A community of learners improving our world

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design
Course Design, Outcomes and Objectives. 3 Questions.
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
What should be the basis of
Creating Significant Learning Experiences L. Dee Fink.
ABC Curriculum Showcase Coventry Public Schools February 10, 2009 An introduction for parents and community members Left click your mouse to advance to.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Significant Learning Goals
Online Course Development and Constructivist Teaching Strategies Susan M. Zvacek, Ph.D
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
LT512 Reading in the Content Areas Professor: Donna Numeroff-Martin, EdD Seminar: Monday 7:00pm EST Week 5: Unit 5 Comprehension Strategies.
Course Design: Outcomes, Objectives and Assessment Strategies
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
CEIT 225 Instructional Design Prof. Dr. Kürşat Çağıltay
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Sharon Lalla, Ed.D. Wenona Nutima ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK.
Mapping Your Online Course Susie Bussmann, Ph.D. & Sandy Johnson, M.A. & M.S.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
ENHANCING QUALITY IN ONLINE LEARNING Nadeosa Conference Durban University of Technology 8-9 July 2015 Dr Ephraim Mhlanga.
Courses of instruction are usually divided into learning units as reflected in textbooks, manuals, modules, and other instructional materials that are.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Writing Course and Module-Level Objectives
Getting Prepared for the Webinar
The Academic Technology Center
Set Sail on a Three-Course Tour: Three examples of a QM Reviewed Course Krista MacDonald Doña Anna Community College Sharon Lalla New Mexico State University.
QM, Health Care, Adult Learners, and Leadership
Snaptutorial ESE 697 Help Bcome Exceptional/ snaptutorial.com
Creating Course Objectives
ALIGN AND REDESIGN.
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Module 2: Introduction to Using OER for Math Instruction
Robin O’Callaghan Mary Bohman Winona State University
The Road to Quality - A Panel Discussion on Campus Implementation
The Learning Experience Plan
Starting with the End in Sight…
Planning for Social Studies Instruction
Instructional Design Gibran Carter.
Tutorial Welcome to Module 13
Starting Off Right Engaging Activities for Kick-Starting the Development of Learning Outcomes Presenter: Kim Woodruff Director of Instructional Design,
Using Action Research to Guide Student Learning Experiences & Assessments Exploring the synergistic activities of curriculum design/delivery and assessment.
The Buggy Before the Horse
3 Stages of Backward Design
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Setting Instructional Outcomes
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Countdown to Your New Co-op
The curriculum The curricullum tells «What and how the learners should learn» at specific levels of the education system. It includes the objectives and.
Leanne Havis, Ph.D., Neumann University
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
Creating Meaningful Student Learning Outcomes
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards
Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards
Writing Learning Outcomes
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Training for the New Georgia Performance Standards
Project-Based Learning Integrating 21st Century Skills
Designing and delivering a learner centred curriculum
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Countdown to Your New Co-op
Create engaging content using effective Instructional Design practices​ Ana Maria Zurita  Instructional Designer​ | CCOL Mariana Fernandez ​ Professor | Media.
Presentation transcript:

A community of learners improving our world Integrating Dr. Fink’s “Designing Courses for Significant Learning” into Creating Online QM Courses Robin O'Callaghan Senior Instructional Designer, QM Peer Reviewer & QM F2F Facilitator Dr. Ken Graetz WSU TLT Director A community of learners improving our world

Workshop Learning Objectives www.winona.edu Workshop Learning Objectives Summarize the importance of taxonomy integration into their online course Identify reasons why using different taxonomies with QM standards can be effective with course design Compare and contrast Fink’s Instructional Design Model and QM Identify instructional design tools that align with QM Discuss the importance of using taxonomies with QM  

Designing Courses for Significant Learning Dr. Fink www.winona.edu Initial Design Phase Situational Factors Learning Objectives Feedback and Assessment Teaching and Learning Activities Integration Intermediate Phase Course Structure Instructional Strategies Learning Activities Final Design Phase Grading System Possible Problems Syllabus Evaluation Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

Designing Courses for Significant Learning Dr. Fink www.winona.edu Initial Design Phase Situational Factors Learning Objectives Feedback and Assessment Teaching and Learning Activities Integration Intermediate Phase Course Structure Instructional Strategies Learning Activities Final Design Phase Grading System Possible Problems Syllabus Evaluation Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

Fink-Step 2: Learning Objectives www.winona.edu Fink-Step 2: Learning Objectives Fink Taxonomy chart to draft learning objectives that are appropriate for the course level and module level. What do you want the students to learn or retain 2-3 years from now? How do you want your students to stand out from others taking a similar course? More emphasis on critical thinking skills, application of knowledge and solving world problems. Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Fink’s Taxonomy Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

Fink Bloom

QM Standard 2 Learning Objectives www.winona.edu QM Standard 2 Learning Objectives 2.1 The course learning objectives describe outcomes that are measurable. 2.2 The module/unit learning objectives describe outcomes that are measurable and consistent with the course-level objectives. Copyright MarylandOnline 2013

www.winona.edu Video Insert

Backward Course Design Learning Objectives Identify desired results Assessment Determine evidence Learning Activities Plan learning experiences & activities

Fink-Step 3: Feedback & Assessment Procedure www.winona.edu What will students be able to demonstrate based on your learning objectives? Projects, papers, quizzes, discussions. Working backwards (starting with assessment) can help you align Learning Objectives with Assessments. Feedback should be immediate frequent and make sure it’s clear as to the different between acceptable and unacceptable work. Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

Fink-Step 3: Feedback & Assessment Procedure www.winona.edu Educative Assessments-Set of feedback and assessment. Forward Thinking Assessment-questions or real-world problems. Criteria and standards for evaluating student work. Self-Assessment-students reflect on their own work or projects. Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

Assessment and Feedback www.winona.edu QM Standard 3 Assessment and Feedback 3.1 The types of assessments selected measure the stated learning objectives and are consistent with course activities and resources. 3.3  Specific and descriptive criteria are provided for the evaluation of students’ work and participation and are tied to the course grading policy. 3.4  The assessment instruments selected are sequenced, varied, and appropriate to the student work being assessed. 3.5  Students have multiple opportunities to measure their own learning progress. Copyright MarylandOnline 2013

www.winona.edu Video Insert

www.winona.edu Step 5: Integration Make sure all your components are aligned in Steps 1-4. Key components in Steps 1-4 should be closely related and support each other. Course Matrix or Course List: List your learning objectives, identify the assessment tool that aligns with the learning objective. Next align the learning activities with the assessment tools. Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

Key components must align www.winona.edu Key components must align Eight General Standards: Course Overview and Introduction Learning Objectives (Competencies) Assessment and Measurement Resources and Materials Learner Engagement Course Technology Learner Support Accessibility Alignment: Critical course elements work together to ensure that students achieve the desired learning outcomes. Copyright MarylandOnline 2013

www.winona.edu Bite from Pat Insert text here

Fink-Step 6: Course Structure Intermediate Phase Fink-Step 6: Course Structure www.winona.edu 4-7 segments that focus on themes, concepts, topics or issues Arrange these segments into a logical sequence and decide how many weeks each segment will need. Each new segment: Introduction Opportunity to apply and use what they are learning-practice Assessment with final application As more content is delivered to your students the more complex the assignments can become. Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

Structured Sequence for Course Content Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

www.winona.edu Bite from Pat

Quality Matters Overview Find, Buy, Build and Share Online Content www.winona.edu WeTeach Tracks One Charting your course Quality Matters Overview Find, Buy, Build and Share Online Content Communicating and collaborating with your online students Online Assessment & Feedback Connecting your students to online resources at WSU Creating a timeline for your online course

WeTeach Tracks Two www.winona.edu Initial Design Phase Situational Factors Learning Objectives Feedback and Assessment Teaching and Learning Activities Integration Intermediate Phase Course Structure Instructional Strategies Learning Activities Final Design Phase Grading System Possible Problems Syllabus Evaluation Source: Dr. Dee Fink-A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning

Internal Review of your course Report on each standard-met or not met www.winona.edu WeTeach Tracks Three Internal Review of your course Report on each standard-met or not met Detailed report of how you might improve the “not-met” standards Create an action plan to meet any QM standards you have not met Work 1:1 with Instructional Designer External Review (TLT funding)

Workshop Learning Objectives www.winona.edu Workshop Learning Objectives Summarize the importance of taxonomy integration into their online course Identify reasons why using different taxonomies with QM standards can be effective with course design Compare and contrast Fink’s Instructional Design Model and QM Identify instructional design tools that align with QM Discuss the importance of using taxonomies with QM  

www.winona.edu