Richard Roth, PhD. Executive Director, Impact DWI Research.
Ignition Interlock Devices Explained. Texas DWI Statistics  Texas was number 1 in 2003 in the number of traffic fatalities involving alcohol. California.
Alabama’s New Ignition Interlock Law Effective September 1, 2012 Patrick Mahaney Montgomery, Alabama.
What are some reasons why an individual would lose their driving privileges? Bell Ringer.
Virginia Association for Pupil Transportation Legislation Committee Report June 2012.
Misdemeanor Sanctions
Effective and Ineffective Laws To Reduce Drunk Driving Richard Roth, PhD Executive Director, Impact DWI Citizen Lobbyist and Research Consultant Supported.
Roth 2/22/07Minnesota Interlock Symposium1 New York Times Editorial November 25, “The initial (MADD) goal, which is backed by associations of State.
Roth 8/26/ Interlock Symposium1 New Mexico Ignition Interlock: Laws, Regulations, Utilization, Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Fairness 8.
Roth 3/25/ Lifesavers Conference1 Reducing DWI With Interlocks The New Mexico Experience Lifesavers Conference March 25-27, 2007 Richard Roth, PhD.
Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.1 Regaining Control of Revoked DWI Offenders Interlocks As an Alternative To Hard License Revocation Substance.
SAFETEA - LU NHTSA Highway Safety Programs SAFETEA - LU NHTSA Highway Safety Programs.
Driver Education Chapter 7: Driver Privileges and Penalties.
Iowa’s Impaired Driving Records Demonstration Project Traffic Records Forum July 16, 2003 Mary Jensen Iowa Department of Transportation Traffic Records.
Interlock Requirements and Hardship Licensing
Roth CircumventionInterlock Symposium How Do DWI Offenders Get Arrested While Interlocked? 8 th Ignition Interlock Symposium August 26-7, 2007 Richard.
IGNITION INTERLOCKS How To Use Them Effectively to Reduce Drunk Driving Richard Roth, PhD ICADTS at TRB Sunday January 12, 2014.
Presentation to the Illinois State University April 20, 2006 Dr. Ronald Henson, Ph.D. Ignition Interlock Devices: Should they be Mandated for DUI Offenders?
IGNITION INTERLOCKS AND DRUNK DRIVING Richard Roth, PhD Lifesavers March 27, 2011 Abridged Version of Region 2 Ignition Interlock Institute Presentation.
Alcohol Interlocks and Continuous Alcohol Monitoring.
October 22, 2006Administrative vs Judicial1 Administrative vs. Judicial Interlock Programs A Roundtable & Debate on Pros and Cons Presenters: Robert Voas,
MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE IGNITION INTERLOCK PROGRAM.
Interlocks in New Mexico Richard Roth, PhD Executive Director, Impact DWI Citizen Lobbyist and Research Consultant Supported by PIRE, NHTSA, RWJ, and NM.
IGNITION INTERLOCKS How To Use Them Effectively to Reduce Drunk Driving Richard Roth, PhD Santa Fe DWI Planning Council Meeting Thursday September 12.
SAFETEA-LU Funds administered by the Washington Traffic Safety Commission.
◦ Administered by Driver and Vehicle Services ◦ Almost 4000 participants currently enrolled ◦ Statute: §
March 2016 Advancing Drugged Driving Data at the State Level: Synthesis of Barriers and Expert Panel Recommendations.
Joanne E. Thomka Director, National Traffic Law Center National District Attorneys Association
AAMVA Interlock Work Group May 28, 2014.
California Interlock Evaluation TRB: January, 2005 An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock in California Report authors: David J., DeYoung,
 In New Mexico, the Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) at which you’re presumed impaired is: % for drivers 21 and over % for those drivers under.
Drinking and Driving. PENALTIES – FIRST OFFENSE.08% BAC or “Under The Influence” Fine of not less than $250 nor more than $400 and a period of detainment.
IS AN IGNITION INTERLOCK DEVICE ESSENTIAL IN NJ If You are Convicted of DWI?
Status and Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock Laws Richard Roth, PhD 2012 MADD National Conference September 29, 2012 Research Supported By NM TSB, NHTSA,
MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH THE IGNTION INTERLOCK Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court First Offender’s Program Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Interlock Installations in the United States and Strategies to Increase Participation 4 th Annual AIIPA Conference Denver, Colorado May 15 - May 18, 2016.
If I Get A DWI While In New Jersey, Will I Lose My License In My Home State?
Trends in Impaired Driving Legislation By Anne Teigen 4 th Annual Association of Ignition Interlock Program Administrators Conference May 18, 2016.
Enhanced Interlock Technology Christopher Morris, Virginia Dawn Blake, Washington.
2016 AIIPA CONFERENCE Denver, Colorado May 15/18, 2016
Safe and Sober Alcohol Interlocks in Europe
Campaign to Eliminate Drunk Driving Update
Motivating DWI Offenders To Install Interlocks: What Works?
Bernard C. Soriano, Ph.D. Deputy Director
Pennsylvania Ignition Interlock Program
Reducing DWI With Interlocks The New Mexico Experience
MADD Director of State Government Affairs
Changes in DUI Law: An Examination of a Nonadjudication Option
Tara Casanova Powell TIRF USA
Tara Casanova Powell TIRF USA
Reciprocity Presented by: Angela Coleman, Executive Director
HIRING A DUI DEFENSE ATTORNEY
CHAPTER 7 – MANUAL DRIVER PRIVILEGES & PENALTIES
Jennifer Huebner Davidson NHTSA AIIPA Conference May 23, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE AND TRAFFIC LAWS
Chapter 7: Driver Privileges and Penalties
Wyoming Ignition Interlock Program
Legislation Committee Report June 2012
Division of Long-Term Services and Supports
Day 8/ Chapter 7 Bell Ringer
Driver Privileges and Penalties
Chapter 7: Driver Privileges and Penalties
Presentation transcript:

Ignition Interlocks and the Model Guideline for State Ignition Interlock Programs Maureen Perkins Impaired Driving Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

What is an Ignition Interlock? An ignition interlock is a device installed in a DWI offender’s vehicle that requires a breath sample from the driver before the car will start If the breath alcohol content of the driver is above the set point, usually .02, it will not start www.nhtsa.gov

Benefits of Ignition Interlocks Benefits the DWI offender Reduction in recidivism among first and repeat offenders Allowed to maintain driving privileges Benefits families DWI offender able to continue working Effect of interlock on DWI offender’s drinking Predictor of future DWI behavior www.nhtsa.gov

Who Pays for the Cost of Ignition Interlocks? Fees are borne by the offender Installation fee $70-$90 Monthly fee $70 Cost is roughly $3-4 a day Indigency Funds Eligibility criteria www.nhtsa.gov

Ignition Interlocks in Use All States allow or require the use of ignition interlocks There are an estimated 1.4 million DWI arrests each year An estimated 305,000 interlocks installed www.nhtsa.gov

Types of Ignition Interlock Programs Administrative- licensing agency requires as a condition of license reinstatement Judicial – Courts mandate interlock either pre- trial or post-conviction Hybrid- include features of both www.nhtsa.gov

Model Guideline for State Ignition Interlock Programs Ensure consistent and effective interlock programs nationwide Provide states with practical strategies based on successful programs in key program areas: Legislation Education Program administration Devices Vendors Data Licensing www.nhtsa.gov

Legislative Require interlocks for all DWI offenders Designate one agency with authority for the program Eliminate barriers to enrolling in the interlock program Minimize the ability for offenders to opt out Establish the minimum length of time for offenders to be on the interlock www.nhtsa.gov

Education Agencies involved with the interlock program should be educated about the device and the program DWI offenders need to be trained in how to use the device, what the program rules are, and consequences for violations www.nhtsa.gov

Program Administration One agency in charge Ensure all offenders in the state have access to ignition interlock service providers Establish eligibility for indigency funds Plan and implement strategies to become self- sustaining Establish rules on offender monitoring and program violations Increase sanctions with multiple violations Performance-based requirements for removal www.nhtsa.gov

Ignition Interlock Devices Approval process for interlocks used in the state Requirements to meet or exceed NHTSA model specifications Testing procedures Proposed modifications to the devices Evaluate new technology www.nhtsa.gov

Vendors Create a vendor oversight and management plan Define vendor violations Methods of monitoring Penalties Violation definitions Establish standards for licensing and operation of service providers www.nhtsa.gov

Data Ownership and security of the data Roles and Responsibilities of Agencies Where is the data housed Submission of data Who can access the data Who is responsible for monitoring the data Link data systems www.nhtsa.gov

Licensing Require the ignition interlock restriction be marked on the license Establish procedures to notify offenders of the requirement and status in the program Coordinate with courts, offenders, and service providers Establish reciprocity with other states www.nhtsa.gov

NHTSA Resources Ignition Interlock Toolkit Ignition Interlock Curriculum Model Specifications for Ignition Interlocks Model Guideline for State Ignition Interlock Programs www.nhtsa.gov

Contact Information Maureen Perkins National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 (202) 366-9781 Maureen.perkins@dot.gov www.nhtsa.gov