Crab Cavity HOM Coupler Specification Drawings & Tolerances

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
Advertisements

Page 1 Thinning of stamped End cap 1.The measurement from Niowave shows the corners of FPC and H-HOM openings are thinned and its thinnest area is 2.2mm.
Status of the SPL cavities at CERN I.Aviles & N. Valverde on behalf of SPL team 1I. Aviles & N. ValverdeLund, 11 December 2013.
LHC CRAB CAVITY He Tank DQW Prototype P.Freijedo-Menendez C.Zanoni L.Giordanino R.Leuxe.
Structural Design. Introduction It is necessary to evaluate the structural reliability of a proposed design to ensure that the product will perform adequately.
G. Olry for the IPN Orsay team 5 th SPL collaboration meeting, 25-26/11/2010, CERN.
G. Olry, H-M Gassot, S. Rousselot (IPN Orsay) EuCARD-SRF annual review 2011, 4-5 May, IPN, Orsay Unité mixte de recherche CNRS-IN2P3 Université Paris-Sud.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
DQW Cryogenic Magnetic Shield Internal Review Niklas Templeton 06/05/15.
Geometric Dimensions and Tolerances
Cryomodule Concept for the ODU RF Dipole Crab Cavity Tom Nicol* - Fermilab December 10, 2013 * With lots of help from HyeKyoung, Tom J, Shrikant, Ofelia,
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Zenghai Li SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LHC-CC13 CERN, December 9-11, 2013 HOM Coupler Optimization & RF Modeling.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1.
Documentation review: Beam tube assembly Comments given by CERN to the technical file submitted by Niowave prior to release for fabrication 16/10/20141.
Status of Activities at CERN
Cold Magnetic Shield Update
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 1. Introduction Both cavities will be supported by the fundamental power coupler and a number of blade flexures.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule Norihito Ohuchi, Norio Higashi KEK Xu QingJin IHEP 2008/3/3-61Sendai-GDE-Meeting.
Mechanical Designs of The Central Detector Jinyu Fu
Date 2007/Oct./25 FNAL-GDE-Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Report N. Ohuchi KEK 1.Cryomodule & Cryogenics KOM 2.GDE-meeting discussion I.Interface.
SCH Controls Readiness Review- Cryostat Nov 4-5, 2015 Kurt Cantrell.
RF-Dipole Cavity: Processing and RF Measurements Procedure
 =1 cavity: parameters Dimensions for cavity fabrication before any chemical polishing and at room Temp. outer ½ cell pick-up side inner ½ cells outer.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
CHAPTER TWO : Geometric Tolerances
HiLumi-LHC/LARP Crab Cavity System External Review – May Work partly supported by the EU FP7 HiLumi LHC grant agreement No and by the.
S1 global: thermal analysis TILC09, April 19th, 2009 Serena Barbanotti Paolo Pierini.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule (up-dated) Norihito Ohuchi KEK 2008/4/21-251FNAL-SCRF-Meeting.
ALCPG/GDE Meeting FNAL Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Specification Table 23 Oct 2007 FNAL Lutz Lilje DESY.
Adam Carreon July 19, 2012 Technical Division SRF Department Dressed SSR1 Cavities.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
Thermal screen of the cryostat Presented by Evgeny Koshurnikov, GSI, Darmstadt September 8, 2015 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (Dubna)
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
RISP SSR1 Design - `Balloon’ TRIUMF/PAVAC
Fits and Tolerances: Linear and Geometry.
RF Dipole HOM Electromagnetic Design
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 04/22/2016
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
Warm measurements on cavities/HOMs
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Odu/slac rf-dipole prototype
PANDA Yoke of the Magnet
Pure Bending.
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 09/29/2016
SPS – RFD Experience and Evolution to LHC
DQW HOM filter fabrication quality control
Niklas Templeton – STFC – UK Collaboration
Crab Cavity Manufacturing Readiness Meeting
RF-Dipole Cavity Update
Superconducting RF Crab Cavities
BDA30303 Solid Mechanics II.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Stresses, Strains and Deflections of Steel Beams in Pure Bending
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
CONNECTION Prepared by : Shamilah
Overview of mechanical design & construction
EAT 415 :ADVANCED STEEL BUILDING DESIGN PLATE GIRDER
3 Torsion.
TORSION CO 2 : ABILITY TO ANALYZE TORQUE-LOADED MEMBER EVALUATE THE VALUES AND DISTRIBUTION OF BENDING AND SHEAR STRESSES IN BEAM SECTION By: ROSHAZITA.
DQW HOM Update and Recent Developments
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Crab – RFD prototype: Fabrication Status Update
Presentation transcript:

Crab Cavity HOM Coupler Specification Drawings & Tolerances Nik Templeton 22/02/2015

Overview Functional drawing scope HOM model modifications - Rev B HOM flange locations Tolerance Analysis Model checks FEA design Validation 253-10420-B Drawing samples 253-10520-B 1

Functional Drawings Drawing Datums located at fixed flange/cavity interface & inner coupler-body cylinder Part breaks shown but not dimensioned - TBD by manufacture Drawings to be used with models for manufacture All critical dimensions referenced from drawing datums All dimensions at 300K before BCP: Dimensional & Geometric drawing tolerances stipulated Assuming 0.143% contraction (300>>2K) for Niobium 200µm & 150µm BCP removal for DQW & RFD HOMS respectively Drawing tolerances are after assembly and welding – maximum final error Drawing Models have been successfully cross checked with: Tolerances consider stacking/cumulative error Native coupler models CERN HOM models Scaled parameter tables 4

DQW HOM Rev B 2 Ø26/20mm 2-phase line Rigid coax flange Possible assembly method Ø26/20mm 2-phase line Ø10/8mm Bottom fill pipe Iso view Rigid coax flange Ring thickness reduced 4mm>>3mm Section view 2

RFD HHOM Revision B 3 Flange step with weld feature Ø26/20mm 2-phase line Ø10/8mm Bottom fill pipe Rod taper blending Iso view Section view 3 Possible assembly method

Beam Centre - Hook Height (mm) Cavity Interface Beam Centre - Hook Height (mm) Calculation at 2K post-BCP at 300K pre-BCP DQW HOM 143.000 143.004 143 x 1.00143 -0.2 RFD HHOM 35.000 34.900 35 x 1.00143 -0.15 5

DQW Tolerance Analysis Tolerance Region Specification Dimension Tolerances Geometric Tolerances Hook offset X-Z -0.4/+0.5 mm 0.2 Surface Profile A/B 0.1 Location A 0.1 Parallelism A 0.1 Perpendicularity B Capacitive ring offset X-Z 0.4 Concentricity B Rod3 offset X ± 0.5 mm Rod3 location Y ± 0.2 mm Rod1 location X-Z Rod2 offset Y Hook offset Y Filter (all parts) rotation Y-axis ± 1˚ ± 0.5˚ Rod3 Probe Rod1 Ring Rod2 Hook 6

RFD Tolerance Analysis Tolerance Region Specification Dimension Tolerances Geometric Tolerances Probe bar offset longitudinal ± 0.3 mm *coax design 0.1 Parallelism A Tee offset longitudinal ± 0.1 mm location ± 0.1 mm length 0.5 Parallelism A 0.5 Perpendicularity B Hook offset longitudinal ± 0.2 mm ± 0.05 mm location ± 0.1 mm height Probe bar offset transverse ± 0.1 mm 0.1 Position B Tee offset transverse 0.5 Perpendicularity A Hook offset transverse Hook rotation X-axis ± 0.5˚ Within general tolerances 0.2-0.5 Perpendicularity A Hook rotation Z-axis, Two pivot points Filter (all parts) rotation Y-axis 0.2 Surface Profile A/B Filter (all parts) offset longitudinal ± 1 mm ± 0.1 mm depth Hook and tee (Nb parts) dimensions ± 0.1 - 0.2 mm 0.1 Surface Profile Filter tank radius ± 0.5 mm 7

FEA Design Validation Material Properties: Cryogenic material data supplied by FNAL (ES-371110) Coupler parts Niobium Helium Jacket & Flanges SS 316LN Loads: Cool Down: 300-2K temperature all bodies Pressure Test: 0.18MPa applied to all cooled surfaces Self-weight and offset coaxial load applied Boundary Conditions: Remote displacement at cavity-flange bolt holes – fixed in all 6DOF 8

Cool Down Analysis 9 DQW HOM RFD HHOM High localised stress in Niobium parts at flange connections due to difference SS Contraction. Deemed acceptable after successful fabrication and operation of similar structures at CERN. Results agree with CERN Thermo Mechanical Analyses Jan15 (Zanoni) 9

DQW Pressure Test Analysis Maximum Stress occurs in SS helium jacket and is well within allowable stress limits. Maximum pressure deflection of hook is elastic and negligible ~0.07mm. Results agree with CERN Thermo Mechanical Analyses Jan15 (Zanoni) 10

DQW Pressure Test Analysis Maximum Stress occurs in SS helium jacket and is well within allowable stress limits. Maximum pressure deflection of hook is elastic and negligible ~0.01mm 11

Thank You! Questions?