Orientation for New Site Visitors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Orientation for New Site Visitors Site Visitor Responsibilities, Expenses, and Training.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
HOUSTON EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (HEAR) INTERIM APPLICATION ORIENTATION FOR TRAINERS & HEAR ADMINISTRATORS For more information, visit
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Illinois Educator Code of Ethics Training
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
A Snapshot of TEQSA Dr Carol Nicoll Chief Commissioner Festival of Learning and Teaching University of Adelaide Tuesday 6 November 2012.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
An Overview of the Accreditation Process and Important Policies Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation, Stacy Wright, Site Visit.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
An Introduction to the HR Management Standards for Nonprofits Module 5 Training Learning and Development Please open this link at the beginning of class.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
ADEPT Framework
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Standards for Supported Employment Wednesday 09 November 2005 NIUSE Facilitators:- Teresa Hazzard & Heather Logan.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING PRESENTATION ON THE APP AND BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2016/ th APRIL 2016.
ACUI TRAINING Core Competency Module. Purpose Overview of the 11 core competencies Introduction to the resources offered by ACUI regarding the core competencies.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Team Member Briefing The Middle States Association Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools.
The Association for Challenge Course Technology
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Blueprint for a Stronger Club
GETTING INVOLVED: VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES AT CAEP
University Career Services Committee
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Overview of MAAP Accreditation
Accreditation Canada Medicine Accreditation 2016.
Curriculum and Accreditation
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
National Health Corps: A Case Study for Training as a Driver for Member Engagement Sara Wein, MSS, MLSP, LSW Caitlin Hoge, MPS Jennifer Larramore, MPH.
An Overview of the Minnesota Afterschool Accreditation Program (MAAP)
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Be an Effective Council Member
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Accreditation and curriculum
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
University Community Briefing
Ethics as Culture key elements
NATSPEC Governor Seminars 2009
Overview of accjc stanard IV
World’s Largest Educational Community
Outcomes Training.
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Development of Internal Quality Assurance and its Challenges in Taiwan Higher Education from University and Students’ Perspectives Angela Yung Chi Hou.
Ethics as Culture key elements
Presentation transcript:

Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review

Introduction This presentation addresses CIDA’s mission, values, and the guiding principles of peer review. Before participating in a site visit, you should review the training presentations on CIDA’s website, the Site Visitor Handbook, and attend an in-person training workshop.

CIDA’s Mission The Council for Interior Design Accreditation provides the foundation for future excellence in the interior design profession by setting standards for education and accrediting academic programs that meet those standards.

Value of CIDA Accreditation is a quality assurance process that replaces government regulation of higher education. Accreditation is a process that includes program self-evaluation and peer review. CIDA is a specialized (discipline-specific) accreditor. CIDA accredits interior design programs that culminate in a minimum of a bachelor’s degree.

Value of CIDA Accreditation promotes the achievement of high academic standards Accreditation makes education responsive to students and society by maintaining standards that accurately reflect the evolving requirements of the profession.

Value of CIDA CIDA ensures quality in interior design education by: Setting standards for postsecondary interior design education. Evaluating and accrediting interior design programs at colleges and universities. Facilitating outreach and collaboration with all stakeholders in the interior design community.

Value of CIDA Setting Standards: A core responsibility of CIDA is to set and periodically update standards for interior design education. CIDA exercises a well-established protocol in developing educational standards. CIDA’s Standards Committee stewards the standard-setting process.

Value of CIDA Evaluating and accrediting interior design programs: The accreditation process includes program self-study and an on-site review conducted by CIDA site visitors. CIDA’s Accreditation Commission (composed of 5 experienced site visitors, 1 accredited program representative, and 1 public representative) decides to grant or deny accreditation depending on a program’s level of compliance with the Standards.

Value of CIDA Facilitating outreach: CIDA consistently communicates with all relevant stakeholders in the interior design community. This communication guides CIDA’s outreach efforts and actions. These efforts and actions utilize brainstorming, teamwork, and consensus-building to address issues and concerns in the interior design community.

Value of CIDA Examples of CIDA outreach efforts include: Interior Design Profession’s Body of Knowledge, 2005 and 2009 Updates, joint sponsorship with 5 other design associations. Careers in Interior Design Website – www.careersininteriordesign.com Video competitions hosted by IDEC, CIDA, NCIDQ, and other partners if appropriate

Value of CIDA As a site visitor, you will assist CIDA in serving: Academic programs Parents and students The interior design profession

Value of CIDA CIDA serves academic programs by: Facilitating self-assessment and development by requiring programs to complete a self-study process. Acting as a strong marketing tool and helping programs fulfill enrollment goals.

Value of CIDA CIDA serves student and parents by: Assisting them in selecting the right school by serving as a strong indicator of program quality. Providing an objective third-party assessment of programs.

Value of CIDA CIDA serves the profession by: Assuring potential employers and clients that interns and potential employees with CIDA-accredited degrees have received an education that meets specific standards of competency. Serving interior design professional organizations’ commitment to enhancing and strengthening education and the profession.

Guiding Principles of Peer Review Site visitors serve as ambassadors of CIDA by promoting understanding of it’s mission and work in the interior design community. Site visitors are drawn from interior design practice and education. Site visitors participate in the peer review process by gathering evidence and making informed decisions regarding program compliance using CIDA’s Professional Standards for evaluation.

Guiding Principles of Peer Review The goal of peer review is to evaluate a program’s compliance with CIDA Standards and to document the evaluation clearly in a written report. You must always use unbiased judgment when determining program compliance. Following good practices for peer review will help you perform well in the role of site visitor. Examples of these practices are outlined in the following slides.

Guiding Principles of Peer Review Always use your background and experience to make informed judgments regarding program quality. CIDA visiting teams consist of three members, each team includes at least one educator and one practitioner. CIDA site visitors are experts who come together to evaluate the quality of an interior design program.

Guiding Principles of Peer Review The visiting team must focus only on criteria included in CIDA’s Standards for evaluation. The visiting team’s evaluation must not be excessively influenced by one team member’s area of expertise or ideas regarding the necessary requirements for practice.

Guiding Principles of Peer Review Accreditation uses threshold standards as a measure of quality – CIDA accreditation status makes no distinction between programs that meet standards and those that exceed standards. Not all programs will exceed CIDA Standards. When reviewing a program, be objective. Comparisons to other programs are strictly prohibited.

Guiding Principles of Peer Review As a site visitor, you must observe appropriate protocols. Professional courtesy sets the stage for respectful dialogue between site visitors, program representatives, and others engaged in the review process.

Follow-up Thank you for reviewing the Peer Review presentation. Please complete a brief quiz using the link below: http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/WEB22CLNQSHDBJ/ This quiz will take approximately 10 minutes. CIDA staff will review your responses and forward you the results.