UPDATE: 8/8/2011 Batavia City School District

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROGRAM ADJACENCIES Note: The functional relationships illustrated are diagrammatic only. Further interpretation of these relationships.
Advertisements

February 16, Tonight’s Agenda  Review Assets and Challenges From Last Meeting  Review Necessary Assumptions  Look at Possible Considerations.
Design Review Planning to date Project scope summary
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
NEW PALTZ CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Comprehensive Facilities Master Plan – Progress Report Summary.
Merger Study Grade Level Configurations Options and Rationale.
1 Building Use Study Plattsburgh City School District Presentation to the Board January 9, 2014 Castallo and Silky- Education Consultants Bill Silky and.
N EXISTING FACILITIES BUILDING “A” -Principal’s Office -Workroom -(9) 3 RD Grade Classrooms - (4) 4 TH Grade Classrooms -Life Skills Classroom -Title.
Options to move MCS Forward CONSOLIDATION POSSIBILITIES TO CREATE A FISCALLY SUSTAINABLE SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Creating a Staffing Model for Your District Annette Moreno Director of Budget and Finance Brian Mee Assistant Supt Business Services Pendergast Elementary.
Fiscal Year  Dothan City Schools – Proration has resulted in a loss of : $5,378, for FY09 $3,500, for FY10 $8,878, Lost due to.
BOE PRESENTATION – TONA 2020 UPDATE June 24, 2014 PRESENTED BY: CARRIE OLIVER, LISA DRMACICH, BOB STARR, DIANE MISNER AND JAMES NEWTON.
Lansing Central School District Budget Update January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent Ms. Mary June King, Business Administrator.
Jim Ned CISD School Bond Election May 8 th, 2010.
1 Building Use Study Plattsburgh City School District Advisory Committee Meeting November 20, 2013 Castallo and Silky- Education Consultants Bill Silky.
SHARON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 1 of 18. SHARON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 2 of 18 OPTION 1C – New Building on Case Avenue Site  Building Grades: K-6.
PARENT BUDGET MEETING #2: BUDGET PRIORITIES MARCH 24, 2015.
Spanish Fort Middle School “Built on Toro Pride”.
Preliminary Budget Update February 9, 2009.
LOCKPORT CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT Washington Hunt Elementary School Michelle T. Bradley Superintendent of Schools Deborah Coder Assistant Superintendent for.
Proposed Budget.  Teaching – Regular School  Special Education  Pupil Personnel Services  Revenue  Budget Summary.
Walkerton Accommodation Review April 24, 2008 The following most recommended scenarios were reviewed by the Accommodation Review Committee.
Plumas Lake Elementary School District Budget Update February 24, 2009 Where students build foundations for the future …A Vision in Focus Our Mission Plumas.
Shrewsbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2013 Administrative Budget Recommendation March 14, 2012.
The 20/20 Vision Report to the Board of Education January 2009.
MIDDLE SCHOOL CONCEPT FOR THE RUTHERFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Demographic Advisory Committee Thomas BarryRebecca Kalagher LeAnn BeaulieuBonnie Mazzoli Maureen BrennanTimothy Neville Daniel CooganJennifer Rancourt.
Lincoln Consolidated Schools Citizens Steering Committee Bond Issue Final Recommendation Board of Education Meeting October 18, :00 p.m.
11 School Board Monitoring Report: Capacity Update Arlington Public Schools April 29, 2010.
Saint Croix Central Task Force Findings May 2, 2012.
District & Finance Update Presented to School Leaders Stillwater Area Public Schools April 16, 2007.
1 Verona Board of Education Final Budget and Financial Framework March 2009.
M & M ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ARIZONA CITY, AZ SCHOOL BUDGET BY: TRACEY KLELL.
WAREHAM PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT January 15, 2014 OPEN HEARING FY15 Proposed Budget.
OCTOBER 15, 2015 SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION & REDISTRICTING Dr. Karen M. Couch, Superintendent Ron Kauffman, RK Educational Planning, LLC.
Financial Update and Impact Pinconning Area School District January 2010.
Funding Sources The District receives ongoing revenue from several funding sources General Fund Greatest Flexibility $76,347,543 Ongoing Federal Title.
Wahoo Public School District Facility Planning Update April 18, 2016.
Budget Overview March 27, K – 3 Elementary Maintains small class sizes (19-22 students per class) Maintains current level of teaching assistants.
SCHOOL #1 BALLOT QUESTION AND PROPOSAL Fall, 2016.
Instructional Program Budget Overview for
Proposed Budget Presentation
East Grand Rapids Public Schools
Cambrian School District March 19, 2015
Dedham Public Schools proposed FY14 operating budget
Where Does the Money Go? Programs Expenses Developmental Debt Service
WILMINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
BATAVIA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Sullivan West Central School Proposed Instructional Services Budget
Milford School District
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
School #1 Ballot Question and Proposal
System Goals Academic Excellence Educational Equity Social and Emotional Learning Improving and Expanding Facilities.
Budget Overview Budget Presentation.
Bond and Override Report
Building Configuration Presentation
21st Century School Buildings Plan
Dr. Teresa Thayer Snyder Mr. Edmund Galka May 3, 2018
Castallo and Silky LLC Jessica Cohen and Alan Pole, Consultants
MSAD # PROPOSED BUDGET.
ROCKVILLE CENTRE UFSD 2010/2011 BUDGET
Budget Report to NISD Board of Trustees
Pillager Public School District Community Survey Results
Chimacum District Facility & Program Plan
Budget Presentation March 13, 2019.
REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #16 PROSPECT / BEACON FALLS
Expenditure Budget PLAN and Revenue Update
Bensalem Township School District Feasibility Study
Zumbrota-Mazeppa School District Community Survey Results
The Martin County Board of Education South Creek Middle School Study
Presentation transcript:

UPDATE: 8/8/2011 Batavia City School District Building Conditions Survey Space Utilization Study UPDATE: 8/8/2011 Batavia City School District Presentation Young + Wright Architectural

2010 BUILDING CONDITIONS SURVEY Space Utilization Study Goal: Review possible savings through maximizing building utilization. Steps: 1. Analyze current enrollments, grade configurations and classroom utilization 2. Review site issues associated with each school 3. Propose alternatives to reduce cost by: A. Relocating programs and selling building. B. Reconfiguring grade levels and buildings to allow for staff reductions Building Conditions Survey Scope Summary Young + Wright Architectural

2010 BUILDING CONDITIONS SURVEY Building Conditions Survey Administration Scope Summary Young + Wright Architectural

Enrollment Trends Young + Wright Architectural

Current Elementary Utilization Max SED Capacity Current Enrollment Self Contained PK K 1 2 3 4 5 Total Jackson (68,671sf) John Kennedy (76,500 sf) Robert Morris (62,000 sf) 546 618 516 395 380 435 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 20 19 22 0 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Total by Grade 2 9 9 9 8 9 8 7 Building Conditions Survey Scope Summary Young + Wright Architectural

SED Capacity- Jackson Elementary Young + Wright Architectural 8 Full Size Classrooms 25 General Classroom Spaces SED Capacity- Jackson Elementary Young + Wright Architectural

SED Capacity- Robert Morris Elementary Young + Wright Architectural 15 Full Size Classrooms 28 General Classroom Spaces SED Capacity- Robert Morris Elementary Young + Wright Architectural

SED Capacity- John Kennedy Elementary Young + Wright Architectural 22 Full Size Classrooms 29 General Classroom Spaces SED Capacity- John Kennedy Elementary Young + Wright Architectural

Current Site Plan Issues Physical Education Ball Fields Parking Staff/Visitors Bus Loop Parent Drop Off Expansion Options Site Analysis Young + Wright Architectural

Site Analysis Young + Wright Architectural

Full Size Classrooms (>770sf) Criteria Best Worst Site Issues John Kennedy (10 acres) Jackson (4 acres) Robert Morris (3 acres) Full Size Classrooms (>770sf) PE Space Adequacy Cafeteria Space Elementary School Review Young + Wright Architectural

Young + Wright Architectural Jackson (25 classrooms) Robert Morris (28 classrooms) John Kennedy (29 classrooms) Middle School Option #1 PreK-1 (20) Admin 2-4 (25) 5 (8) Option #2 Option #3 PreK-2 (28) 3-5 (25) Option #4 PreK/Admin (2) K-2 (26) - Grade Level # of Classrooms Pre-K 2 K 9 1 8/9 3 8 4 5 Configuration # of Classrooms PreK/Admin 2 PreK-1 20 K-1 18 PreK-2 28 K-2 26 2-4 25 3-5 Grade Configuration Review & Options Young + Wright Architectural

Young + Wright Architectural Jackson (25 classrooms) Robert Morris (28 classrooms) John Kennedy (29 classrooms) Middle School Option #1 PreK-1 (20) May need 1 special ed classroom Admin 2-4 (25) Will need 4 special ed classrooms 5 (8) Will need 1 special ed classroom Option #2 Option #3 PreK-2 (28) Will need 2 special ed classrooms 3-5 (25) will need 3 special ed classrooms Option #4 PreK/Admin (2) K-2 (26) - *In order to maintain our students in the district as they are now. Grade Configuration Review & Options w/Special Education Classroom Needs* Young + Wright Architectural

Young + Wright Architectural Option #1- Jackson: PreK-1; Robert Morris: Admin; John Kennedy: 2-4; MS: 5 Young + Wright Architectural

Young + Wright Architectural Option #2- Jackson: Admin; Robert Morris: PreK-1; John Kennedy: 2-4, MS: 5 Young + Wright Architectural

Young + Wright Architectural Option #3- Jackson: Admin; Robert Morris: PreK-2; John Kennedy: 3-5 Young + Wright Architectural

Young + Wright Architectural Option #4- Jackson: PreK/Admin; Robert Morris: K-2; John Kennedy: 3-5 Young + Wright Architectural

Young + Wright Architectural Middle School Program Young + Wright Architectural

Projected Grade 5-8 Enrollment: 718 Enrollment in 1997/98: 677 Prior to addition of 14 classrooms which increased capacity by approximately 350 students Current Enrollment: 542 Projected Grade 5-8 Enrollment: 718 Middle School Capacity/Enrollment Young + Wright Architectural

Option #1 Jackson: PreK-1; Robert Morris: Admin; John Kennedy: 2-4; MS: 5 Advantages PreK-1 fits at Jackson Utilizes Jackson’s gymnasium and cafeteria and has room for growth Jackson’s site has better traffic flow Administration fits well at Robert Morris- including district storage Disadvantages 5th grade will move to MS Some K-1 rooms will have no toilets Option #2 Jackson: Admin; Robert Morris: PreK-1; John Kennedy: 2-4, MS: 5 Advantages PreK-1 fits at Robert Morris Room for growth Disadvantages 5th grade will move to MS Robert Morris gymnasium and cafeteria are undersized Robert Morris bus loop and parent drop off are challenging Summary Review- Advantages/Disadvantages Young + Wright Architectural

Jackson: Admin; Robert Morris: PreK-2; John Kennedy: 3-5 Option #3 Jackson: Admin; Robert Morris: PreK-2; John Kennedy: 3-5 Advantages 5th graders remain at elementary schools PreK is with kindergarten Disadvantages Robert Morris has no room for expansion No special ed, computer lab, art, and music rooms at Robert Morris Underutilizes Jackson’s gym and café No room for special education at JK Option #4 Jackson: PreK/Admin; Robert Morris: K-2; John Kennedy: 3-5 Advantages 5th graders remain at elementary schools Disadvantages Robert Morris has no room for expansion PreK separate from kindergarten program Cafeteria and gym at Robert Morris are undersized Summary Review- Advantages/Disadvantages Young + Wright Architectural

Middle School High School Possible relocation of fifth grade Relocation of information technology department infrastructure A/C needed for relocated IT offices High School A/C needed for relocated IT offices Maintenance shop Middle School & High School Scope Young + Wright Architectural

Young + Wright Architectural Jackson (25 classrooms) Robert Morris (28 classrooms) John Kennedy (29 classrooms) Middle School Option #1 PreK-1 (20) Admin 2-4 (25) 5 (8) Option #2 Option #3 PreK-2 (28) 3-5 (25) Option #4 PreK/Admin (2) K-2 (26) - Grade Level # of Classrooms Pre-K 2 K 9 1 8/9 3 8 4 5 Configuration # of Classrooms PreK/Admin 2 PreK-1 20 K-1 18 PreK-2 28 K-2 26 2-4 25 3-5 Grade Configuration Review & Options Young + Wright Architectural

Goal of Consolidation Save programs and jobs by changing school building structure. Use the savings realized from the consolidation to avoid having to make the many budget cuts that would be necessary without increases in State Aid. For every $500,000 in budget cuts, we estimate the need to cut 10 positions at $50K in salary and benefits per year.

In order to cut $579,000 from the 2011-12 budget, these personnel reductions were made: NON-INSTRUCTIONAL Reduction in Athletic Supervision Reduction in Department Chairperson hours Clerical Staffing hours and vacant position Eliminates vacant custodial worker position Reduction in custodial OT and summer custodial workers Seven part-time lunch aides One administrative position Technology Integration Specialist In School Suspension teacher Study Hall Monitor INSTRUCTIONAL Elimination of ACE program Reduction of 1 Secondary ELA position 2 Music positions 1 Technology position 1 Library Clerk 6 Teacher Aides .8 PE teacher position

Consolidation Savings Many potential saving opportunities are available through building consolidation. Potential Personnel Savings Estimated at $1,050,799 Administrative Counselor Custodial Nurse Art* Music* Library Media Specialist PE* Teacher Aides, clerical and library clerk * It’s difficult to estimate these savings until we actually decide on a grade configuration and the number of sections.

Consolidation Savings Infrastructure Estimated savings Utilities (Admin Building and part of 1 Elementary) $57,804 Maintenance on Admin Building Initial Estimate for total savings is: $1,108,603 Economies of scale may result in more savings: Resources are easily shared instead of purchases in sets of three Some instructional staff reductions to be determined based on cohort size Nutritional Services staffing reductions along with transporting of food from JK

Instructional Program Advantages Increased opportunities for grade level collaboration among staff. Principal’s focus, as an instructional leader, is more defined. Better horizontal and vertical alignment of the curriculum throughout the District. Scheduling of services such as OT, PT, ESL, speech, and AIS is more streamlined. Ease of student transition to Middle School. If 5th graders are included at middle school, there may be more opportunities for special area exploration By not selling a school building the district can remain more flexible in the future regarding how many buildings are needed.

Disadvantages Needs for transportation may increase Impact on families as children may be in multiple buildings Loss of neighborhood schools Reduction of staff Some renovations may be necessary