Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Make Commitment Milestone 1 Inventory Emissions Milestone 2 Set Target/Goal Milestone 3 Establish Local Action Plan Milestone 5 Monitor/Evaluate Progress.
Advertisements

Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.
Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
Transportation Planning Association Meeting MAP 21 PERFORMANCE MEASURES February 19, 2013.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
Performance Elements National Goals Performance Measures Performance Targets Performance Plans Target Achievement Special Performance Rules Performance.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
CONGESTION MITIGATION & AIR QUALITY(CMAQ) 1.  FY2013 = $9.8 million for NE  New CMAQ Guidance, November 12, 2013  Purpose of the CMAQ Program is to.
Minnesota Department of Transportation ARRA, Greater Minnesota Transit, Airport Program Status, & Local Bridge Bonding Update House Transportation Finance.
Performance Measurement Requirements Notice of Proposed Rule Making.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Virginia Association of Planning District Commissions October 4, 2012.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO TCC & CAC Presentation – August 21, 2012.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
‘‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act’’ or ‘‘MAP–21’’ Signed into Law July 6, 2012 Implications for Infrastructure Asset Management, Pavement.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
MAP-21 Performance-Based Planning: A Focus on Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Presentation to the Transportation.
December 16, :00 – 2:45. MPM Team Agenda 1.Review of MPM Program and Team 2.Consensus items document 3. Upcoming activities 4. Discussion.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
Association for Commuter Transportation Best Work Places for Commuters
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) April 7, 2016.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century An Update on Implementation.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 and Managing National Highway Performance Michael Nesbitt Federal Highway.
UW - Madison Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) David L. Kopacz, P.E. Wisconsin Division Office February 20, 2015.
Assessing Performance of the National Highway System, Freight Movement on the Interstate System, and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Federal Performance Update MPO Coordination Meeting May 10, 2016.
Statewide Mobility Performance Measures Team Purpose Consensus on approach and measures.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management Transportation Performance Management Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
May 2017 Caron Whitaker Federal Policy Update May 2017 Caron Whitaker
Nevada Transportation Conference
CMAQ Emissions Calculator Toolkit Gina Solman – Volpe Center
TPM Performance Reporting: Telling Our Story
Greater Toronto Transportation System
Effectiveness of Funding Mechanisms and
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
August 2016 Traffic Records Forum Baltimore, Maryland
Overview of FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures
Performance Measure Exploration Preparing for the 2018 RTP
Above and beyond MAP-21: More bang for our transportation buck
Going beyond LOS: Towards a Performance Measure Framework for State DOTs January 9, 2016.
Florida’s Multimodal Mobility Performance Measures Program
Using NPMRDS Data for System Performance
Finance Committee & City Council August 8, 2016
River to Sea TPO Board Meeting September 28, 2016
River to Sea TPO Board Meeting October 26, 2016
Calculating MAP-21 Performance Measures Using NPMRDS Data
Oregon Freight Plan Amendment
Transportation Performance Measures
ACEC of Arizona & ADOT Liaison Todd A. Emery, PE
Laurie Leffler, Division Administrator
Michael Koontz November 2013
MPO/RPO Safety Performance Measures
River to Sea TPO CAC & TCC Meetings September 20, 2016
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Transit
Surface Transportation Reauthorization: Corridors and Borders
Transportation Performance Management
Performance-Based Federal Highway Program Implementation Update
U.S. DOT Funding Opportunities for Idle-Reduction Projects
Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (Non-SOV) Travel Performance Measure and Regional Targets Daniel Snyder - NCTCOG.
Transportation Performance Management Resources you can Use Susanna Reck FHWA Office of Transportation Performance Management June 2019 Outline: What.
Webinar: Responding to the FHWA CMAQ & System Performance Measures:
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures Presented by: Jason Pavluchuk Association for Commuter Transportation

Agenda CMAQ Overview Changes Made by FAST ACT 2013 Guidance Performance Measures Background Overview of System Performance Measures Overview of CMAQ Performance Measures

FAST Act – CMAQ Few programmatic changes made to CMAQ Makes two eligibility changes Clarifies eligibility of port related freight operations (so long as emission reductions are attained) Makes installation of vehicle to infrastructure communication installation eligible FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Total FY16-20 CMAQ Obligations $2.27b $2.31b $2.36b $2.40b $2.45b $2.50b $12.02b % Increase 1.8% 2.1% 1.9% 2.0% Maintains that carpool/vanpool projects are still eligible for 100% Federal share (all other projects have a maximum of 80% Federal Share)

CMAQ – 2013 Guidance What is Guidance? Questions to ask yourself – is it capital or operating Vanpool projects – Understand difference between Capital costs & Operating Costs Capital acquisition – including third party contract – should be transferred to FTA

CMAQ – 2013 Guidance Operating costs limited to 3 years (third year may last three years**) Marketing & Outreach are not subject to operating limit Vanpool projects – Understand difference between Capital costs & Operating Costs Capital acquisition – including third party contract – should be transferred to FTA

CMAQ – 2013 Guidance Vanpool projects – Understand difference between Capital costs & Operating Costs Capital acquisition – including third party contract – should be transferred to FTA carpooling and vanpooling activities may be supported with up to 100 percent Federal funding

CMAQ – 2013 Guidance Marketing & Outreach are not subject to operating limit

CMAQ – 2013 Guidance

Post Authorization CMAQ Issues FAST Act – CMAQ Post Authorization CMAQ Issues Need DOT to create clear and definitive guidance and practices What one FHWA State office allows under CMAQ, another does not. There is a need for consistency in rulings. Clarify difference between operations/labor and education/outreach Operations/Labor are only eligible to receive CMAQ funding for up to 5 years. Education & Outreach have no limitations. Clarity & consistency needs to be made when it comes to whether labor associated with education & outreach is subject to limitation

Post Authorization CMAQ Issues FAST Act – CMAQ Post Authorization CMAQ Issues Clarify use of CMAQ funds for incentives Some FHWA state offices allow CMAQ funds to be used for commuter incentives, while others do not. Clarity & consistency needs to be set on the question. Amend CMAQ guidance related to vanpools Current guidance refers to leasing of vanpools. Vanpool arrangements between the public and private sector are ‘contract for service’ agreements, not leases.

Background Section 150 of MAP-21 Requires State DOTs and Metropolitan Planning Organizations to demonstrate progress towards national performance metrics The Secretary is required to establish performance measures and standards within 18 months of passage of MAP-21 (Jan 6, 2014) MAP-21 specifically limits the rulemaking process to measure only the performance measures listed by the section

Background What are we Measuring? State of Good Repair -- Condition of Pavement & Bridges on the National Highway System Highway Safety Serious injuries and fatalities per vehicle mile travelled The number of serious injuries and fatalities Performance of the Interstate System-National Highway System Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program Traffic congestion On-road mobile source emissions National Freight Movement

Background Why is this important? Thus, BUT WE MUST GET METRICS RIGHT Requires State DOTs and MPOs to: Focus on problems and develop projects to address those problems Track and monitor progression of stated targets and goals Project selection must be based on achieving goals Thus, Holds decision makers accountable Places value on results over politics BUT WE MUST GET METRICS RIGHT

We Made Our Voices Heard

Final Rule Major Changes made in Final Rule Changed focus of reliability from percentage of mileage to percentage of impacted travelers Dropped Peak Hour travel time measure Added Greenhouse Gas measure (ON HOLD) Changes delay measure to person hours of delay Adds modal share measure Commits to revisiting measures in 2018

Final Rule Three measures are established for assessing the performance of the NHS under the NHPP. Two measures assess reliability: (1) Percent of Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate System That Are Reliable (the Interstate Travel Time Reliability measure); and (2) Percent of Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS That Are Reliable (the Non- Interstate NHS Travel Time Reliability measure). Together they are the Travel Time Reliability measures. Both of these measures assess Level of Travel Time Reliability (LOTTR), defined as the ratio of the 80th percentile travel time to a “normal” travel time (50th percentile). Data are derived from the travel time data set using either the National Performance Management Research Data Set (NPMRDS) or equivalent. (3) Percent Change in Tailpipe CO2 Emissions on the NHS from the Calendar Year 2017, assesses environmental performance. This measure is calculated using data on fuel use and VMT.

Final Rule Three measures are established under the CMAQ program (the CMAQ measures) including two measures for traffic congestion: (1) Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive Delay Per Capita (the PHED measure); and Data for this measure is derived from the travel time data set of NPMRDS. (2) Percent of Non-SOV Travel The second measure is a new measure developed to recognize the role of lower-emissions modes in meeting air quality goals. State DOTs and MPOs have three options for providing data for this measure. (3)Total Emissions Reduction.  This measure uses data from the CMAQ Public Access System to calculate total emission reductions for applicable criteria pollutants or precursors. 

Final Rule Measuring Non-SOV Travel American Community Survey data A second option is for State DOTs or MPOs to use local surveys to estimate the percentage of non-SOV travel occurring in the urbanized areas. These surveys may focus on either household or work travel and must be conducted within the 2 years before the start of the performance period and be updated on at least a biennial frequency. A third option is for State DOTs and MPOs to estimate the percent of non-SOV travel based on volume measurements of actual use of each transportation mode, including but not limited to cars, bicycles, pedestrian travel, travel avoided by telework, and on- road bus transit. Use or development of the third option is encouraged by FHWA as it will provide the most accurate data for future use.

Timeline Targets 1st Reported – October 1, 2018 State Reports Progress – October 1, 2020 FHWA Assess progress – August 15, 2022