Office of Inspector General Budget Presentation – February 20, 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Association of State Auditors
Advertisements

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
OPERATING EFFECTIVELY AT WESD. What is Internal Control? A process designed to provide reasonable assurance the organizations objectives are achieved.
Fraud Trends & Risks Effective Utilization of Data Practice - Florida Modernization (virtual environment) 90%+ applications received online (enhances.
Minnesota Department of Public Safety Presented by: Mona Dohman, Commissioner Mark Dunaski, Deputy Commissioner.
The Partnership Fund for Program Integrity Innovation March 2012.
LOCAL REVOLVING LOAN FUND (RLF). Page 2 Local Revolving Loan Funds Indications that HUD and GAO will heavily monitor and audit the RLF activities HUD.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
1 Frank J. Murphy Assistant Chief Financial Officer for Financial Management June 15, 2009 HUD’s Results on Eliminating Improper Payments.
Gulf Consortium Orlando, Florida June 20, 2014
The Council of State Governments – Innovations Award July 20, 2012 – Atlantic City, NJ Gary D. Alexander Secretary, PA Department of Public Welfare.
California Department of Social Services presents……. 1REV 7/11/14.
SEPARATION OF DUTIES CONFLICT OF INTEREST POTENTIAL FRAUD 1.
1 FoodShare Wisconsin (reports 12-3 and 12-8) Legislative Audit Bureau August 2012.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Elimination of Improper Payments U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE RURAL DEVELOPMENT PAYMENT RECAPTURE RECOVERY AUDITING (PRRA) INITIATIVE RENTAL ASSISTANCE.
Texas Department of Information Resources Information Resources/Technology Initiatives.
November 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education Quarterly Special Education Meeting American Recovery and Reinvestment Act November.
Fraud Prevention and Investigation Branch. Fraud Prevention- Everyone’s Responsibility.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Budget Presentation FISCAL YEAR 2014.
UI Integrity/ Improper Payments Joint Federal/ State Task Force October 14, 2011.
Audit and Fiscal Oversight Responsibilities VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP December 15,2010.
1 Disaster Recovery Division Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs.
Tax Compliance Report January 30 th, Major Themes of Study IRS and other states also have income tax compliance issues. Estimating the level of.
GOVerify Business Center. Improper Payment Initiative 2 The purpose of this order was to reduce improper payments by intensifying efforts to eliminate.
1 DHS Office of Inspector General. 2 Introduction l Front End Eligibility (FEE) targets active cases with immediate concerns i.e., dual assistance. l.
Louisiana UI Integrity Task Force October 24, 2011.
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.
SSA, Todd Petrie The AMLA Presentation: 3/18/2009.
CONFIDENTIAL © 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
The Plan, The Plan: Creating a Fraud Plan Angela Saddler Recipient Investigations Coordinator Division of Medical Assistance Quality Assurance/Program.
Updated Trafficking Definition. What is Trafficking? Trafficking is the buying or selling of Food and Nutrition Services benefits for cash or consideration.
Presentation to: Presented by: Date: Office of Inspector General Updates Nutrition Services Directors Ondray Jennings, Deputy Inspector General December.
NATIONAL DIRECTORY OF NEW HIRES Office of Child Support Enforcement Administration for Children and Families Department of Health and Human Services.
STATE OF GEORGIA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Fraud Risk Within State Government.
Revitalization of the Long Beach City Auditor’s Office Presented to the Rotary Club of Long Beach August 9, 2006 Laura Doud, City Auditor, Long Beach.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General Budget Presentation – February 20, 2013.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL PRESENTERS : Charles W. Hicks, Jr., Interim Inspector General S. Maurice D. Ingram, Manager, Benefits Recovery Unit PRESENTED.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Challenges Facing the Department of Transportation and the Office of Inspector General’s Strategy for.
2011 OGS State Purchasing Forum Navigating Proof of Coverage May 18-19, 2011 Required Proof of NYS Workers' Compensation and Disability Benefits Insurance.
MAINE Works! TANF and ASPIRE Programs DHHS Office for Family Independence.
Proposed Budget and Superintendent’s Message FY Presented to the Board of Education April 14,
1 Stakeholder Consultation Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS) Department of Labor (DOL) DRAFT Strategic Plan FY Draft: February 22,
Oregon DMV Fraud Prevention Program Tom McClellan, DMV Administrator.
Fraud Awareness Audit, Business & Technology Committee September 23, 2004.
2010 OGS State Purchasing Forum Navigating Proof of Coverage May 19-20, 2010 Required Proof of NYS Workers' Compensation and Disability Benefits Insurance.
Police Department FY 2015 Operating Budget June 2, 2014.
ValleyView Publishing.  To achieve a suitable location for the new office will be determined  To establish administrative systems  To establish an.
1 Elder Justice Act Shirley A. Cox MSW, JD Legal Services Developer Oklahoma Department of Human Services, ASD 2401 N.W. 23rd St. Ste. 40 Oklahoma City,
Office of the State Auditor Overview
Presented by Jean Fecteau OEO Fiscal Analyst
Converging on Standards: Tool Migration Bob Padgett Mark Wagner
Protecting the Integrity of Federal Payments
HUD OIG: Common Issues and Concerns Texas NAHRO’s 2018 Conference
Updates on U.S. Spending Transparency Improvements
Laws Relating to Accreditation, the use of NGABs, and Enforcement
BEST PRACTICES Will Lewis.
Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians
Red Flags Rule An Introduction County College of Morris
Federal Protective Service
Balance Sheet & Income Statement
Legislative Hearing December 17, 2018 OIG FFAID OVERVIEW
Business Center Workshop I Introduction to Accounts & Reports
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Capital Improvement Plans
Larimer 101 Department of Human Services
Achieving a Complete and Accurate Count
Presentation transcript:

Office of Inspector General Budget Presentation – February 20, 2013 Michigan Department of Human Services Office of Inspector General Budget Presentation – February 20, 2013

Office of Inspector General (OIG) Criminal Justice Agency within Department of Human Services (DHS), created in 1972 Governed by State law 130 Staff On-Board, 118 Field Positions. Agents strategically located throughout Michigan to provide investigative coverage for every county of Michigan

OIG Mission The mission of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) is to assist the Michigan Department of Human Services in maintaining integrity and accountability in the administration of its programs. The OIG provides investigation and advisory services to ensure appropriate and efficient use of available public resources.

OIG RESPONSIBILITIES Investigate: Recipient fraud Vendor - Contractor fraud Provider fraud Employee fraud (Internal Affairs)

Specialized Units Investigative Analytics Unit (IAU): Data mining/analytical support of the office Special Investigations Unit (SIU): Specializing in major investigations and internal affairs investigations Trafficking Unit: Specializing in FAP trafficking investigations

Recipient Integrity Activities Front End Eligibility (FEE) Investigations: Fraud Prevention - Referrals based on questionable information in public assistance applications prior to case opening and payment of benefits Internal referrals based on OIG data analytics Recipient Fraud Investigations: Unreported income Unreported assets Misrepresentation of household circumstances Trafficking Hotline - Internet complaints

High Risk Areas Bridge Card Trafficking Internet “IP Address” Tracking Assists in identifying the physical location of persons applying for benefits online (MiBr PARIS: Interstate Match Indicator of individuals receiving duplicate assistance

High Risk Areas II Social Media Monitoring Identifies individuals selling FAP benefits Out-of-State EBT Transaction Monitoring Indicator of household living out of MI while on public assistance in MI Bridge Card Transaction Trend Analysis Identifies evolving FAP Trafficking trends Multiple Bridge Card Replacement Indicator of FAP trafficking (selling EBT card)

Bridge Card Trafficking The buying and selling of Bridge Card benefits for cash and/or other prohibited items

Bridge Card Trafficking 2” Bullet Proof Glass; Lack of Counter Transactions of $80-$200 were common at this location within minutes of each other

Raid Photo Meat expired in April of 2001 Store was raided 10 years later!

Raid Photo Eggs expired in September of 2009 (Raid occurred approximately 18 months later)

Raid Photo Nearly Empty Cooler

FAP Trafficking Efforts OIG has made FAP trafficking investigations a priority. Prioritization of investigative resources (Trafficking Agents) Identification of retailers and recipients Partnered investigations with federal, state and local law enforcement agencies Public and media outreach

OIG Trafficking Unit Statistics $5.8 Million in Trafficked Benefits Identified $4.1 Million in Fraud Receivables Established 1,652 Trafficking Cases Completed 184 IPV Hearings Conducted

i-Sight Case Management System (in development) Integration of three disparate databases Front End Eligibility (FEE) Recipient Fraud Provider/Employee Fraud Automated Functionality Upgrades Development of an automated fraud tool from data warehouse – Improve Analytics, Increase Efficiency, Improve Investigative Outcomes. Improved communication to Field Agents and Prosecutors

Recipient FAP Fraud FY 2012 9,907 FAP Recipient Fraud Investigations 7,702 Fraud (IPV) Dispositions $14.2 Million in FAP Recipient Fraud 975 Criminal Warrants 1,124 IPV Hearings – IPV Established 4,400+ FAP IPV Disqualifications IPV DQ = $13M in Cost Avoidance $11.3 Million in FAP Fraud Receivables

OVERALL STATISTICS FY2012 30,296 FEE and Fraud Complaints 11,497 Recipient Fraud complaints 16,900 FEE investigations completed 6,065 recipient fraud investigative dispositions. Recipient Fraud found: $22.6 Million Revenue generated: $19.7 Million in fraud receivables

FY2012 Cost Savings Recipient Fraud /IPV $22,690,534 Front End Eligibility $69,584,900 Recipient Fraud /IPV $22,690,534 IPV Disqualifications $14,419,620 Special Investigations $5,723,544 _______________________________ TOTAL SAVINGS $112,418,599

Front End Eligibility (FEE) Return on Investment FEE deters fraud; prevents improper payments and reduces errors. Provides eligibility workers with a resource for accurate case openings. Every dollar spent on FEE investigation efforts resulted in program cost savings of $26.00

Fraud Dollars Established by Program

Receivables Established

Alan Kimichik, Inspector General QUESTIONS Alan Kimichik, Inspector General (517) 335-3899 www.michigan.gov/dhs