1. Final report and Impact Typology
Joint Secretariat
September 20th, 2017 – Galway, Ireland
The Final report check list asks projects a number of important questions we are not addressing in the current eMS report template.
Impacts, tangible and intangible are according to Nathalie’s typology for the “Achievement report for the NPP ”
Some additional questions about the geography and transferability of the impacts, taken from INTERACT’s typology form from the period
Arctic dimension, based on the geography outlined in the SPO, and the Arctic topics identified for the Arctic Project Awards.
Strategies:
EUSBSR
Atlantic Action Plan

2. Purpose of checklist Capture tangible and intangible project impacts
Capture contribution to Arctic dimension, and macro regional and sea basin strategies

3. Typology of Project Impacts & Contribution to Strategies
Tangible impacts
Intangible impacts
Geographical impact
Transferability
Arctic dimension
European Strategies

4. Tangible impacts Improved access to services Cost savings Time savings
CO2 savings
Reduced energy consumption/increased RES generation

5. Tangible impacts (Man-made, natural) risk reduction
Business development
Job creation
Improved competitiveness

6. Intangible impacts Building institutional capacity Raising awareness
Changing attitudes and behaviour Influencing policies
Improving social cohesion Leveraging synergies

7. Geographic impacts Partner level Regional level National level
Programme level
EU level

8. Transferability
Transfer of project impacts to other organisations, regions, countries outside the current partnership

9. Arctic dimension Project geography Arctic project topics covered
Sustainable use of resources
Arctic entrepreneurial spirit
Cold climate opportunities
Direct benefits for the people living in the Arctic regions

10. EU Strategies European Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
Action Plan for a Maritime Strategy in the Atlantic area

11. Thank you for listening