Michael Kelly, Ed. D. John Gratto, Ed. D. Virginia Tech

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Advertisements

CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Teachers Know Their Content And Teach Effectively: CAEP Standard 1 Stevie Chepko,
Change Initiative Common Curriculum Review. Change Initiative Portfolio
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
What is the Curriculum/Program Development Process? What leadership will you offer? How does it work in your organization? Share with your group…..
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
 K-12 Principal Internship and Competency Summary Aaron Freed K-12 Principal Licensure Candidate Bethel University.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Enhanced Assessment Grant: English Language Proficiency Assessment.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Grandview High School March 9-10, 2009.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education CAS Standards and Self- Assessment in Higher Education Tony Ellis, CAE Director of Education,
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 5: Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville,
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Recognizing Quality School Systems Billy K. Floyd, Director Mary Ann Keeley, Director Richard Parkins, Assoc. Director Southeast Region Northeast Region.
Huntsville City Schools AdvancEd Survey District Accreditation Cathy C. McNeal, Ed.D. January 8, 2013.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Michael Kelly, Ed. D. Virginia Tech
Presented by Deborah Eldridge, CAEP Consultant
Eastern’s Assessment System
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Partnership for Practice
Using survey data for continuous improvement
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
MUHC Innovation Model.
District Accreditation
Elayne Colón and Tom Dana
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
Tony Kirchner Developing a Quality Assurance Plan with the Teacher Work Sample as the Linchpin Tony Kirchner
Standard 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity
April 17, 2018 Gary Railsback, Vice President What’s new at CAEP.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Diocese of Baton Rouge Catholic Schools
Leadership for Standards-Based Education
Theory into Practice: On-site Expectations for the Administrative Internship Candidate Selection.
Assessing Students with Special Needs
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Standard Four Program Impact
EDA: Educator Disposition Assessment
Roles and Responsibilities
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
February 21-22, 2018.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Roles and Responsibilities
Colorado Department of Education
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Curriculum and Programs
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Michael Kelly, Ed. D. John Gratto, Ed. D. Virginia Tech Developing a Survey to Determine Student Perceptions of Readiness at the Beginning of an Educational Leadership Program Michael Kelly, Ed. D. John Gratto, Ed. D. Virginia Tech

Introduction Reason for the study Program information Council for the Accreditation of Educator Programs (CAEP)

CAEP-Advancing Excellence in Educator Prep Programs Three CAEP standards buttress the importance of this study. Pertinent CAEP “Advanced Program Components” are as follows: Satisfaction of Completers 4.4: The provider demonstrates, using measures that result in valid and reliable data, that advanced program completers perceive their preparation as relevant to the responsibilities they confront on the job, and that the preparation was effective. Quality and Strategic Evaluation 5.1: The provider’s quality assurance system is comprised of multiple measures that can monitor advanced program candidate progress, advanced completer achievements, and provider operational effectiveness. Evidence demonstrates that the provider satisfies all CAEP standards. Continuous Improvement 5.3: The provider regularly and systematically assesses performance against its goals and relevant standards, tracks results over time, tests innovations and the effects of selection criteria on subsequent progress and completion, and uses results to improve program elements and processes (CAEP, 2015).

Literature Review Current literature Orr & Orphanos (2011) Stanford Educational Leadership Institute Baker University

Literature Review Accreditation Agencies CAEP UCEA ISLLC/ELCC

Literature Review State Standards Florida California Connecticut

Methodology Instrument Population Internship objectives Likert scale Sections (6) Population Locations Students

Sample Survey Question

Methodology Validity Reliability Data collection and analysis Faculty review Panel of experts Reliability Cronbach’s Alpha Section then whole Data collection and analysis

Survey Questions Knowledge of leadership and change functions The various methods of communication our school uses to communicate with the various constituent groups. The various ways my school collaborates with community agencies. How to develop and implement a school improvement plan that meets the needs of a school. How to effectively disaggregate SOL scores to identify areas of need for a school.

Case Processing Summary Findings Knowledge of leadership and change functions Case Processing Summary   N % Cases Valid 48 94.1 Excludeda 3 5.9 Total 51 100.0 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .632 4

Survey Questions Knowledge of curriculum and instructional supervision The process used by the school system to develop curriculum, pacing charts, and scope and sequence guides. The process used by the school system to adopt textbooks and other instructional materials. The instructional technology needs of the faculty and district or school staff. The process of how to develop a master schedule in a school.

Case Processing Summary Findings Knowledge of curriculum and instructional supervision Case Processing Summary   N % Cases Valid 48 94.1 Excludeda 3 5.9 Total 51 100.0 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .872 4

Survey Questions Knowledge of student services The process my school system uses for identifying and providing services for students with disabilities. The policies and procedures required for meeting the needs of students identified under the Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The process my school uses to identify students considered at-risk. The process an administrator must follow when handling student discipline situations.

Case Processing Summary Findings Knowledge of student services Case Processing Summary   N % Cases Valid 48 94.1 Excludeda 3 5.9 Total 51 100.0 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .804 4

Survey Questions Knowledge of school system operations My school system's accounting procedures, the monthly financial statements, and the annual financial audit. The budget process and timeline used by the central office each year to develop the school system budget. The budget process and timeline used by my principal each year to develop the school budget. The requirements for conducting emergency drills in our school system.

Case Processing Summary Findings Knowledge of school system operations Case Processing Summary   N % Cases Valid 48 94.1 Excludeda 3 5.9 Total 51 100.0 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .850 4

Survey Questions Knowledge of school board policies The process used to develop a school board policy. The school board’s policy and regulations regarding professional ethics and diversity. The crisis intervention plan for my school. The school system's policy for "bring your own device" (BYOD) related to students.

Case Processing Summary Findings Knowledge of school board policies Case Processing Summary   N % Cases Valid 48 94.1 Excludeda 3 5.9 Total 51 100.0 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .896 4

Survey Questions Knowledge of human resource functions How to implement a professional development plan in a school. The process administrators must go through to conduct teacher observations in my school system. The process a principal must undergo to place a staff member on a plan of action for improvement. The process an administrator must follow to screen, interview and hire new faculty and staff members.

Case Processing Summary Findings Knowledge of human resource functions Case Processing Summary   N % Cases Valid 48 94.1 Excludeda 3 5.9 Total 51 100.0 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .627 4

Case Processing Summary Findings Reliability of complete survey instrument Case Processing Summary   N % Cases Valid 48 94.1 Excludeda 3 5.9 Total 51 100.0 Cronbach's Alpha N of Items .927 24

Conclusions and Future Study Validity Reliability Future Study Low n value Qualitative study of faculty implementation Study upon program completion

Questions and Close Michael Kelly, Ed. D. michk66@vt.edu John Gratto, Ed. D. john1112@vt.edu