Detector building Notes of our discussion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
Advertisements

The Intermediate Silicon Layers detector OUTLINE ISL inside CDFII Why the ISL? Conceptual Design Ladders and Spaceframe Rasnik Online Alignment System.
LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics LHCf: a LHC Detector for Astroparticle Physics Lorenzo Bonechi on behalf of the LHCf Collaboration * University.
LHC Experiments at Liverpool E2V Visit – Nov 2005 Introduction Si Technology Upgrade/Maintenance Summary.
The LHCb Inner Tracker Marc-Olivier Bettler SPS annual meeting Zürich 21 February 2007.
LHCC referees meeting, 10 October 2005Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of the FMD LHCC referees meeting, 10 October 2005 Børge Svane Nielsen Niels Bohr.
The AMS-02 detector is based on a large acceptance (~0.5 m²sr) and high sensitivity spectrometer composed by a super-conducting magnet (0.8 T), cooled.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
Abraham Gallas (USC-IGFAE) Strips and Pixels for the VELO upgrade.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
VELO upgrade electronics – HYBRIDS Tony Smith University of Liverpool.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
1 Conceptual design adopts state-of-the-art silicon sensor techniques (compare ATLAS/CMS/ALICE inner tracker layers, BaBar tracking of B mesons). Design.
BIONIC DATA STORAGE USING HOLOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES BY KAILASH.K AND PRIYADHARSHINI.R.
M. Adinolfi – University of Oxford – MAPMT Workshop – Imperial College 27 June Rad-Hard qualification for the LHCb RICH L0 electronics M. Adinolfi.
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
HPD Performance in the RICH Detectors of the LHCb Young Min Kim University of Edinburgh IoP HEPP Conference – April
Pixel hybrid status & issues Outline Pixel hybrid overview ALICE1 readout chip Readout options at PHENIX Other issues Plans and activities K. Tanida (RIKEN)
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
Ideas for LC mechanics (we will work on sensors as well – particular CMOS)
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
At the HERA collider in Hamburg an experiment (ZEUS) has been built to study electron-proton collisions. For the near future an upgrade of this experiment.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
9 September 2004The Straw Tube Chamber1 The CDC Curtis A. Meyer Carnegie Mellon University Physics Requirements and Specifications Prototype Construction.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
The Compact Muon Solenoid. What does CMS do? The Compact Muon Solenoid is a general purpose particle detector installed at point 5 of the Large Hadron.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
M. Deveaux, CBM-Collaboration-Meeting, 25 – 28. Feb 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Considerations on the material budget of the CBM Micro Vertex Detector. Outline:
On a eRHIC silicon detector: studies/ideas BNL EIC Task Force Meeting May 16 th 2013 Benedetto Di Ruzza.
February 14, Comprehensive Review B. Schmidt Outline: Status and overview of activities: –Platforms and staircases –Muon Filters and beam plugs.
Electronics Preparatory Group 6 June Events which happened  Meeting of all the conveners of working groups 
M. Garcia-Sciveres July 2002 ATLAS A Proton Collider Detector M. Garcia-Sciveres Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
Ideas for Super LHC tracking upgrades 3/11/04 Marc Weber We have been thinking and meeting to discuss SLHC tracking R&D for a while… Agenda  Introduction:
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Geoff HallLECC LHC detector upgrades Introductory comments on electronic issues Organisation of this short session.
A New Inner-Layer Silicon Micro- Strip Detector for D0 Alice Bean for the D0 Collaboration University of Kansas CIPANP Puerto Rico.
HIE-ISOLDE Design Study Safety and Beam Quality Challenges for the HIE-ISOLDE Frontend Jacobo Montaño (EN/STI/RBS) HIE-ISOLDE Workshop, November 2013 *
1/20 LHCb upgrade, Jeroen van Tilburg Nikhef Jamboree, 14 Dec 2015 Preparing for the LHCb upgrade.
RD42 Status Report W. Trischuk for the RD42 Collaboration LHCC Meeting – June 12, 2013 Development of CVD Diamond Tracking Detectors for Experiments at.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
With. Project Overview  Introduction to Factory Automation Numerical Control  Build an autonomous robotic solution  Testing an autonomous robot build.
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 2/27/2014
Pixel 3D Sensor Test Beam Analysis Update
Progress with System Integration of the CBM Silicon Tracking Detector
The fibre journey for fibre-to-the-cabinet (FTTC) solutions
Producing detector parts & The CNC machine
How to build a particle hunter
Some input to the discussion for the design requirements of the GridPixel Tracker and L1thack trigger. Here are some thoughts about possible detector layout.
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector
Prospecting for Gold: Particle Detectors
Hybrid Pixel R&D and Interconnect Technologies
LumiCal mechanical design, integration with LDC and laser alignment
Design of the He and HB ODU
UNIZH and EPFL at LHCb.
LHCb VErtex LOcator For precision measurements of CP-violation at CERN (GENEVE) HALF of DETECTOR Si strip detector Read-out electronics Secondary vacuum.
LHCb VErtex LOcator ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
LHCb VErtex LOcator For precision measurements of CP-violation at CERN (GENEVE) HALF of DETECTOR Si strip detector Read-out electronics Secondary vacuum.
Peter Kodyš, Zdeněk Doležal, Jan Brož,
HL-LHC upgrade at IPHC news
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Experimental Method: 2 independent detectors on both sides of IP
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

Detector building Notes of our discussion Stagiere group 15 Feb 2017 Karl.gill@cern.ch

Outline We considered a timescale of the next 10 years, looking at the project to upgrade the CMS Tracker We talked mainly about prototyping phase (going on now in 2017 and for next 2-3 years) Some particular questions we discussed How do we decide what to build (e.g. how to make aTracker) Why such light material used? How do we meaasure 3D spacepoints with 2D microstrip detectors Why are optical fibres used? Why are we using QR codes? Engineering and Physics - How do these different fields connect at CERN in detector building? Why we need to collaborate? We talked briefly about what follows prototyping Production and testing (2019 – 23) Why do we need to do the production of parts in batches? Assembly and testing (2023-24) and how do we test the detector at CERN Meyrin at the same time as getting the CMS cavern ready to install the new detector… All to get ready for final installation and testing (2025) then 10+ more years of measurements

The beginning, what and why? How to decide what to build? First, what is the objective of the Tracker? We try to measure precisely the point of origin of the particle, when and where the particle was produced, which direction it is going, and how fast, and what charge sign the particle has. Combining Tracking information with other information from CMS (calorimeters and muon detectors) allows to identify more precisely the type of particles made in the collision Some key points: The tracker detectors each need to make a precise measurement of where the particles cross Means we need to use very fine detectors (the lines or strips on the piece of silicon) With a collection of points we can put all the information together to reconstruct the tracks The electronics has to be fast and well synchronized to be able to measure signals over 15000 modules (72000 electronic chips and 36000 fibres) from collisions that occur every 25 nanoseconds (40 million times per second!) The Tracker has to be as lightweight

Why is the Tracker lightweight?? Particles can bump into any piece of material in the Tracker that is in their path If this happens the particles are deflected in a different direction which can spoil the tracking performance So, we use thin silicon (just thick enough for a good signal) and light mechanics (carbon-fibre, aluminium, etc., thin materials) We make the electronics to use as little power as possible to avoid needing too large and too many copper cables to bring the electricity and to reduce the amount of cooling needed to take away the heat from the silicon sensors, electronics and power cables

First steps in detector building in parallel: Test small prototypes silicon sensors, early electronics, and basic mechanical modules Understand how to use latest technology Figure out how to improve existing detector designs Physics and tracking performance simulations Physics theory (modeled in the simulation programmes) predicts what we might be able to create with LHC collisions Detector physics simulation predicts how well we can measure particles from the collisions Allows us to figure out how many sensors (and how many different types) we need and where to put them.

Prototyping Prototyping = Designing and testing the ingredients that we will use to build the detector First we make and test very small prototype detectors For example, checking different silicon sensor designs in the case of the new Tracker We didn’t talk much about this, but why silicon detectrs? we use Silicon to profit from all the advances in the last decades in the electronics industry, where silicon chips have been getting cheaper and cheaper, and more advanced, with smaller features. Also, test small versions of the electronics chips Simplified versions collecting signals from only a few microstrips. Small versions of prototype sensors and chips are more affordable and we can then test more versions before deciding on the final designs In parallel, we also design the first prototype detector module mechanics (carbon fibre, aluminium, ceramic, kapton cables, thermal glue, etc..) To figure out how to attach sensor to the electronics, cables and cooling How to do this solidly and reliably with the lightest materials

Are the prototypes good enough? Make “beam-tests”, putting one or more modules into a particle beam can be done at CERN, or other accelerator facilities Checks the detector performance Optimise the mechanics to be as stiff and light as possible for holding many modules in place throughout the Tracker Make other tests e.g. radiation damage Every part of the tracker is hit by about a 100 million million particles per square centimetre during the 10 year lifetime. Each particle can make a tiny bit of damage, which builds up and can kill the sensor or the electronics, or the fibre optics components. Estimate the expected costs to make industrial production based on the prototypes Can we afford to build the detector we would like to have??? Have to make these first steps over and over (usually it takes several years work of prototyping!) until we are in a good enough situation to continue to production

Collaboration There are at least 3000 people involved in the CMS experiment, and about 500 involved in the Tracker alone. Why do we collaborate? We have so much development, testing, production and assembly work to do Not all of it can be done by automatic machines So, we must share the work over many groups and people E.g. if we need to make 20000 modules in no more than 2 years time period to fit the planning overall, we better have several (5+) groups able to make at least several thousand modules each in 1-2 years of time. A big challenge: to organise that every group gets all the ingredients it needs on time, has all the lab space and test equipment it needs, Has the people and training needed for all the assembly and testing This organisation has to include how to manage the purchasing from industry to get on time all the raw ingredients (sensors, chips, hybrids, fibres, connectors, etc..) Money has to be available and collected from the different countries sometimes millions of CHF

Other questions How do we measure 3D spacepoints with 2D microstrip detectors We put detectors back to back with a small tilt angle on one of the layers Why are optical fibres used? Lightweight way of sending huge amounts of data at low power from a very small laser chip Why are we using QR codes? We need to keep track of what is connected to what using a cabling map. The codes on the QR label are unique and allow us to make a map of what is connected to what. Why is production done in batches? Production then done in batches of a certain size to manage the risk of faults in production and allow time for us to test each batch before making the next batch. Also we do not then have to pay all the money at once for all the material!

Conclusion With a collection of: good ideas of how to use the latest technology, a good detector design, that can be built and has the performance to measure with the right precision and speed, a great team in each partner institute ready to dedicate to years of work, a good organisation over many groups across the world, enough money when we need it to buy parts, high quality materials from all of our industrial partners, and lots and lots of testing at each stage These are some of the ingredients for successful detector building!