Design of the NFIRAOS PWFS module

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard stars for the ZIMPOL polarimeter
Advertisements

Fast & Furious: a potential wavefront reconstructor for extreme adaptive optics at ELTs Visa Korkiakoski and Christoph U. Keller Leiden Observatory Niek.
GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
Thomas Stalcup June 15, 2006 Laser Guidestar System Status.
CHARA AO WFS Design JDM (+LS,MJI) 2012Sep06 v0.1 1.
Géraldine Guerri Post-doc CSL
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
LGS WFS Design Status & Issues Dekany, Delacroix, & Velur Caltech Optical Observatories.
A Short Introduction to Adaptive Optics Presentation for NGAO Controls Team Erik Johansson August 28, 2008.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 31 st March 2010.
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 1 st April NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories.
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 1 st April NGAO WFS design, Caltech Optical Observatories.
Telescope Errors for NGAO Christopher Neyman & Ralf Flicker W. M. Keck Observatory Keck NGAO Team Meeting #4 January 22, 2007 Hualalai Conference Room,
NGAO Laser Guide Star wavefront sensor Optical Design 17/16/2015Caltech Optical Observatories PD Phase LGS WFS Mini-Review.
ASTRI SST-2M The Prototype monolithic 1.8 m
Keck AO the inside story D. Le Mignant for the Keck AO team.
AST3 detector properties
 Johann Kolb, Norbert Hubin  Mark Downing, Olaf Iwert, Dietrich Baade Simulation results:  Richard Clare Detectors for LGS WF sensing on the E-ELT 1AO.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
Position sensing in Adaptive Optics Christopher Saunter Durham University Centre for Advanced Instrumentation Durham Smart Imaging.
MCAO System Overview Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Primary subsystems and their characteristics.
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
Lyot Stop Focal Plane Mask OAP3 Out of plane spherical mirror.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
04. November 2004 A. Freise A. Freise, M. Loupias Collaboration Meeting November 04, 2004 Alignment Status.
IRIS OIWFS Concept Study D. Loop1, M. Fletcher1, V. Reshetov1, R
Design and Implementation of a Fast-Steering Secondary Mirror System Maryfe Culiat Trex Enterprises July 25, 2007.
1 Characterization of the T/T conditions at Gemini Using AO data Jean-Pierre Véran Lisa Poyneer AO4ELT Conference - Paris June , 2009.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Strehl Ratio estimation. SR from H band images High Strehl PSF ->fitting with Zernike modes We suppose: No relevant loss of energy due to high modes (Z>36)
Evaluation of Astrometry Errors due to the Optical Surface Distortions in Adaptive Optics Systems and Science Instruments Brent Ellerbroek a, Glen Herriot.
Introduction of RAVEN Internal meeting on future instrument projects at Subaru Shin Oya ( Subaru Telescope/NAOJ) ‏ Hilo.
Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory WFAO bench A. Costille*, C. Petit*, J.-M. Conan*, T. Fusco*, C. Kulcsár**, H.-F.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 1 Adaptive Optics Requirements, Concepts, and Performance.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Some Thoughts on Ground Layer Adaptive Optics & Adaptive Secondary Mirrors for Keck P. Wizinowich 9/15/14 1.
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova A study of Pyramid WFS behavior under imperfect illumination Valentina Viotto Demetrio Magrin Maria Bergomi Marco Dima.
Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
ICCD of HERD Le WANG, XIOPM , XI’AN The 3 rd HERD Workshop.
Fundamentals of adaptive optics and wavefront reconstruction Marcos van Dam Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National.
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
Telescope Phasing Slides Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
# x pixels Geometry # Detector elements Detector Element Sizes Array Size Detector Element Sizes # Detector elements Pictorial diagram showing detector.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Synopsis of the pyramidal surface parametrization. Figure Legend: From: Modeling.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
B. Humensky 2/24/2012 CTA-SCT Mtg - SLAC
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
SPHERE – SAXO Performance status
CCD wavefront sensing system for the ESO Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics Demonstrator (MAD) C.Cavadore, C.Cumani, The ESO-ODT team, F.Franza, E.Marchetti,
NGS AO Control Light from Telescope Telescope pointing offload
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism
Calibration Plan Chris Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory April 20, 2010.
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Presentation transcript:

Design of the NFIRAOS PWFS module Jean-Pierre Véran National Research Council Canada – Herzberg, Victoria, BC Presentation at the "Wave Front Sensing in the ELT era" workshop Padova - Oct 2, 2017 TMT.AOS.PRE.17.XXX.REL01

NFIRAOS Simplified Control Diagram in LGS Mode WFS/DM telemetry (PSF recon) Telescope offloads TWFS is an NGS WFS that measures radial modes at low speed to track changes in the profile of the sodium layer. It is nominally a ~12x12 WFS. Also track drifts in NCPA compensation? Reconstruction parameters RTC Param. Gen. RTC Star selection mechanism LGS Offsets Truth WFS LGS Pixels DM/WFS Statistics Actuator commands OAP LGS Trombone LGS BS 6 LGS WFS 6 LGS WFS OAP OIWFS Pixels On Inst. WFS(s) 6 LGS Inst. Fold Inst. Fold NGS(s) Sci. Obj. OAP DM11 OAP OAP DM0 + TTS SCI BS OAP To Sci. Instrument

NFIRAOS Simplified Control Diagram in NGS Mode WFS/DM telemetry (PSF recon) Telescope offloads NGS WFS is a high-order WFS. This mode is typically used for high-contrast imaging, or when the lasers are not available. Reconstruction parameters RTC Param. Gen. RTC Star selection mechanism NGS WFS pixels NGS WFS DM/WFS Statistics Actuator commands OAP LGS BS OAP OIWFS Pixels On Inst. WFS(s) Inst. Fold Inst. Fold NGS(s) Sci. Obj. OAP DM11 OAP OAP DM0 + TTS SCI BS OAP To Sci. Instrument

Context within NFIRAOS Input window SS- Source simulator Rotating pupil mask OAP3 DM11 OAP1 OAP4-S OAP4-L OAP2 VNW- Visible natural wavefront sensor Instrument selection mirror Beamsplitters Tip-tilt stage & DM0 LGS- Laser wavefront sensors & trombone OAP4-V

PWFS top-level parameters CCID-96 256x256 pixels frame transfer CCD with 64 output amplifiers <3e- noise at 800 Hz frame rate On-chip binning Each pupil image has 96 pixels in diameter Oversamples 60x60 Fried geometry Binning to 48, 24, 12 and 6 possible PWFS module design sub-contracted to ABB and INO (Quebec City, Canada) PDR: October 2017 FDR: March 2018 NFIRAOS FDR: June 2018 TMT.AOS.PRE.15.039.DRF02

Current CAD model

Double Pyramid Canadian and Italian double pyramids have same optical effects Italian pyramid already prototyped for GMT Canadian pyramid has better thermal properties NFIRAOS operates at -30C so ΔT=50C !

Can we use a single pyramid? PWFS operates between 610nm and 785nm Chromatic blurring with single pyramid ~0.9 pixel Assumes BK7 Current budget for quality of pupil image is ~0.9 pixel FWHM Dominated by charge diffusion (0.7 pixel FWHM) Double roof-prism set-up at NRC (Van Kooten 2016)

Relaxation of quality of pyramid edges and roof Original specification: Edge and roof < 5um We have simulated the effect of having a 22um edge / roof f/45 beam on pyramid Incremental wavefront error is only 16nm RMS Specifying edge / roof < 20um makes pyramid much easier to manufacture

Relaxation angle tolorances on pyramid (Lardiere AO4ELT4) Wang, L, AO4ELT4 2017

-30C operated mechanisms Rotary stage (ADC) customized version of PI stage DT-80 Slow tip, tilt and focus stage (pupil pointing) customized version of PI stage PLS-85 (linear stage) PI S330.8 (tip-tilt) Required to achieve repeatability spec (<5 urad) Fast Steering Mirror X-Y stages customized version of PI stage LS-180 Main challenge are: Travel: 300mm Bi-directional repeatability: 2um Differential accuracy: 4um over 60mm (2mas over 30” on sky for AO guider offsetting) and 20um over whole travel range

FSM trade-off Traditional choice for PWFS modulation: PI S330 However, this module has several downsides: Heat dissipation (~4W when modulating at 800Hz) Would require active cooling Lifetime (109 cycles or about 4 months at 800Hz @ 1000 hours/year) PI has proposed a custom mono-crystal stage No heat dissipation Improved lifetime (to be quantified) Very linear (no capacitive sensor, no feedback electronics) But limited stroke: ≤±0.3mrad or 10λ/D (at all frequencies)

Testing of mechanisms PI has been the most responsive / interested vendor PI mechanisms are rated to -20C PI will test the mechanisms at room temperature and at -30C No optical test We are in the process of procuring all mechanisms now to conduct our own optical tests at -30C

TMT Pupil Mask NFIRAOS on Nasmith platform and does not have a derotator Telescope pupil will rotate on DMs and WFSs For calibration and testing, a rotating pupil mask could be implemented at an image of the telescope pupil in the high-altitude DM (DM11) relay Could simulate ragged pupil edge and spiders Would have to retract during operations If no pupil mask, pupil is defined by oversized circular mask on DM0

Interaction matrix calibration For LGS WFS, we are planning to use a hybrid approach Experimental interaction matrix to derive low-order mis-registration parameters. Then the actual interaction matrix is computed analytically, including details of TMT pupils. Interaction matrix and reconstructor are updated as the TMT pupil rotates (every 0.5 degree) Can this approach work for PWFS, or do we need to use an experimental interaction matrix In order to properly capture diffraction effects In the coming months, we are planning to compare experimental and synthetic interaction matrices on our PWFS bench