National Wildlife Refuge

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.
Advertisements

Causes of Haze Assessment Mark Green Desert Research Institute Marc Pitchford, Chair Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop PM 2.5 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) Carbon Conversion Joann Rice.
Natural Background Visibility Feb. 6, 2004 Presentation to VISTAS State Air Directors Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtn. National Park.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Ion Analysis 2014 IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting Cape.
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
Carbon Measurements and Adjustments Measurement of organics by IMPROVE & STN networks, Use of blank data to correct carbon concentration measurements,
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
Fossil vs Contemporary Carbon at 12 Rural and Urban Sites in the United States Bret A. Schichtel (NPS) William C. Malm (NPS) Graham Bench (LLNL) Graham.
Comparison of the STN and IMPROVE Networks for Mass and Selected Chemical Components (Preliminary Results) Paul Solomon, ORD Tracy Klamser-Williams, ORIA.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
IMPROVE Ion Study Plan Presented by Marc Pitchford to the RPO Technical Groups Dallas, TX 12/3/02.
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
Is there need to collect routine ammonia/ammonium measurements in ambient air monitoring networks? Perspectives of a Data Analyst from a Small State Air.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
AQS Development and Enhancement Plans AQS Development and Enhancement Plans AQS CONFERENCE Jake Summers June 9, 2010.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
CAMD PROGRAM UPDATE NACAA/EPA Ambient Air Monitoring Steering Committee Clean Air Markets Division, OAP June
Lessons Learned: One-Atmosphere Photochemical Modeling in Southeastern U.S. Presentation from Southern Appalachian Mountains Initiative to Meeting of Regional.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Emergency Air Monitoring During Wildfires Jim Homolya USEPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park, NC.
Low-Wind/High Particulate Matter Episodes in the Calexico/Mexicali Region 1 The University of Utah 2 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 3 San Diego.
MRPO Nitrate and Organic Speciation Special Studies Donna Kenski National RPO Technical Meeting Dallas, Dec. 3-4, 2002.
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
VISTAS Emissions Inventory Overview Nov 4, VISTAS is evaluating visibility and sources of fine particulate mass in the Southeastern US View NE from.
Data Analysis/Monitoring Session OAQPS Updates Neil Frank RPO National Workgroup Meeting Dallas TX December 3-4, 2002.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Eric Edgerton, ARA, Inc. PM Model Performance Workshop Chapel Hill, NC February 10, 2004 SEARCH: Overview of Data for Model Performance Evaluation Photo.
SEARCH & VISTAS Special Studies RPO National Technical Meeting St. Louis, MO November 5, 2003.
Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI Aerosol Modeling: Performance Evaluation & Future Year Simulations Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology SAMI.
MARAMA/NESCAUM/LADCO Project: MARAMA/NESCAUM/LADCO Project: Source Apportionment of Air Quality Monitoring Data: Paired Aerosol / Trajectory Database Analysis.
VISTAS Modeling Overview Oct. 29, 2003
Particulate Matter and its Sources in Georgia Sangil Lee.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
California Ambient Dioxin Air Monitoring Program (CADAMP) Kathy Gill Air Resources Board Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Environmental Protection.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Regional Air Grant Coordinators Meeting PM 2.5 Monitoring and Funding April 17, 2007.
Elements of a Weight of Evidence Determination
IMPROVE/STN Comparison & Implications for Visibility and PM2.5
Current Capabilities and Future Directions of CASTNET
VISTAS 2002 MPE and NAAQS SIP Modeling
Ann M. Dillner, Mark C. Green
Source Attribution for Southeastern US: Weight of Evidence
Speciation Update: URG 3000N Carbon Sampler
Brian Timin- EPA/OAQPS
Organics Analyses and Results
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Sulfate Attribution Methods
Airport Air Quality Study Update
WAQS Monitoring Network Assessment
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
TCEQ AMBIENT Air Monitors in Corpus christi
ACTRIS Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) Network and new filter off-line techniques to measure PM chemical composition and determine organic aerosol.
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Time-Integrated Particle Measurements : Status in Canada
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.
EPA FY2008 Air Monitoring Budget Guidance
The UC Davis Semi-Annual Report on Quality Assurance IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting October 16, 2018 | Fort Collins, Colorado Xiaolu Zhang*, Katrine.
Presentation transcript:

National Wildlife Refuge VISTAS Monitoring RPO National Technical Meeting June 8, 2005 Denver, Colorado Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge

VISTAS Focus Sites Great Smoky Mtns. Raleigh Atlanta Cape Romain VISTAS determined in 2002 that the region needed to develop speciated PM2.5 data with high temporal resolution (hourly or less) for purposes of model performance evaluation. Sites selected based on availability of funding and availability of suite of companion meteorological and air quality data. Four Focus sites were identified, three are being funded currently. These are Look Rock in Great Smoky Mtns National Park, Cape Romain Wilderness Area, and Millbrook outside Raleigh, NC. CLASS 1 URBAN

VISTAS Focus Sites Great Smoky Mtns. Raleigh Atlanta Cape Romain VISTAS determined in 2002 that needed to develop speciated PM2.5 data with high temporal resolution (hourly or less) for purposes of model performance evaluation. Sites selected based on availability of funding and availability of suite of companion meteorological and air quality data. Four Focus sites were identified, three are being funded currently. These are Look Rock in Great Smoky Mtns National Park, Cape Romain Wilderness Area, and Millbrook outside Raleigh, NC. CLASS 1 URBAN SEARCH

Focus Site Data Objectives: Responsibility: States, Contractors Create as complete a record as possible of local conditions, gas, fine particulate mass and component concentrations at source and receptor sites. Make the data available for use in model evaluation. Evaluate the continuous methods used for comparability with existing networks. Responsibility: States, Contractors Deliverables: Verified data in AQS Normalized data on VISTAS site

Cape Romain - Cape Romain NWR, SC Focus Sites Cape Romain - Cape Romain NWR, SC 6-10 ft - 3 M Cape Romain- May 2004

Look Rock - Great Smoky Mountains NP, TN Focus Sites Look Rock - Great Smoky Mountains NP, TN ~ 2670 ft 815 M Look Rock - GRSM

Focus Sites Millbrook – Raleigh, NC Millbrook - April 2004 Cape Romain- May 2004

Focus Sites Continuous monitoring: Filter Speciation: IMPROVE and STN March 2003 - December 2004 Continuous monitoring: Sulfate, Nitrate, Carbon Precursor gases - SO2, NOy, CO Continuous Mass Scattering (at the Class 1 area sites) Meteorology Alternative methods Filter Speciation: IMPROVE and STN

Third Quarter 2003 E/W Difference- ~8/12 CR diff 8/26 Mass same 9/20

Third Quarter 2003 MASS SULFATE

Focus Sites Objectives: Evaluate the continuous methods used for comparability with existing networks. Collocated with IMPROVE or STN ‘Alternative’ methods at Millbrook SEARCH Sulfate, Nitrate (plus ammonium) TVA/Harvard Sulfate at Look Rock Aethalometers at all sites Search Sulfate- Modified Harvard TVA Harvard - ~1 month SEARCH FRM- Particulate Composition Monitor( PCM) and Dichot

Filter comparisons Mass - IMPROVE

Filter comparisons Mass – STNRVE

Filter comparisons Sulfate – STNRVE

Filter comparisons Sulfate - IMPROVE

Filter comparisons Sulfate - IMPROVE

Continuous to Filter ratio Sulfate Something after 9/28?

Continuous to Filter ratio Sulfate

Continuous to Filter ratio Nitrate Nitrate and Sulfate from same module

Filter comparisons Nitrate - IMPROVE

Filter comparisons Nitrate - IMPROVE

Filter comparisons Nitrate - STNRAVE 3.15

Filter comparisons Carbon - IMPROVE

Filter comparisons Carbon - IMPROVE

Focus Sites Objectives: Make the data available for use in model evaluation. Differences in instrument types,individual instruments and changes in performance and effect on ability to ‘mimic’ filter results

Data Completeness 2003 Data in AQS 05/18/2005 update

Data Completeness 2004 Data in AQS 05/18/2005 update

Focus Site Data Normalization

Focus Site Data Normalization

Focus Site Data Normalization Comparison of Millbrook ‘raw’ and Normalized data Provides another opportunity for validation

Third Quarter 2003 MASS SULFATE

Focus Site Data Normalization Must have filter data IMPROVE - ~1 year STN- ~4 months STN protocol sampler added at Cape Romain Site April 2004 Comparison of IMPROVE and STN at a rural site

Focus Sites Objectives: Evaluate the continuous methods used for comparability with existing networks. Collocated with IMPROVE or STN ‘Alternative’ methods at Millbrook SEARCH Sulfate, Nitrate (plus ammonium) TVA/Harvard Sulfate at Look Rock Aethalometers at all sites

Sulfate alternative method Millbrook July 2004 Diurnal Sulfate and Ammonium Raw Unadjusted Data Millbrook, NC VISTAS Focus Site 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour of Day RPSO4, Alt SO4, Alt NH4 - ug/m3 RPSO4 ALT SO4 Preliminary Data Summary Millbrook July,2003-August 2004

Focus Sites Objectives: Routine operation in State Networks Monitors require more attention. Heavier data management load than criteria monitors. SC and NC plan to continue to operate to meet specific state or regional objectives. May need collocated filter analysis.

Focus project status Data collection phase ended January 1, 2005 Verification and posting of raw data to AQS Normalization… Final Reports.. SC and NC have continued some monitoring Supporting data for VISTAS work at ROMA Investigations of PM composition in NC urban areas

At this point…. Continuous monitors provide qualitative information Comparable between sites and methods BUT… Filter data is needed to improve correlation between the continuous data and the ‘Standard’ (filter analysis)

Sources of Organic Carbon Objectives: Identify sources of primary organic carbon (OC) Estimate relative contributions from source categories to primary OC Infer contribution of secondary OC to total Carbon mass Phase 1 – Collection Phase 2 – Analysis

VISTAS CMB Sites SHEN MACA Millbrook GSRM ROMA VISTAS determined in 2002 that needed to develop speciated PM2.5 data with high temporal resolution (hourly or less) for purposes of model performance evaluation. Sites selected based on availability of funding and availability of suite of companion meteorological and air quality data. Four Focus sites were identified, three are being funded currently. These are Look Rock in Great Smoky Mtns National Park, Cape Romain Wilderness Area, and Millbrook outside Raleigh, NC. CLASS 1 URBAN SEARCH

6-10 ft - 3 M Cape Romain- May 2004

Sources of Organic Carbon Phase 1 - Collection Responsibilities: States, NPS- Install and operate samplers Contractor- Provide filter prep, management and storage. Perform initial analysis of filters and blanks Deliverables: High volume PM2.5 samplers installed at 5 sites Sample collection – May 2004 through May 2005 Sample prep and storage – ongoing.. Initial analysis

Sources of Organic Carbon Initial analysis Blanks OK ? Enough Sample ? 34 Alkanes 60 Polars 37 Hopanes and Steranes 20 PAHs

Sources of Organic Carbon Initial analysis

Sources of Organic Carbon Initial analysis Blanks OK ? Yes, but need to watch filter handling... Enough Sample ? Yes, but more, better.. Increase extracted portion of filter from 1/2 to 3/4.

HiVol comparison - STN

Sources of Organic Carbon Phase 2 - Analysis Responsibilities: Contractor- Perform analysis of filters and blanks Perform data and source attribution analysis Report Deliverables: Quarterly analysis of selected filters Exploratory analysis - Principal Component Analysis, Positive Matrix Factorization, Cluster Analysis Compile source profiles Apply receptor model (CMB) Report Dec 2005 Principal Component Analysis, Positive Matrix Factorization, Cluster Analysis

Sources of Organic Carbon Phase 2a – Interlab Comparison VISTAS and SEARCH Perform analysis of split filters and blanks Principal Component Analysis, Positive Matrix Factorization, Cluster Analysis

Sources of Organic Carbon Phase x – C14 Analysis Approximately 250 of 600 samples cut for chemical analysis Remaining ¼ of the filter sufficient for C14 analysis Planning intercomparison with SEARCH Principal Component Analysis, Positive Matrix Factorization, Cluster Analysis

At this point…. Most of the collection work is done Finalize proces for C14 selection and analysis get the data out

Great Smoky Mountains National Park Purchase Knob, Great Smoky Mountains National Park