Activity Report in the Progress Report lifecycle

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Reporting Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 25th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
Advertisements

How to make a Progress Report Activity Reporting Lead partner and partner seminar Voss, Norway June 2008 Maxi Nachtigall.
Application Form – Part C Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Northern Periphery Programme Final Administrative Report Lead Partner Seminar 22 nd February 2012.
NPP Information sources & guidance documents Niclas Forsling Kirsti Mijnhijmer First Level Control Event 6 November 2008, Copenhagen European Union European.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Preparatory Project Application Form Kirsti Mijnhijmer 27 th August 2009 – Inverness, Scotland European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Northern Periphery Programme How to Close a Preparatory Project Christopher Parker 20th March 2014 North Atlantic House, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 5-6 February 2009 – Sundsvall, Sweden Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner Seminar 8 th September 2010 – Bunratty Co. Clare, Ireland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
NPP concepts and communications Kirsti Mijnhijmer 21 August 2008 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Northern Periphery Programme Final Project Claim 18th September 2013 Scandic Hotel, Skellefteå, Sweden Stefan Nyström.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
Project Communication Kirsti Mijnhijmer & Christopher Parker 23 February 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 21 st April 2010 – Portrush, Northern Ireland Teresa Lennon and Michael O’Brien European Union European.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 20 th January 2011, Friars Carse Hotel, Dumfries, Scotland Rachel Burn.
Orientation for new Lead Partners and Partners Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 12 June 2008 – Voss, Norway Kirsti.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 22 February 2012 Copenhagen Rachel Burn.
NPA eMS application Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 20th October 2015 – Copenhagen, Denmark.
Northern Periphery Programme Advice to Lead partners for final reports Lead Partner Seminar 18th September 2013 Scandic Hotel, Skellefteå, Sweden.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
Northern Periphery Programme The challenge of communication in a large programme area OPEN DAYS - Workshop “Communicating Cohesion Policy Together”
Orientation for new project Lead partners and partners Overview of the claim system Lead partners and partner seminar Voss, Norway June 2008 Maxi.
Overview of the claim system Lead partner and partner seminar Sundsvall, Sweden 5th February 2009 Maxi Nachtigall.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
PROGRESS REPORTING Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat 1st October - Kuopio, Finland.
Preparatory projects as tool for project development 4th February 2009 – Sundsvall, Sweden Maxi Nachtigall European Union European Regional Development.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
NPA eMS application – Project Information Joint Secretariat 1st June 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities 17 th June 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European Regional.
Lead Partner Seminar Christopher Parker 13 th of June 2008 – Voss, Norway European Union European Regional Development Fund.
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING Christopher Parker, Joint Secretariat April 20th, 2016 – Faroe Islands.
Filippo Compagni - UK Contact Point – Atlantic Area
REPORTING THROUGH THE EMS
GEF Familiarization Seminar
REPORTING THROUGH THE EMS
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
How to make a preparatory project application Maxi Nachtigall “How to Apply” seminar 4th February Sundsvall, Sweden European Union European Regional.
Introduction - Final activity reporting
Application Form Sections 1-3 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Preparatory projects and funding opportunities th August 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark Christopher Parker and Rachel Burn European Union European.
PROJECT MANUAL Galina Georgieva Project Officer
Presentation on the Application Process
Baltic Sea Region Programme : New Funding Opportunities
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
NPA eMS application – Project Information
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Seed Money Facility EUSDR PA4 – 14th SG meeting
NPA eMS application – Project Information
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
Application Form – Part C
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
PROJECT CHANGES Rachel Burn, Joint Secretariat
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
Interreg IPA CBC Programme "Greece - Albania "
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee - Labour
Project Communication Niclas Forsling 21st and 22nd of September 2009 – Höfn, Iceland European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Presentation transcript:

Activity Reporting Lead Partner Seminar 8th September 2010 – Bunratty Co. Clare, Ireland Rachel Burn

Activity Report in the Progress Report lifecycle

Activity Report in the Progress Report lifecycle

Why to report? Monitoring of project by - PMC - MA - Secretariat Guarantee satisfactory project implementation Continous measurement and quantifiaction of project outputs Cross-check project application/ decision vs implementation Information and knowledge to broader public

Activity Report Template Available on www.northernperiphery.eu 10 Sections: General information Project Activities and Performance Project Indicators Project Financial Information Analysis of Project Activity and Outcomes Performance Project Management and Partnership Dynamics NPP Horizontal Principles Project Communication Other changes (partnership, target area, other) Additional information

Section 1: General Information Report number and period Project title Acronym and Duration Priority

Section 1: General Information Target area/ location of operation Partnership information Based on the information from the application Note: Changes need prior approval by the Secretariat Lead partner’s written request to Programme Secretariat by mail

Section 1: General Information Executive summary Overall description of project implementation process Status of development of products and services (outcomes so far, compared with objectives set out in application) Will be used for wider dissemination

Section 2: Project Activities and Performance Overall description of activities so far Highlights of most important activities for project implementation progress Links between Work Packages

Section 2: Project Activities and Performance Information taken from the application Description of each project work package Activities as planned in the activity plan in the approved application Results to date

Section 2: Project Activities and Performance Change of activities in comparison to approved application Any activity changes need pre-approval by Secretariat Justification of the change and impact on implementation of project 1 request for change per year

Section 3: Indicators General indicators based on indicators outlined in application and decision (reporting should be accumulative) Indication of UHIs, Technology institutes and SMEs should be ‘ticked or crossed’. Equal opportunity indicators based on indicators outlines in the application and decision (reporting should be accumulative) Involvement of Small & Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) based on numbers outlined in application and decision.

Section 3: Indicators Priority 1 or 2 specific indicators Activity Output Result

Section 3: Indicators Additional project indicators as in the approved application Change of indicators in comparison to approved application Any indicator changes need pre-approval by Secretariat Justification of the change and impact on implementation of project 1 request for change per year

Section 3: Contribution to strategies Contribution to the EU Baltic Sea Region Strategy (EUBSRS) State whether the project contributes to the EUBSRS (http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/cooperation/baltic/index_en.htm) Contribution to other relevant strategies for your region. Does your project contribute to EU2020? www.ec.europa.eu/eu2020 Does your project complement regional economic strategies and align with national strategies?

Project Outcomes and Transnational Impact Overall description of project implementation process. Status of development of products and services (outcomes, so far, compared with objectives set out in the application) Transnational impact Could the product/ service be transferred to other countries? How does it make a difference across the region? Organisational learning, i.e. Collaboration between SMEs and UHIs. Added value of the adopted transnational approach?

Section 4: Project Financial Information Project Expenditures Total approved project budget Total certified expenditures Current reporting period Accumulative

Section 4: Project Financial Information Analysis of the financial performance in comparison to approved total budget Underspendings/ Overspendings/ Unexpected expenditures % of budget spent vs. % of time spent according to project plan Will the project keep spending targets and still achieve outputs Good value for money Could have been more achieved with the same inputs of money or could same outcomes have been achieved with reduced financial inputs? Efficient use of the budget Cross referring to the financial report

Section 4: Project Financial Information Budget changes Justification for the change Description of impact of changes for the project implementation 1 request for change per year

Section 5: Analysis of Project Activity and Outcomes Performance Project activity and outcome performance Analysis of project activity and outcome performance in relation to: Indicators Time plan Budget

Section 6: Project Management and Partnership Dynamics Analysis of Project Management dynamics Arrangements that were used to implement the project, involved partners List of issues discussed List of decisions taken Description of impact of decision on project implementation Dynamics in the project partnership Advantages of the transnational partnership approach Challenges of international cooperation in transnational setting Project cooperation/ Synergies with other projects Concrete cooperation activities

Section 7: NPP 2007-2013 Horizontal Principles Equal Opportunities – concrete steps and activities Gender: provision of day care for children during partner meetings Age: Special tailored staff recruitment plan for young employees Social: Special employment plan for indigenous people How did this change the working culture in the organisations participating in the project?

Section 7: NPP 2007-2013 Horizontal Principles Sustainable Development – concrete steps and activities Implementation of Sustainable impact assessment tool for resource use Minimized travel plan for meetings – ICT solutions, use of environmental friendly transportation, voluntary carbon offset Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) plan Transnational/ shared use of rescue equipment How did this change the working culture in the organisations participating in the project?

Section 8: Project Communication Communication indicators to measure progress on the mandatory communication measures and expected attendance at NPP events accumulative List of all communication tools and promotional materials developed Purpose to exemplify indicators given in question 8.1 Examples: Brochure Website exhibition roll-up PowerPoint presentations Pens

Section 8: Project Communication Provide an analysis of the internal and external communication activities Purpose to get a sense of general performance on communication and best practices What activities worked well, any innovative steps to enhance performance Certification of compliance with the NPP and European publicity requirements Commission Regulation No 1828/2006, Articles 8 and 9. This is a matter of eligibility: European Commission recommends a 2% flat rate cut

Section 9: Changes in Project Partnership, Target Area and Other Changes Additional changes in comparison to the approved application/ to the decision All changes require pre-approval by Programme Secretariat: Partnership Target area Duration Work package structure

Section 10: Additional Information Feedback and Suggestions To NPP bodies/ the programme Background for evaluation activities in the programme Overview on other documents requested Project claim Certificates of Expenditure Summary of Certificates of Expenditure FLC checklists Examples of information/ dissemination material Signature

Submitting an Activity Report Please send the Activity report as part of the Progress Report together with other required documents to: Northern Periphery Programme Secretariat Att.: Responsible Desk Officer Strandgade 91, 4.Sal DK-1401 Copenhagen-K Denmark and per e-mail: secretariat@northernperiphery.eu

Assessment of the Activity Report The Programme Secretariat is the body that assesses the Activity Report Assessment includes: Completeness of the information Eligibility of activities carried out Coherence of activities with objectives set out in the application and decision Concrete actions meeting the NPP horizontal principles Quality of partnership and distribution of roles between the partners Current degree of project progress achieved Efficiency and effectiveness of the project implementation process Measurement of quality and quantity of project outputs and results Impact, Added value and Sustainability Improvement proposed and anticipated results Analysis of project expenditure and other budgetary matters Assessment of activity report will be sent to Managing Authority together with the project claim

No Report = No Money!!

Thank you for listening!