Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC and NJ ASK RESULTS: Englewood Cliffs School District Kimberly Dowling Supervisor of Curriculum and Instruction October 10, 2016 Measuring College and Career Readiness

What has Changed? Times - 2016- The PARCC was shortened by 90 minutes total. 60 minutes in Mathematics 30 minutes in ELA One testing window instead of two Fewer test sessions and questions Quicker results for everyone

PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

2016 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 Grade 3 55 3.6% (2) 12.7% (7) 20% (11) 50.9% (28) 63.6% 47.6% 37.2% Grade 4 76 9.2% (7) 2.6% (2) 23.7% (18) 46.1% (35) 18.4% (14) 64.5% 53.5% 41.5% Grade 5 48 0% (0) 18.8% (9) 56.3% (27) 25% (12) 81.3% 53.2% 40.5% Grade 6 56 1.8% (1) 12.5% (7) 44.6% (25) 41.1% (23) 85.7% 52.3% 38.7% Grade 7 43 11.6% (5) 25.6% (11) 62.8% (27) 88.4% 56.3% 41.7% Grade 8 32 2.3% (1) 4.5% (2) 34.1% (15) 59.1% (26) 93.2% 55.2% 41.9%

2016 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 Grade 3 55 1.8% (1) 25.5% (14) 40% (22) 30.9% (17) 70.9% 51.7% 37.6% Grade 4 77 10.4% (8) 11.7% (9) 20.8% (16) 45.5% (35) 11.7% (9) 57.1% 46.6% 32.3% Grade 5 48 4.2% (2) 27.1% (13) 43.8% (21) 20.8% (10) 64.6% 47.2% 31.9% Grade 6 58 3.4% 25.9% (15) 43.1% (25) 24.1% (14) 67.2% 43% 32% Grade 7 45 2.2% (1) 8.9% (4) 20% 37.8% (17) 31.1% 68.9% 38.7% 28.8% Grade 8 Algebra 1 43 0% (0) 4.7% 16.3% (7) 65.1% (28) 14% (6) 79.1% 41.2% 30.8%

GRADE 3 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 White 17 0% 11.8% (2) 23.5% (4) 64.7% (11) Asian 32 3.1% (1) 9.4% (3) 21.9% (7) 43.8% (14) 65.6% (21) Hispanic or Latino 3 33.3% (1) 66.7% (2) Black or African American 1 100% (1) Two or More Races 100%(1) Not Indicated Male 34 5.9%(2) 20.6% (7) 47.1% (16) 5.9% (2) 52.9% (18) Female 21 19% (4) 57.1% (12) 23.8% (5) 81% (17) Students with Disabilities 8 12.5% (1) 25% (2) 37.5% (3)

GRADE 4 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 District % >= Level 4 White 25 16% (4) 8% (2) 28% (7) 48% (12) 0% Asian 42 2.4%(1) 16.7% (7) 47.6% (20) 33.3% (14) 81% (34) Hispanic or Latino 4 100% (4) Black or African American 3 33.3%(1) 66.7% (2) Not Indicated 2 50% (1) Male 38 13.2% (5) 2.6% (1) 21.1% (8) 55.3% (21) 7.9% (3) 63.2% (24) Female 5.3% (2) 26.3% (10) 36.8% (14) 28.9% (11) 65.8% (25) Students with Disabilities 13 38.5% (5) 7.7% (1) 15.4% (2)

GRADE 5 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 District % >= Level 4 White 16 0% 25% (4) 62.5% (10) 12.5% (2) 75% (12) Asian 24 12.5% (3) 50% (12) 37.5% (9) 87.5% (21) Hispanic or Latino 4 25% (1) 50% (2) 25%(1) 75% (3) Black or African American Male 19 31.6% (6) 52.6% (10) 15.8% (3) 68.4% (13) Female 29 10.3% (3) 58.6% (17) 31% (9) 89.7% (26) Students with Disabilities 3 66.7% (2) 33.3% (1)

GRADE 6 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 White 17 0% 5.9% (1) 23.5% (4) 58.8% (10) 11.8% (2) 70.6% (12) Asian 35 5.7% (2) 40% (14) 54.3% (19) 94.3% (33) Black or African American 4 25% (1) 50% (2) 75% (3) Male 27 3.7% (1) 18.5% (5) 44.4% (12) 33.3% (9) 77.8% (21) Female 29 6.9% (2) 44.8% (13) 48.3% (14) 93.1% (27) Students with Disabilities 6 16.7% (1) 33.3% (2) 50% (3)

GRADE 7 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 White 21 0% 19% (4) 42.9% (9) 38.1% (8) 81% (17) Asian 18 11.1% (2) 88.9% (16) 100% (18) Hispanic or Latino 4 25% (1) 75% (3) Male 23 17.4% (4) 30.4% (7) 52.2% (12) 82.6% (19) Female 20 5% 20% 75% (15) 95% (19) Students with Disabilities 7 57.1% (4) 42.9% (3)

GRADE 8 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 White 16 0% 6.3% (1) 50% (8) 37.5% (6) 87.5% (14) Asian 21 23.8% (5) 76.2% (16) 100% (21) Hispanic or Latino 6 33.3% (2) 66.7% (4) 100% (6) Black or African American 1 100% (1) Male 23 4.3% (1) 39.1% (9) 56.5% (13) 95.7% (22) Female 9.5% (2) 28.6% (6) 61.9% (13) 90.5% (19) Students with Disabilities 5 20% (1) 40% (2)

GRADE 3 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 District % >= Level 4 White 17 0% 5.9% (1) 35.3% (6) 41.2% (7) 17.6% (3) 58.8% (10) Asian 32 21.9% (7) 37.5% (12) 40.6%(13) 71.8% (25) Hispanic or Latino 3 66.7% (2) 33.3% (1) 100% (3) Black or African American 1 100% (1) Not Indicated Two or More Races Male 34 2.9% (1) 20.6% (7) 44.1% (15) 29.4%(10) 73.5% (25) Female 21 33.3% (7) 66.7% (14) Students with Disabilities 8 12.5%(1) 50% (4) 12.5% (1) 25% (2) 37.5% (3)

GRADE 4 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 White 25 20% (5) 12% (3) 36% (9) 28% (7) 4% (1) 32% (8) Asian 43 2.3% (1) 4.7% (2) 14% (6) 60.5% (26) 18.6% (8) 79.1% (34) Hispanic or Latino 4 0% 100% (4) Black or African American 3 33.3%(1) 66.7% (2) Not Indicated 2 50% (1) Male 39 7.7% (3) 12.8% (5) 25.6% (10) 46.2% (18) 53.8% (21) Female 38 13.2%(5) 10.5%(4) 15.8% (6) 44.7% (17) 60.5% (23) Students with Disabilities 13 30.8%(4) 23.1% (3) 38.5% (5) 7.7% (1)

GRADE 5 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 White 16 0% 50% (8) 50% (8) Asian 24 4.2% (1) 12.5% (3) 41.7% (10) 83.3% (20) Hispanic or Latino 4 25% (1) 50% (2) 25% (1) Black or African American (2) Male 19 5.3% (1) 31.6% (6) 36.8% (7) 21.1% (4) 57.9% (11) Female 29 3.4% (1) 3.4% (1) 24.1% (7) 48.3% (14) 20.7% (6) 69% (20) Students with Disabilities 3 33.3% (1)

GRADE 6 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 White 17 5.9% (1) 11.8% (2) 41.2% (7) 35.3% (6) Asian 36 0% 16.7% (6) 47.2% (17) 36.1%(13) 83.3% (30) Hispanic or Latino 1 100% (1) Black or African American 4 50% (2) Male 28 3.6%(1) 21.4% (6) 39.3% (11) 35.7%(10) 75% (21) Female 30 3.3% (1) 6.7% (2) 30% (9) 46.7% (14) 13.3% (4) 60% (18) Students with Disabilities 6 16.7%(1) 16.7% (1) 33.3% (2) 50% (3)

GRADE 7 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 White 22 4.5% (1) 13.6%(3) 31.8% (7) 45.5% (10) 50% (11) Asian 19 0% 31.6% (6) 68.4% (13) 100% (19) Hispanic or Latino 4 25% (1) 50% (2) 25% (1) Male 24 4.2% (1) 8.3% (2) 29.2% (7) 58.3% (14) Female 21 9.5% (2) 47.6% (10) 33.3% (7) 81% (17) Students with Disabilities 8 12.5%(1) 37.5% (2) 50% (4)

GRADE 8 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS ALGEBRA I Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 White 16 0% 12.5% (2) 37.5% (6) 50% (8) Asian 21 71.4% (15) 28.6% (6) 100% (21) Hispanic or Latino 5 100% (5) 100% (5) Black or African American 1 100% (1) Male 23 4.3% (1) 13.0% (3) 60.9% (14) 21.7% (5) 82.6% (19) Female 20 5% (1) 20% (4) 70% (14) 75% (15) Students with Disabilities 20% (1) 80% (4)

= 2015 = 2016 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Math Cohort Comparison =2015 = 2016 Current Grade 4 Current Grade 5 Current Grade 6 Current Grade 7 Current Grade 8

= 2015 = 2016 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

ELA Cohort Comparison = 2015 = 2016 Current Grade 4 Current Grade 5

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 3 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Literary 18.2% (10) 25.5% (14) 56.4% (31) Informational Reading 20% (11) 21.8% (12) 58.2% (32) Vocabulary 12.7% (7) 65.5% (36) Written Expression 30.9 (17) 9.1% (5) 60% (33) Writing Conventions 10.9% (6) 70.9% (39)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 4 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Literary 17.1% (13) 26.3% (20) 56.6% (43) Informational Reading 19.7% (15) 21.1% (16) 59.2% (45) Vocabulary 34.2% (26) 48.7% (37) Written Expression 19.7 (15) 22.4% (17) 57.9% (44) Writing Conventions 10.5% (8) 72.4% (55)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 5 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Literary 18.8% (9) 12.5% (6) 68.8% (33) Informational Reading 10.4% (5) 22.9% (11) 66.7% (32) Vocabulary 8.3% (4) 27.1% (13) 64.6% (31) Written Expression 0% (0) 6.3% (3) 93.6% (45) Writing Conventions 91.7% (44)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 6 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Literary 12.5% (7) 10.7% (6) 76.8% (43) Informational Reading 8.9% (5) 17.9% (10) 73.2% (41) Vocabulary 16.1% (9) 25% (14) 58.9% (33) Written Expression 1.8% (1) 5.4% (3) 92.9% (52) Writing Conventions

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 7 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Literary 16.3% (7) 9.3% (4) 74.4% (32) Informational Reading 4.7% (2) 18.6% (8) 76.7% (33) Vocabulary 6.8% (3) 23.2% (10) 69.8% (30) Written Expression 0% 100% (43) Writing Conventions 2.3% (1) 97.7% (42)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 8 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Literary 4.5% (2) 15.9% (7) 79.5% (35) Informational Reading 4.7% (2) 11.4% (5) 84.1% (37) Vocabulary 2.3% (1) 81.8% (36) Written Expression 0% 95.5% (42) Writing Conventions 6.8% (3) 90.9% (40)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 3 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Major Content 7.3% (4) 20% (11) 72.7% (40) Supporting Content 5.5% (3) 29.1% (16) 65.5% (36) Reasoning 9.1% (5) 16.4% (9) 74.5% (41) Modeling 12.7% (7) 78.2% (43)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 4 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Major Content 24.7% (19) 50.6% (39) Supporting Content 22.1% (17) 53.2% (41) Reasoning 16.9% (13) 26% (20) 57.1% (44) Modeling 15.6% (12) 58.4% (45)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 5 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Major Content 14.5% (7) 23% (11) 62.5% (30) Supporting Content 20.8% (10) 18.8% (9) 60.4% (29) Reasoning 16.7% (8) Modeling 8.3% (4) 72.9% (35)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 6 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Major Content 12.1% (7) 22.4% (13) 65.5% (38) Supporting Content 15.5% (9) 62.1% (36) Reasoning 10.3% (6) 20.7% (12) 70% (40) Modeling 72.4% (42)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 7 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Major Content 13.3% (6) 17.8% (8) 68.9% (31) Supporting Content 15.6% (7) 71.1% (32) Reasoning 8.9% (4) 31.1% (14) 60% (27) Modeling 22.2% (10) 6.7% (3)

2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 8- Algebra 1 Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations Approached Expectations Met or Exceeded Expectations Major Content 16.3% (7) 2.3% (1) 81.4% (35) Supporting Content 9.3% (4) 18.6% (8) 72.7% (31) Reasoning 62.8% (27) Modeling 4.7% (2) 25.6% (11) 69.8% (30)

QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA REFLECTION How will we use PARCC data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in curriculum and instruction? How will we use PARCC data to inform the conversations of our educators? What can we learn about where additional professional resources are needed to meet the learning needs of all students? I

Using PARCC Data Effectively Using data to drive instruction in the classroom Flex Grouping Writing in Mathematics Cross Curricular Units of Study Viewing the data from previous years to drive instruction Utilizing PARCC online resources Practice tests Example questions View responses with scores View rubrics and use the same ones in the classroom PARCC Sample Responses/ All Grade Levels https://prc.parcconline.org/assessments/parcc-released-items?title=&field_subject_tid=&field_grade_level_unlimited_tid=All https://prc.parcconline.org/system/files/Grade%203%20Rubric%20Final_July%202015.pdf https://prc.parcconline.org/system/files/Grade%204-5%20Rubric%20Final_July%202015.pdf https://prc.parcconline.org/system/files/Grade%206-11%20Rubric%20Final_July%202015.pdf

Using PARCC Data Effectively Utilizing online programs Study Island Online practice, immediate feedback. built-in remediation, customizable assessments to promote individual instruction, students are engaged with a variety of modes (practice, game, and printable worksheets) Tenmarks Comprehensive, standards based curriculum Scaffolded lessons, guided practice, assignments, assessments and interventions

How We Are Using the Data? Each teacher in grades 4-8 received a copy of their individual class lists with each child’s score, overall performance, and performance in each sub category for both ELA and Mathematics. Score Overall Performance Literacy Informational Reading Vocabulary Written Expression Writing Conventions 743 3-Approached Expectations 774 4-Met Expectations 811 5-Exceeded Expectations 732 739 744 790 758 760 771 770 819 731 788 721 2-Partially Met Expectations 769 762

NJ ASK: Grade 4 Grade 4: Total General Education Special Education Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Total 3.8% (3) 25.6% (20) 70.5% (55) 78 Students Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Total 3.1% (2) 21.5% (14) 75.4% (49) 65 Students Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Total 7.7% (1) 46.2% (6) 13 Studentds

NJ ASK: Grade 4 Demographic Groups Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Total Female 2.6% (1) 28.2% (11) 69.2% (27) 39 Students Male 5.1% (2) 23.1% (9) 71.8% (28) White 0% 46.2% (12) 53.8% (14) 26 Students African American 33.3% (3) 66.7% (2) 3 Students Asian 2.3% (1) 11.4% (5) 86.4% (38) 44 Students Hispanic 75% (3) 25% (1) 4 Students Other 100% (1)

5 Year Comparison – Grade 4 2012 2015 AP 72.2% P 27.8% PP 0% AP 77.4% P 22.6% PP 0% 2013 2016 AP 71.7% P 26.4% PP 1.9% AP 70.5% P 25.6% PP 3.8% 2014 AP 80.3% P 19.7% PP 0%

NJ ASK: Grade 8 Grade 8: Total General Education Special Education Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Total 8.5% (4) 34% (16) 57.4% (27) 47 Students Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Total 4.8% (2) 31% (13) 64.3% (27) 42 Students Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Total 40% (2) 60% (3) 0% 5 Students

NJ ASK: Grade 8 Demographic Groups Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced Proficient Total Female 13.6% (3) 36.4% (8) 50% (11) 22 Students Male 4% (1) 32% (8) 64% (16) 25 Students White 21.1% (4) 47.4% (9) 31.6% (6) 19 Students African American 0% 100% (1) 1 Students Asian 9.5% (2) 90.5% (19) 21 Students Hispanic 66.7% (4) 33.3% (2) 6 Students

5 Year Comparison – Grade 8 2012 2015 AP 50% P 47.2% PP 2.8% AP 38.5% P 51.3% PP 10.3% 2013 2016 AP 56.7% P 43.3% PP 0% AP 57.4% P 34% PP 8.5% 2014 AP 42.6% P 46.8% PP 10.6%