Value of Sequencing-Guided Treatment for Patients with

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management of Drug Formulary Dimitry Gotlinsky Western University Managed Care Clerkship ProPharma Pharmaceutical Consultants, Inc. 06/16/06.
Advertisements

Clinical Implementation of Genomic Cancer Medicine
Expression profiles for prognosis and prediction Laura J. Van ‘t Veer The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
Personalized Medicine
Cancer Clinical Trials:
Precision Medicine: From stratified therapies to personalized therapies Fabrice ANDRE Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif, France.
Round-Robin Review of HER2 Testing in the Context of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer (NCCTG N9831/BCIRG006/BCIRG005) 1 Concordance of HER2 Central Assessment.
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
Description of fracture with endocrine therapy use in older breast cancer survivors in a population-based setting Taryn Becker 123, Geoff Anderson 123,
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Choice of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Eng C1, Rogers J2, Chang GJ3, You N3, Das P4, Rodriguez-Bigas.
Precision Medicine A New Initiative. The Concept of Precision Medicine (PM) The prevention and treatment strategies that take individual variability into.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
CANCER IN THE WORKPLACE: HOW EMPLOYERS CAN HELP Lynn Zonakis Principal, The Zonakis Group LLC October 23, 2015.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
Jens Jakob 1 ; Anna Simeonova 2 ; Bernd Kasper 3 ; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch 1 ; Frederik Wenz 2 ; Peter Hohenberger 1 1 Department of Surgery, 2 Department.
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
INTERPRETING GENETIC MUTATIONAL DATA FOR CLINICAL ONCOLOGY Ben Ho Park, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Oncology Johns Hopkins University May 2014.
Responses to Subsequent Anti-HER2 Therapy After Treatment with Trastuzumab-DM1 in Women with HER2- Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 A Phase Ib/II Trial.
A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast.
Facilitating tissue collection for translational research Jane Rogan Business Manager.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
[NAME CCG] [DATE] [FACILITATOR] Early Diagnosis of Cancer Quality Improvement using Cancer Significant Event Analysis [CCG MAP]
Shubhangi Arora1; Eden Haverfield2; Gabriele Richard2; Susanne B
Rheumatology Mastery in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Challenges for the treatment of breast cancer
Precision Medicine: The Potential for Identifying Personalized Therapies for Patients with Gastro-Esophageal Cancer.
HEALTH ECONOMICS BASICS
Hypertension November 2016
Table 1: Patient Demographics
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Fig 1A. Patient enrollment flow chart
HER2 and estrogen receptor status drive decisions regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy Neil Love, MD1, Kimberly L Blackwell, MD2, Eleftherios.
MUHC Innovation Model.
Implementation of Project: Nursing Role/Responsibilities:
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
National and International Efforts worth knowing about
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Response to chemotherapy
Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative Joint Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends.
Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation
S1400 OVERVIEW / BACKGROUND
Innovative Approaches to Clinical Trials
Ospedale Misericordia, Grosseto
SAMPLE – Preliminary Results
Tania Tillett Royal United Hospital
Progression After Cancer Immunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC
Aligning Patients and Clinicians: Optimizing Outcomes in Metastatic NSCLC.
Applying Genomics to Daily Clinical Practice Current Status and Major Challenges Michael Seiden M.D. Ph.D.
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
DKTK MASTER is an example of whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing-based precision oncology programme. DKTK MASTER is an example of whole-exome and.
Chapter 3 Treatment guidelines for NSCLC that does not have targetable driver mutations.
Treatment Overview: The Multidisciplinary Team
Introduction To Medical Technology
Breast Cancer.
Valencia, España SESION CONTROVERSIAS ¿Es necesario modificar el desarrollo clínico de los nuevos fármacos? COMENTARIOS Y DISCUSION Andres.
TCGA Clinical Data Analysis of Sources of Error Mary E. Edgerton, MD, PhD Department of Pathology UT MD Anderson Cancer Center October 7, 2010.
Moving the Goal Post: Multidisciplinary Management of Advanced NSCLC
Response to Carfilzomib Therapy
Precision Medicine A New Era Hazem Assi American University of Beirut
Martin M et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-7.
PROSTATE CANCER CIRCULATING BIOMARKER CONSENSUS STATEMENT QUESTIONS
This program will include a discussion of off-label treatment and investigational agents not approved by the FDA for use in the United States, and data.
MX39795 Study Design Category 1 R 3:1 Category 2 Inclusion criteria
Hypertension November 2016
Jennifer Gauvin, Group Head and Director
Interview Timeframes Conduct a minimum of 2 interviews: 1st interview
THE LANCET Oncology Volume 19, No. 1, p27–39, January 2018
Opening remarks Welcome to CUP 2019: Cancer of Unknown Primary in the Era of Precision Medicine Focus: Contemporary Clinical Management and International.
Genomic determinants of response to cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Presentation transcript:

Value of Sequencing-Guided Treatment for Patients with Advanced Malignancies Abstract # 165624 C Williams1, B Goldberg2, K Williams1, P De1, L Rojas1, D Starks1, N Dey1, J Klein1, R Elsey1, A McMillan1, B Xu, P Ye1, B Solomon1, A Krie1, B Leyland-Jones1 1Avera Center for Precision Oncology, Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD 2Center for Medicine in the Public Interest, New York, NY BACKGROUND RESULTS RESULTS RESULTS Current approaches in the treatment of advanced cancer are based predominantly upon lessons learned from the cytotoxic era. Our current approaches have yielded incremental steps forward, but most patients who develop metastatic disease still die and the costs of care are soaring Rational combination approaches that are selected based upon computational analysis of multi-platform molecular data, tailored for each patient based upon their past medical history, performance status and unique molecular profile, and curated to prevent the development of resistance represent a possible solution that warrants further exploration The optimal treatment strategy for patients with advanced breast or ovarian cancer is currently unknown. Resistance to standard therapies like anthracyclines and taxanes limit the number of treatment options in many patients to a small number of non-cross-resistant regimens We hypothesized that genomic and proteomic profiling of samples from advanced patients would identify genomic alterations that are linked to targeted therapies, and that this could facilitate a personalized approach to therapy for our patients 100 Evaluable patients Over 60% of patients were able to receive full recommended therapy Average lines of previous therapy was over 3 Table 1. Best Response Rate for Fully Evaluable Patients Full (n =61) Partial (n =12) None (n = 27) CR 20% 8% PR 35% 42% - SD 39% 25% 24% PD 6% 68% CBR 94% 75% 32% DISCUSSION Molecular profiling patients with advanced breast or ovarian cancer has yielded actionable targets in a majority of cases Presently, we are predominantly using FDA approved drugs in combinations based upon the molecular and proteomic information and seeking insurance approval for the treatment Biggest challenge has been working with insurance companies to grant approval for off-label treatments/combinations Our remarkable initial data provides very strong evidence that it is critical to incorporate multi-platform profiling as early as possible (preferably at diagnosis) in the disease course to allow for the best chance of benefit Off-label drug use in a variety of combinations can be utilized safely and effectively in a community cancer center and make a significant impact in patient outcomes METHODS Single center analysis of 150 advanced breast or ovarian cancer patients seen over a 24 month period (May 2014 through April 2016) Most patients were re-biopsied after consultation with the genomic oncology service Most tissue samples were sent for FoundationOne© and/or TheraLink© (proteomics) and blood samples were sent for Guardant360© starting in the summer of 2015 All metastatic biopsies were obtained at same center (Avera Cancer Institute) and same protocol was used for all samples Routine pathology was completed predominantly at Avera, including IHC and FISH for HER2 if applicable All FFPE samples sent to Foundation Medicine and Theranostics were obtained and processed based upon instructions from both companies All patients were enrolled in a sequencing protocol (NCT02470715) with no standardized treatment provided All treatment suggestions were made by a formal sequencing review team Response rates were based upon RECIST 1.1 measurements whenever possible Full - patient received all of recommended therapy Partial - patient received at least 1 of the recommended therapies, CR – no detectable disease PR – greater than 30% disease reduction SD – overall no or minimal change PD - progressive disease Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) = CR + PR + SD ACKNOWLEGEMENTS The investigators would like to thank all of the patients, research staff, clinic nurses, and our many colleagues for their continued support of this research and the excellent care they provide our patients. The investigators would also like acknowledge the generous support from the Helmsley Trust Foundation as well as the Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center through The Leona M. & Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust Grant #2012PG-RHC031.