Leading Enhancement in Assessment and Feedback in Medical Sciences

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhancing Induction: Principles for Improving the Student Experience Engaging the learner: Why did I get 37%? Professor Brenda Smith Goldsmiths, University.
Advertisements

Completing the cycle: an investigation of structured reflection as a tool to encourage student engagement with feedback Jackie Pates Lancaster Environment.
Peer Mentoring Works : In the students own words…
Perceptions of Feedback: Myth & Reality Jon Scott School of Biological Sciences.
Audio-feedback Background – why I did it. My experiences – what I did. Student feedback – how did it go?
Developing your Assessment Judy Cohen Curriculum Developer Unit for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching.
Improving Students’ understanding of Feedback
Voice feedback on formative assigments Ian Greener School of Applied Social Sciences.
Perceptions of the Role of Feedback in Supporting 1 st Yr Learning Jon Scott, Ruth Bevan, Jo Badge & Alan Cann School of Biological Sciences.
Is PeerMark a useful tool for formative assessment of literature review? A trial in the School of Veterinary Science Duret, D & Durrani,
Texting transition Claire Craig and Neil Mayne. Overview and background The broader context of the work –My research: health promotion –LTA post: exploring.
Assessment for Learning: supporting post graduate students’ Margo McKeever.
Presentation skills My first term at college You are expected to give a talk called “My first term at college”. Here are a few steps to guide you.
© 2015 albert-learning.com How to talk to your boss How to talk to your boss!!
An Interview Dialogue Name: Period:. Step Five Interview- An Interview Dialogue You are going to read the question and pick the best response. The person.
Year 10 New AQA Triple Science What you will be doing.
Margo McKeever, Hannah Waller, Emma Davies, Ben Ward & Lisa Gilholme.
Articulating from FE to HE: Assessing & Improving Academic Confidence Enhancement Themes conference, Thursday 9 June 2016 John McIntyre Conference Centre,
Think Future: Year 8 Lesson 5: Developing a ‘can do’ attitude.
GIVING FEEDBACK ON PERFORMANCE CONCERNS IN A 1:1 MEETING -
Can a grade based approach improve our assessment practice?
Doing something with stories
Hello and welcome to today’s training.
Evaluate the Evaluator Responses
Discuss Talk to someone near you.
Assessing Your Strengths
Introduction to KS4 at Highgate Wood School
International support programme
Assessment in Language Teaching: part 1 Lecture # 23
Presented by Pat Day and Gale Hazleby
Human Bingo!!! Find someone who…
Damned if you do and Damned if you don’t
In-Service Teacher Training
Norton’s Field Guide to Writing
English Proficiency Workshop
Dr. Peter Hills, Kara Peterson, Simon Croker, and Dr. Rachel Manning
How to Study for Finals- What DOES It Look Like?
A department-wide approach to Feedback
Assessment for Learning
How to Be a Successful Student
All About Me Healthy Relationships
Susan Rhind, Neil Lent, Kirsty Hughes, Jill MacKay
Transparency of Assessment in Practice Education
Research preferred A levels for law
Using rubrics in Turnitin: a more consistent approach to assessment and feedback Jenny Woof 22 March 2018.
Academic scenarios.
Helen Jefferis, Soraya Kouadri & Elaine Thomas
A department-wide approach to Feedback
GIVING FEEDBACK ON PERFORMANCE CONCERNS IN A 1:1 MEETING -
Be Positive - I see the good in things. - I believe in me!
Building a relationship with your supervisor
Jocelyn Hickcox, Daniel Melendez, Ashley Mills
Teamwork & Active Listening Teamwork and Active Listening.
JOB SEEKER JOB SEEKER STUDENT STUDENT.
Ashridge Inventory of Management Skills
Developing Communication Styles & Refusal Skills
Refusal Skills Saying “No”.
Evaluation of Research Training in Biochemistry
What do Edinburgh Students Want?
Assessment Workshop September 16, 2009.
Creative assessment and feedback
Comments written by Pupils about particular strategies used in English which helped their writing As you will read, some of our pupils commented about.
Communicating Effectively
Communicating Effectively
Object-based learning
A Moodle-based Peer Assessment Tool
Session 36 How not to be a worry pot.
The Impact of Peer Learning on Assessment Literacy and Feedback Orientation
Title, Hook, and Closing.
Year 11 & 12 Maths from a students’ viewpoint
Presentation transcript:

Leading Enhancement in Assessment and Feedback in Medical Sciences Hazel Marzetti: hazel.marzetti@ed.ac.uk Neil Lent: n.lent@ed.ac.uk

Aims To gain a birds eye view of the programme To understand students’ experiences To identify excellent practice within the department

Context Accounting and finance Applied Animal Behaviour and Animal Welfare Ancient History Biological Sciences Biomedical Sciences Business Chemistry Classics and Classical Studies Computer Science and Informatics Economics Engineering European Languages, Literatures and Cultures History Mathematics Physics Veterinary Medicine

Curriculum mapping and assessment blueprinting Methodology Desk based audit Staff workshop Curriculum mapping and assessment blueprinting Assessment Experience Survey Focus Groups Student Research Report Second meeting What next?

Headline Findings 84% of students either satisfied or very satisfied with assessment and feedback (51 students). There were however 4 distinct areas for improvement: Assessment methods Marking consistency Clarity of assessment expectations Approach to feedback

Assessment expectations They didn’t really say what they’re trying to achieve using this assessment method, or using this type of test. They don’t really say, okay, we want you to know this. This is why we’re doing this. [lab test] I’m realising now, I must have interpreted it [the assessment guidance] completely differently. My marker must’ve been like, what?

Suggestions Continue providing written expectations in advance Provide opportunities to work with assessment expectations and marking criteria Peer marking – facilitate discussion of drafts or plans of students’ work in advance of the assessment Encourage students to make individual appointments to discuss assessed work with staff.

Marking Consistency Marking is so subjective, it depends on what mood the person is in, how many other papers they’ve marked, and how many other ones that they didn’t like, and now they’re in a bad mood, and ... I just feel like it needs to be more standardised. I can never really tell, like, how much you can transfer that feedback to other essays, because of the whole difference between the courses, so I do find that is a bit difficult, still.

Suggestions Increasing confidence in the moderation and/or second marking process through clear communication I struggle to imagine that a second marker would’ve read my first feedback and thought that’s appropriate. Communicating clearly within the department about what is expected of students Ensuring that student understand fully what is expected of them because….

Negative Cycle Unclear about assessment expectation Poorly completed assignment Receives poor grade and does not understand feedback.

Approach to feedback I wasn’t expecting to get feedback being, like, ‘whoa, let me just publish it, that was amazing’. But I was really proud of it. So, I was disappointed with the mark, but it wasn’t the end of the world, but the feedback, it sounded like my marker was really annoyed at me. Like, I was reading my feedback, and I was like, it sounded as if my marker really thought that I hadn’t put a lot of work into it, and it was really obvious I had, like, it really was. It was on a Turnitin, and you had a little comment box, and I had, like, rhetorical questions, like obviously I’d made a statement, then I’d got, ‘is it?’ and that’s not feedback. I was so angry. So, I went and spoke to her, and she did give me feedback, and she said, ‘Oh, yes, this feedback wasn’t that great’

Suggestions Give feedback with empathy Focus on providing feedback that will allow students to both understand their grade and give them actionable feedback for their next piece of work. Provide face to face feedback. Ask students what they would like feedback on, with reference to future work they know is coming up and provide feedback around specific issues identified.

Assessment methods I feel like exams are weighted too much, just because I do find I’m just not an exam person. I’ll do ok, but I think it’s just in my head, I just can’t get it out because of the stress of the exam. I’m just not in a great condition. When an exam is, like, 70% of a course mark, I’m just like, that doesn’t make any sense, because I feel like assessment, you should be assessed more on your continuous work throughout the semester, rather than just a two hour period where you have to regurgitate everything that you’ve memorised, or you slightly understand, or you really understand it, but it’s still about, like, how much you remember, and actually regurgitating, it’s not like ... Because, somebody could memorise something in, like, a week, come in, say it all, and literally get, like, amazing, and the someone who understands everything, and who’s done really well on coursework, and who’s showed their understanding, could come in and achieve, bomb the exam, but then the exam is the biggest weight of your grade.

Suggestions Review whether exams are the most appropriate method of assessment If they are review whether they should be worth 60% or more Explore other methods of coursework based assessment that could be used as an alternative

Compare to NSS Free text comments more positive than negative. Areas students felt could be improved were: Feedback Organisation Assessment Departmental culture

Take away messages Staff’s expertise, supportive nature, and enthusiasm is a major perk of the degree programme. Staff may consider: Reviewing the assessment methods to check that exam is the best primary method of assessment Finding out about the other courses students are taking and ensuring that feedback will be useful to the assessed work for these Provide more opportunities for students to play with assessment and marking criteria before final summative assessments Increase confidence around second marking and moderating processes