Supportability Design Considerations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Engineering From a Life Cycle Perspective John Groenenboom Director Engineering – Mesa Boeing Rotorcraft Dec 12, 2007.
Advertisements

SIAP SE TEM ppt-1 IEEE Standard for Application & Management of the Systems Engineering Process Robert L. Hobart Deputy Commander, C4I Integration.
1 Lecture 3.2: Technical Reviews and Audits (SEF Ch 11) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
“Common Process for Developing Briefings for Major Decision Points” INSTRUCTIONS Provide Feedback via to: Lois Harper PEO C4I and Space
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
Department of Defense Acquisition Yvette Rodriguez
Systems Engineering Management
Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum (CBDAIF)
What are MRLs ? Alfred W. Clark Dawnbreaker, Inc.
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
FIELDS iCDR Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR Introduction 1Peter Harvey.
Software Engineering Chapter 15 Construction Leads to Initial Operational Capability Fall 2001.
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Cleared for Public Release by OSR on 8/04/11; SR Case # 11-S-3228 applies R&M Engineering 08/16/11 Page 1 DTM R&M Engineering.
1 Lecture 5.2a: SEF Ch 8 SE Outputs Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
SE Team Agenda Review work being done by Dwayne –Review Sect 4.4.X for DAG – being processed –SEP Guide – being processed; seen as OK –Technical Reviews.
Configuration Management Non Government Std: EIA Standard-649 “A management process for establishing and maintaining consistency of a product’s performance,
Life Cycle Logistics.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
Critical Design Review (CDR)
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
1 Lecture 2.3: SE Process (SEF Ch 3) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
Installation and Commisioning SE view point Romuald Duperrier ESS SE manager.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Business, Cost Estimating & Financial Management Considerations
Integration of DTM “Reliability Planning, Analysis, Tracking and Reporting” into LOG 103 and other DAU Life Cycle Logistics Learning Assets.
DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL
Contracting (Product) Considerations
Session 2 Dr. Dan C. Surber, ESEP
System Engineering Considerations (See Chapters 3 and 9)
Life Cycle Logistics.
Key Management Issues for Software Reviews
Competitive Prototyping – the New Reality
Summary of Changes to the
NSS SMC/XR Template SMC April 2008; rev19 Program Management
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Production Considerations
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
DAG CH 3 Figure 11: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Session 5b Dr. Dan C. Surber, ESEP
Test and Evaluation Considerations
DAG CH 3 Figure 17: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 23: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
INCOSE – North Texas Chapter
DAG CH 3 Figure 13: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
MRL 6 Artifacts (at End of TMRR) Page 1 of 6
DAG CH 3 Figure 19: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Product Support Considerations
Adjustments required for program or funding changes Options
DAG CH 3 Figure 18: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
International Acquisition and Exportability (IA&E) Considerations
DAG CH 3 Figure 28: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
DAG CH 3 Figure 15: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
8 Tech Processes Drive Acquisition
PSS verification and validation
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
DAG CH 3 Figure 21: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 27: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 22: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
DAG CH 3 Figure 25: Weapon System Development Life Cycle
Presentation transcript:

Supportability Design Considerations DAG Chapter 5.3  Logistics Infrastructure and Footprint Reduction Architecture Considerations Reliability Maintainability Other logistics technologies Systems Engineering Design Considerations DAG 4.3.18  

Supportability Considerations Supportability requirement enablers, such as Human Systems Integration (HSI) design features, inclusive of the environment, safety and occupational health risk reduction features, are included in the design. Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis have been completed and any remaining subsystem requirements for the product support package elements design are complete. Key sustainment characteristic drivers (including critical manufacturing processes to achieve them) have been identified, and an estimate of system reliability based on demonstrated reliability rates and other sustainment drivers are being used in developing the product support package. Development testing results are used to update the sustainment metric projection estimates and any planned corrective actions to hardware/software deficiencies have been identified. Test success criteria for any remaining development testing and operational testing plans (for testing both operationally effective and suitable) for key sustainment enablers or drivers requirements are complete. Program sustainment development efforts with corresponding schedules, including system fabrication, test, and software critical path drivers, are included in LCSP updates.

5.4.2.2.3. Technical Reviews in Technology Development 5.4.1.3.3.1. Sustainment Considerations in the Initial Technical Review (ITR) 5.4.1.3.3.2. Sustainment Considerations in the Alternative System Review (ASR) 5.4.2.2.3. Technical Reviews in Technology Development 5.4.2.2.3.1. Sustainment Considerations in the System Requirements Review (SRR)           5.4.2.2.3.2. Sustainment Considerations in the System Functional Review (SFR) 5.4.2.2.3.3. Sustainment Considerations in the Preliminary Design Review (PDR)   5.4.3.2.2. Technical Reviews in Engineering and Manufacturing Development 5.4.3.2.2.1. Sustainment Considerations in the Critical Design Review (CDR) 5.4.3.2.2.2. Sustainment Considerations in the Test Readiness Review (TRR) 5.4.3.2.2.3. Sustainment Considerations in the System Verification Review (SVR) 5.4.3.2.2.4. Sustainment Considerations in the Functional Configuration Audit (FCA) 5.4.3.2.2.5. Sustainment Considerations in the Production Readiness Review (PRR)

5.4.2.2.3. Technical Reviews in Technology Development 5.4.2.2.3.1. Sustainment Considerations in the System Requirements Review (SRR)   An approved system performance specification with achievable system, supportability, human systems integration, and sustainment enabler requirements which satisfy and are traceable to the ICD or draft CDD and support concept. A preliminary allocation of system requirements to hardware, human, and software subsystems. The system sustainment requirements should be sufficiently detailed and understood to enable system functional definition and functional decomposition. Demonstration that critical sustainment system and support element enabler technologies required to implement the support strategy and achieve the needed materiel availability are sufficiently mature to enable low risk entry into development. Approved support and sustainment concepts with the corresponding metrics. A preliminary Cost Analysis Requirements Description consistent with the approved system performance specification and sustainment concept.         

DoD SSE “DAPS Methodology” http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/docs/DAPS_V2.0_Methodology.pdf The Systems and Software Engineering (SSE) Assessments and Support directorate uses the DAPS Methodology as a part of its review process. DASD Materiel Readiness participates in these reviews as a part of the SE team. Areas addressed include: 4.0 Technical Process Sub-Area 4.1 Design Considerations 4.1.6 Sustainment as a Design Consideration p 236 Sub-Area 4.7 Supportability Planning 4.7.1 Acquisition Logistics 4.7.2 Performance-Based Logistics 4.7.3 Sustainment 5.0 Performance Sub-Area 5.2 Suitability 5.2.1 Reliability Assessment 5.2.2 Availability Assessment 5.2.3 Maintainability Assessment

Systems Engineering Community of Practice Technical Reviews 4.2.8. Technical Reviews and Audits Overview Technical Reviews Slide Rule https://acc.dau.mil/docs/technicalslider/slider.html Technical Review Check List https://acc.dau.mil/TechRevChklst

Technical Review Check List

5.4.4.2.5. Pre-Initial Operational Capability Supportability Review This review and its associated analysis should be performed at the DoD Component level in conjunction with the OTRR to: Confirm design maturity and configuration of the system Determine status of correction of any deficiencies identified Confirm configuration control Certify product support integrator/providers plan to meet user requirements Verify product support integrator/provider agreements/contracts and funding are in place

5.4.4.2.6.1. Sustainment Considerations in the Operational Test Readiness Review (OTRR) Participate in the review to ensure the test: Is properly planned and resourced (e.g., people, facilities, data systems, support equipment, and any other logistics elements) to achieve the test objectives. The Pre-Initial Operational Capability Supportability Review should be used to support this process. Will verify and validate the key sustainment drivers to achieve the Sustainment KPP and KSAs are included. This should include ensuring system reliability, maintainability, and support performance features are included and demonstrated. Is structured to include as much of the product support package that will be used in the operational environment. Where this is not possible, prototypes should be used to gain early user feedback on the product support package.