Using Observation to Enhance Supervision CIMH Symposium Supervisor Track Oakland, California April 27, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lessons Learned in Washington State: Implementing and Sustaining Evidence- Based Juvenile Justice Programs Minnesota Juvenile Justice Forum June 19, 2008.
Advertisements

Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Chestnut Health Systems Bloomington-Normal, IL
Diversity Issues in Research Charlotte Brown, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychiatry Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic PMBC Summer Institute, Pittsburgh,
1 NM Behavioral Health Collaborative New Mexico Behavioral Health Plan for Children, Youth and Their Families March 2007.
Implementation of MST in Norway Iceland June 2008 Bernadette Christensen Clinical Director of the Youth Department Anne Cathrine Strütt MST Consultant.
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
Background: The low retention rates among African Americans in substance abuse treatment (Milligan et al., 2004) combined with the limited number of treatments.
A Framework for Minnesota
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
Site Dev Highlighted article or topic – Transport Findings Update and Summary _____________________________________ Website: Pre Sonja Schoenwald, Ph.D.
Tribal Juvenile Wellness Courts
© Family Nurse Partnership FNP: Integration of a licensed programme Improving Integrated Assessment, Interventions and Developing Integrated Pathways.
Preventing and Intervening in Delinquency through Integration and Coordination of Services.
Is a community court a program or a partnership?: Evaluation scope and design issues Stuart Ross & Karen Gelb, University of Melbourne BOCSAR Applied Research.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Improving Parenting Skills Perrin EC, Sheldrick RC, McMenamy JM, Henson BS, Carter.
Steve Aos Assistant Director Washington State Institute for Public Policy Phone: (360) Institute Publications:
Motivational Interviewing to Improve Treatment Engagement and Outcome* The effect of one session on retention Research findings from the NIDA Clinical.
Challenges and Successes Treating Adolescent Substance Use Disorders Janet L. Brody, Ph.D. Center for Family and Adolescent Research (CFAR), Oregon Research.
California’s Annual FFT Symposium 2008 Sustainability April 3, 2008 FFT LLC, 2008.
Daniel Flynn 1, Mary Kells 1, Mary Joyce 1&2, Catalina Suarez 1&2 1. Health Service Executive 2. National Suicide Research Foundation The National Dialectical.
Early Childhood Mental Health Consultants Early Childhood Consultation Partnership® Funded and Supported by Connecticut’s Department of Children and Families.
Cost-Effective Interventions for Juvenile Offenders Dr. Peter W. Greenwood Academy of Experimental Criminology Association for the Advancement of Evidence-Based.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
April 3-4, 2003 Garden Grove Proven Programs for Community Supervision Settings 1 Proven Program for Community Supervision Settings Todd Sosna, Ph.D.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
Implementation Strategy for Evidence- Based Practices CIMH Community Development Team Model Pam Hawkins, Senior Associate Association for Criminal Justice.
Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2012.
EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ADDING THE RECLAIMING FUTURES APPROACH TO JUVENILE TREATMENT DRUG COURTS: RECLAIMING FUTURES/JUVENILE DRUG COURT EVALUATION Josephine.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Clackamas County Juvenile Drug Court Enhancement Evaluation (OR) NPC Research Outcome and Cost Evaluation Results.
STICS: Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) Applying the RNR Principles.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2012.
Research, Policy and Politics in Evidence Based Practice (RPP in EBP) Peter Greenwood, Ph.D. Association of Criminal Justice Research (CA) 71 st Bi-Annual.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
META-ANALYSIS, RESEARCH SYNTHESES AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
California Implementation of Functional Family Therapy (FFT) California Institute for Mental Health (CiMH) Todd Sosna Ph.D., Senior Associate, Center for.
1 Establishing Spanish- and English- Speaking CBT Groups for Depression in a Training Clinic Velma Barrios, Ph.D. Margareth Del Cid Ashley Elefant Palo.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators To learn how to explain the Communities That Care process and the research.
MODELS FOR SUCCESS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH FOR JUVENILE DRUG COURT Reclaiming Futures/Juvenile Drug Court Evaluation Southwest Institute for Research on.
Evidence-Based Public Policy in the Criminal Justice System  Washington State’s (Evolving) Approach  What Works Conference, 2013 —Justice Reinvestment.
A Presentation to The Local Public Safety Coordinating Council Portland, OR November 1, 2011 A Presentation to The Local Public Safety Coordinating Council.
Roles in JDTC Discipline Specific Breakout Session.
Adaptive trial designs in HIV vaccine clinical trials Morenike Ukpong Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
FUNCTIONAL FAMILY THERAPY ADMINISTRATORS Tracye Jones, LMFT, MBA SHIELDS for Families, Inc. FFT State Consultant.
State of the Science in Functional Family Therapy
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Evidence-based policy and youth justice outcomes
Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective
Functional Family Therapy- Child Welfare
Research Questions Does integration of behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location, improve patient-centered outcomes in.
Linda de Caestecker Director of Public Health
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
Erika Ostlie, M.A. Carnevale Associates, LLC April 10, 2012
Measurement of Implementation Components Ten Years After a Nationwide Introduction of Empirically Supported Programs Society for Prevention Research,
RAPID RESPONSE program
14 Cultural Competence Training, Assessment, and Evaluation of Cultural Competence, and Evidence-Based Practices in Culturally Competent Agencies.
Transforming Hidalgo County CSCD into an Evidence Based Agency
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FRAMEWORK CONCEPT: AN OVERVIEW
How to Use Cost Benefit Analysis to Weigh Policy Options
Beyond the referral Presented by:
Building a Strong Outcome Portfolio
As we reflect on policies and practices for expanding and improving early identification and early intervention for youth, I would like to tie together.
IV-E Prevention Family First Implementation & Policy Work Group
Comprehensive Youth Services
Presentation transcript:

Using Observation to Enhance Supervision CIMH Symposium Supervisor Track Oakland, California April 27, 2012

FFT is an Evidence-Based Practice Four decades of research support establishing the efficacy of FFT with behavior problem youth Recidivism/arrest, including violent felony crimes Drug use Out of home placement Prevention of arrest in siblings of referred youth Reduction in youth, mother, father interpersonal distress/somatic complaints Improvement in family functioning Significant cost effectiveness (up to $14.87 return for each dollar spent) Findings replicated across research teams, with therapists with diverse clinical experience, and with culturally diverse populations

Science to Practice Challenge in dissemination is to ensure that therapists implement FFT with the same rigor and fidelity established in controlled trials

Fidelity and Outcomes: State of Washington Implementation 38%* reduction in felony recidivism $10.67 return for each $1 invested $2100 per family cost to implement * Statistically significant outcome as compared to control condition Wash State Institute for Public Policy, 2005

The Effect of Supervised Experience: Felony Recidivism by Level of Therapist Competence The data for this slide was obtained from the Statewide Washington State FFT Project. The case experience was clustered into three levels: 1-7, 8-14, and 15-21. The high competence therapists are the competent and High competent group combined while the low competent group are the “borderline and non competent” groups combined. Case Experience Aos et al., 2004 5

Summary of Washington Findings Only half the therapists were actually implementing FFT in a competent manner Reductions in felony recidivism were evident only for therapists implementing the model competently For the subset of competent FFT therapists, the financial benefits of the dissemination were estimated at $7.50 for each dollar of program cost (Aos et al., 2004)

Modifications to Training and Dissemination System Intensive engagement of stakeholders and buy-in during site set-up process Revisions to the Client Services System Web-based tracking system Implementation of new procedures for training and supervising therapists Increased accountability for practice using data-informed practice guidelines

What Works to Reduce Crime?   Juvenile Offenders Change in Crime (# of EB Studies) Benefits Minus Costs (per-person, life cycle) Probability: you lost $ Functional Family Therapy -18% (7) $32,021 (<1%) Multisystemic Therapy -13% (10) $18,120 (<1%) Family Integrated Transitions -10% (1) $29,721 (~5%) Multi-Dimensional Treatment Foster Care -18% (3) $64,486 (<1%) Adapted from Aos (2010)

Return-on-Investment of Juvenile Offender Programs on Crime Reduction (WSIPP)   Juvenile Program Program Cost Per Program Participant Victimizations Avoided Per Program Participant Taxpayer Benefits Per Program Participant Victim Benefits Per Program Participant Per $/1000 Program Cost State Percent of Benefits Multi-Dimensional Treatment Foster Care $7418 0.10 50% $24,068 Family Integrated Transitions $10795 0.04 $13,050 Coordination of Services $379 0.19 45% $2,135 Functional Family Therapy $3134 0.22 $20,623 Multi-Systemic Therapy $7076 0.05 $11,027

Next Steps Is FFT effective in real world settings? Moving from efficacy to effectiveness research What procedures are necessary to achieve the most potent effects? Observation-based supervision has been critical in the development of clinical practices and in efficacy trials The costs associated with supervision based on a direct review of therapy session recordings are often viewed as prohibitive . Does observation-based supervision influence therapist competence and subsequent treatment outcomes? The sustainability of community implementations must be considered in the context of empirical evidence for the procedures in relation to outcomes achieved.

Primary Objective To examine the effects of observation-based supervision (BOOST) versus the standard supervision as usual (SAU) approach currently used by FFT LLC on the therapists’ ability to facilitate changes in the family. BOOST will examine the following outcomes: adolescent drug use conduct/delinquent behaviors. engaging youth/families in treatment enhancing therapist competence 

Engagement-Retention Mediating Variables Outcome Variables Engagement-Retention in Treatment AIM 2 AIM 4 Therapist Competence AIM 3a Supervision Condition AIM 4 AIM 3b AIM 4 Family Functioning Adolescent Substance Use AIM 1a, 1b Adolescent Conduct / Delinquency Conceptual Model of Hypothesized Relationships

Random Assignment of FFT Supervision Teams Supervision as Usual 8 Teams - 3 Therapists Each (n=24) Observation-Based Supervision 8 Teams – 3 Therapists Each (n=24) Family Referral (n=288) Screening and Informed Consent Baseline Assessment Functional Family Therapy Follow-Up Assessments: 5-and 12-months after Baseline

Implementation at Each Site Participants will be 18 adolescents/families per team FFT teams will include 3 therapists (6 families per therapist) Duration of study at each site Month 1: Start Up; Therapist Consent; Randomization of FFT teams Month 2-8: Enrollment of family participants Months 2 to 12: Clinical services * Months 6-12: Completion of 5-month assessment Months 14-20: Completion of 12-month assessment *Supervisor and Therapist activities completed. Therapists in SAU eligible to participate in BOOST training

Features of the Study One of the only formal examinations of dissemination outcomes in evidence-based practices for youth with disruptive behavior problems First study of supervision procedures! Inclusion of a diverse sample of family and therapist participants across multiple community agencies Tracking treatment outcomes and post-treatment outcomes Protocol is fully bi-lingual (including computerized assessment procedures) BOOST procedures will be transported into participating agencies to enhance sustainability after study Includes procedures to train therapists and site supervisors in SAU after clinical phase of study is completed at each site

Cautions Intensity of review can be overwhelming Rule of 5 to 1 Try not to blow smoke Specificity and brevity Matching to therapist and family Let therapist and team make comments and recommendations