The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
New results from the CHORUS Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Pasquale Migliozzi CERN XXIX International Conference on High Energy Physics UBC, Vancouver,
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
April 1, Beam measurement with -Update - David Jaffe & Pedro Ochoa 1)Reminder of proposed technique 2)Use of horn-off data 3)Use of horn2-off data?
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
Simulation of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for the Neutrino Factory Malcolm Ellis & Alan Bross Fermilab International Scoping Study Meeting KEK,
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
GEANT Study of Electron ID and  0 Rejection for Containerized detectors Compare detectors in shipping containers to idealized continuous detector with.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
DOE Review 3/18/03Steve Brice FNALPage 1 MiniBooNE Status Steve Brice Fermilab Overview Beam – Primary Beam – Secondary Beam Detector – Calibration – Triggering.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Status of MiniBooNE Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jonathan Link Columbia University International Conference on Flavor Physics October.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
PROPOSAL FOR A MUON VETO SYSTEM BEHIND THE HADRONIC CALORIMETER (MUV-3) Problems and requirements:  Expected total rate for 9.25 < R < 120 cm: 12.1 MHz:
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia INTRODUCTION The purpose of.
MiniBooNE: Status and Plans Outline Physics motivation Beamline performance Detector performance First look at the data Conclusions Fernanda G. Garcia,
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
LKr inefficiency measurement
Results of dN/dt Elastic
Neutronics Studies for the Nab Experiment
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy
MUPAGE: A fast muon generator
A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector Martin Tzanov University of Colorado Purpose, Instrumentation, Event Reconstruction, Data analysis, Preliminary results, Conclusions and future. Martin Tzanov NBI’06

MiniBooNE Beamline Not to scale MiniBooNE Beam: LMC 8GeV primary proton from the FNAL booster, 5 pulses every second with 5E12 POT. Horn focusing for mesons produced in p-Be interactions, 99%  beam from meson decays in the 50m decay pipe - mostly from + -> + + , LMC monitors the mesons produced in the p-Be, provides information (constraint) of the kaon flux in the MiniBooNE decay pipe. Martin Tzanov NBI’06

MiniBooNE Flux Prediction GEANT4 based Monte Carlo simulates the neutrino flux in MiniBooNE beamline, high purity  beam – 99%, small e component – intrinsic e - background for e appearance  -> e , e from kaon decays is not well known comparable rate to the oscillation signal PRELIMINARY Martin Tzanov NBI’06

LMC - Off-Axis Detector cartoon Phase space in two-body decays limits the accessible kinematic region of the products: High-pT ’s come from K+ decay (mostly), use of off-axis muon detector can allow and effective |p| separation. Separation at 70 (see the plot): clear separation of  from  and K+, High K/  ratio, Most ’s have too high energy to produce  at this angle. No detector effects Martin Tzanov NBI’06

LMC Detector Construction Martin Tzanov NBI’06

LMC Layout and Components – Collimator and Veto Not to scale Collimator: designed to accept tracks originating in the decay pipe of MiniBooNE beamline 2.06m long - constructed from steel with inner tungsten core, Inner hole has 5mm downstream and 3mm upstream radius. Veto Counters: designed to reject tracks which are not exiting through the downstream hole of the collimator, 4 scintillation counter situated between the collimator and the first plane of the fiber tracker. Martin Tzanov NBI’06

LMC Layout and Components – Fiber Tracker Not to scale Fiber tracker spectrometer – analyses track momentum Permanent magnet - provides constant magnetic field By = 2.27 kG along 23cm in z. 6 fiber planes consisting of 1mm fibers. Each plane consists of two subplanes staggered at ½ fiber diameter – removes inefficiencies if track passes between two fiber of one subplane. 4 planes cover the bending direction of the magnet. (2 upstream and 2 downstream of the magnet) remaining 2 planes are situated upstream of the magnet (perpendicular to both the beam and magnet bend direction). dry interface to light-guide fibers, 160 6-stage Hamamatsu R1666 ¾” PMT’s mounted on active custom bases active base - 4 PMT’s per base, preamp, postamp, 1HV channel. Martin Tzanov NBI’06

LMC Layout and Components – Muon Filter and Acceptance Not to scale Muon acceptance counters: four scintillation counters situated downstream of the fiber tracker two of the counters are placed in the beam one is placed above the beam one is placed below the beam Muon filter range stack: designed to identify muons from range, consists from 8 2” thick tungsten sheets alternating with scintillation counters, a muon with energy 1.3GeV will pass through the muon filter. Martin Tzanov NBI’06

LMC Installed Martin Tzanov NBI’06

Event Reconstruction We form 6-plane coincidence with the following requirements - all hits are within 10ns time window (5ns about the hits mean time), multiple hits per plane are allowed within the coincidence window, Track fitting algorithm is performed to determine: track momentum and momentum uncertainty, 2/dof for each fitted 6-fold coincidence is obtained. All hits from the veto, muon acceptance counter and the filter which fall into the coincidence window are added. Muon filter penetration (range) is determined as the most downstream filter layer which has a hit in a counter. - one inefficient layer is allowed. This event reconstruction procedure is used for both data and Monte Carlo. Martin Tzanov NBI’06

Event Display for LMC range stack acceptance 4X fiber plane Veto counters Martin Tzanov NBI’06

LMC Monte Carlo – Detector Simulation LMC Monte Carlo is generated in two stages: Input flux generation, LMC detector simulation. LMC detector response is simulated with GEANT3 hit level Monte Carlo includes exact geometry and material definitions, the input is a flux of particles, the output is hits in the active volumes of the detector, The output from the LMC MC undergoes the same event reconstruction procedure as data. LMC detector – GEANT3 geometry Martin Tzanov NBI’06

LMC Monte Carlo – Input Fluxes Inputs to the GEANT3 MC: Fast Monte Carlo - re-decays  and K flux at a z slice in MiniBooNE decay pipe which is generated by the MiniBooNE beam MC. Simulates only signal for the LMC as well as muons,which passed through dirt (dirt muons). A flux of all particles hitting the MiniBooNE decay pipe wall near the LMC opening. Generated by the MiniBooNE GEANT4 beam MC. Simulates both signal and beam related background. AKA Full/Cocktail Monte Carlo Gas of various types of particles used to study the response of the LMC detector. A sample of leptons or hadrons with flat energy spectrum is used to illuminate the LMC detector. cartoon z-slice cartoon cartoon Martin Tzanov NBI’06

LMC Monte Carlo – Parentage Parentage information is propagated through the entire process. Plot shows the reconstructed momentum by parent for Fast MC. Includes detector effects. Martin Tzanov NBI’06

Muon ID Muon ID cut- Black lines Hadrons – Ovals Designed as a simple cut based on muon gas Monte Carlo: Set of limits on reconstructed momentum and reconstructed penetration in the muon filter (range), requiring muon acceptance efficiency to be higher than 95%. Fiber tracker measures the momentum properly, Muon filter identifies muons, Range=8 has highest purity. Data Muon ID cut- Black lines Hadrons – Ovals Martin Tzanov NBI’06

Fiber Efficiency Pseudo efficiency: algorithm looks for 5-fold coincidences when 1 plane is excluded (2X on the plot) hit is simulated in the excluded plane by extrapolating the fit which includes the remaining 5 planes. a probability is assigned to each PMT based on the proximity to the simulated hit: Hi =1 if there is a hit and 0 if no hit in the excluded plane Pi – probability that the fiber is part of the reconstructed track. Absolute efficiency of the fibers is obtained from iteration and is found to be about 90-95% per plane. Pseudo Pseudo Extrapolated track Excluded plane Actual hit Extrapolated hit with uncertainty band Martin Tzanov NBI’06

Data vs. Signal MC Analysis Cuts: Well reconstructed track, No veto hits, Muon ID cut (red histograms only). Plots show the reconstructed momentum for both data and MC. Muon ID cut removes much more events from data than from signal Monte Carlo, This large fraction of events cut out from data are coming from different sources of background, which are not simulated. This is an upper limit on the kaon flux normalization (no background MC). PRELIMINARY P, PRELIMINARY P, Martin Tzanov NBI’06

Backgrounds Beam related backgrounds which are simulated by the full Monte Carlo: simulated using GEANT4 beam Monte Carlo, includes interactions in the air of the decay pipe, interactions in the surrounding dirt, proper ratio of signal/background, muons from pion decaying within the LMC detector. very slow (it will take months to obtain) Accidentals/Pile-up: the reason we run at 1/10th of the normal neutrino beam intensity. accidentals were significantly decreasing the efficiency. code which overlays data and Monte Carlo streams is used to to study the effect of accidental (testing stage). Early indication show that accidentals are not a problem at this beam intensity. Beam-off-target data: e-1.7 =18% of all protons do not interact in the target, beam was aimed in the air gap between the target and the horn, handle on proton-air interaction background. Martin Tzanov NBI’06

Conclusions and Future LMC provides an important internal check of the Kaon flux, Monte Carlo is developed and running (needs more statistics), Preliminary muon spectrum is extracted, Preliminary Data/MC comparison. Future: Run large sample of full Monte Carlo, Data/MC comparison for special runs (beam-off-target, different horn current settings) – important checks, Extract background subtracted muon spectrum, Evaluate systematic errors, Include the LMC measurement as a constraint to hadron production fits. Martin Tzanov NBI’06