The benefit of resilience building

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DRM Working Group FAO Rome
Advertisements

Workshop on Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change Adaptation Washington DC, September 2010 An Introduction to Disaster Risk Management Michel Matera,
Current UK and EU Policy on Water Management Thames Tunnel Commission 29/7/11.
AGENDA ITEM 4: FOLLOW-UP ON THE DECISIONS OF THE WORLD METEOROLOGICAL CONGRESS ON THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL BOARD ON CLIMATE SERVICES AGENDA ITEM 4.1: IMPLEMENTATION.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IN DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT Arandjelovac, 5 th June 2015.
Quantifying Disaster Risk and optimizing investment Sujit Mohanty UNISDR – Asia Pacific Protecting development gains: A path towards resilience.
23 rd September 2008 HFA Progress Report Disaster Risk Reduction in South Asia P.G.Dhar Chakrabarti Director SAARC Disaster Management Centre New Delhi.
Key Elements of Legislation For Disaster Risk Reduction Second Meeting of Asian Advisory Group of Parliamentarians for DRR 5-7 February, 2014, Vientiane,
Special Session II Increasing Investment for Disaster Risk Reduction.
9th Dealing with Disasters International Conference (DwD 2015) Health Centered Disaster Risk Reduction: A New Agenda for a New Era Current Progress in.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
Workshop on RISKS AND IMPACTS ON FLOOD FROM EXTREME EVENTS IN ASEAN COUNTRIES Bali, August 5 th 2015.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
New World, New World Bank Group Presentation to Fiduciary Forum On Post Crisis Direction and Reforms March 01, 2010.
What APEC Task Force for Emergency Preparedness (TFEP) has progressed in the implementation of HFA Presented by Vincent Liu Program Director APEC Secretariat.
Yuki Matsuoka The United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction th CEOS Plenary 5 November 2015.
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction ,
Delivering Global Goals in human settlements and city regions by 2030 with data partnerships #roadmap rd May 2016 WMO, Geneva Stephen Passmore Head.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
Teacher’s Professional Development in EU Policy
GFDRR Work Plan April 27, 2016 Luis Tineo
Effects of natural disasters on displaced workers
Presentation title Enhancing synergies towards climate action and sustainable development on the ground GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Da Nang, Vietnam,
Sustainable Development, Resilience & Risk Management
A Presentation to the 2017 GEO Work Programme Symposium,
Recovery and Reconstruction in India: Future Directions
Disaster risk reduction A users perspective from the IFRC
Innovation Development Strategy
Global Libraries – Recommendations for Leaving the Field Strong National Libraries – New Service Solutions CDNL - August 22, 2017 © Bill & Melinda Gates.
Fourth Overall Performance Study
Prime Minister’s Ten-Point Agenda on Disaster Risk Reduction
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
Institutional Strengthening Support
Partners for Resilience in the
Professor Virginia Murray, Public Health England
GFDRR Gender Action Plan
SMEs needs and challenges in a changing disaster context
Disaster Risk Management Knowledge Centre
School Safety in the Post-2015 Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction Toward Sendai and Beyond
Health & Social Care Devolution
LEARNING REPORT 2016 Disasters and Emergencies Preparedness Programme
Launch of the Urban Pathways project
RA II Regional priorities
Presented by Jianping YAN UNDP/ BCPR/ GRIP On behalf of
Low Carbon Development for climate resilient societies
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
Public Health England – Our progress under the Sendai Framework
Impact and the Global Challenges Research Fund
Infrastructure Standards Model
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
14th meeting of Working Group F on Floods
Private sector development and SDGs in Albania
Nepal’s Initiative on Climate Resilient WASH Programming
EXPLORING GLOBAL COOPERATION OPPORTUNITIES
Implementation of SAPCC:
Partnerships and networks
Susan Johnson CFOA Director Performance & Improvement
Gender mainstreaming in environmental
Discussions support slides
Infrastructure Standards Model
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
State of World’s Cash Report:
UNDMTP Presentation, Session V: Early Warning Symposium 24 May 2006
RRI Baseline and Endline
Afghanistan Climate Budgeting Guidelines
Health & Social Care Devolution
Global Platform on Disaster Risk Reduction May 17th 2019
SDGs Learning and Information Platforms:
Presentation transcript:

The benefit of resilience building 21 December 2016 David Nash Z Zurich Foundation

Agenda Why we chose to work with community flood resilience How our program works What we have achieved so far Motivation - why should an insurer (in fact any business) care about resilience building Q&A

Why choose Community Flood Resilience Why Floods: The humanitarian and physical losses from flood, in any year, are more than the losses from all other natural hazards combined Floods are a global issue affecting almost every country Why Communities: Every community is different and experiences flood differently, so solutions will necessarily be different for each one Why Resilience As an insurer we believe that pre-event action to build resilience to a hazard is more effective than post-event Yet 87% of all disaster-related funding is targeted at relief and recovery after an event Zurich’s risk understanding expertise can be used to shift this equation

Theory of Change Our aim is that communities become more resilient in the face of floods. Resilience is defined as the ability of a community to pursue its social, ecological and economic development and growth objectives, while managing its flood risk over time, in a mutually reinforcing way. This means that a greater proportion of disaster-related funding from all sources is directed to pre-event resilience building This requires that stakeholders have the capacity: To know how to engage in resilience building with communities AND To be willing to redirect or prioritise resources towards this To do that, they will need good knowledge about the benefits of taking action and practical evidence of what works Our community program Tests resilience building activities and develops knowledge on what works AND Invests in research, specifically to support development of solutions and to understand the benefits

A cross-sector Alliance Knowledge for action Research and modeling Influence Scientific credibility Case studies Methodologies & tools Catalyze Risk engineering Financial resources Influence and advocacy Global Reach Technical Innovation Community presence Scale and reach Influence and advocacy Small and agile Innovation and ideas piloting Solutions catalogue Innovation & Technical Advice

What are achievements so far? At the Community level: Bangladesh, Indonesia, Mexico, Nepal and Peru: Among the most flood exposed countries in the world. We can transfer insights from these communities, both to the developed and the developing world In Indonesia: Early Warning System with real-time flood warning implemented. Information access through website and SMS. Link to government authorities. Fully endorsed by the government disaster management agency. It benefits 17 million people. Assessing and measuring flood risk is key to identify the right solutions. Currently no validated approach to measure what makes a community resilient. We created our own Flood Resilience Measurement Tool now being tested in 8 different countries including the US. At the Community level: We work in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Mexico, Nepal and Peru as they are among the most flood exposed countries in the world. We believe that we can transfer insights from working in these communities to other places, both in the developed and the developing world. In Indonesia, we have implemented an Early Warning System that provides real time flood warning with an hourly prediction. It can also provide rain fall/flood prediction for next 5 years. Information is accessed through a website and SMS. The system is linked with government river authority, ministry of information and communications and is fully endorsed by the government disaster management agency. It currently benefits 17 million people. Assessing and measuring flood risk is key to identify the right solutions but as part of our work we discovered that there is no validated approach to measure what makes a community resilient to floods so we created our own Flood Resilience Measurement Tool (see appendix for methodology). The tools is now being tested in 8 different countries including the US.

What are achievements so far? At a Research level: IIASA and Wharton provide new insights into flood risk management and test hypothesis that risk reduction is better than relief and recovery. Review of cost-benefit studies: every dollar spent on risk reduction measures saves 5 dollars through avoided and reduced losses. Insights why people do not protect themselves from flood risk even if protection measures are available: People have a false sense of security. They may overestimate the likelihood of a flood, but underestimate the losses. Zurich-developed forensic post-event review methodology (PERC) that analyzes large flood events. 9 major floods reviewed. Findings are cross-cutting, irrespective of their geographical or development context. We use the insights gathered through research and PERC to improve services to our customers and our in-house expertise in RE and UWR through trainings, workshops and communication. At a Research level: The research partnership with IIASA and Wharton provides new insights into flood risk management but also tests our hypothesis that risk reduction is better than relief and recovery Through a review of a large number of cost-benefit studies, IIASA has proven that for every dollar spent on selected flood risk reduction measures, an average of five dollars is saved through avoided and reduced losses. Wharton has provided insights into why people do not protect themselves from flood risk even if protection measures are available. If government funds are always made available after a disaster, it leads people to have a false sense of security. They also often overestimate the likelihood of a flood, but underestimate the losses they will face if a flood affects them. We have developed a forensic post-event review methodology (PERC) that analyzes large flood events after the fact to understand what works and what does not and which patterns emerge. We have conducted studies of 9 major floods during the past three years and findings are very similar, irrespective of their geographical or development context. We use the insights gathered through research and PERC to improve services to our customers and our in-house expertise in RE and UWR through trainings, workshops and documentation.

What are some achievements so far? At a Public Policy Level: We support national, regional and global public policy discussions on flood risk and resilience. We want to improve national flood insurance arrangements longer term. In 2016, co-organized a Forum on the Financial Management of Flood Risks with OECD. The forum gathered over 100 regulators, insurers and academics, and positioned Zurich as the go-to insurer for insights on flood risk and resilience. In 2015, North America CEO participated in a White House meeting on climate resilience and extreme weather events. He presented our approach to measuring resilience which led to further meetings regarding the role the insurance sector can play. We are engaging with the European Commission (EC) Working Group on Climate Action (DG CLIMA), with the EC Working Group on Floods and the Rhine Commission At a Country Level: Flood resilience is a focus topic for Zurich Switzerland. In 2015, they launched a Natural Hazards Radar which is a publicly available tool for a property flood hazard and risk assessment in Switzerland including a set of recommendations how to manage risks.

Collaboration Success Development of a framework to understand what provides resilience to floods at a community level Based around the idea that the way in which a community builds, uses and maintains its assets (the 5 capitals of the sustainable livelihoods framework) creates aspects of resilience Creation of a measurement tool to measure changes in these capitals over time Testing across communities in 8 countries to provide evidence that building capitals results in better resilience outcomes Providing analysis of community data to help with solution finding

What motivates Zurich’s involvement? Challenge for any business is relevance to community Insurance is a risk-transfer tool, but only effective at the tail end In many places, insurance is simply not a priority spend By building resilience, communities manage risk and build prosperity This creates relevance for insurance and opens new markets

Thank you zurich.com