MVCA’s Watershed Watch Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MCA Test Preparation Part 2. #1: 2/2 = 1 pt. #2: /3 = 1 pt. 26 Points Total.
Advertisements

PowerPoint Development Tool For the Cooperative Lakes Monitoring Program Enabling YOU to make your own presentations.
RICE CREEK CHAIN OF LAKES TMDL. PELTIER LAKE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS MONITORING DATA.
Haliburton County Lakes Stressors and Troubling Indicators Terry Moore Research Director.
Riparian Property Partnerships Stewardship Local property owners are the best long-term stewards of the river, and it is important that.
NOAA’s NWS and the USGS: Partnering to Meet America’s Water Information Needs Ernie Wells Hydrologic Services Division NOAA National Weather Service May.
Anna Mathis, VA Program Coordinator RiverTrends: Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring.
Complexities of the Carters Lake TMDL Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech 26th Annual Alabama Water.
Long-Term Volunteer Lake Monitoring in the Upper Woonasquatucket Watershed Linda Green URI Watershed Watch ,
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Ballast Water Ecological Impact. Ballast Water Video Watch the video on ballast water in order to explain: 1.What is ballast water? 2.Why do ships use.
PEARL: Data Acquisition and Information Summaries for Environmental Education and Outreach in Maine. David Kramar and Peter Vaux.
Field Museum CI AquaRAP Rapid Assessment of Aquatic Ecosystems An Interdisciplinary, International Program Developing Integrated Solutions For.
The Hydrologic (Water) Cycle. Surface Water Oceans Rivers and streams Lakes and ponds Springs – groundwater becomes surface water.
Water Quality Completing Lab 8. Reminder - What’s Due for Lab 8 Full Lab Report (One per Group) (a)Title & Abstract start with catchy title and list of.
Biotic indices and Indicator species. Remember about canaries in coal mines? Indicator species – Use of a living organism that is sensitive to certain.
SELF-HELP MONITORING — A WISCONSIN LAKE — Mary Jane Bumby Green Lake Green Lake County Wisconsin.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Historic Water Quality Concerns High nutrients Impacts on downstream Cutler Reservoir Causes included poor management of riparian corridors and uplands,
PowerPoint Development Tool For the Cooperative Lakes Monitoring Program Enabling YOU to make your own presentations.
Comparative Limnology of Honeoye, Canandaigua, Keuka, Seneca, Cayuga, Owasco & Skaneateles Lakes John D Halfman Environmental Studies Program.
Sentinel Lakes Program: Water quality monitoring and assessment Steve Heiskary, Research Scientist III Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division Minnesota.
Ken Lake Water Study 6/6/06 Conducted by Chris Sogn, Avanti High School Science Teacher David H., Avanti High School Multi-Talented Student.
MLA-MVC Annual Meeting April 22th, 2013
Development of a Southeastern Reference Stream Monitoring Network Debbie Arnwine Water Resources, TDEC
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
A Chemical and Vegetative Characterization of the Ichetucknee River Sky K. Notestein and Thomas K. Frazer.
QA/QC Assessment of Lay Monitoring in Rhode Island Elizabeth M. Herron, Linda T. Green & Arthur J. Gold URI Watershed Watch University of Rhode Island.
Sentinel Lakes Program: MPCA Update – WQ Sampling, Data Analysis & Reporting Steve Heiskary Prepared in conjunction with: Jesse Anderson Pam Anderson Lee.
Fish Assemblages of the Wabash River Mark Pyron. Wabash River Fishes 1.Large river 2.High diversity 3.History of human impact 4.Fish assemblages respond.
Effects of Marine-Derived Nutrients on Productivity in Sockeye Systems.
Pollution and Monitoring
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.
BASIN SCALE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT EVALUATION CONSIDERING CLIMATE RISK Yasir Kaheil Upmanu Lall C OLUMBIA W ATER C ENTER : Global Water Sustainability.
Data and Metadata Archiving: Atlantic Coast Environmental INdicators Consortium (ACE INC) Lexia M. Valdes June 11, 2003 R
WATERSHEDS Concepts and Curriculum Review LAKE MONITORING AND ANALYSIS Tony Thorpe and Dan Obrecht Lakes of Missouri Volunteer Program – Univ. of Missouri.
Analysis of Mechanisms of Nutrient Cycling in Floodplain Lakes of the Lower Mississippi River By Alex Dominguez.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Aquatic Ecosystems as Sentinels of Change Field Station & Marine Lab Emerging Initiatives Workshop November 17, 2011 Colorado Springs, CO Craig Williamson.
Placido Bayou 2 year update followed by 5 year alum budget
McKittrick Canyon, Guadalupe Mtns. National Park, TX
Caddo Lake Nutrient Study Roy Darville - Caddo Lake Institute
Clayton Cox, AAAS Science & Technology Policy US EPA
Mississagua Lake Chain Levels To August 19, 2017 & Projections for Climate Change in the TSW Reservoir Area Presentation to the Cavendish Community Ratepayers’
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
Aquatic Ecosystem Overview:
Mozhaysk reservoir long-term monitoring: potential GLEON site
Amanda Smith and Chris Lorentz, Ph.D. Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)
David Herring (NOAA) Ed Laine (Bowdoin College)
ENV 310 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
ENV 310 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
ENV 310 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Lake Spokane 2012 Nutrient Monitoring Data
Lower Nemahbin Lake Association 2017 Annual Meeting WELCOME
Comparison of Environmental Quality Objectives, Threshold Values or Water Quality Targets under the WFD Jens Arle, Ulrich Claussen & Patrick Müller Federal.
Monitoring Muskoka’s Water
Cassie Druhl, Coordinator Web: partnersofscottcountywatersheds.org
IBI’s: An Introduction
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
First results of the expert network on scarcity and drought
Mazinaw Lake Property Owners Association AGM June 28th, 2014
Lower Nemahbin Lake Association 2018 Annual Meeting WELCOME
Lake Water Quality PLA Meeting August 17, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

MVCA’s Watershed Watch Program Kelly Stiles Lake Networking Group Meeting August 3, 2017

History of the Watershed Watch Program Recent Changes Rotation Parameters Report style Data Presentation

History Initiated in 1998 Partnership between MVCA and Lake Steward Network Program objectives To provide baseline monitoring to 44 lakes To accumulate reliable environmental data and to monitor trends over time To distribute this data to educate residents on sound stewardship practices Variables measured Total phosphorous, Secchi depth, calcium, pH, dissolved oxygen and temperature profiles, Zebra Mussels and Spiny Waterflea

Challenges Previous Rotation Problem Each lake was visited every 5 years Problem Insufficient sampling events Long time to determine trends (due in part in to inter-annual variation)

A 5 year rotation vs yearly data

Solution: A New Rotation Emphasize lakes that are more indicative of the health of the Mississippi River 2 years – Mississippi line 3 years – large lakes representative of each subwatershed 5 years – smaller lakes from each subwatershed 8 years – very small, less developed, headwater lakes Organized by subwatershed Full rotation found in Appendix A of the 2016 Intergrated Report

Changes to Protocol: Total Phosphorous Problem Potential for artificially high TP results from zooplankton in samples Risk of removing samples that may actually be high TP values Data not as comparable to other monitoring programs Solution We began filtering the samples in 2016 80 µm mesh filter Same as LPP Question Will we still be able to compare to historical results? Yes Looking for trends over absolute values Filtering a TP sample Various zooplankton species

Changes to Protocol: Chlorophyll a Problem Requires too many sampling events to get an accurate annual average Expensive lab fees for minimal information Solution Eliminated in the 2016 season TP and Secchi depth are good trophic status indicators Explanation Leftover parameter from old sampling schedule

Changes to Reporting Old Individual Reports New Integrated Report

Integrated Monitoring Report Sections 1. Seasonal Conditions Snow pack, precipitation and water levels 2. Indicators & methodology descriptions 3. Lake by lake results 4. Biotic data from stream sampling 5. Invasive species results Reasons for the Change Efficiency No longer 12 reports/year More holistic analysis Can look at lakes upstream and downstream to see how your lake relates to the system Can consider weather impacts such as droughts and floods Can compare current year to previous year’s TP results

Thank you Kelly Stiles kstiles@mvc.on.ca 613-253-0006 ex 234