PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Validation of Satellite Rainfall Estimates over the Mid-latitudes Chris Kidd University of Birmingham, UK.
Advertisements

Multiple Sensor Precipitation Estimation over Complex Terrain AGENDA I. Paperwork A. Committee member signatures B. Advisory conference requirements II.
Empirical Analysis and Statistical Modeling of Errors in Satellite Precipitation Sensors Yudong Tian, Ling Tang, Robert Adler, and Xin Lin University of.
1 COPS Workshop 2008 University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart; 27 to 29 February 2008 IMGI‘s contribution to the COPS 2007 field experiment Simon Hölzl & Alexander.
Validation of Satellite Precipitation Estimates for Weather and Hydrological Applications Beth Ebert BMRC, Melbourne, Australia 3 rd IPWG Workshop / 3.
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
The Climate Prediction Center Rainfall Estimation Algorithm Version 2 Tim Love -- RSIS/CPC.
Monitoring the Quality of Operational and Semi-Operational Satellite Precipitation Estimates – The IPWG Validation / Intercomparison Study Beth Ebert Bureau.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
Francesca Torricella, Vincenzo Levizzani and Miria Celano Satellite Meteorology Group ISAC-CNR Italy Applications of a rainfall estimation technique based.
World Renewable Energy Forum May 15-17, 2012 Dr. James Hall.
For the lack of ground data the verification of the TRMM performance could not be checked for the entire catchments, however it has been tested over Bangladesh.
How low can you go? Retrieval of light precipitation in mid-latitudes Chris Kidd School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science The University of.
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
The IPWG* Precipitation Validation Program The IPWG* Precipitation Validation Program Phillip A. Arkin and John Janowiak ESSIC/University of MarylandINTRODUCTION.
Ethiopia Improving Availability, Access and Use of Climate Information in Ethiopia Tufa Dinku 1, Kinfe Hilemariam 2, David Grimes 3, and Stephen Connor.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
The Evaluation of a Passive Microwave-Based Satellite Rainfall Estimation Algorithm with an IR-Based Algorithm at Short time Scales Robert Joyce RS Information.
Nairobi, 25 th /Oct. – 18 Dec 2010AMESD eStation users’ training. AMESD eStation users’ training N 08. Precipitations products from RS Marco Clerici, JRC/IES/GEM.
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute SE Norrköping, SWEDEN COMPARISON OF AREAL PRECIPITATION ESTIMATES: A CASE STUDY FOR A CENTRAL.
LMD/IPSL 1 Ahmedabad Megha-Tropique Meeting October 2005 Combination of MSG and TRMM for precipitation estimation over Africa (AMMA project experience)
Climate data sets: introduction two perspectives: A. What varieties of data are available? B. What data helps you to identify...
IPWG Validation current status and future directions Chris Kidd Beth Ebert John Janowiak The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Bureau of Meteorology,
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Potential June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Fine-scale comparisons of satellite estimates Chris Kidd School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham.
Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN) Kuolin Hsu, Yang Hong, Dan Braithwaite, Xiaogang.
Slide: 1 Quality indicators in an operational precipitation product IPWG meeting 4 Beijing, October 2008 Presented by: Thomas Heinemann Meteorological.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
5. Accumulation Rate Over Antarctica The combination of the space-borne passive microwave brightness temperature dataset and the AVHRR surface temperature.
VALIDATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE GOES-R RAINFALL RATE ALGORITHM Background Robert J. Kuligowski, Center for Satellite Applications and Research, NOAA/NESDIS,
Evaluation of Passive Microwave Rainfall Estimates Using TRMM PR and Ground Measurements as References Xin Lin and Arthur Y. Hou NASA Goddard Space Flight.
A Global Kalman Filtered CMORPH using TRMM to Blend Satellite Rainfall Robert Joyce NOAA/NCEP/CPC Wyle Information Systems Pingping Xie NOAA/NCEP/CPC John.
Evaluation of gridded multi-satellite precipitation (TRMM -TMPA) estimates for performance in the Upper Indus Basin (UIB) Asim J Khan Advisor: Prof. Dr.
Locally Optimized Precipitation Detection over Land Grant Petty Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Wisconsin - Madison.
1 Validation for CRR (PGE05) NWC SAF PAR Workshop October 2005 Madrid, Spain A. Rodríguez.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 The use of an intensity-scale technique for assessing operational mesoscale precipitation forecasts Marion Mittermaier and.
Institute of Environmental Sciences (ICAM) University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), Toledo, Spain 2nd GPM GV Meeting, Taipei, Taiwan 27-29/Sep/2005 Ground.
COMPARING HRPP PRODUCTS OVER LARGE SPACE AND TIME SCALES Wesley Berg Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University.
The Potential Role of the GPM in Activities at the Naval Research Laboratory Joe Turk and Jeff Hawkins Naval Research Laboratory Marine Meteorology Division.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 2nd GPM GV Workshop TRMM Ground Validation Some Lessons and Results.
Application of Probability Density Function - Optimal Interpolation in Hourly Gauge-Satellite Merged Precipitation Analysis over China Yan Shen, Yang Pan,
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Validation of Satellite Rainfall Estimates over the Mid-latitudes Chris Kidd University of Birmingham, UK.
Estimation of precipitation over the OLYMPEX domain during winter
Multi-Site and Multi-Objective Evaluation of CMORPH and TRMM-3B42 High-Resolution Satellite-Rainfall Products October 11-15, 2010 Hamburg, Germany Emad.
*CPC Morphing Technique
Precipitation Data: Format and Access Issues
Chris Kidd UMD/ESSIC & NASA/GSFC
Precipitation Classification and Analysis from AMSU
Overview of Downscaling
Systematic timing errors in km-scale NWP precipitation forecasts
NSIDC DAAC UWG Meeting August 9-10 Boulder, CO
Radar/Surface Quantitative Precipitation Estimation
Meng Lu and Edzer Pebesma
Soo-Hyun Yoo and Pingping Xie
Precipitation Validation
Jennifer Boehnert Emily Riddle Tom Hopson
Validation Working Group
Estimating PM2.5 using MODIS and GOES aerosol optical depth retrievals in IDEA Hai Zhang , Raymond M. Hoff1 , Shobha Kondragunta2.
Validation of High-Resolution Precipitation Products over the U.S.
Validation of Satellite Precipitation Estimates using High-Resolution Surface Rainfall Observations in West Africa Paul A. Kucera and Andrew J. Newman.
Welcome to….. The First Workshop for the Evaluation of High Resolution Precipitation Products: An Activity of the International Precipitation Working.
The Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) project: Integration of microwave and infrared radiometers for a global precipitation map Tomoo.
Welcome from the The International Precipitation Working Group
Comparing NetCDF and a multidimensional array database on managing and querying large hydrologic datasets: a case study of SciDB– P5 Haicheng Liu.
PEHRPP Error Metrics WG Summary
An Inter-comparison of 5 HRPPs with 3-Hourly Gauge Estimates
Comeaux and Worley, NSF/NCAR/SCD
Presentation transcript:

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Inter-comparison of precipitation products over Europe: experiences, results and recommendations Dr Chris Kidd School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Birmingham PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Overview Introduction European IPWG validation basics Experiences Day-to-day running of a validation site Data availability, ingest, processing, checking Results Summary of results Radar performance; MPE performance Recommendations Current issues Recommendations… PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

IPWG European validation Radar used as 'ground truth' Composite of radars over UK, France, Germany, Belgium and Netherlands Nominal 5 km resolution Equal-area polar-stereographic projection Data and product ingest Near real-time Statistical and graphical output (SGI/Unix; f77/netpbm) Currently developing the BALTEX region data set… PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Processing setup Perceived requirements: Daily inter-comparison → 00Z-24Z (also -06, -09, -12Z) 0.25 degree resolution → 25 km resolution Real-time → near real-time dependent upon product Validation data → radar data (gauge being added later) Automatic → quasi-automatic (not ‘operational’) Many products → limited number of products PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Processing Schedule 01Z Global IR 02Z SSM/I data GPI FDA ECMWF 03Z European radar data PMIR 04Z 3B4x 05Z cics data Statistics at 20km 22Z EUMETSAT MPE Web pages PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Processing system Initial setup: Setting of dates Cleaning out old/decayed data Remapping of data: 5 km PSG projection (equel area) Acquiring data: Searching existing data Listing missing data Creation of .netrc file ftp data sources Results generation: Statistical analysis Graphical output Web pages: Generate HTML files Copy over to server PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Processing checks foreach day (d0-d0-31) dn=dn+1 set d0=today foreach product & day remap to PSG using LUTs & standardise format standardise filename foreach day (d0-d0-31) foreach product (p1-pn) if (product for day) !exist add to .netrc file foreach datasource (s0-sn) ftp datasource (4k) Y N foreach product & day Generate statistics Generate plots foreach product & day generate HTML files PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Processing checks foreach day (d0-d0-31) dn=dn+1 set d0=today Set up list of past dates/days Usually okay: sometimes needs tweaking Prepares products into common format Usually okay… foreach product & day remap to PSG using LUTs & standardise format standardise filename foreach day (d0-d0-31) foreach product (p1-pn) if (product for day) !exist add to .netrc file foreach datasource (s0-sn) ftp datasource (4k) Y N Checks for a products results: Okay if no results, but not if bad data Generates outputs: Okay if there is rain… foreach product & day Generate statistics Generate plots FTP runs several times: 4K buffer limit on macros Generates raw HTML: Occassional issues with server foreach product & day generate HTML files PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 IPWG-EU Results Similar to other regions: seasonal dependence of satellite techniques (poorer in winter) Models tend to overestimate rain area/extent Satellite products underestimate rain area/extent Significant day-to-day variations: rainfall patterns, extent, intensity affect statistics Surface contamination noticeable in winter PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Results: Snow problems PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Results: rain extent PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Performance of radar data European composite – different radar systems, difference calibration strategies, different QC. Nominally 5km 15-minute data product; available within ~ 1 hour; 2002-present Known errors include range effects and anaprop (including shipping!) Gauge data: 09-09Z data (dated at end of period) ~6000 daily gauges with mean 10km spacing available 1 month in arrears PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Radar & gauge data PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 - a bad day… PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Radar vs Gauge correlations CCs essentially independent of month Radar is calibrated using gauge data – even so, cc's rarely exceed 0.9 PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Radar vs Gauge correlations – by rain extent Correlations (and other statistics) are dependent upon rain extent PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

High-temporal resolution study EUMETSAT Multi-spectral Precipitation Estimate Nominal 15 minute estimates Utilises multi-spectral capabilities of SEVIRI sensor Remapped to 0.25 degree resolution AMSR L2 Rain product (for comparison) Nominal 25km (ave'd 5km) instantaneous estimates PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

AMSR instantaneous: very variable Correlation Date (mmdd) PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

AMSR vs radar (instantaneous) 3 months of data: 20 August 2007 to 20 November 2007 PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Vis/IR MPE vs radar: 15 minute PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Vis/IR MPE vs radar: 30 minute PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Vis/IR MPE vs radar: 1 hour PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Vis/IR MPE vs radar: 3 hour PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Vis/IR MPE vs radar: 6 hour PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Vis/IR MPE vs radar: 12 hour PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Vis/IR MPE vs radar: 24 hour The critical temporal gap is ~3-6 hour accumulations PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

Statistical Performance Performance can be improved just by smoothing the data! PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Issues I Standardisation of data sets – Why? Easier/better processing (& fewer errors) More coherent long-term data sets Problems: Grid box vs grid point Instantaneous vs accumulation (i.e. ±1.5 hours or 00-03) Data resolutions (temporal & spatial) Data units (storage resolution vs retrieval resolution) Formats (I*2; I*4; R*4) (& units: mmh-1 ;mmd-1 ; kgd-1) Filename and date/time conventions (end, start, period) W-E (180°E/0°E & E-W) and N-S (or S-N) layout PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Issues II Statistical results are dependent upon the rainfall: intensity, extent and patterns temporal resolution spatial resolution All these are inter-related and pose a multi-dimensional problem that cannot currently be adequately resolved PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007

PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007 Recommendations To establish guidelines for satellite precipitation data sets: we need to be forward thinking and establish common criteria that can and will be used to promote long-term data sets Investigate statistical tests that are more relevant to the data sets we are dealing with, and that be applied over a range of spatial and temporal scales To promote near real-time high resolution (sub-daily, <0.25 degree) precipitation inter-comparisons alongside those of the current IPWG comparisons: these should include combined & component products PEHRPP Geneva, 3-5 December 2007