Bentham’s Classical Utilitarianism

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Utilitarianism These slides are intended to remind you of the main points (features). You should also be using your booklets and doing further reading.
Advertisements

Utilitarianism Maximize good.
What is a normative theory?
RECAP – TASK 1 What is utilitarianism? Who is Jeremy Bentham?
Utilitarianism.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 11 Utilitarianism By David Kelsey.
Chapter Seven: Utilitarianism
ETHICS BOWL CONSEQUENTIALism.
Utilitarianism: happiness and preferences
Utilitarian Approach. Utilitarianism The founder of classical utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham. According to Bentham human beings always try to avoid.
Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.
THEORIES OF ETHICS PART 2 OF CHAPTER 12 (ETHICS).
 The benefits of embryo research come mainly from stem cell usage  it is hoped that stem cells can be stimulated to develop any tissue or organ of the.
Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill. When an objection is raised: When some objection is raised to a moral theory, if that objection is a good one, the proponent.
Consequentialism Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill ( ) Principle of Utility: actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness,
Utilitarianism Lesson # 4 Leadership and Ethics. Utilitarianism What is Utilitarianism?
Utilitarianism. Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters; pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we.
The Morality of Consequences. Utilitarian Ethics We ought to perform actions which tend to produce the greatest overall happiness for the greatest number.
What is Utilitarianism?
Ethics A look at the reasons behind decisions about what is right and wrong. What is the right thing to do?
Act and Rule Utilitariansim
Nicole Pongratz Allisen Jacques Shannon Griese Amber Teichmiller 4/13/2010.
Utilitarianism. Types of Theory Teleological Teleological The consequence of the moral act is the important thing.
Utilitarianism is a kind of consequentialism
UTILITARIANISM “A moral theory according to which an action is right if and only if it conforms to the principle of utility.” (Jeremy Bentham, Introduction.
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
Utilitarianism is a theory about what we ought to do. It states that we should always choose actions which produce the greatest amount of happiness for.
‘UTILITARIANISM FROM BENTHAM & MILL’ THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES
LO: I will know about the Hedonic Calculus Hmk: Do some biographical work on John Stuart Mill Starter: Using your homework, what did you find out about.
Morality in the Modern World
Consequentialism (utilitarism). General description 'Consequentialist theories regard the moral value of actions, rules of conduct, and so on, as dependent.
‘The New Testament principle of Agape is a better guide to ethical decision making than the Utilitarian principle of happiness.’ Discuss. Robert Brown.
Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives:- (long term) 1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness principle’. 2. To understand the similarities and differences.
HEDONISM “Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die.”
Jan 29, 10 Ashley Tao. Tues 8-10pm Dundas Town Hall
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 10 Utilitarianism.
AS Ethics Utilitarianism Title: - Preference Utilitarianism To begin… What is meant by preference? L/O: To understand Preference Utilitarianism.
Ethics: Theory and Practice
COMMON BELIEFS MEN HAVE ABOUT WOMEN
Utilitarianism Learning outcome:
Utilitarianism.
Rule Utilitarianism To understand later developments in Utilitarianism and the works of Mill and Singer.
Act and rule Utilitarianism
Introduction to Ethics
Utilitarianism Learning Intention:
John Stuart Mill.
John Stuart Mill ( ) An Introduction to Mill’s form of Utilitarianism in comparison to Bentham’s.
Lecture 02: A Brief Summary
Utilitarianism: Modern Applications of the theory
J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism (1863)
Utilitarianism: John Stuart Mill
Happiness, pleasure and preferences
Absolute and Relative Morality
Mill and Bentham’s Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism – John Stuart Mill
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Utilitarianism.
Evaluating utilitarianism
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Bentham’s Utilitarianism
Theories of Justice Retributive Justice – How should those who break the law be punished? Distributive Justice – How should society distribute it’s resources?
20th century conflict day one
Utilitarianism 2.0.
Philosophy 2030 Class #11 4/12/16 Take-home / open book midterm
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Lecture 02: A Brief Summary
Utilitarianism Consequential, i.e. Utilitarianism – a good moral decision is that which the consequences of the action produces the greatest good for the.
Moral Theories: Utilitarianism
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Presentation transcript:

Bentham’s Classical Utilitarianism Seems reasonable to link morality with the pursuit of happiness and avoidance and pain. Offers a balanced, democratic morality that promotes general happiness It is a commonsense system that’s practically applicable to real-life situations. It has no need for special wisdom. The Principle of Utility – “An action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number.” Proposed the Hedonic Calculus - Quantative Seems natural to consider the consequences of out actions when deciding what to do. It doesn’t support individual pursuits that are at the expense of the majority. A working morality that can be brought into operation in organisational rather than simply individual matters. Benefits in the management of hospitals where fixed budgets must be best to alleviate the suffering of many. Utilitarianism ensures a maximum-pleasure result, but it doesn’t set out how the pleasure is distributed. It guarantees nothing for minorities. There’s nothing in utilitarianism that prevents the total sacrifice of one pleasure for the benefit of the whole e.g. bullies torturing a single boy. John Rawls – A Theory of Justice – “The striking feature of justice is that does not matter, except indirectly, how this sum of satisfactions is distributed among individuals any more than it matters, except indirectly, how one man distributes his satisfactions over time.” The concept of happiness is so broad that it can be taken as the name for whatever a person takes as his or her personal goal. Utilitarianism offers no objective method of assessing rights and wrongs of an action. Difficulty in measuring pleasure. The hedonic calculus seems straightforward but can different pleasures and different pains be so easily quantified? E.g. pleasure of chocolate bar or pleasure of seeing a child grow up? How to quantify. E.g. What about pain that’s good for you? When we hurt ourselves, the pain is a reminder that we have the injury and to take care. Utilitarianism depends upon accurate predictions of the futures, but human beings don’t always display accurate foresight. The consequences of actions may not become apparent until years into the future. Alasdair MacIntyre – A Short History of Ethics – “Utilitarianism could justify horrendous acts as being for the pleasure of many e.g. Nazi policy of persecution. He identifies the focus on happiness as the problem: “That men are happy with their lot never entails that their lot is what it ought to be. For the question can always be raised of how great the price is that is being paid for the happiness.” Robert Nozick – The experience machine – There must be things apart from pleasure that we consider intrinsically valuable. Mill’s Utilitarianism - Qualitative Focus on qualitative pleasures – pleasures of the mind are higher than those to the body. “It is better to be human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.” Mill

Strong Rule Utilitarianism Weak Rule Utilitarianism Act Utilitarianism Flexibility– being able to take into account individual situations at a given moment, although the actions that it justifies can change. Potential to justify virtually any act if, in that particular case, the result generates the most happiness. More closely associated with Jeremy Bentham The principle of utility must be directly applied for each individual situation. Which action will create the greatest good or the greatest number? Value in the consequences. Can have some quite extreme results: An act utilitarian goes out to see a film, sees a charity collector so gives money away. This happens again and again. Taken to the extreme, all leisure activities would end. Impractical to suggest that we should measure each and every choice every time, especially as we may not have all the information required but the hedonic calculus. Rule Utilitarianism Associated with John Stuart Mill (1861) and John Austin (The province of Jurisprudence, 1832) Practical – general rules exist Focuses on general rules that everyone should follow to bring about the greatest good for that community. Rule utilitarianism establishes the best overall rule which, when pursued by the whole community, leads to the best result. I should never lie because, as a general community rule, lying doesn’t bring about the greatest good for the community. People would not trust each other. A person would be allowed to see the film, because a rule that allows people leisure time would be acceptable. Could still permit certain practices, such as as slavery, that appear to be morally unacceptable. There’s no guarantee that minority interests will be protected. As long as slaves are the smaller proportion, the greatest good might be to keep them enslaved. R.M.Hare – suppose a maniac is chasing someone who hides in my shop. My gut feeling would be to lie. A rule utilitarianist would state that I have to be honest, because I’m not allowed to break a rule, even though, the result isn’t the greatest happiness. A rule utilitarian will maintain that I must always drive on the left-hand side of the road in the UK, even when stuck in a traffic jam – because that will ensure the greatest good when everyone acts in such a way. Strong Rule Utilitarianism Maintains that rules established through the application of utilitarian principles should never be broken. Weak Rule Utilitarianism Tries to allow for the possibility that utilitarian principles can take precedence in a situation over a general rule. However, the rule would still form part of the decision-making process.