C.F.I.T. © Global Air Training Limited 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN C F I T
Advertisements

Flight Validation Process of RNP APCH Procedures: Thailand Case Study ICAO Asia-Pacific GNSS Seminar Bangkok, Thailand 26 March 2012 Flight Validation.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
“Teaching the Science, Inspiring the Art, Producing Aviation Candidates!” Aeronautical Decision Making Written for the Notre Dame Pilot Initiative By the.
Downloaded from Approach and Landing Accidents Reducing the Risk Presented by Bryan W. Neville Aviation Safety Inspector.
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS)
Instrument Ground Training Module 4 & 5
Learning from failure (to learn) Mahabubul Alam CS/SE 6361, Fall 2014  Final Term Paper Presentation  The University of Texas at Dallas Asiana Airlines.
HCI in Safety-Critical Applications: ATC Systems Aslan Neishaboori.
IFR Emergencies.
Equipment for Aircraft and Air Traffic Control © 2000, 2001 Flight Safety Foundation.
Executive Briefing This briefing is designed as a stand alone briefing for Airline Senior Executives / CEOs. Minor text amendments following review at.
Avionic S UNIT 1.
Flight Operations and Training © 2000, 2001 Flight Safety Foundation.
Safety Report Treatment of Safety-Critical Systems in Transport Airplanes Office of Research and Engineering.
Offices of Research and Engineering and Aviation Safety Overview of HEMS Safety Issues Dr. Joseph Kolly Acting Director, Office of Research and Engineering.
Special Topics Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
Incident Review Meeting Example  The next slides are an example of how to complete the template and identify latent conditions, threats, errors, UAS and.
Chapter 5:intrument flight rules
Office of Aviation Safety Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Aviation Operations Jeff Guzzetti Deputy Director for Regional Operations.
AIRSPACE What’s old –What’s new!.
Controlled Flight Into Terrain CFIT
Office of Aviation Safety Controlled Flight Into Terrain Learjet 35A San Diego, California October 24, 2004.
PERFORMANCE BASED NAVIGATION OPERATIONAL APPROVAL
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Minimum Safe Altitude Warning November 19, 2008 Glenn W. Michael Air Traffic Manager, Boston ARTCC.
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS)
1 IE 590D Applied Ergonomics Lecture 26 – Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Automation Vincent G. Duffy Associate Prof. School of IE and ABE Thursday April.
Software Testing and Quality Assurance Software Quality Assurance 1.
Human Supervisory Control February 26, 2004 American Airlines Flight 965 Accident Report Cali, Colombia December 20, 1995 Paul Mitchell Sylvain.
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
TAWS Improved Functionality Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) Safety Enhancement, SE-120 Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) Safety Enhancement,
1 ATM SEARAST Safety Enhancements 8 – 9 January 2007.
Lecture 9 Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) Radio Aids & Navigational System.
Introduction to Navigation
Distance Measuring Equipment (DME)
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND AIRPLANES - TRAFFIC COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM (TCAS) YIXIN ZENG.
CFIT Controlled Flight into Terrain Video - ron flat light.
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS).
Lecture 10: Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS)
Level Busts © Global Air Training Limited Common Causal Factors  Correct readback - incorrect action  Failure to follow SID  Mis-hear  Incorrect.
Airbus training support & services Erroneous ILS Indications.
Larry Ley | Digital Aviation | Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Vertical, lateral separations based on time / distance
Dr. Dennis Vincenzi Human Factors Issues Dr. Dennis Vincenzi
Flight Validation Process of RNP APCH Procedures: Thailand Case Study
TYPES, AIRSPACE CLASSIFICATION, CHANGE FROM ONE TO ANOTHER
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
Safety Nets: Primary or Secondary Defenses? Does it Matter?
Graphic showing EGPWS Activation
Spectrum issues and challenges, not on the specific agenda for WRC-19
KOREAN AIR FLIGHT 801 CRASH: A CASE STUDY
Automatic Collision Avoidance Systems
Runway Incursion JJ Johnson May 2011
Controlled Flight Into Terrain Learjet 35A
Preventing Runway Excursions Technical solutions
Digital Copilot Cognitive Assistance for Solo Pilots
GLOSSARY OF TERMS.
Airspace Presented by: Michelle, Joe, Gino, Shelby.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
RR-TAG Liaison Report September 2008 IEEE
Situational Awareness
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 2.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
The Golden Age Of Aircraft Design AVIONICS from Early Days till Now
RR-TAG Liaison Report September 2008 IEEE
Runway Excursions.
Air Traffic Control the Netherlands
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Presentation transcript:

C.F.I.T. © Global Air Training Limited 2010

“How did that goat get into this cloud?” © Global Air Training Limited 2010

CFIT Definition A CFIT accident is “one in which an otherwise serviceable aircraft under the control of the crew is flown unintentionally into terrain, obstacles or water, with no prior awareness on the part of the crew of the impending collision” © Global Air Training Limited 2010

We are all average. No-one is GOD. -We are human we make mistakes when operating systems/interfacing with technology/CRM & Automation -Is it our human failing cos we are stupid? -Is it the design of the equipment; small buttons, small screen? -Is it the interface; poor labelling, poor schematics? -Is it logic; Otto not doing something in the order/way a human would? EXP: FMS vs home computer. Q Screen size Q Windows vs mode buttons and submenus Q Qwerty vs alphabetic keyboard Q Vertical vs horizontal location of screen Q Use of Colour © Global Air Training Limited 2010

Causes of CFIT CFIT occurs in IMC or at night or both Lack of Horizontal position awareness 33% Lack of Vertical position awareness 66% © Global Air Training Limited 2010

CFIT Accidents Chart © Global Air Training Limited 2010

Risk Factors Altimeter settings Safe Altitudes ATC Errors Incorrect units used (inHg/hPa/mbars) Incorrect values transcribed from radio communications Confusion of QNH/QFE settings Extreme atmospheric conditions Safe Altitudes ATC Errors Be prepared to question Flight Crew Complacency Familiarity leads to complacency Non Precision Approaches No SOP for GPWS pull up warning © Global Air Training Limited 2010

CFIT Is it a new type of accident? March 1931 the Southern Cloud (Tri-motor Fokker) crashed 200mls NE Melbourne. Since then over 30,000 pax & crew have lost their lives in CFIT accidents Half of all early piston engine commercial aircraft accidents were due to CFIT It can happen at any stage of the flight Virtually all CFIT accidents involve either: Error in Navigation Ineffective monitoring Failure to follow S.O.P.s © Global Air Training Limited 2010

Equipment to reduce CFIT risk Radio Alt - introduced in late 1960’s GPWS SAS Electronics Engineer started concept in Europe 1971 Voluntarily installed by a number of airlines 1973 Boeing offered it as a recommended safety device 1974 Basic part of all Boeing aircraft manufactured 1975 FAA enacted a rule requiring all large transport aircraft to be fitted This followed a TWA 727 accident in USA, during a VOR/DME approach, 90 Fatalities FAA Mandatory Requirement rushed through & UK CAA Follows MSAW – 1975 software package for ATC detects a/c flying below MSA and enables the controller to warn the crew. Developed for use with ARTS (automatic radar terminal systems) radar capabilities VASI, PAPI, ILS, VOR, DME, © Global Air Training Limited 2010

Early GPWS Doubts Prior to the introduction the FAA expressed doubts Would crew become complacent? If crew followed procedures wasn’t that a sufficient safeguard against CFIT? In a survey conducted soon after the GPWS installation requirement, 83% of the pilots surveyed expressed concerns about false or nuisance alerts. Concerns included: having a midair collision while performing a mandatory pull-up losing control of the airplane while distracted ignoring a valid warning because of system credibility problems ignoring a valid warning through a misunderstanding of the cause of the warning. © Global Air Training Limited 2010

Frequency of pull-up warnings GPWS Improvements Frequency of pull-up warnings Mark 1 = 1 per 750 sectors Now = 1 per 5,000-7,000 sectors © Global Air Training Limited 2010

CFIT KL © Global Air Training Limited 2010