Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nigeria Case Study HIVAIDS Specific Slides. ANALYZING AND INTERPRETING DATA.
Advertisements

Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.
Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.
DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.
UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.
Technical Approach to and Experiences from Strengthening National Monitoring and Evaluation System for Most Vulnerable Children Program in Tanzania Prisca.
Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Case management versus M&E in the context of OVC programs: What have we learned? Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making.
Day 6: Supervisors’ Training This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency.
Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.
PLANNING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION Day 2 - Session 4.
MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.
MER Essential Survey Indicators Jenifer Chapman, PhD & Lisa Parker, PhD February 2, 2015.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.
Day 1: Well-being and Interviewing This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.
Management of RHIS Resources
Module 2 Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool Database.
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:
Community Health Information System in Action in SSNPR/Ethiopia
Difference-in-Differences Models
Data Quality Assurance Workshop
Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:
RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 10:
From the Conceptual Framework to the Empirical Model
Data Quality Assurance
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Using Data to Inform Community-Level Management
Session: 8 Disseminating Results
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 8:
Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia
Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use
Right-sized Evaluation
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
The PLACE Mapping Tool Becky Wilkes, MS, GISP Marc Peterson, MA, GISP
ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Module 1 Training on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.
MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero
Presenting an Information Needs Framework for PEPFAR OVC Programs
Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Complementing Routine Data with Qualitative Data for Decision Making: Understanding the "Why" Behind Program Data Day 1 - Session 1 Note to Facilitator:
Use of Community Health Data for Shared Accountability
Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia
Assessment Implementation
Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis
Training Content and Orientation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:
Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Information Systems for Health:
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Information Systems for Health:
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,
Data and Interoperability:
Measuring Data Quality
Introduction to Health Informatics
Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
EHRs and Privacy Protection in LMICs
Willis Odek, PhD Chief of Party/Senior Technical Advisor,
Presentation transcript:

Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool

Training of Trainers Objectives  Be prepared to conduct a training on all aspects of the use of the Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool (HVPT), including: Administering the tool Entering data from the tool Using the HVPT database to prioritize households during an enrollment period These are the objectives of the full training of trainers (TOT).

HVPT TOT Curriculum Training Module Learning Objectives Target Audience 1. Administering the HVPT Articulate the purpose of the HVPT Understand the pre-identification process Effectively administer the HVPT Administer the tool in an ethical manner Volunteers, para-social workers, village health teams staff 1a. Field Practice (optional) Administer the HVPT to beneficiaries Respond to different challenges in the field when administering the HVPT 2. HVPT Database Become familiar with the HVPT Database Practice using the HVPT Database Use advanced functions of HVPT Database Prioritize households for enrollment Generate a list of households needing referrals Know how to use the database for future rounds of enrollment Data entry clerks; local government and civil society organization (CSO) leadership This training manual has two primary modules and one optional module, presented in the table here. Module 1 presents information on how to administer the VPT. It is designed for community workers and others who administer the HVPT at the household level, or supervise those administering the tool. Optional Module 1a provides an opportunity for participants to practice using the HVPT with households in the field. It is recommended but not required for those attending Module 1. It is not required because some of trainees may already be well-versed in administering household-level instruments and do not require such practice. Module 2 focuses on how to use the HVPT database and prioritize households for program enrollment. This module is designed for data entry clerks and their supervisors. Individuals who are responsible for administering the HVPT at the household level should not participate in this module. The household prioritization is an independent process to avoid community worker bias in household selection.

HVPT TOT Curriculum Type of Training Number of Days Modules Potential Participants National/ Subnational Training of Trainers (TOT) 1.5 days or 2.5 days   Modules 1, 2 Modules 1, 1a, 2 Implementing partners staff; government trainers Administering the HVPT Training 1 day or 2 days Module 1 Modules 1, 1a Volunteers; parasocial workers; village health teams staff HVPT Database 0.5 days Module 2 Data entry clerks; local government and CSO leadership This manual suggests a cascade approach for the TOT whereby national and subnational government and project staff implement the TOT that will then be cascaded down to the target participants, as shown in the table here. A separate slide deck for TOT trainings is included. The TOT can last up to 2.5 days, as these trainers will be trained in both Module 1 and Module 2. When the trainers roll the training out to the target participants, the training will be split as follows: - Up to two day training on administering the tool (Module 1 and 1a); - Half day training on entering data in the HVPT database and using the database functions to prioritize households for enrollment (Module 2).

Acknowledgments The Government of Uganda wishes to thank the USAID- and PEPFAR-funded MEASURE Evaluation project for leading the development of this work.

This presentation was produced with the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of MEASURE Evaluation cooperative agreement AID-OAA-L-14-00004. MEASURE Evaluation is implemented by the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with ICF International; John Snow, Inc.; Management Sciences for Health; Palladium; and Tulane University. Views expressed are not necessarily those of USAID or the United States government. www.measureevaluation.org