Translational Research Methodology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early stages of research programmes: pilot and feasibility studies From Scoping to Activity Rehabilitation Conference A Byrne.
Advertisements

Minorities and the medically underserved in clinical trials Edward L. Trimble, MD, MPH CTEP, DCTD, NCI.
Informing the Strategy – Strengths and Gaps Delyth Morgan Strategic Research Coordinator Cardiff University, School of Medicine.
Tumor Markers Lecture one By Dr. Reem Sallam. Objectives  To briefly introduce cancers, their incidence, some common terms, and staging system.  To.
Clinical Trial Designs for the Evaluation of Prognostic & Predictive Classifiers Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer.
1 Knowledge Management for Disease Coding (KMDC): Background & Introduction Timothy Hays, Ph.D. Project Manager, Knowledge Management for Disease Coding.
Cancer Staging. What is cancer staging? Staging describes the severity of a person’s cancer based on the extent of the original (primary) tumor and whether.
Meta-Analysis of PSA Growth Lurdes Y.T. Inoue, Ph.D. Ruth Etzioni, Ph.D. Elizabeth Slate, Ph.D. Christopher Morrel, Ph.D.
Tumor Markers Lecture one By Dr. Waheed Al-Harizi.
Introduction of Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles.
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
Large Phase 1 Studies with Expansion Cohorts: Clinical, Ethical, Regulatory and Patient Perspectives Accelerating Anticancer Agent Development and Validation.
Cancer Clinical Trials:
Purposes and uses of cancer registration E.E.U. Akang Department of Pathology University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria.
The NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
Funding Priorities: National Cancer Institute Carly Parry, PhD, MSW National Cancer Institute.
Clinical pharmacy Dr. Mohammed Al-Rekabi Lecture One First Semester.
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Johns Hopkins Technology Transfer 1 Translational Biomedical Research: Moving Discovery from Academic Centers to the Community Translational Biomedical.
PhenX-Sickle Cell Disease Project at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH Ellen M. Werner, Ph.D. Program Director Blood Epidemiology and Clinical.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Cancer Staging.
Recognition Of Team Science Faculty Appointments, Promotions and Titles at The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth “Recognition by peers as an investigator.
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the CTRC: Designing Quantitative and Qualitative Measures to Assess in Real Time the Value of the Center Mike Conlon, University.
Background to Adaptive Design Nigel Stallard Professor of Medical Statistics Director of Health Sciences Research Institute Warwick Medical School
Panel Discussion Part I Methodology Ideas from adult MR brain segmentation are used in neonatal MR brain segmentation. However, additional challenges.
Serbia Health Project – Additional Financing Training for Trainers on AR-DRG, Република Србија МИНИСТАРСТВО ЗДРАВЉА Linda Best
Sage Bionetworks A non-profit organization with a vision to enable networked team approaches to building better models of disease BIOMEDICINE INFORMATION.
Igniting our potential Health Research Classification System Dr. Ian Viney Medical Research Council (MRC) Director of Strategic Evaluation and Impact MRC.
Randomized Clinical Trials: The Versatility and Malleability of the “Gold Standard” Wing Institute Jack States Ronnie Detrich Randy Keyworth “Get your.
Access to Personalised Medicine for PDAC patients STSM of the application of an EU-index for barriers Denis Horgan (EAPM) & Angela Brand (IPHG) on behalf.
Evaluating the impact of health research: Revisiting the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Impact Assessment Framework Nicola Lauzon, Marc Turcotte.
 A test of a new intervention or treatment on people.
Measuring Technical Progress and Potential Impact in Real Time Presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference 2009 by Jerald Hage, Wilbur.
Data Sources-Cancer Betsy A. Kohler, MPH, CTR Director, Cancer Epidemiology Services New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services.
Public Health Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology Prof. Ashry Gad Mohammed MB, ChB. MPH, Dr P.H Prof. of Epidemiology College of Medicine King Saud University.
Why a CPCRN? CDC Expectations Katherine M. Wilson, PhD, MPH CPCRN Technical Monitor Division of Cancer Prevention and Control CDC.
“Under Construction” Building the Best Possible (Team) Grant Proposal.
Sage Bionetworks A non-profit organization with a vision to enable networked team approaches to building better models of disease BIOMEDICINE INFORMATION.
National Center for Research Resources G. Iris Obrams, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D. NCRR Update 5 August 2006.
Supporting people with active and advanced disease Need better data collection Discussion at MDT – new diagnosis support Identify best practice Early palliative.
Cancer Survivorship: Transforming how we deliver cancer care Catherine Neck Macmillan Cancer Rehabilitation/ Recovery Package Project Lead.
NCI Division of Cancer Prevention Ongoing Activities at Frederick Facilities Presented By: Lori Minasian, M.D. Robert Shoemaker, Ph.D. October 1, 2015.
NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre The Southampton Biomedical Research Centre is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Challenges in Personalised Medicine.
1 Seminar 6: Applied Epidemiology Chapters 8-10 Kaplan University School of Health Sciences.
TITIN ANDRI WIHASTUTI SCHOOL OF NURSING FACULTY OF MEDICINE
Samantha Finstad, Ph.D.* National Cancer Institute Lynne Davies, Ph.D.
American Evaluation Association
Kari Wojtanik, Ph.D. Susan G. Komen Samantha Finstad, Ph.D.
Big Data Analyses: The Cancer Moonshot
Kari Wojtanik, Ph.D. Susan G. Komen Samantha Finstad, Ph.D.
Senaida Poole, Ph.D. California Breast Cancer Research Program
Chapter 14 Implementing Dr. James Pelletier Swain Department of Nursing The Citadel.
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
Innovative Approaches to Clinical Trials
A Clinical trial awareness tool
Power to the People Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment on Community-Based Monitoring in Uganda Martina Björkman, IGIER, University of Bocconi,
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program
UK Health Research Analysis
An Introduction to the NIHR programmes
What is “Biomedical Informatics”?
EAST GRADE Course 2019 PICO Question Formulation
Experimental Medicine Challenge Grants Round 3
Cancer Survivorship: Transforming how we deliver cancer care
Submitted By : Pratish Singh Kuldeep Choudhary Chinmay Panchal
Introduction to Basic Research Methods
American Public Health Association 2007 Meeting
PICTURE HERE Eric Chokunonga Zimbabwe Cancer Registry On behalf of:
Presentation transcript:

Translational Research Methodology Mission www.icrpartnership.org Dr. Miranda Kleijn Dutch Cancer Society

Translational Research What is Translational Research (TR)? The transition from basic research to clinical testing. Bench-to-bedside Why is analysis of TR important for cancer research organizations? Trends in TR are important for funding decisions Acceleration of the transition from basic research to clinical testing More new treatments to the patients

Methodology Translational Research Dilemma CSO code not developed to recognize translational research (TR). TRWG coding scheme for translational research Double coding of 76,581 grants in ICRP database too time-consuming Goal Indicating which CSO codes coincide with TR by analysis of projects coded with both CSO and TRWG coding methods Intended result Use CSO coding system as tool to identify TR CSO TRWG Broad outline to detect TR

CSO coding scheme 1. Biology 2. Etiology 3. Prevention 1.1 Normal functioning 1.2 Alteration chromosomes 1.3 Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes 1.4 Progression and metastasis 1.5 Resources and infrastructure 2. Etiology 2.2 Endogenous factors 2.3 Interactions 2.4 Resources and infrastructure 3. Prevention 3.1 Interventions to prevent cancer 3.2 Nutritional science 3.3 Chemoprevention 3.4 Vaccines 3.5 Complementary and alternative approach 3.6 Resources and infrastructure 4. Early detection, diagnosis and prognosis 4.1 Development and discovery 4.2 Evaluation 4.3Testing in clinical setting 4.4 Resources and infrastructure 5. Treatment 5.1 Localized - Development 5.2 Localized - Clinical 5.3 Systemic - Development 5.4 Systemic - Clinical 5.5 Localized + Systemic 5.6 Complementary and alternative approach 5.7 Resources and infrastructure 6. Control, survivorship, outcome 6.1 Care and survivorship 6.2 Surveillance 6.3 Behavior 6.4 Cost analysis 6.5 Education 6.6 Ethics 6.7 Complementary and alternative approach 6.8 Resources and infrastructure 7. Scientific model systems 7.1 Development 7.2 Application 7.3 Resources and infrastructure

TRWG coding scheme

Methodology Translational Research Dutch Cancer Society (DCS) expanded TWRG coding scheme to fit all types of research in DCS portfolio

Methodology Translational Research: Approach Assumptions before investigation Description of CSO codes was used to map translational research roughly into specific CSO categories Awards either wholly or partly coded to specific CSO codes are considered translational Approach Awards from CCRA or NCI* coded ONLY to one CSO code Manual mapping of awards to basic or translational (early/late/clinical) research Check with TWRG coding performed by CCRA or NCI Creation of a map of CSO vs TR *CCRA = Canadian Cancer Research Alliance *NCI = National Cancer Institute

Methodology Translational Research Resulting scheme (v1) We then tested this using 2 pilot datasets

Methodology Translational Research: Validation Validation of the method Comparison of two datasets manually coded to TRWG and CSO with the CSO-based TR coding scheme KWF awards coded to an adapted TRWG system ICRP bladder cancer awards coded manually to TRWG Translational projects (KWF) ICRP bladder cancer projects 137/139 (99%) of awards classed as TR by manual coders were also classed as TR by the CSO method. 81/83 (98%) of awards classed as TR by manual coders were also classed as TR by the CSO method. Result: Using the CSO as a proxy for TR worked well and was within expected margins of error

Methodology Translational Research Resulting scheme (v2) post-validation

TR TR (early) TR/clinical TR (patient) 1. Biology 1.1 Normal functioning 1.2 Alteration chromosomes 1.3 Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes 1.4 Progression and metastasis 1.5 Resources and infrastructure 2. Etiology 2.2 Endogenous factors 2.3 Interactions 2.4 Resources and infrastructure 3. Prevention 3.1 Interventions to prevent cancer 3.2 Nutritional science 3.3 Chemoprevention 3.4 Vaccines 3.5 Complementary and alternative approach 3.6 Resources and infrastructure 4. Early detection, diagnosis and prognosis 4.1 Development and discovery 4.2 Evaluation 4.3Testing in clinical setting 4.4 Resources and infrastructure 5. Treatment 5.1 Localized - Development 5.2 Localized - Clinical 5.3 Systemic - Development 5.4 Systemic - Clinical 5.5 Localized + Systemic 5.6 Complementary and alternative approach 5.7 Resources and infrastructure 6. Control, survivorship, outcome 6.1 Care and survivorship 6.2 Surveillance 6.3 Behavior 6.4 Cost analysis 6.5 Education 6.6 Ethics 6.7 Complementary and alternative approach 6.8 Resources and infrastructure 7. Scientific model systems 7.1 Development 7.2 Application 7.3 Resources and infrastructure

Methodology Translational Research Sufficiently robust to use CSO sub-codes as a proxy for TR Significantly reduces manual coding time Introduces consistency between different coders/organizations Caveats Additional category of ‘patient-focused TR’ was added for clarity Cancer survival, health services and behavioral/education research is difficult to classify into a standard ‘basic – translational – clinical’ scheme Often contains late translational/clinical research Prevention research (CSO3) is called ‘Translational’ research Research is not split out into clear translational/clinical boundaries. Research is spread from early – late translation / clinical in the TRWG scheme

Methodology Translational Research Issues with prevention codes - Examples: Research program encompasses both biology of chemoprevention (early TR) and a phase II trial (late TR/clinical) but is (appropriately) coded to CSO3.3. This is then coded to “Translational” in this scheme.

Trends in Translational Research in ICRP database Using the ICRP TR method: Initial results from our forthcoming data report suggest that TR (especially early/translational) has risen from 63% of the portfolio in 2005 to 67% in 2012, indicating that organizations’ efforts to increase TR are successful.

Extension of methodology to Health Research Classification System (HRCS) HRCS = a system for classifying and analysing biomedical and health research funding. Research Activity Codes Used to classify the type of research activity (from basic to applied). 48 codes divided into eight groups: Underpinning Aetiology Prevention Detection and Diagnosis Treatment Development Treatment Evaluation Disease Management Health Services

Extension of methodology to Health Research Classification System (HRCS)

Methodology Translational Research Conclusions CSO (or HRCS) can be used as a tool to identify TR Automated methodology Trends in translational research funding can now be identified easily ICRP will use this methodology to monitor trends in TR funding.