RD. Schaffer, L. Iconomidou Fayard, D. Fournier

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

First look at  -jet Samples using BDT e-ID Algorithm Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li and B. Zhou) ATLAS egamma Meeting March 9, 2009.
QCD Background… and the Resolution Saminder Dhaliwal August 30 th 2005.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
Top Physics Validation: Reconstruction, Simulation and Bytestream Paul S Miyagawa The University of Manchester.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Analysis Meeting 12 th June 2007.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
1 4 th June 2007 C.P. Ward Update on ZZ->llnunu Analysis and Sensitivity to Anomalous Couplings Tom Barber, Richard Batley, Pat Ward University of Cambridge.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Zhijun Liang,Song-Ming Wang,Dong liu, Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica 8/28/20151 TWiki page.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
MCP checks for the H-4l mass. Outline and work program The problems: – Higgs mass difference from the  – Possible single resonant peak mass shift (with.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
C.ClémentTile commissioning meeting – From susy group talk of last Wednesday  Simulation and digitization is done in version (8) 
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
1 c. mills (Harvard U.) 20 September, 2010 W and Z Physics at ATLAS Corrinne Mills Harvard DOE Site Visit 20 September 2010.
A Study of Electron Identification Jim Branson UCSD with collaborators from FNAL, UCSB & UCSD.
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
Studies of the Electron charge misidentification rate DPG/PH egamma meeting 7/20/09 W. Andrews, D. Evans, F. Golf, J. Mülmenstädt, S. Padhi, Y. Tu, F.
MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS Helsinki b/tau workshop Lauri A. Wendland / HIP.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Software offline tutorial, CERN, Dec 7 th Electrons and photons in ATHENA Frédéric DERUE – LPNHE Paris ATLAS offline software tutorial Detectors.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of photon reconstruction efficiency in H  events Fast Simulation and the Higgs: Parameterisations of.
The “Comparator” Atlfast vs. Full Reco Automated Comparison Chris Collins-Tooth 19 th February 2006.
28/4/2006Chris Collins-Tooth tth, (h → bb) with EventViews Chris Collins-Tooth, Christian Shaw 03-May-2006.
Electron reco and identification improvements for 17.2 rel & H  ZZ analysis Fany Dudziak ISU group meeting Focus Talk - June 4th
Electron physics object tutorial C. Charlot / LLR Automn08 tutorials, 14 oct
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Status Update: Search for Low Mass Strings at CMS Andy Yen.
Thursday, March 13th Z   had Z  had Preselection Efficiencies (muon) Backgrounds + Cuts Trigger Back to the Tau..and what remains to.
Electron Identification Efficiency from Z→ee Maria Fiascaris University of Oxford In collaboration with Tony Weidberg and Lucia di Ciaccio ATLAS UK SM.
Current Status of e-ID based on BDT Algorithm Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (with X. Li, T. Dai, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) BNL Analysis Jamboree March.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
VBF H- > ττ- > lept had Electron Channel Analysis Jaspreet Sidhu
Photon Reconstruction Efficiencies in Higgs → γγ Events Neil Cooper-Smith RHUL ATLAS UK Higgs Meeting - Durham 11/01/07.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
1 Tuning des coupures tights Fany Dudziak RD. Schaffer, L. Iconomidou Fayard Réunion de physique du LAL Le 10 septembre 2009.
Feb. 4,2009 Jongseok Lee (Sungkyunkwan University)
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
Efficiency of Muon Reconstruction
SUSY Particle Mass Measurement with the Contransverse Mass Dan Tovey, University of Sheffield 1.
Measurement of the γ,W,Z with ATLAS for the ATLAS Collaboration
Validation of valid3 samples Zee(106050) and Jpsiee(105751)
Update: High energy photon pairs Search for RS-1 Gravitons
Electron Identification Based on Boosted Decision Trees
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec
PDF Uncertainties on W+Jets
RecoTracks Revisited.
tth, (h→bb) with EventViews
Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Electron PID & trigger using EMCal
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

RD. Schaffer, L. Iconomidou Fayard, D. Fournier Impact of new trackselection, new track extrapolation on the H4e analysis. Fany Dudziak RD. Schaffer, L. Iconomidou Fayard, D. Fournier Higgs WG meeting March 27, 2009

Reminder H->4l (M=130GeV) suffers from low efficiency coming from the Z*->lowPt electrons. Essentially radiating electrons The track/cluster matching is sensitive to brems which produce a lower reconstructed track momentum  E.g from the simple formula: dphi =8.6 mrad *(50GeV/ptelec)*(rclus/rcalo) ..one sees that a 25GeV Pt electron with E/p=2 will be shifted by 20mrad and will be rejected by the standard Δφ cut (20mrad).  Important losses of efficiency for low Pt Electrons due to cut on Δφ(tr-cal) cut  Rescaling the momentum and extrapolating from the perigee improves the track/cluster matching conserving these electrons

Overview We compare efficiencies/rejections for electrons in releases (dataset used for studies: H4l130): « Standard reco »  : i.e. rel 14.2.X Release 15.0 : changes in track match and priority for electrons vis- a-vis conversions. Here we will use : “Simulated” Rel 15.0 = “Simulated” Rel 15.0 starting from Rel14 and WITHOUT E/P cut Release 15.0 + new track extrap : available as option in rel 15.1 We show impact on the H->4e analysis for a set of MH (120,130,150 and 200 GeV) Reminder : For CSC note comparison: - Conversions are kept in Electron Container - Since CSC, isEM has changed: E.g. Medium now has Δη<0.005 and calo iso cut in.

Datasets, release Mc08 samples : H4l mc08.105300.PythiaH130zz4l.recon.AOD.e352_s462_r604_tid032239/40 mc08.106300.PythiaH120zz4l.recon.AOD.e352_s462_r604_tid038862/63/039066 mc08.106301.PythiaH150zz4l.recon.AOD.e352_s462_r604_tid038858 mc08.106301.PythiaH150zz4l.recon.AOD.e352_s462_r604_tid038859 mc08.106305.PythiaH200zz4l.recon.AOD.e352_s462_r604_tid038861 mc08.106305.PythiaH200zz4l.recon.AOD.e352_s462_r604_tid038860 DiJets minbias : mc08.105805.filtered_minbias6.recon.AOD.e347_s462_r604_tid032288- 89-90-91-92- 039063 Zz4l mc08.109292.Pythiazz4l_3MultiLeptonFilterElecMu.recon.AOD.e379_s462_r617 Analysis with 14.5.2.2 EMPhotonToElectron tool used to make the new electrons with a modified EMTrackMatch tool (in rel 15.1) egammaMCTruthClassifier used to classify the electrons in jet sample

TrackMatch definition VS Releases Rel 14.2.2x: Extrapolate the track to calo from the last measurement point Has losses due to : E/P cut at <10 Choose the best track in φ => sometime took TRT track instead of Si track Priority given to conversions => electrons end up in photon container Rel 15 reco: Recuperate above losses: Select preferentially tracks with hits in Pixel and SCT E/P cut removed (finally not, but removed here for studies) Conversions ignored for electrons New trackmatch As in Rel 15 with removed E/p. Rescale track momentum and extrapolate from perigee Recuperates effects of bremsstrahlungs

From Rel14=>Simulated Rel15+NewExtrapolation: How to make a new (transient) container of electrons EMPhoton- -toElectron + EMTrack- Match photons != 2 Electrons author&0x1 New electrons 2.8% of e rejected by trackMatch 19.1% of γ remain γ rejected NB :The different TrackMatch algorithm are simulated via our EMPhotonToElectronTool

Results on electrons

The New deltaPhi trackMatch Signal e Fake e deltaPhi(tr-cal) deltaPhi(tr-cal) Rel14 Δφ : asymmetric + large tails Rel15+newΔφ : more symmetric + narrower Rel14 Δφ : peak centered at 0 Rel15+ New Δφ : peak off-centered and wider because of energy rescaling

Rejection vs efficiency CSCnote for et>20GeV CSCMedium : MediumRel14 - CaloIsolation-DeltaEta

Sim15.0+new extrapolation Efficiency % Electron candidates loose medium medium + Δφ 14.0 88.3 ± 0.2 86.0 ± 0.2 73.5 ± 0.2 69.2 ± 0.2 Sim15.0 96.0 ± 0.1 93.6 ±0.1 80.1 ±0.2 74.2 ±0.2 Sim15.0+new extrapolation 98.7 ± 0.1 96.2 ±0.1 81.8 ±0.2 80.3 ±0.2 +11.1% +8.3% Simulated 15.0 +new extrapolation: Improvement by 8.3% (absolute) vs Rel14 and by 1.7% (absolute) vs Rel 15 for mediumId efficiency With Medium+Δφ cut: small loss vs Medium (-1.5% in 15.0+New instead of -5.9% in 15.0) . Allows to improve fake rejection

Efficiency -- Rel 14.0 eff =73.5% efficiency -- 15.0 electrons eff =80.1% -- 15.0 +new extrapolation eff =81.8% efficiency Pt(GeV) efficiency Gain more events at low Pt and at large eta η

SimRel 15.0+new extrapolation Rejection Min bias sample : Pt>8GeV Electron fake = electron with electrontype==4 in egammaMCTruthClassifier Rejection = nb_event *0.31 /(nb_cut * 0.057) loose medium medium + Δφ Rel 14.0 640 ± 9 3638 ± 119 4705 ± 177 SimRel 15.0 ± 11 4018 ± 129 4551 ± 156 SimRel 15.0+new extrapolation 611 ± 8 3817 ± 119 5052 ± 181

Results on H4e analysis

H->ZZ*->4e 130 GeV +35.3% +5.7% Rel 14 (%) Rel 15 (%) Rel 15 +new Extrapolation (%) 4e loose, |η|<2.5 61.5 ±0.7 79.4 ±0.5 87.2 ±0.5 2e w/ Pt>20 GeV 4 w/ Pt>7GeV 47.1 ±0.7 62.7 ±0.7 69.1 ±0.6 mZ, mZ* (*) 18.9 ±0.5 25.0 ±0.6 26.8 ±0.6 |m4e-130|<10 GeV |m4e-130|<4.4 GeV (2σ) 18.1 ± 0.5 15.0 ±0.5 23.9 ± 0.5 19.2 ±0.5 25.6 ± 0.5 20.3 ± 0.5 +35.3% +5.7% To be compared with 12.5% of efficiency in csc for H4e but with 2 more cuts (impact parameters, track cone ~>2%) (*) opposite charges, electron medium, |me1e2-mZ|<15 GeV, mZ*>20 GeV

H->ZZ*->4e different masses Efficiencies for cut on mH ± 2σ for different possible masses of the Higgs Rel 14 (%) Rel 15 (%) Rel 15 +new Extrapolation (%) H 120 GeV 10.5 ± 0.4 14 ± 0.5 14.7 ± 0.5 H 130 GeV 15.0 ± 0.5 19.2 ± 0.5 20.3 ±0.5 H 150 GeV 18.3 ± 0.5 23.5 ± 0.6 24.3 ± 0.6 H 200 GeV 27.8 ± 0.7 36.1 ± 0.7 37.8 ± 0.5

Summary about Higgs efficiencies ---14 ---15 (without E/P cut) ---15+new extrapolation Gain in efficiency: 14-15 15-15+ 14-15+ 120 GeV 28.4% 5% 34.9% 130 GeV 22.7% 5.4% 29.3% 150 GeV 27.0% 3.4% 31.4% 200 GeV 28.5% 4.7% 34.5%

Background to the H4e signal ZZ4e : for 130 GeV Rel 14 (%) Rel 15 (%) simulée Rel 15 +new Extrapolation (%) 4e loose, |η|<2.5 57.4 ± 0.4 78 ± 0.4 85.3 ± 0.3 2e w/ Pt>20 GeV 4 w/ Pt>7GeV 50.0 ± 0.4 69.3 ± 0.4 76.1 ± 0.4 mZ, mZ* (*) 28.1 ± 0.4 38.5 ± 0.4 40.8 ± 0.4 |m4e-200|<7.8 GeV 0.28 ± 0.05 0.63 ±0.07 0.7 ± 0.1 X2 the zz4l background as we increase efficiency for electrons

Summary about Higgs efficiencies Gain in efficiency: 14-15 15-15+ 14-15+ 120 GeV 33.3% 5% 40% 130 GeV 28% 5.7% 29.3% 150 GeV 28.4% 3.4% 32.8% 200 GeV 29.9% 4.7% 36% ---14 ---15 ---15+new extrapolation Increase with Pt Decrease with Pt

Summary Rel 15.0 electron reco improves electron efficiency relative to rel 14 (6.6% in absolute at medium level) Further improvement is obtained with a rescaled momentum extrapolation from perigee for efficiency and rejection: For efficiency : 8.3% in absolute for medium For rejection : 10.4% of gain for 14->15 and 5% for 14->15+ new extrapolation Application to the H4l analysis shows encouraging results at 130 GeV efficiency increased by 22.7% for 14->15 and 29.3% for 14->15+ new extrapolation

Back-up slides

H->ZZ*->4e 120 GeV +34.9% +5% Rel 14 (%) Rel 15 (%) Rel 15 +new Extrapolation (%) 4e loose, |η|<2.5 60.1 ±0.7 77.5 ±0.5 84.9 ±0.5 2e w/ Pt>20 GeV 4 w/ Pt>7GeV 41.8 ±0.7 55.2 ±0.7 60.5 ±0.7 mZ, mZ* (*) 13.4 ±0.5 18.2 ±0.5 19.3 ±0.6 |m4e-120|<4.4 GeV 10.9 ±0.5 14.0 ±0.5 14.7 ±0.6 +34.9% +5% (*) opposite charges, electron medium, |me1e2-mZ|<15 GeV, mZ*>15 GeV

H->ZZ*->4e 150 GeV +31.4% +3.4% Rel 14 (%) Rel 15 (%) Rel 15 +new Extrapolation (%) 4e loose, |η|<2.5 64.1 ±0.7 83.5 ±0.5 90.0 ±0.4 2e w/ Pt>20 GeV 4 w/ Pt>7GeV 56.0 ±0.7 74.6 ±0.6 81.2 ±0.5 mZ, mZ* (*) 23.6 ±0.6 31.4 ±0.6 33 ±0.6 |m4e-150|<4.6 GeV 18.5 ±0.5 23.5 ±0.5 24.3 ±0.6 +31.4% +3.4% (*) opposite charges, electron medium, |me1e2-mZ|<15 GeV, mZ*>30 GeV

H->ZZ*->4e 200 GeV +34.5% +4.7% Rel 14 (%) Rel 15 (%) Rel 15 +new Extrapolation (%) 4e loose, |η|<2.5 64.9 ±0.8 84.9 ±0.5 91.3 ±0.4 2e w/ Pt>20 GeV 4 w/ Pt>7GeV 60.9 ±0.8 82.2 ±0.7 89.1 ±0.4 mZ, mZ* (*) 34.5 ±0.5 45.2 ±0.7 47.8 ±0.7 |m4e-200|<7.8 GeV 28.1 ±0.5 36.1 ±0.7 37.8 ±0.5 +34.5% +4.7% (*) opposite charges, electron medium, |me1e2-mZ|<15 GeV, mZ*>60 GeV