The Active Learning Catalysts Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GenChem ABOR Learner-Centered Education 2009 General Chemistry Redesign Department of Chemistry University of Arizona.
Advertisements

Our location is in Hattiesburg, MS Redesign Course: Nutrition Required course for 8 health profession majors 9 sections Fall and Spring; 2 sections Summer.
Using Peer Tutors to Support Learning Focus on Teaching and Technology Conference November 1-2, 2007 Co-presenters: Keith Stine, Department of Chemistry.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Faculty Instructional Support Moving beyond putting courses online to curriculum redesign Leila Lyons, University of Delaware.
NSF Programs That Support Research in the Two-Year College Classroom  V. Celeste Carter, National Science Foundation Jeffrey Ryan, University of South.
Michael J. Badolato, EdD, Senior Academic Technology Officer Middlesex Community College | Bedford and Lowell MA.
INTERACTIVE CLASSROOM TECHNOLOGIES Terminology Interactive technology - What is it? –Interactive whiteboard –Smartboard –Electronic whiteboard –Interactive.
Custom Faculty Development: Reach Faculty Where They Live Linda A. Leake, M. Ed. Instructional Designer/Blackboard Support Specialist University of Louisville.
Freshman Faculty Forum April 3, 2013 April 3, 2013.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
University of Delaware LTC Fall Topics Student Collaborative Multimedia Center Summer Faculty Institute Winter Faculty Institute WebCT 4.1 Upgrade/Migration.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Engaging Mathematics at Roosevelt University College Algebra: Modeling the City Barbara Gonzalez and Cathy Evins Engaging Mathematics 1 Timeline: Fall.
Hybrid Courses “By blending approaches, colleges hope to save money and meet students' needs.” Jeffrey R. Young, Chronicle of Higher Education, March 22,
Michigan’s Public Review of the Next Generation Science Standards for Today’s Students and Tomorrow’s Workforce.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
What Works: Research-Based Best Practices in Developmental Education A Presentation by Ruth Dalrymple and Marilyn Mays based on Hunter R. Boylan’s work.
Group-Based Learning in the TILE Environment Kevin Gerstle and Catie Patterson Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa History of TILE Introduction.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
New Faculty Forum 17 February How educational technology can invigorate your classes – and you! Support Services What’s coming… The team.
Assessing the Impact of the Interactive Learning Space Initiative on Faculty Morale and Student Achievement Ball State University 2015 Spring Assessment.
Interview with Joe Redish about Dickinson Layout and “Science thinking”
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
No Teacher Left Behind D. Gerald. How would you suggest we, as a nation, provide consistent learning opportunities for teachers and ensure that they are.
Faculty Instructional Support Moving beyond putting courses online to curriculum redesign.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Gabrielle Wong HKUST Library
Medical Education Center
University of Southern Mississippi
A Sip of MERLOT KEEP UP WITH EMERGING TECHNOLOGY:
Copyright Carol L. Smith, Dave Berque and Terri Bonebright 2008
Learning to Flip the Classroom Using a MOOC Learning Community
Dr. Donna Harp Ziegenfuss
Heidi Manning, Susan Larson and Bethany Leraas
Wadley Medical Education Center
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Many definitions exist for instructional design 1. Instructional Design as a Process: 2. Instructional Design as a Discipline: 3.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Changing the Culture of Learning One Class at a Time
Creating a Collaborative Learning Classroom
Blended Online Instruction
Medical Education Center
Ryan McFall, Herb Dershem Dept. of Computer Science Hope College
Learning Resource Center
A Collaborative Blueprint for Classroom Design
Accelerating the Pace of Research and Implementation of
Initial Findings about Graduate Teaching Assistants’ Training Needs to Foster Active Learning in Statistics Kristen E. Roland and Jennifer J. Kaplan.
Perceptions of Technology
MELL CLASSROOM RBD UNIVERSITY SENATE APRIL 18, 2017.
Design and Implementation of a Course Review Process
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
Facilitator Linda C. Hodges
TILE Learning Spaces at the University of Iowa
The Home Base Professional Development Tool
The State of RBD 2018 Last time I spoke, the building had not opened yet, now we have over a year of classes in the building Wiebke Kuhn Learning.
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
Post Learning Commons and Drexel Library
Where Do We Grow from Here?
Investigation of Inverted and Active Pedagogies in STEM Disciplines: A Preliminary Report Reza O. Abbasian Texas Lutheran University, Department of.
Impact of AB 705 and Guided Pathways on Part-Time Faculty
Wireless Workstation Revolution
Biography Eddie is an Assistant Professor in the Security Systems and Law Enforcement Technology Department in the School of Engineering Technology at.
University of Southern Mississippi
Presentation transcript:

The Active Learning Catalysts Project Increasing Adoption of Active Learning in STEM Disciplines Technology-Rich Studio Classroom Professional Development of Faculty “Catalysts” In 2011, NMU transformed a traditional classroom into a 63-seat active learning classroom. Classes were first held in the classroom during the winter 2012 semester. NMU’s Instructional Design and Technology unit, directed by Matt Smock, provides training and support for faculty teaching in the classroom. Principal Investigators Jill Leonard (Biology) and J.D. Phillips (Mathematics and Computer Science) lead a team of faculty catalysts that are redesigning at least one of their own courses and serving as models for other faculty. Catalysts represent each of the six STEM departments: Biology - Alec Lindsay Chemistry - Thomas Getman Earth, Environmental, & Geographical Sciences - Robert Legg Engineering Technology - Michael Martin Mathematics & Computer Science - Quinghong Zhang Physics - William Tireman Classroom Features Seven student tables, each seating 9 students, with: Multimedia document cameras 42” monitors with switching for 9 student laptops and document camera Interactive whiteboard overlays Microphones Dry-erase surfaces on all walls Two projectors that can display instructor or student content Centrally located instructor station with: Touch-screen projector controls for selecting content for projector Interactive podium tablet Document camera Dedicated licenses for web-based student response system Catalysts Receive Training, including on-campus pedagogy workshops, educational technology training, and off-campus conferences. Development time needed to integrate technology-enhanced active learning techniques into their courses. Resources, including articles and other publications about active learning, discipline-specific online resources, and an Active Learning at NMU community with both online and in-person components. Design Principles Follows SCALE-UP, the active learning approach developed by Dr. Robert Beichner and his team at North Carolina State University Round tables, 7 feet in diameter Chairs on castors to facilitate movement Centrally located instructor station serves as home base for a “guide on side” not a stage for a sage Accommodates multiple levels of collaboration 3 teams of 3 at each table for some activities 9 students at each table for other exercises Entire class for larger discussions and presentations Catalysts’ Commitment Help expand and sustain use of active learning within and outside of NMU STEM courses by: Sharing ideas and activities in a variety of forums Promoting active learning within their departments and disciplines, and Presenting their experiences at conferences. Acknowledgements: Thank you to all the faculty and students involved in this project, especially the STEM catalysts and our outside evaluator, Dr. Diane Ebert-May (Michigan State University). This project is funded as an NSF TUES Phase I project DUE-1043984 with additional support from Northern Michigan University.

End of Semester Feedback Faculty Interest in Active Learning Classroom The Active Learning Catalysts Project Objectives and Assessment Project Objectives Establish a student-centered technology-rich studio classroom designed to support active learning pedagogy. (Completed November 2011) Facilitate the implementation of technologically-enhanced active learning by developing a cohort of six STEM faculty catalysts who will redesign at least one of their own courses and serve as models for other faculty. (January 2012 – April 2014) Assess the overall and individual impacts of technological tools in an active learning studio classroom on the reform of STEM education. (January 2012 – April 2014) End of Semester Feedback Faculty Students Responses by faculty (18 over 3 semesters) and students (421 over 3 semesters) to survey questions related to their experience in the technology-enhanced active learning teaching space. Courses include those taught by catalysts as well as others who self-selected to use the teaching space. 2 3 Assessment Methods Tracking classroom activities and technology usage through daily logbook. End-of-semester feedback surveys for all faculty and students who have courses in active learning classroom. Tracking requests by all faculty to have courses scheduled in active learning classroom. Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALG) pre and post surveys for courses taught by Catalysts in active learning classroom (winter 2012 and fall 2012 analysis in progress) Faculty Interest in Active Learning Classroom Course requests and scheduling metrics for the technology-enhanced active learning room. Note that average room usage rates for NMU classrooms are 23-26 hours per week in the regular academic year. Semester # course requests # instructors scheduled # course sections scheduled # STEM sections Classroom Use (hours/wk) Winter ‘12 19 14 17 46 Summer ‘12 9 3 4 1 10,18 Fall ‘12 16 13 11 42.5 Winter ‘13 15 44 Relative proportion of class sessions that implemented traditional lecture and group activities based on self-reported data from instructional faculty (N=30) from daily logbook. Left panel shows choices as given to instructors and instructors were allowed to choose more than one to represent a single session. Right panel shows data reassessed with all group activities pooled; in any session, both lecture and group work could still have occurred. Initial results suggest that instructors (catalysts and non-catalysts) are implementing group activities in the active learning room in a slightly higher proportion of classes than they are using for lecturing. Most respondents reported using a combination of techniques in a single class period. In-Class Activities Use of technology associated with the active learning space over two semesters (Winter 2012 and Fall 2012). Data is presented as the number of class sessions (all courses per semester pooled) where each type of equipment was reported by instructors as used. Note that instructors were able to record using more than one apparatus per session. Data covers 359 (Fall) – 353 (winter) sessions with 849-715 entries. Technology Usage 1 Learn more! http://catalysts.nmu.edu