21st Century Faculty and Students: Educational Technology Surveys 2009

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING AS A TOOL IN DEVELOPMENTAL EDUCATION MELISSA BURGESS, EDD.
Advertisements

The 1999 Faculty Survey Results by question for Engineering Carl Berger March 21, 2000.
The Milliennial Instructor The Milliennial Student... and now... The Milliennial Instructor? Carl Berger Copyright by the author, This work is the.
EDUCAUSE Midwest st Century Faculty and Students: How to Use What We Know J.D. Walker Bradley A. Cohen 3/17/08.
Multimedia in the Classroom Toy or Tool?. Multimedia as a Resource Attitudes  Faculty  Student Benefits Concerns.
Online Learning at UMass Dartmouth Jen Riley Faculty Instructional Technology Coordinator CITS/Instructional Development For Faculty Senate Meeting October.
Barry A. Berger Professor of Regulatory Affairs Temple University School of Pharmacy QA/RA Graduate Program 1Discussion-BABTechDay2012.
SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.
CA12 Assessing Online Courses Howard University November 2013.
PSYCHOLOGY ONLINE: PERSPECTIVES IN LEARNING & TEACHING Kyle R. Hawkey University of Minnesota & Arizona Western College
Lecture 9 E-Marketing Consumer Behavior Online
Moodle: Engaging Students Online Nathalie Rudner, Thornhill Secondary School Anita Drossis, Vaughan Secondary School York Region District School Board.
ECAR Student Technology Study. Report Authors Eden EDUCAUSE Director of Research Charles Dziuban, University of Central Florida.
Teaching with Technology (part 1) Workshop 1 Fall 2013.
Using Video to Support Face to Face and On-Line Instruction Richard Hall Professor, Information Science and Technology Director, Center for Technology.
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
Igniting 21st century learning ® ® © One-to-One Institute 1 Teaching & Learning in a One-to-One Environment 1 Muskegon August 16,17,18.
Making Student Work Public: All About Web 2.0 By Robin Rider and Andreas Brockhaus Hosted by UWB Teaching and Learning Center April 25, 2008 By Robin Rider.
E-learning readiness among young students in Malaysia.
Debbie East, HEIS Chair-elect Indiana University March 19, 2011 TESOL 2011.
FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY DUMAGUETE CITY Mr. Jeffrey “George” Estores Philosophy Instructor ACTION PLAN TO IMPLEMENT 21 ST TEACHING AND LEARNING.
Scott Elliot, SEG Measurement Gerry Bogatz, MarketingWorks
Community Survey Report
Get Your Head in the Cloud
MBA CLASS CONTENT AND TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS
Judy Borreson Caruso Shannon D. Smith 11/6/2009
Academic and Personal Use of Social Media Frances G. Smith, Ed
The Millennia Adult Learner
1 Online, But Skeptical Results of Inside Higher Ed/Gallup 2013 Survey of Faculty Attitudes on Technology Quality Matters Conference, Nashville, Tenn.
Online Ed Ambivalence, Doubts About Data: Faculty Views of Technology
Collaboration Connect With Me
Amy Garrett Dikkers, Bernadette Longo,
Mobile learning three C’s
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Getting the Most from Your ID What Can Designers Do for Me?
Louise Thorpe & Helen Lyons Sheffield Hallam University, UK
Kevin Oliver, Assistant Professor of Instructional Technology
Higher Education in the 21st Century
Community Survey Report
Professor Rebecca Strachan Sanaa Aljabali
Staff and student experience of flipped teaching
Eric Schmidt - Assignment
LOWERING THE BARRIERS TO MOBILE DEVICE ADOPTION
Distributed Education Personalization for Student Success
Becoming a More Effective Classroom Teacher
Student perceptions of the use of multimedia for online course communication A Research Study.
Jacob Prunuske, MD, MSPH STFM Predoc 2009
Meeting Them Where They Live: Using Twitter SMS To Connect With Students A Research Study.
University of Arkansas Information Technology Services
Web 2.0 By: Samantha, Jaden, Dorrian, and Cheney.
Building Engagement in Course Evaluation
Distance Learning Facilitator Skills
Cheating in Online Classes: How Concerned Should We Be?
Campus Needs Assessment
Teaching Research Skills Using the Internet
Finding Great Resources on the Internet
ANALYSIS OF TEACHER’S ATTITUDE TOWARDS ONLINE LEARNING
Consumer Behaviour PROJECT WORK Laura Grazzini
Working Together WORKSHOP 4
Working Together workshop 4
Social Networking.
2016 Faculty Technology Survey Stephen Burd
Developing Faculty to Teach Online
Focus Group #2 Conducted using Adobe Connect
Can E-learning Replace the Traditional Classroom
Aspects of Online Courses That Are More Effective and Successful Than Face-to-Face Courses Eli Collins-Brown, Ed. D. Methodist College of Nursing.
Virtual Schooling Standards
Learning Community II Survey
COE TTHP Third Annual Technical Meeting
THE USE OF YOUTUBE TO COMPLETE ASSIGNMENTS AMONG STUDENTS
Presentation transcript:

21st Century Faculty and Students: Educational Technology Surveys 2009 Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

OIT Student and Faculty Technology Surveys - 2009 Surveys – so what? Interesting features: Longitudinal: third in a series (2004, 2007); some questions date to 2001 Comparative: ability to compare students and faculty Generational: ability to look for technology-related generational change (e.g., “digital natives”) Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

OIT Student and Faculty Technology Surveys - 2009 Asked about student and faculty experiences, attitudes, preferences, perceptions, problems Delivered online in spring 2009… …to stratified random samples of students and faculty at the University of Minnesota’s Twin Cities campus Supplemented by focus groups Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student and Faculty Tech Surveys – 2009 Respondents Number of respondents Response rate Students 1287 >22.1% (down slightly from 2007) Faculty 249 >31.0% (down slightly from 2007) respondents demographically similar to nonrespondents Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student Tech Survey – 2009 Continuity over time Survey responses overall quite similar to those from 2004 and 2007. Students continue to have: positive attitudes toward technology high comfort levels few problems using technology high experience levels Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Faculty Tech Survey – 2009 Continuity over time Survey responses overall quite similar to those from 2004 and 2007. Faculty continue to report: positive attitudes toward technology high perceived usefulness broad experience using technology in teaching Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student Tech Survey – 2009 Experience : Courses that use online technology Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student Tech Survey – 2009 Experience: Fully online courses growth rate similar to Sloan Foundation’s 17% Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Faculty Tech Survey – 2009 Experience using technology Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Faculty Tech Survey – 2009 Experience using technology Taught at least one online course: Minnesota: 10.2% Sloan/APLU: 34.4% Why? Question wording (“most or all content online” vs “total online, no face-to-face interaction”) Sampling Response rate Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student/Faculty Tech Surveys – 2009 Experience: Fully online courses Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student Tech Survey 2009 Technology use: Web 2.0 Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Percentage of students who never: Student Tech Survey 2009 Web 2.0: ECAR Comparison Percentage of students who never: Why? Question wording (e.g. “contribute content” vs “upload video”) Sampling/response rates Minnesota ECAR Wikis 84.6 58.1 Video websites 75.2 55.2 Blogs 68.2 62.7

Student Tech Survey 2009 Web 2.0: The 1% Rule most students use Web 2.0 technologies like blogs, wikis, and podcasting as consumers rather than producers “What is the 1% rule? It's an emerging rule of thumb that suggests that if you get a group of 100 people online then one will create content, 10 will "interact" with it (commenting or offering improvements) and the other 89 will just view it.” - Charles Arthur, July 20, 2006, The Guardian

Student Tech Survey – 2009 Technology as info delivery students seem to view educational technology primarily as a means for delivering information efficiently and conveniently shown in: what tech students find useful types of uses they favor best uses of tech Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Faculty Tech Survey – 2009 Technology as info delivery faculty also see educational technology primarily as a means for delivering information efficiently and conveniently shown in: attractors effective uses ideal classroom what faculty want to learn about delivery-model uses of tech consistently rated above uses having to do with collaboration, interaction, gaming, etc. Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student Tech Survey 2009 Mobile technology ownership Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student Tech Survey 2009 Mobile technology ownership Course management systems have been with us for many years. Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Faculty Tech Survey – 2009 Digital distractions Three groups of faculty: the incensed: “it bugs me – an incredibly disrespectful behavior.” the resigned: “using digital media is part of my students’ everyday life now… I can’t control daydreaming either.” the circumspect: “I believe this is a challenge to create learning opportunities with more involvement.” Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student Tech Survey – 2009 Digital distractions Three groups of students: the distracted: “I tend to do it… it’s bad news and very distracting.” the undistracted: “It doesn’t affect my learning when [someone else] is on Facebook.” the incensed: “I hate watching kids surf the internet while in class. I find it rude to the professor.” Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

results similar to ECAR 2009 Student/Faculty Tech Survey – 2009 Faculty and students on online courses results similar to ECAR 2009 Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student Tech Survey – 2009 Faculty and students on online courses Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Faculty Tech Survey – 2009 Faculty and students on online courses Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

“don’t know” numbers about 5% (students) and 10% (faculty) Student/Faculty Tech Survey – 2009 Faculty and students on class capture “don’t know” numbers about 5% (students) and 10% (faculty) Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student Tech Survey – 2009 Are students digital natives? With respect to: experience and use: yes expertise and abilities: no preferences: maybe Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Faculty Tech Survey – 2009 Are faculty millennial instructors? Age does matter. Older faculty: perceive themselves to be less skilled with tech encounter more problems (e.g. time, keeping up with changes, lack of standardization) are less attracted to tech (less enjoyment, less use of multimedia, less communication with students (Thanks to Carl Berger!) Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit

Student and Faculty Tech Surveys – 2009 For more information Full reports available at: http://z.umn.edu/cv J.D. Walker OIT Research & Evaluation Team jdwalker@umn.edu March 16, 2010 Office of Information Technology | www.umn.edu/oit