1 K thermal model for QUBIC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction
Advertisements

Heat Transfer Chapter 2.
1 Cooling the Hydrogen (Helium) Absorbers with Small Coolers Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Video.
Magnet Cooldown Scheme 17 th February 2012 Roy Preece (STFC RAL)
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Roberto Than R&D ERL Cryogenics Roberto Than February 17-18, 2010 CRYOGENICS.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
An Autonomous Dilution Microcryostat- Insert for Nano Physics V. S. Edelman, Institute for Physical Problems RAS, Moscow, Russia The cryostat with base.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 16 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
Slide 1 D G Haase, EDM Meeting, 5/06 Refrigeration and Heat Budget for the EDM Cryostat David G. Haase Physics Department North Carolina State University.
Close Cycle Dilution for Space Ph. Camus, G. Vermeulen, G. Chaudhry, A. Benoit, F. Martin B-POL Workshop, IAP Paris, 29th July 2010.
Large-capacity Helium refrigeration : from state-of-the-art towards FCC reference solutions Francois Millet – March 2015.
M. FOUAIDY Thin films applied to superconducting RF cavitiesLegnaro Oct.10, 2006 improved accuracy and sensitivity as compared to the usual RF method RS.
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
Chapter 10 Heat and Temperature. Temperature Page 324 Temperature is proportional to the average kinetic energy of an object.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
STFC Technology undulator manufacture and measurement James Rochford On behalf of the Helical collaboration.
24 January 2014 LARP VTF Follow-up Meeting P. Kovach VTF 1 LARP Vertical Test Facility Vertical Dewar Design, Magnet Prep And Installation Paul Kovach.
HD target.
JPARC- Decay Volume M.Sakuda (KEK) 11 November Decay Volume Requirements Design 2. Construction Status 3. Summary and schedule In collaboration.
1 NEDM 4 He Purifier and Other Cryogenic Issues David G. Haase North Carolina State University Update on Cryovessel Engineering Evaporative Purification.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
L. Serio COPING WITH TRANSIENTS L. SERIO CERN, Geneva (Switzerland)
Project X RD&D Plan Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
a magnetic refrigeration stage
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Restoring Komag Yasuhiro Makida Consideration of restoring and modifying Komag for a stand alone operation without the refrigerator. Contents 1.Magnet.
Status of the HV Test System Purposes of the HV test system Design and assembly progress Vacuum enclosure Projected assembly and test milestones (short-term)
1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.
LCGT f2f meeting/ICRR, 04/Aug./2011 N. KIMURA Status of the Cryogenics Design N. KIMURA A, S. KOIKE B, T. KUME B, T. OHMORI D, Y. SAITO C, Y. SAKAKIBARA.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
17-18 December 2013 LARP VTF Workshop BNL Proposal 1 A.Marone
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
Magnetic Refrigeration down to 1.6K for FCC_ee Jakub Tkaczuk Supported by: DRF Energy Program – DESA41K CERN FCC Collaboration Francois Millet, Jean-Marc.
Chapter 16 Temperature and Heat.  Definition of heat: Heat is the energy transferred between objects because of a temperature difference.  Objects are.
F LESEIGNEUR / G OLIVIER LUND January 9th, ESS HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE ESS CRYOMODULE STATUS MEETING HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE LUND JANUARY 9TH, 2013 Unité.
Magnetic Refrigeration down to 1.6K for FCC_ee Jakub Tkaczuk Supported by: DRF Energy Program – DESA41K CERN FCC Collaboration.
110 1.
Final Design Cryogenic and mechanical configurations
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
The Development of the Dilution Insert and some Tunneling Experiments
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
M Chorowski, H Correia Rodrigues, D Delikaris, P Duda, C Haberstroh,
Cooling down of W7-X coils with/without casing circulation
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
SNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Coimbatore-107 Subject: Thermal Engineering
Heat Transfer: The Physics of Computer Cooling By Kenneth Yu
MICE Meeting at RAL, Oct-23, 2005
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
Xiaomin Pang, Yanyan Chen, Xiaotao Wang, Wei Dai, Ercang Luo
SILICON PIXELS DETECTOR
Peter Loveridge High Power Targets Group
Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green
CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN
Horizontal Tests in a Vertical Cryostat
Recirculating CO2 System
BESIII Collaboration Meeting, June 5~6, 2002, Zian Zhu
Members of project: Christian Brosch Andreas Maier Tamara Bubeck
Chapter 16 Temperature and Heat.
Second Law of Thermodynamics
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
Thermal Energy and Heat!
Thermal Expansion of Solids/liquids
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
How Refrigerators and Freezers Work
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
Presentation transcript:

1 K thermal model for QUBIC For Technological Demonstrator (T.D.) J.P. Thermeau, M. Piat QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Schematic representation QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano 1K stage To 4K stage 6 Tie rods Thermal conduction from 4.2K to 1K 1K stage QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Tensile tests of the carbone fiber tubes All experiments are made at SACM/IRFU/DSM, CEA Saclay Possibility to make the tensile tests at room temperature and low temperature (77K and 4.2K) QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Tensile tests of the carbon fiber tube QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Mechanical tests of the tie rods First design T (K) Force Max (N) E (GPa) Tests n°1 with pin 300 13 000 120 Tests n°2 25 000 110 Tests n°3 77 1 300 Tests n°4 33 000 85 Tests n°5 16 000 78 Second design T (K) Force Max (N) E (GPa) Test n°6 300 71 000 120 Tests n°7 77 36 000 82 tests n°8 4.2 28 000 81 QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Carbon fiber tube physical properties With the current design of the 1K stage the maximum forces applied to the carbon tube are about 800 N  Last design of the tie rods with carbon fiber tube is validated. Characteristics of the carbon fiber tube: 60%(volum) of fiber, 40% DP406 resin 80% of fiber at 12°, 10% at 45°, 10% at 90° E theorical = 111 GPa at 300K external diameter: 32mm, internal diameter: 30mm The coefficient of thermal expansion was measured: axial: -0.014% from 80K to 280K radial: 0.12% from 80K to 280K The thermal conduction properties will be measured in february at APC. - Replace SS304 by CF, the thermal leaks through the tie rods are reduced by a factor 2.5 - Decrease the thickness of CF tube, the thermal leaks through the tie rods are reduced by a factor 2 QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano 0.3K stage 0.3K stage 2 x 8 Tie rods Thermal conduction from 1K to 0.3K 1K stage QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Sub-Kelvin cryogenic scheme QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Sub-Kelvin static thermal losses 1K Stage 6 Tie rods (epoxy/carbon-fiber): 0.32 mW 2 Precooling thermal switches (52 µW/K): 0.33 mW Instrumentation wires: 15 µW Thermal radiation through instrumentation window: 1 µW Thermal radiation (=0.1), 4.2K1K: 6 µW Total:  0.7 mW 0.3K Stage 16 Tie rods (epoxy/carbon-fiber): 17 µW Instrumentation wires: 6 µW Thermal radiation through instrumentation window: 1 µW Thermal radiation: (=0.1), 1K0.3K: <<1 µW Total:  25 µW QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

1K stage Thermal model Cool down from 4.2K to 1K 1. 2. Assumptions: Cooling capacity Thermal conduction Precooling thermal switches Thermal conduction Tie rods Energy stored in materials removed during the cooling Cool down of liquid helium 2. Assumptions: mHe = 1.5 mol 4He = 6g 4He. P1Kfridge = Cooling capacity of 1K fridge is constant = 6mW at 0.9K KPC : Conductance (W/K) of thermal switches is constant Thot: 1K stage temperature at the starting cooling Material = 115 kg of aluminum  60J at 4.2K QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano Cooling of the 1K stage Assumptions for the cooling from 4.2K to 1K Remove energy 4.2K -> 1K:  60J Constant cooling capacity: 6mW at 0.9K Thermal losses (Tie rods, instrumentation, …): 0.35mW Others losses (precooling switches): 2 x 52W/K Cooling time from 4.2K to 1K:  4.5 h Steady state at 1K (static thermal losses): Energy available in the 1K fridge 1.65 g LHe:  32J 1K fridge temperature: 0.8K with 0.7mW Cooling time at 0.8 K:  12h QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

1K stage thermal model Warm up of 1K stage during the pump regeneration cycle 1. Thermal conduction Precooling thermal switches Thermal conduction Fridge thermal switch Thermal conduction Tie rods Energy needed to increase the material temperature Assumptions: Thot4K: Temperature of 4K refrigerator is constant ThotF: 1K fridge temperature is constant Thot: 1K stage temperature at the end of the regeneration sequence Tcold: 1K stage temperature at the starting of the regeneration sequence KPC, KF: Conductances (W/K) of thermal switches (precooling and fridge) are constant Material = 115 kg of aluminum QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Dynamic cooling of the 1K stage Assumptions for the warm-up Thot4K: Temperature of 4K refrigerator is constant = 4.2K ThotF: Temperature of 1K fridge is constant = 6K KPC: Conductance of precooling thermal switches: 52W/K KF: Conductance of ridge thermal switch: 530W/K Thermal losses (Tie rods, instrumentation, …): 0.35mW Warm-up time of 1K pump: 3 h (data given by Andy) When the regeneration sequence is finished:  What is the helium available quantity for the cooling sequence ? Assumptions for the cool-down The available quantity of helium is 80% of the initial filling quantity = 4.8 g Thot4K: Temperature of 4K refrigerator is constant = 4.2K P1Kfridge: cooling capacity is constant = 6 mW at 0.9K KPC: Conductance of precooling thermal switches: 52W/K Thermal losses (Tie rods, instrumentation, …): 0.35mW QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Initial cooling of the 1K stage Initial cooling of 1K stage First step: from room temperature to 4.2K  cooling using the cryo-refrigerator 4K and the ON state of the precooling switches Second step: from 4.2K to 1K  cooling using the 1K refrigerator and the 1K fridge switch Cooling down from 300K to 4.2K Energy stored in materials removed during the cooling Thermal conduction Precooling thermal switches = Cooling capacity Assumptions: Cooling capacity = thermal conduction of the thermal switches The 4K refrigerator operates at 4.2K during the initial cool-down sequence QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

Initial cooling of the 1K stage - 115 kg aluminum  20 x106 J to remove during the cool-down - 2 precooling thermal switches : 2 x 69 mW/K Initial cool-down from 300K to 4.2K : High quantity of energy to extract, Cooling capacity limited by the ON state of the thermal switches, Cooling time very long  2 weeks Investigate others solutions to improve the cooling capacity, - mechanical heat switch - exchange gas in vacuum vessel, …. Obtain the cryogenerator cooling capacity in function of the temperature., QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano Summary 1/2 1K Static thermal losses: Thermal budget  0.7 mW Half of this budget is the contribution of the thermal switches. Other half of the budget is due to the losses through the tie rods 0.3K Static thermal losses: Thermal budget  25 µW (16 tie rods and instrumentation) 1K Dynamic analysis: Current operating time at 1K: Steady state at 1K: 15h Regeneration cycle (warm-up + cooling): 5h Operating ratio: 15/20 = 0.75 One Fridge thermal switch seems enough to cool the 1K stage from 4.2 K to 1K What is the helium available quantity for the cooling sequence ? QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano

QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano Summary 2/2 1K Dynamic analysis: The duration of the 1K stage initial cool-down is too long > 10 days The current ON state of the precooling thermal switches is not enough to allow the initial cooling of the 1K stage fast enough from the room temperature to the 4.2K. The OFF state of the precooling thermal switches has: a small impact on the cool-down duration from 4.2K to 1K. a strong impact on the duration of the steady state at 1K Is it possible to increase the ON conductance value of the precooling switch without increase OFF conductance value ? ON state > 140 mW/K OFF state  50 µW/K Investigate others solutions to improve the cooling capacity during the initial cooling down. Is it possible to reduce the OFF conductance of the 1K fridge switch ? ON state = 100 mW/K  T switch = 7 mK if the cooling power = 0.7mW (steady state) OFF state = 100 µW/K  the steady state duration increases. QUBIC Collaboration Meeting, January 18/19, Milano