A look at librarians teaching credit-bearing courses

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
READINESS CRITERIA What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready? Which courses are readyi.e., are good candidates.
Advertisements

Rich Veit Judy Nye Laura Jannone. Why a New First-Year Seminar First-year seminars are offered at more than 95% of American colleges and universities.
Service-Learning in the STEM Disciplines CIRTL-Cast: Feb. 19, 2013 Dr. Anna Karls, Dr. Paul Matthews – University of Georgia.
The Nuts and Bolts of Aligning Service-Learning with Content Standards Presented by Lisa Guilfoile Education Commission of the States Lori Gonzalez and.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
The Value of Academic Libraries Initiative: A Briefing, A Discussion, and An Opportunity for Engagement Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe & Mary Ellen Davis 9 th.
Assurance of Learning The School of Business and Economics SUNY Plattsburgh.
Faculty Instructional Support Moving beyond putting courses online to curriculum redesign Leila Lyons, University of Delaware.
Information Literacy Tutorial for the First Time in College Student St. Philip’s College LRC San Antonio, Texas Dr. Adele S. Dendy, Dean of Learning Resources.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 Results Online and Blended Learning Views of Ohio’s K-12 Students, Parents, Teachers and Administrators.
Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
Julie Evans, Project Tomorrow CEO Speak Up 2012 National Findings June 26, 2013 Speak Up Findings & Trends: Informing the changing role of educators 9.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Fill Em’ Up Austin Graham. Service-Learning Service-learning is a method of teaching, learning and reflecting, frequently youth service, throughout the.
Building Collaborative Initiatives that Enhance Student Learning Nancy Mitchell and Linda Major.
Faculty Handbook The Faculty Handbook states that the normal full-time teaching load is 15 credits per term, including 12 credits of assigned courses and.
Mapping Through the Maze Status of Information Literacy on WeTALC Campuses.
Preceptor Orientation
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
Advising to Make the Grade FYE Assignments that Benefit Students and Advisers Veronica Giguere Florida Institute of Technology.
Slides from a workshop at the annual conference of the American Theological Library Association, New Orleans, June 2014 TD Lincoln.
Different approaches and experiences at the University of Parma (Italy) Embedding information literacy into subject learning Fabrizia Bevilacqua Monica.
Craig Rutan, Curriculum and Instruction Council Chair 2013 Fall Academic Senate Retreat.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
San Joaquin Delta College Flex Calendar Program General Flex at Delta Types of Activities Administration of Program Process Filling Out the Flex Contract.
ARE STUDENTS LEARNING WHAT WE SAY THEY ARE? THE IMPORTANCE AND PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE PROGRAM REVIEWS IN THE BUSINESS CURRICULUM Presented by:
Standards-Based Education
University of Southern Mississippi Hattiesburg, MS NCAT Course Redesign Introduction to Psychology David J Echevarria
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
Faculty Instructional Support Moving beyond putting courses online to curriculum redesign.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Competencies and standards for Principal Preparation
ACA Intermediate March 23, 2017
Instructional Design Groundwork:
Missouri State University
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Paulina Liżewska Paweł Kamiński
Becoming an Online Teacher
Curriculum and Emotions – Solving Problems and Managing Conflict
Instructional Coaching Samir Omara RELO-NileTESOL Trainer s. m
School Library Services 21
SUNY Applied Learning Resolution.
Effective Instructional and Accommodative Practices
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
New Student Experience
Completion of Educational Pathways
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
Proposed Policy on Undergraduate Certificates
Analyzing Student Work
New Teacher Induction Workshop
Annie Bélanger September 2016
Sit by institution or program size Self-define small, medium, or large
Sue McPherson: Project Lead Katharine Cox: Head of English
Accessibility Updates
Student Learning Outcome Assessment Plan
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
First-year seminar.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
New Faculty Orientation
Trying to get the Horse in Front of the Buggy
Articulation Manual Faculty Senate Presentation
Curriculum and Distance Education
Navigating Institutional Improvement and Accreditation
The Washburn University Diversity Climate Survey Results
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
General Studies ePortfolio Pilot
Presentation transcript:

A look at librarians teaching credit-bearing courses Give Us Some Credit A look at librarians teaching credit-bearing courses Dr. Monty L. McAdoo Edinboro University of PA July 25, 2017

Today’s presentation Part I: Introduction Part II: Development Part III: Reflection and Review

Part 1 Introduction

Background EUP 1 of 14 PASSHE institutions 2016: 4,840 UG; 1,341 G 341 faculty Library 15-20 work-study, 12 staff, 7.5 librarians Me Librarian since 1994, PASSHE 1996, EUP 1999 Research and instruction UWCC COUN794

How many students… can articulate what a librarian does? can tell the difference between a staff member and a librarian? know two or more librarians by name? never participate in traditional library user education? do not value and/or benefit from traditional library user education?

As a librarian, do you… believe you have valuable knowledge or skills to share with students? believe the library should be/is the academic hub of your institution? believe you – individually or collectively – could contribute more? want to find ways to add relevance to your department/library?

As a profession, librarians… Perceive our work as inherently valuable Often lack a communicable context for the work that we do Risk marginalization Experience ongoing questions about “faculty status” and our 9-month contract

The journey begins…

Opportunities Greater depth and exposure Truly embedded Showcase expertise Revitalize self and department Draw positive attention to department Better understand faculty/student needs Add weight to “faculty” status Curricular needs

Department Meeting Fall, 2011 Stepping In Slam dunk Confident Focused Energized Showcase our skills and insights Positive step Stepping Out Being slammed Uncertain Confused Frustrated “Librarians don’t teach!” Watch your step

Timeline Fall, 2011 2/3/12 2/9/12 4/11/12 4/12/12 4/16/12 Spring, 2014, Fall, 2014, Spring, 2017 Initial idea proposed Fac. mtg;  ballot 7-2 Signed by Chair and AVPUL UWCC approval Signed by Provost Signed by President Taught three times

Part I: Introduction Challenges

Personal Challenges Expertise Motivation Resources Process Coordination

Workload Challenges Who will teach? How many sections how often? Translating workload hours Victim of our own success Reassignment of responsibilities Position realignment

Colleague Challenges Why do you want to teach? Credits won’t go anywhere. Will we be expected to teach as well? What makes you qualified to teach? Librarians don’t teach. If you want to teach, why don’t you go to a different department?

Departmental Challenges Articulating process Determining workload equivalency New or existing contract? Who pays? Ambiguous administrative milieu

Institutional Challenges What is your product? Perception of “remediation”

Contractual Challenges What does “faculty” mean? Teaching vs. non-teaching vs. mixed status Part-time/adjunct in another department

Curricular Challenges What is the process? Where will credits go? LIBR prefix vs. other department’s Online or F2F?

Part II DEVELOPMENT

LIBR106: Information Ethics

Self-Assessment Who? What? Where? When? Why? How?

Identify Your Curricular Niche Avoid “dead credits” Address curricular “bottleneck” Identify curricular opportunities Avoid “remediation”

General Considerations “Specialized” vs. “normal” course Departmental assignation Alignment with curriculum structure Curricular approval process/timeframe Online or face-to-face? Developing awareness

Teaching Time, time, and more time Generating course materials Grading Student follow-up Participation Revision

Assessment Content Official Self-developed “Feel good” caveat

Part III REFLECTIONS AND REVIEW

Successes Interaction with students is invigorating Interaction with students is frustrating Sense of accomplishment/pride A right to be happy

Challenges Feeling compromised Grading Authorization Non-Honors Writing co-requisite

Opportunities Precedent set Curricular viability Publishing opportunity

Thank you! Dr. Monty L. McAdoo Research and Instruction Librarian Baron-Forness Library Edinboro University of PA Edinboro, PA 16444 mmcadoo@edinboro.edu 814-732-1070