P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Composite Filament Winding Machine: P09226 Shijo George Christofer Brayton Alex Sandy Tiago Santos Daniel Weimann Project Manager Electrical Engineer Chief.
Advertisements

P10057: Delivery and Scale-Up of a Monitoring Device for Human Smoking Behavior Ryan Miller – Project Manager Chris Oxley – Lead Engineer Ryan Enyeart.
P11228 Week 4 Japh Learn Joseph Corea Tim Monahan Bryan Reinheimer Ed Gliss.
Project Review. Current State Currently on track to meet our mission objectives and cover all customer needs – Unpredictable to know whether or not sensors.
Project Reviews.1 KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder 2006 R I T MSD I Project Review Objectives of the Project Review Proposed Review Structure.
LFTB Proprietary Information 1 Fuser test bed ™ R I T MSD1 Project Review February 22, 2007 Fuser Test Bed P07501 IE TEAM Justin McMillan – Project Lead.
P09451 Mid-Project Review Bryan McCormick (ME) Project Manager Andy Freedman (ME) Heat Transfer/Fluids Analysis & Design John Kreuder (ME) Thermal Modeler.
Analysis vs. Design When you take a test in your math or physics course, there is one and only one answer! When you do a goal-driven design there may be:
RIT Senior Design I, Project Review P07310: Electronic Shifted Manual Transmission George Slack Team Guide Jason BotterillTeam Leader, Mechanical Engineer.
P08456-LED Lighting for an Underwater ROV Jeremy Schiele-Project Manager Jonathan Lent-Mechanical Engineer Ryan Seeber-Computer Engineer Justin VanSlyke-Mechanical.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P Management Review (MSD I) Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Automatic Home Medication Dispenser Project # P07009 Team Guide - Dr. Daniel Phillips Project Sponsor - Dr. Michel Berg Team Members Alan StrandburgChris.
EDGE™ Final Project Presentation P09141 – Satellite Thermal Heater Controller Anthony Berwin (Mechanical Engineer)
EDGE™ Project Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME),
Design Reviews.1 KGCOE Multidisciplinary Sr. Design Borkholder 2006 R I T Design Reviews Objectives of the Design Review Participants for a successful.
P09561 – Visible Spectrum Imaging System: Project Update Dave Lewis Steve Sweet Joanna Dobeck Lenny Calabrese Jason Thibado Darrell Draper Customer: Dr.
P08009 Audible Memo Board Phase II Monday, October 22, 2007 P08009: Audible Memo Board Phase II Sponsor: Tala Hopkins Jon GosligaAudio Output Lead Loic.
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
MSD P07302Design Review1 Motor Controller Subsystem MSD P07302 Project Sponsor: KGCOE Project Members: D. ShenoyProject Manager S. TallauSoftware Design.
CS 360 Lecture 3.  The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software system.  Fundamental Assumption:  Good software.
PACS IIDR 01/02 Mar 2001 Instrument Interfaces1 PACS FPU Opto-mechanical Design Overview and Interfaces J. Schubert MPE.
Automatic Shift Controls for ATV Sponsored by: Joel Notaro Polaris Industries Advised by : Professor George Slack Project Family: Modular, Scalable, Open.
MSD I – Mid Project Presentation Winter 08/09 P09454: Design & Testing of Centrifugal Pump Components.
Heather Beam Thomas Bean Megan Chapman Steven Geiger Kimberly Keating.
Table of Contents Project Overview (brief explanation of leukodystrophy) Reviewed customer needs Reviewed engineering specs Detailed system lay out Mechanical.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
P07108: METEOR Instrumentation Recovery System. Team Bash Nanayakkara – Project Manager (ISE) Scott Defisher – Fuselage Design (ME) Mike Kochanski – Software.
Software Development Process CS 360 Lecture 3. Software Process The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software.
Front Suspension Design Final Report Solomon Metcalf Kevin Beckford Daniel Atsyor.
Project Final Presentation Joe Featherall.
What has been accomplished at the end of MSD 1 & 2?
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
Request for Proposal (RFP) In response to the RFP – the first step is to prepare a proposal 1. Review Customer Requirements and come up with candidate.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Joseph Ferrara Team Lead (ME) Joseph ChurchDesign Engineer (ME) Joshua Van Hook LabView Engineer (EE) Jamie Jackson Electronics (EE) Joelle Kirsch Project.
MOBILE CAMERA CONTROL SYSTEM. Team Members Ruth Ayalon – ME Ruth Ayalon – ME Erin Gillespie -ME Erin Gillespie -ME Claudia Forero –ISE Claudia Forero.
FIGURE 9.1 An electronically controlled suspension system can help reduce body roll and other reactions better than most conventional suspension systems.
MNS - Mission need statement
Dr. Marcos Esterman Faculty Guide W. Casolara Project Leader
OVERVIEW Impact of Modelling and simulation in Mechatronics system
P07203 Dynamometry Laboratory Infrastructure
Stationary Balance Training Bicycle - P08001
APPENDIX A EXAMPLE ANALYSES
Mini Baja Suspension Design
AUTOMATIC SHIFT CONTROLS FOR ATV SPONSOR: POLARIS INDUSTRIES
P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension
Validation through Instrumentation
Request for Proposal (RFP)
P08351: Automated Oiling System
P08002-Automated Parallel Bars
HEMODYNAMIC SIMULATOR II P09026
P07021: Instrument to Detect Thromboemboli
Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony Miuccio
Software Engineering Lecture #14.
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS chapter FOUR
Project Review P07442: Thermoelectric Demonstration Test Bed
P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension
Chapter 25 Process and Project Metrics
P15311: PCB Router Phase 4 System Demo with Customer
P08424 Residential Energy Savings
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter
Metrics for process and Projects
Final Project Review -Senior Design 2
Chapter 32 Process and Project Metrics
P09045: Membrane Characteristic Test Stand
SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT P08455
Detailed Design Review: P18001
Preliminary Detailed Design Review: P18001
MSD I Review February 22, 2008 (9:00 AM) Room
Team Members: Sagar Sheth Team Leader Leonardo Silva Industrial Eng.
Presentation transcript:

P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension Mark Lifson Project Manager Todd Simon Technical Lead Kapil Chandersen Engineer Khue Ho Engineer Sponsor: After Hour Racing LLC

P07307: Design Concept Shock position Coil-over spring MR shock replacing the mechanically adjustable shock Rear right tire

P07307: Project Description Develop a Dynamic Suspension System - controls the damping co-efficient on a sprint race car - responds to significant track conditions e.g. banking degree, corner radii, roughness etc. - suspension system controlled through adjustment of rear right shock - uses magneto rheological fluid to dynamically adjust the damping co- efficient - sensors will consist of 2 accelerometers mounted: center of gravity & front right wheel Gives a better control over the sprint car and hence win races Key high level customer needs / engineering specs: - Basic Requirements: Max value for current of approx. 1A Response time ≈ 25ms Power consumption < 50 watts System weight < 20lbs - General Dynamics: Matches the valving requirements for regular shocks (1-6) Max. damping co-efficient ≈ 240 lbs@ 8in/sec Min. damping co-efficient ≈ 50 lbs@ 8in/sec - Easy to modify: System parameters can be easily modified before the race begins

P07307: Technical Risk Assessment Risks: Ability to accurately sense turns Ability to sense bumps with front, right wheel Determination of shock response time Possible system lockup Proposed Mitigations: Add yaw rate sensor to detect turns Determine response time through shock dyno or in the final implementation on the car Add software logic to return shock to “safe” state and LED indicator

P07307: Product Development Process Phase Phase 0/1: SD I -planning, concept development, system-level design Phase1: Detail design- finalizing full system design/ PCB layouts/ cabling Phase 2: Testing & refinement- Assembly of PCB, system interfacing, bench testing Phase 3: Integration into car and testing Current Phase of Project Development 1 2 3 MSD I MSD II

P07307: Current State of Design Design is feasible and meets most customer requirements except: Bump sense: may not sense during power sliding Design meets all engineering specifications for the full system and subsystems except: Response time: could be over 25ms Available project budget is $1000 Project BOM budget: $740 Extra evaluation board for demo/bench test: $150-$200 Mitigations for non-compliances Can still respond to turns and bumps in straightaway

P07307: Budget Distribution

P07307: MSDII Project Schedule Milestones Mar 2: Order Materials and Components Mar 23: Finalize full Detailed Design (PCB Layout) Mar 30: Machine Shock Fixtures & Order PCBs April 13: Assemble and Bench Test PCBs (system with rough software) April 20: Software Interfacing & Data Collection on Tensile Tester April 21: System Case Mounting, Field Testing April 28 (end of 7th week): Overall software integration for Control System May18: Documentation, Final Project Review