Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Successes in Demand Response
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
APPA Business & Financial September Time of Use and EZ-3 Price Plans A Presentation to APPA Business & Financial Conference Savannah, GA September.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
How Technology will make Renewable Energy Competitive 10/17/2013
October 8, 2013 Eric Fox and Mike Russo. AGENDA »Recent Sales and Customer Trends »Preliminary State Sales and Demand Forecast »Building a No DSM Forecast.
Cost of Services Pricing Enables a Net Zero Energy World © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. 1.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
Herbert E. Hirschfeld, P.E. and Joseph S. Lopes Applied Energy Group, Inc. Metering America 2005 April 13, 2005 Submetering Case Studies with Load Management.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Retail Smart Grid Trends Paul Wattles Senior Analyst, Market Design & Development UT Energy Week: “How Smart Grids Enable Consumers” Feb. 18, 2015.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Options to Manage Electricity Demand and Increase Capacity in Santa Delano County Jon Cook Jeff Kessler Gabriel Lade Geoff Morrison Lin’s Lackeys.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Smart Grid: What’s In It for the Customer? Wharton Energy Conference 2010 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing & Regulatory Services.
Leading the Way in Electricity TM Tariff Programs & Services Customer Services Business Unit Overview of Demand Response At Southern California Edison.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT Phone: Teaching The Duck To Fly Pacific.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
RESIDENTIAL DEMAND CHARGES: A CONSUMER PERSPECTIVE Barbara R. Alexander Consumer Affairs Consultant 83 Wedgewood Dr. Winthrop, Maine (207)
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Overview Review results Statewide Pricing Pilot Review results Anaheim Rebate Pilot Compare performance of models used to estimate demand response peak.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT Phone: The Ducks Are Coming: Smart Rate.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
SCE Green Rate and Community Renewables Programs 2016.
1 BGE Smart Energy Pricing Program: Update to Maryland Public Service Commission April 23, 2008 Wayne Harbaugh VP – Pricing & Regulatory Services.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
Residential demand charges
Making it less complicated for people to understand renewable energy
Renewable Energy Challenges: System Stability
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
Public Power’s Role in the Clean Energy Future
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Utility Pricing in the Prosumer Era: An Empirical Analysis of Residential Electricity Pricing in California Felipe Castro and Duncan Callaway Energy &
Hourly vs TOU Avoided Costs
National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
Utility Pricing in the Prosumer Era: An Empirical Analysis of Residential Electricity Pricing in California Felipe Castro and Duncan Callaway Energy &
Preliminary Electricity Rate and Time of Use Rate Scenarios
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
The Rise of Residential Advanced DER Rates
Teaching The Duck To Fly
Maximizing Grid Benefits of DERs through Rate Design
Opportunities in the Changing Energy System
MIT tour of the California ISO Control Center March 31, 2015
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
OGE: Engaging Consumers for Demand Response
2500 R Midtown Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Addressing HPWH Market Barriers: Expanded Perspective
Electrification The Concept: Electrify Everything, Decarbonize Electricity, DISTRIBUTE The Challenges: Resiliency, Security, Equity The Opportunities.
Lebanon Community Power & Liberty Utilities TOU Rate & Battery Pilot December 11, 2018 by City Councilor Clifton Below, Chair, Lebanon.
Christensen Associates
Transformation of the Energy Grid
Cost of Electricity & Energy Usage Energy Use Recall: Measured in Watts (W) Electrical power is the rate at which electrical energy is produced.
Medium & Heavy Duty Electric Transportation Rate Designs at SCE
Beartooth Electric Cooperative Rate Design Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well 12/27/10 Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well November 15, 2016 Presented by Jim Lazar RAP Senior Advisor

What Does This Rate Design Say? 12/27/10 What Does This Rate Design Say? $1.50 $2.25 $2.75

Key Points TOU rates are appropriate if: a) costs vary by time of day, and b) costs of measurement are small Technology helpful to empower consumers Most low-income consumers will benefit Most low-use consumers will benefit Peak-Time Rebates are an alternative Keep the on-peak period as narrow as possible

Types of TOU Rates Simple Two-Period Rates Seasonal Two-Period rates Three-Period Rates Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) Real-Time Pricing (RTP) Alternative: Peak-Time Rebates (PTR)

Example Two-Period Rate Jacksonville, FL

Example Seasonal Three-Period Rate Southern California Edison

Example Critical Peak Rate Oklahoma Gas and Electric

Salt River Project “EZ-3” Rate (Summer) Customer Chooses 3-Hour Window 3 – 8 PM

Real-Time Pricing Commonwealth Edison Customer Charge Distribution Charge “Personal Capacity Charge” Hourly Energy Charge

Incorporating TOU with Inclining Blocks Is Not Difficult TOU Overlay: On-Peak Surcharge: $.05/kWh Off-Peak Discount: $.05/kWh

Demand Charges Historically used for Commercial and Industrial customers NOT used for small commercial or residential due to high diversity. Non-Coincident Peak (NCP): $/kW measured at any hour Coincident Peak (CP): $/kW measured 3 PM – 7 PM ONLY

Demand Charges: A Poor Choice

Peak-Time Rebates Targeted at a few key critical peak hours Events announced Customer usage during event compared to a baseline usage for that customer. Credit applied for reduced usage NO surcharge applied for increased usage

Baltimore Gas and Electric PTR

TOU and Critical Peak Pricing Works Approximate Peak Savings from Demand Charge Rate

Technology Can Help

Technology Can Help

Impact of TOU on Low-Income More Likely: Apartment Electric Water Heat Window AC Less Likely: Pool or spa Central AC Challenge: Upgrade appliances Smart technology

Impact of TOU on Low-Income

SMUD: Customers Actually Do Things

SMUD: Customers Actually Do Things

Impact of Different Rate Forms On kWh Usage and Peak Demand

12/27/10 Smart Rate Design The illustrative rate design we developed in this publication has several distinct elements. First, customer-specific elements to “connect to the grid. A customer charge for billing and collection, and a capacity charge for the line transformer and service drop. Second, bi-directional charges for grid services and power supply. These are time differentiated, to ensure that each customer pays for what they use, and has a proper incentive to shape their usage. Finally, a critical peak element. Our research shows that critical peak pricing can produce as much as a 35% reduction in residential use during critical hours.

Expected Results Important: Deploy technology with roll-out. Beneficial load shift Value proposition for: Load management technology Smart appliances and GIWH Customer-based storage and EVs Consumer engagement Important: Deploy technology with roll-out. Important: Keep peak period to ~3 hours.

Supplemental Slides for Q&A If Needed

Functionalized System Costs

~$6/month

Different Classes and Circuits Peak at Different Times Residential Peak: 5 PM Weekends Commercial Peak: 2 PM Weekends

Class Demands May Drive Distribution Capacity Requirements

System Peak Drives Power Supply Costs 2 – 5 PM Weekdays

System “NET” Peak Moved to 6 PM Solar Can Change This System “NET” Peak Moved to 6 PM

Peak Load Impacts May Reach A Limit 1,200 MW at 1 PM 2014 Peak: 1,050 MW at 7 PM 2006: 500 MW ramp 6 AM to 1 PM 2014: 250 MW ramp 6 AM to 1 PM Source: Hawaiian Electric Co