Lesson 9 Production and Deployment (P&D) Exercise Team #

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Common Process for Developing Briefings for Major Decision Points” INSTRUCTIONS Provide Feedback via to: Lois Harper PEO C4I and Space
Advertisements

Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum (CBDAIF)
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
Process Modeling CS 4320 Fall Process Difficulties SW not a production line Each project is different—even within the same company No universally.
Configuration Management Non Government Std: EIA Standard-649 “A management process for establishing and maintaining consistency of a product’s performance,
Government Procurement Simulation (GPSim) Overview.
Peg Johnson, Owner EVMS-Solutions 1 Peg Johnson
Life Cycle Logistics.
Software Life Cycle The software life cycle is the sequence of activities that occur during software development and maintenance.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
System Integration Exit Criteria Issues Resolved or Addressed Preliminary Design Review/Critical Design Review, Audits Initiate Design Readiness Review.
PEO C4I and SPACE FULL-RATE PRODUCTION REVIEW TIMELINE
Business, Cost Estimating & Financial Management Considerations
Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design
Contracting (Product) Considerations
Session 2 Dr. Dan C. Surber, ESEP
Supportability Design Considerations
System Engineering Considerations (See Chapters 3 and 9)
Life Cycle Logistics.
JTAMS PRE-CDR IT/SIS ANALYSIS
Key Management Issues for Software Reviews
MNS - Mission need statement
Lesson Objectives Assess the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone B to Initial Operational Capability.
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Lesson 5 Materiel Solution Analysis (MSA) Exercise Team#
SE Review Lesson 01 Systems engineering can also be viewed as a “V”
Production Considerations
Lesson 9 Production and Deployment (P&D) Exercise Team #
JTAMS PRE-CDR IT/SIS ANALYSIS
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
AMRU Release 2 Release Report
DAG CH 3 Figure 11: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Lesson 10 Operations and Support (O&S) Exercise Team #
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
JTAMS PRE-MILESTONE B ANALYSIS
Milestone B to Full Operational Capability (FOC) Requirements Management Activities RQM-310, December 2016.
Lesson 6 Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction Exercise Team #
Test and Evaluation Considerations
Lesson 4 Systems Engineering Plan Exercise Team #
DAG CH 3 Figure 17: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 23: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Lesson 6 Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction Exercise Team #
JTAMS PRE-MILESTONE B ANALYSIS
INCOSE – North Texas Chapter
CBA ICD CDD CDD CPD MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA AoA RVA RVA RVA
DAG CH 3 Figure 13: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
CMGT 445 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CMGT 445 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
CMGT 445 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com.
DAG CH 3 Figure 19: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Product Support Considerations
DAG CH 3 Figure 18: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
International Acquisition and Exportability (IA&E) Considerations
DAG CH 3 Figure 28: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
AOFR: Assessment of Operational Field Readiness
DAG CH 3 Figure 15: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
8 Tech Processes Drive Acquisition
Some Practical Considerations for Systems Engineers in a Lean-Agile Airborne Weapons System Program June 12, 2018 Ken Garlington.
CS/EE/ME 75(a) Nov. 19, 2018 Today: Prelimnary Design Review Homework.
The Department of Defense Acquisition Process
Systems Engineering Technical Debt Workshop Outbrief
DAG CH 3 Figure 21: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 27: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 22: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 25: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Presentation transcript:

Lesson 9 Production and Deployment (P&D) Exercise Team #

Scenario 1: Battery Failures in Production Root Cause Analysis Findings Provide Results of Root Cause Analysis

Scenario 2: CM Challenges Tasks Each team answer the following question(s) assigned (delete other team’s questions accordingly for briefing): Team 1. What CM issues are likely to occur because the Bull Dog is in Production and Deployment and the Firebird is in Operations and Support? What could you do as the Configurations Manager to improve the situation?   Team 2. The processing of ECPs has been a serial process between the PMOs. When agreement between Program Offices is obtained, the ECP is formalized and presented to the originating contractor for contract modification. The time to process ECPs has been extensive and costly. What could you do as the PEO SE to improve the situation? How would you manage changes to the interfaces? Team 3. The Bull Dog video interface installs were contracted to be done to the deployed units during their first scheduled depot overhaul period. Unfortunately, the world situation changed and the Bull Dog units were kept overseas causing gaps in the overhaul schedule. What could you do as the SE to improve the situation?

Scenario 2: CM Challenges Tasks (cont’d)   Team 4. When the first Bull Dog units arrived at the depot overhaul facility, it was realized that these units did not match the current Technical Data Package. What could you do as the PEO SE to improve the situation? Team 5. When the Bull Dog System successfully completed OT&E, the Program SE scheduled the Physical Configuration Audit (PCA). Explain the importance of the PCA to the Configurations Manager and Program SE. Identify some common problems associated with this event? Team 6. When the Bull Dog System successfully completed OT&E, the Program SE scheduled the Physical Configuration Audit (PCA). During the PCA it was discovered that the Bull Dog Production Unit did not match the drawing package provided by the contractor. What could you do as the SE for the Bull Dog PMO to rectify the situation?

Scenario 3: Software Upgrade During Production Task All teams: Explain how you would integrate the software into the Bull Dog design. Define a timeline for integrating the software into the Bull Dog. Adapt the provided schedule template as shown on the following slide; Assume FY5 Q1 starting point. Note: As detailed in the CDD, FOC consists of 500 Bull Dog UGVs, one control station per five Bull Dog UGVs, and associated support infrastructure (training, maintenance, and logistics).

Software Upgrade Template (Move/Add/Subtract icons- as required) FY5 FY6 FY7 FY8 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Bull Dog Increment #1 Milestones & Phases SW Rapid Acq. Milestones & Phases Builds/Spirals Testing Hdwr Test Articles Reviews Funding NOW FRP Increment #1 IOC FRP FOC IOC MDD EOA OA DT&E IOT&E Builds/Spirals Production FRP Prototypes SRR PDR SFR TRR SVR PRR CDR RDT&E Procurement

Reviews/Audits/Activities What do these P&D reviews/audits/activities validate and/or produce? What entrance/exit criteria would you propose for these Bull Dog reviews/audits/activities? Team #1 Team #2 Team #3 Team #4 Team #5 Team #6 LRIP X IOT&E PCA FRP Decision IOC FOC

Technical Management Processes 5. Relate the following Technical Management Processes to what you do at work (Briefer pick one). Decision Analysis Technical Planning Technical Assessment Requirements Management Risk Management Configuration Management Data Management Interface Management Note: You must relate the above processes to your work tasks. Keep your answers top level. You do not have to tie your answers into this lesson exercise.