Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The ATLAS Missing E T trigger Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin University.
Advertisements

1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
DØ Run II jet algorithms E. Busato (LPNHE, Paris) TeV4LHC Workshop 12/1/2004 Outline:  Introduction  The Ideal Jet Algorithm  DØ Run II Cone Jet Algorithm.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Jet Reconstruction in ATLAS Slide 1 Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona Peter Loch University of Arizona Peter Loch University of Arizona.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Brief Introduction to Missing Transverse Energy Reconstruction at LHC Peter.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Jet Reconstruction and Calibration in Athena US ATLAS Software Workshop BNL, 27/08/03 Ambreesh Gupta, for the JetRec Group University of Chicago Outline:
Introduction Week of Jets FNAL, Aug , 2009 Aug 23, 2009 Introduction To Jet Reconstruction In ATLAS Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona.
Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.
Measurement of Inclusive Jet cross section Miroslav Kop á l University of Oklahoma on behalf of the D Ø collaboration DIS 2004, Štrbské pleso, Slovakia.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Cluster Finding Comparisons Ron Cassell SLAC. Clustering Studies This report studies clustering in the EM calorimeter, using SLIC simulated ttbar events.
Studies of the jet fragmentation in p+p collisions in STAR Elena Bruna Yale University STAR Collaboration meeting, June
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
8 June 2006V. Niess- CALOR Chicago1 The Simulation of the ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimetry V. Niess CPPM - IN2P3/CNRS - U. Méditerranée – France On.
24 June Thoughts on Jet Corrections in Top Quark Decays Outline: 1. List of some issues regarding jets 2. Figures of merit 3. Eg: Underlying Event.
1 P. Loch U of Arizona July 22, 2011 Experimental aspects of jet reconstruction and jet physics at the LHC (Part II) What Are Jets? The experimentalist’s.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.
Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 New Approaches to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction D. W. Miller SLAC ATLAS.
QCD Multijet Study at CMS Outline  Motivation  Definition of various multi-jet variables  Tevatron results  Detector effects  Energy and Position.
A Comparison Between Different Jet Algorithms for top mass Reconstruction Chris Tevlin University of Manchester (Supervisor - Mike Seymour) Atlas UK top.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
April 5, 2003Gregory A. Davis1 Jet Cross Sections From DØ Run II American Physical Society Division of Particles and Fields Philadelphia, PA April 5, 2003.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
David Berge – CAT Physics Meeting – 9 May Summary Hadronic Calibration Workshop 3 day workshop 14 to 16 March 2008 in Tucson, Arizona
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
First Measurement of Jets and Missing Transverse Energy with the ATLAS Calorimeter at and David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 13 May 2010.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Jet reconstruction with first data in ATLAS Damir Lelas (University of Victoria, BC, Canada) Damir Lelas (University of Victoria, BC, Canada) on behalf.
1 Jet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS Ariel Schwartzman 3 rd Top Workshop: from the Tevatron to ATLAS Grenoble, 23-Oct-2008.
Multi-lepton and general searches at HERA Andrea Parenti (DESY-Hamburg) on behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaborations - DIS Outline: ● Multi-electron.
1 E T miss measurement E T miss is an important signal for - new physics (e.g. SUSY, H  ZZ  ll ) - reconstruction of a narrow invariant mass distribution.
Jet Energy Scale and Calibration Framework
on behalf of ATLAS LAr Endcap Group
Short Overview on calibration
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Jet Production Measurements with ATLAS
From Hadronic Energy Scale to Jet Energy Scale
Jet reconstruction in ALICE using the EMCal
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Decomposing p+p Events at √s = 200 GeV with STAR
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
New Approaches to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Presentation transcript:

Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS Nikola Makovec September the 8th, 2009

Experimental Requirements for Jet Finders Detector independence: The performance of the algorithm should be as independent as possible of the detector that provides the data. For example, the algorithm should not be strongly dependent on detector segmentation, energy response, or resolution. Minimization of resolution smearing and angle biases: The algorithm should not amplify the inevitable effects of resolution smearing and angle biases. Stability with luminosity: Jet finding should not be strongly affected by multiple hard scatterings at high beam luminosities. For example, jets should not grow to excessively large sizes due to additional interactions. Furthermore the jet angular and energy resolutions should not depend strongly on luminosity. Efficient use of computer resources: The jet algorithm should provide jet identification with a minimum of computer time. However, changes in the algorithm intended to minimize the necessary computer resources, e.g., the use of seeds and preclustering, can lead to problems in the comparison with theory. In general, it is better to invest in more computer resources instead of distorting the definition of the algorithm. Maximal reconstruction efficiency: The jet algorithm should efficiently identify all physically interesting jets (i.e., jets arising from the energetic partons described by perturbative QCD). Ease of calibration: The algorithm should not present obstacles to the reliable calibration of the final kinematic properties of the jet. Ease of use: The algorithm should be straightforward to implement with typical experimental detectors and data. Fully specified: Finally, the algorithm must be fully specified. This includes specifications for clustering, energy and angle definition, and all details of jet splitting and merging. Blazey et al. hep-ex/000501 Nikola Makovec

The Atlas Calorimeters EM Endcap EMEC EM Barrel EMB Hadronic Endcap Forward Tile Barrel Tile Extended Barrel Electromagnetic Barrel || < 1.4 Electromagnetic EndCap 1.375 < || < 3.2 Hadronic Tile || < 1.7 Hadronic EndCap 1.5 < || < 3.2 Forward Calorimeter 3.2 < || < 4.9 At least 10 interaction lengths ~200000 channels Varied granularity Varied technologies Overlap/crack regions Nikola Makovec

Calorimeter Signals: Towers Regular grid Δη×Δφ = 0.1×0.1 Calorimeter cell signals are summed up in tower bins No cell selection, all cells are included Indiscriminatory signal sum includes cells without any true signal at all Sum typically includes geometrical weight Towers have fixed direction given by geometrical grid center Massless four-momentum representation projective cells non-projective cells Nikola Makovec

Calorimeter Signals: Topological clusters Attempt reconstruction of individual particle showers Uses cell signal significance Electronic Electronic + pile-up (quadratic sum) Attempt to suppress noise with least bias on physics signals Algorithm: Seeding (S=4) Cells with signal significance above primary seed threshold Collecting (P=2) Directly neighboring cells with signals above basic threshold, directly neighboring seed cells in 3-dim Growth control (N=0) Collect neighbors of neighbors if those have signals above secondary seed significance Splitting Find local signal maxima in cluster with E > 500 MeV Split cluster between those Nikola Makovec

Calorimeter Signals: TopoTowers Noise suppressed towers Electromagnetic energy scale signal only Only cells surviving noise suppression are used in the towers TopoClusters are used as noise suppression tool Additional cell filters possible Nikola Makovec

Degrees of freedom Jet algorithm: Inputs: Size: ATLAS seeded cone SISCone Kt AntiKt Inputs: Truth particles (excluding neutrinos and muons) Towers Topocluster Topotower Size: Narrow R=0.4 Wide R=0.6 or 0.7 Nikola Makovec

Timing: HLT Nikola Makovec

Timing: offline Nikola Makovec

Energy scale and resolution Nikola Makovec

Efficiency Nikola Makovec

Purity Nikola Makovec

Pile-up: multiplicity Nikola Makovec

Pile-up: multiplicity Nikola Makovec

Pile-up: constituents Nikola Makovec

Pile-up: response Nikola Makovec

Randomly triggered events Nikola Makovec

Randomly triggered events Nikola Makovec

Randomly triggered events Nikola Makovec

Back up Nikola Makovec

Efficiency The plots are done using QCD MC events [560-1120GeV] Nikola Makovec

Nikola Makovec

Pile-up: response Nikola Makovec

Pile-up: response Nikola Makovec

75% Et cut on proto-jet Dark tower Nikola Makovec