WITHHOLDING TAXES AND THE FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jurisdictional Aspect of the New EU Member States Prof. Dr. Geerten M.M. Michielse Technical Assistance Advisor to the IMF Georgetown University Law Center.
Advertisements

Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law Dr Mario Tenore Vienna University of Economics and Business Brussels, 28 September.
(c) G.M.M. Michielse EU Harmonization: An Obstacle for Alternative Corporate Income Tax Systems? Geerten M.M. Michielse Technical Assistance Advisor,
ROPES & GRAY LLP Private Equity Tax Practices
Taxes in Finland Fulbright Grantees 28 August 2014.
CJEU CASE C-338/11 – Santander Asset Management SGIIC and Others Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 May European Tax Law 32E22000 Mikko.
TAX PLANNING Presented by Dr. AA Neidermeyer. TAXING SITUATIONS  Earning income  Enjoying portfolio income  Being a passive participant.
C-342/10 Commission v. Finland Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Free movement of capital – Article 63 TFEU – EEA Agreement – Article 40.
, Introduction to Captives and the Bermuda Domicile Moderator: Federico Candiolo, Counsel, ASW Law Ltd Panelist(s):
INTRODUCTION: In recent years integration has been achieved through tax harmonisation and through European Court of Justice (ECJ) case law This integration.
Real Estate Investments in Italy made by foreign investors: FOREIGN COUNTRY  Direct investment Investment through Italian Real Estate Investment Fund.
Case C48/11 Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö ( Tax Recipients' Legal Services Unit) v A Oy Katja Tiainen Anne Koskela
Ministry of Economy and Finance Public Revenues and Taxes Department Main features of the new Income Tax Law December 2009.
Residential Status.
Prof. Dr. Axel Cordewener, LL.M. Of Counsel, Flick Gocke Schaumburg PEARLE seminar “Taxation of non-resident artists: Recent developments in Germany” Brussels,
Taxation of Intellectual Property Presentation to MBA Students on Intellectual Property Management July 16, 2001.
Leading Tax Advice in Cyprus... and across the World Investments in and out of the Czech Republic Avoidance of double taxation Prague, 17 th June 2010.
Chapter Objectives Be able to: n Explain sources of Canadian tax law. n Identify the two primary entities that are subject to tax. n Explain how residency.
Maximising tax efficiency 22 November 2006 Eleanor Watts.
Foreign Tax Credit. U.S. citizens and residents compute their U.S. taxes based on their worldwide income. This sometimes results in U.S. citizens having.
General Features of Finnish Corporate Taxation
9-1 Non-Corporate Forms of Business  Sole Proprietorship  Partnership  LLC  S corporation.
Johan Boersma TAXATION OF COMPANIES IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
EATLP Rotterdam Congress 2012 Taxation of Charities The impact of EU law and ECJ case law on cross-border non- profit activities Prof. Dr. Edoardo Traversa.
Income Tax concepts: General Concepts Ability to pay concept
Preliminary Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements United Arab Emirates and Mexico SCOF: 24 June 2008.
1 Belgium-China income tax treaty Marc De Mil Fiscal Department for Foreign Investments Federal Public Service Finance.
Freedom of investment between EU and non-EU Member States and its impact on corporate income tax systems within the European Union Dr. D.S. Smit LL.M.
Personal Tax and Social Security in cross-border situations Bulgaria 2010 Nevena van Kuyk.
Business Practice Models Minnesota Psychological Association September 18, 2015 Denise Kautzer, MA, LPCC, CPA
Back to EU Member states Sweden Contents 1.Introduction – why buy real estate? 2.Contact details 3.Forms of property ownership 4.Taxes and other costs.
1 CHANGES TO CORPORATE INCOME TAX RULES IN THE CONTEXT OF EU INTEGRATION Sylwia Sobowiec Sławomir Boruc ( presentation prepared with the help of Baker.
E-commerce – VAT Case Study Malta, Carsten Franke, Hamburg 1.
Income Tax Concepts chapter (2). Accounting concept: 1-Entity concept According to the entity concept, each tax unit must keep separate and report the.
Horlings is a world-wide network of independent accountants and consultants firms 6 February 2009 The Dutch co-operative Nexia European Tax Group Meeting.
1 Nexia International Tax Conference - Istanbul “ Loan Restructuring” June 4, 2011.
Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool POA 5: TIMELY PAYMENT OF TAXES.
Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law Beneficial Ownership, Treaty Entitlement including Transparent Entities Prof.
Resource Capital Fund III LP v Commissioner of Taxation.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening: Chapter.
KHO:2008:23 Finnish Dividend Taxation of EU Individuals.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening:
Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law Cooperative compliance at the crossroad of different legal frameworks – Cooperative.
International aspects of fiscal transparency:
الإطار الفكـري للضريبة والزكاة
Schedule D Case III Sources of Income
Taxability of Prizes and Awards President’s Engagement Prizes
Companies & Dividends Mr Arvin Ajay Sami
European and International Tax Law
Dr. Luca Cerioni Fair Tax Conference:
Circularity between measures Questions regarding financial instruments
12. The collection and refund of taxes
European and international tax law
Schedule D Case III Sources of Income
Customer Care No Relaxation to non-residents from higher withholding tax rate in the absence of PAN – Much needed relief
Taxability of Prizes and Awards President’s Engagement Prizes
Income Tax Returns - Individuals
ACC402 - Foundation Accounting Topic 2 - INCOME TAX FOR SALARY AND WAGE EARNERS Week 4 lecture 1.
Simon Thang, Thorsteinssons LLP
Tax liability of Services provided by non-resident enterprises
Kevin Smits
Tax Transparency and Automatization – The Perspective of the Tax Administration EATLP Congress 2018 Zurich 8 June 2018 Christoph Schelling Ambassador,
Resource Capital Fund III LP v Commissioner of Taxation
English for Tax Administration 2
Click to edit Master subtitle style
The EU Regulatory Framework for Tax
Preliminary Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements United Arab Emirates and Mexico PCOF: 17 June 2008.
Hybrid mismatch arrangements
Master 2 droit fiscal des affaires Université de Rennes I
Methods for avoidance of double taxation
Presentation transcript:

WITHHOLDING TAXES AND THE FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS Karin Simader EATLP Congress, Lisbon 1 June, 2013

Table of Contents Introduction Different Treatment based on Withholding Taxes The Fundamental Freedoms under the TFEU and EU Agreements Comparability Analysis Justifications Proportionality Conclusions: The Admissibility of Withholding Taxes

Taxpayers subject to WHT A is a resident of State X. He earns income in State Y. The taxes are collected by withholding by the payment debtor. State Y taxes income earned by resident taxpayers by assessment. X Y Y 100 100 - 20 - 20

Findings I Cash-flow disadvantages Fundamental Freedoms of the TFEU, EEA Agreement, Agreements with Switzerland, Association and Partnership Agreements Different situations with regard to the recovery of taxes (Truck Center)? Justifications Compensatory advantages Effective collection of taxes Prevention of tax avoidance Proportionality: recovery assistance (X.)

Income subject to WHT A receives interest income. Taxpayers resident in State X who earn income in State Y from a perma- nent establishment are taxed by assessment. X Y X Y 100 - 20 100 - 20

Findings II Horizontal comparability? Permanent establishment enables direct supervision and recovery of taxes Outcome if withholding taxes also for residents Variation: Comparable situations are treated differently, e.g. different professions Impossibility of justification? Going beyond what is necessary?

WHT in the absence of a tax liability The interest income received by A is exempt from taxation in State Y under the tax treaty between State X and State Y. A claims an exemption from the withholding tax. X Y Y 100 100 - 20 - 20 + 20

Findings III Different treatment Temporary over-taxation, need for refund procedure But: No tax treaty exemption for residents Comparability with regard to tax exemptions, directly linked expenses Justifications: Effective collection of taxes? Proportionality Taxpayer participation vs. certificates beforehand or at a later stage (exchange of information), 3rd countries! Liability of the payment debtor vs. recovery assistance Payment debtor: choice or obligation?

Further issues treated 1. Tax collection method 1.1. The income recipient’s perspective 1.1.1. Taxpayers subject to withholding taxes 1.1.2. Income subject to withholding taxes 1.1.3. Withholding taxes in the absence of a tax liability 1.2. The payment debtor’s perspective 1.2.1. The withholding obligation 1.2.2. The liability for the tax payment 1.2.3. Assessment of the withholding obligation 2. Tax amount 2.1. (Non-)Taxation 2.2. Taxable base 2.3. Tax rate

Contact Dr. Karin Simader, LL.B.   TJP Austroexpert Steuerberatungsgesellschaft m.b.H. Austrian tax firm of the year 2011 and 2012 (Aquisition International Legal Awards) European Newcomer 2013 (ITR European Tax Awards) Telefon/Telephone: +43 1 890 30 32 DW / Ext 222 Mobil/Mobile: +43 664 883 85 397 karin.simader@tjp.at www.tjp.at