Introduction - Final activity reporting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Governance and delivery through Opt-In Organisations.
Advertisements

Parts of the project proposal
Progress Reporting Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 25th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
How to make a Progress Report Activity Reporting Lead partner and partner seminar Voss, Norway June 2008 Maxi Nachtigall.
Application Form – Part C Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Northern Periphery Programme Final Administrative Report Lead Partner Seminar 22 nd February 2012.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
SESSION 3: FROM SETTING PRIORITIES TO PROGRAMMING FOR RESULTS.
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 20 th January 2011, Friars Carse Hotel, Dumfries, Scotland Rachel Burn.
Role of the Secretariat The Secretariat will be responsible for the co-ordination and enhancement of research and networking activities within MariFish.
Project preparation workshop “Bringing a transnational project to life” Project idea “Challenges and chances from Climate Change for regional and local.
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 22 February 2012 Copenhagen Rachel Burn.
NPA eMS application Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015 – Copenhagen, Denmark.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Michelle Kennedy Child Poverty Sector Specialist 1.
Results Focus & Partnership Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 1st October 2014, Strathpeffer, Scotland.
ESPON Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 18 May 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Transnational Networking Activities (Projects carried through.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
The Lead partner responsibilities Stefan Nyström, MA Per Dahlström, MA Lead Partner Seminar.
PROGRESS REPORTING Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 1st October - Kuopio, Finland.
Part II - Orientation for new project Lead Partners and Financial Officer Christopher Parker, Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 24th- 25th March, 2015,
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Project financial reporting Linda Wormö April 20th, 2016 – Faroe Islands.
Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures. LP Seminar January 2013 Transnational Cooperation & Reporting Procedures I) Transnational cooperation: Definition.
NPA eMS application – Project Information Joint Secretariat 1st June 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
Lead Partner Seminar Christopher Parker 13 th of June 2008 – Voss, Norway European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Project Development seminar Katerina Staneva Kring February 2010 | Prague.
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat April 20th, 2016 – Faroe Islands.
REPORTING THROUGH THE EMS
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Activity Report in the Progress Report lifecycle
Evaluation : goals and principles
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
NPA eMS application – Project Information
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Tracking development results at the EIB
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
Performance Framework
NPA eMS application – Project Information
Reporting 25 April 2018.
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
Application Form – Part C
Welcome address Ole Damsgaard, Joint Secretariat
Final report and Impact Typology
Opening seminar of the project
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Understanding DWCPs, tripartite process and role of Trade Unions
Where do we stand with the Structural Funds?
How to report on outputs
NDPHS Work Plan for 2012 NDPHS 8th Partnership Annual Conference
ESF evaluation partnership
Project intervention logic
Project intervention logic
Strategic development goals and priorities of the Republic of Tajikistan . National monitoring and evaluation system for their achievements. Eshboev.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction - Final activity reporting Joint Secretariat & Managing Authority September 20th, 2017 – Galway, Ireland

Topics Final activity report Final financial report Project extensions Reporting Output in eMS Impact typology

Rationale YOUR project is monitored by: 1. First Level Controllers 2. The Monitoring Committee (MA) 3.The Manging Authority (MA) 4. The Joint Secretariat (JS) 5. European Commission WE want to guarantee satisfactory project implementation Start to end measurement AND quantification of project outputs.... YOUR products and services Activity Reports are cross checked with the project application/ decision throughout the project’s implementation. If you report in time, we will make a payment ideally within 3 months, provided there are no serious errors. Communication and publicity is vital the NPA 2014-2020; the public should know about your project outputs

Purpose of final reporting To allow programme bodies to assess the implementation of the project To ensure satisfactory achievement of the project results To provide quantification and quality assurance of project outputs To cross-check with the project application and decision. To collect information for the NPA’s Annual Implementation Report To help disseminate information about the project to the wider public. To enable reporting of best practices in project implementation and publicity

Results focus - some terminology Result: what is intended to be changed in the programme area Outputs: direct products of the programme, intended to contribute to results. They are mainly developed at project level (products/services). Results orientation: for the 2014-2020 period, the focus is shifting from only measuring outputs (products/services) to measuring the results that they contribute to (change in the programme area).

Intervention logic

Intervention logic at programme level Vision: what does the programme want to achieve Thematic objectives: 4 themes form the basis for the 4 priorities Specific objectives: how the programme plans to meet the vision Results sought: what changes the programme wishes to see, e.g. raised awareness, improved entrepreneurial climate, raised preparedness

Intervention logic at programme level Result indicators: how the changes will be measured Actions supported: examples of interventions to help achieve the results sought, including examples of target groups and partners Output indicators: quantifying the outputs that are developed Performance framework: accountability for outputs, finances

What does it mean for projects at the final reporting stage? Project result: what change does the project hope to achieve? Qualitative contribution to programme result indicators (neutral/positive) Project objectives: how will the project achieve its chosen result? Project outputs: products/services, i.e. the solutions to meet the chosen objectives and result Quantitative contribution to output indicators

What does it mean for projects at the final reporting stage? Deliverable: by-product in developing the main outputs Budget and spending target: Contribution to the programme financial targets

Output indicators – Project level Example Priority axis 3

Output indicators – Project level Quantify contribution to the output indicator. This is a target value for the entire project. Note: one product or service delivered in several programme partner countries is still considered as one, please do not double count!

Final Project Report in eMS Workflow After the Partner Reports are submitted in eMS the Lead Partner can start to compile the Final Project Report. The Project Report consists of questions about the project’s activities, and delivery of the main outputs. Report Work packages Certificates Project report tables Attachments

JS Assessment of Project Report Completeness of the information Eligibility of activities carried out Coherence of activities with objectives set out in application/ decision Final achievements of the implementation vs. the application/decision Analysis of the efficiency and effectiveness of project implementation Measurement of quality and quantity of project outputs and results Analysis of project final spending profile, value-for-money, etc. Quality of partnership and distribution of roles between the partners Analysis of synergies with other strategies and programmes Concrete actions meeting the horizontal principles

Thank you for listening