About The extent to which the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) modifies an existing tax agreement depends on the MLI Positions of the Contracting Jurisdictions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Tax Treaties
Advertisements

Enforcement issues, including status of ITU-T Recommendations APT-ITU workshop on the International Telecommunications Regulations Bangkok, 6-8 February.
The Importance of Dispute Avoidance and Resolution Mechanisms: Domestic and international Konrad Szpadzik specialist in APA Unit Direct Taxes Department.
Article XXXVI – Signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession 1. – This Protocol shall be open for signature in Berlin on 9 March 2012 by.
Double Tax Treaty between Latvia and the Russian Federation Remi Troch, Riga 8 June 2011.
Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law Dr Mario Tenore Vienna University of Economics and Business Brussels, 28 September.
THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
Tax Incentives and Tax Discrimination after CETA The CETA: Implications for British Columbia, Session 3: Legal Perspectives, 6 May 2014 Geoffrey Loomer,
The new Germany/UK Treaty - The German Perspective IFA Trilateral Meeting 3 November 2010 Jan Brinkmann.
Double Taxation Agreements Workshop Interpretation and Application issues SAINT LUCIA 24 July 2006 Tomas Balco IBFD.
Rome I regulation Discussion topics
Page 1 Business income and associated enterprise Prashant Khatore.
Emerging Challenge? Accessing Genetic Resources : the building blocks of new technologies Access and Benefits Sharing, an emerging issue transitioning.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
OECD Multilateral Convention On Mutual Administrative Assistance In Tax Matters.
DOUBLE TAXATION AVOIDANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN FRANCE AND HONG KONG PRESS CONFERENCE CONSULATE GENERAL OF FRANCE 8 DECEMBER 2011.
ICC International Court of Arbitration
1 Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments -Recent Developments- Xiamen University – 18 February 2011 Josine van Wanrooij.
INTERNATIONAL LAW PARMA UNIVERSITY International Business and Development International Market and Organization Laws Prof. Gabriele Catalini.
Preliminary Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements United Arab Emirates and Mexico SCOF: 24 June 2008.
1 Belgium-China income tax treaty Marc De Mil Fiscal Department for Foreign Investments Federal Public Service Finance.
1 STRUCTURE AND OPERATION OF (INTERNATIONAL) TAX TREATIES.
Ratification Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements Sudan DTA Agreement and Australia Protocol PCOF: 17 June 2008.
FIBRAS USE OR ENJOYMENTSALE SALE BUSINESS TRUST GOOD OPTION SALE REAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS.
Tax Information Exchange: approach of the Member States of the BRICS Pustovalov Evgeny Eurasian Research Centre for Comparative and International Tax Law,
Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements Formal Ratification 2011.
1 THE GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN SERVICES (GATS) And The Russian Federation WTO Secretariat.
Nexia International Tax Conference Geneva 31 May to 2 June 2006 Rajesh Sharma & Inez Anderson.
Ratification Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements PCOF: 16 September 2008.
International Legislation AT02 Slide 1. UN Firearms Protocol AT02 Slide 2.
ACTION 14 MAKING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESSES MORE EFFECTIVE 1.
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
Two Case Studies involving intra-EU BITs Christer Söderlund, Vinge, Stockholm, Sweden London, 4 December 2008 EUROPEAN LAW AND INVESTMENT TREATIES: EXPLORING.
Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law IV. Interpretation Issues in Connection with Arbitration Clauses International Arbitration.
The BEPS final reports Daniel Szmaragowski
Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law Session IX. “I had a dream…” A Gradual Approach to Improving Dispute Resolution with.
1 Commodity Agreements Sugar, Coffee, Cocoa, Coconut New York, May 2004 Lynne Moorhouse.
Chapter – 3 setoff and carry forward of losses
Exchange of information 11 Initial Directive EU 2011/16/EU as regards administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, covering: exchange of information.
Resource Capital Fund III LP v Commissioner of Taxation.
Bilateral screening: Chapter 16 PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working.
Mutual Agreement Procedure Statistics for 2014 The statistics for each reporting period (generally a calendar year) include: opening inventory of MAP.
Turkish private international law on matrimonial property and successions Zeynep Derya TARMAN Koç Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi
National Tax Agency Japan Masaharu Koga (Mr.) ―Introduction of Arbitration Procedure― 1.
Unit 7 International Law of Treaties
1 Strengthening the Rule of Law: Contribution of the Treaty Section of the Office of Legal Affairs Patricia Muriel Djella Ogandaga Legal Officer, Treaty.
Workshop on EOI – Florida, July 2012 __________________________________________________________________________________ Duncan Nicol Director, Tax Information.
Getting access to Luxembourg’s tax treaty network going forward
and other BEPS related issues
Protocol amending the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of South Africa and the Government of the State of Kuwait for the avoidance.
PRELIMINARY BRIEFING: KUWAIT, SWITZERLAND, NETHERLANDS AND LUXEMBOURG
Arbitration and the MLI
Advanced Income Tax Law
Circularity between measures Questions regarding financial instruments
Dejan Dabetic, LL.M. Head of Tax Treaties Division
THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
International Taxation
LAW 221: INTERNATIONAL LAW
Aggression Amendments: Articles 15bis &15ter
Jacques Malherbe Professor emeritus, Catholic University of Louvain
Singapore’s Position on BEPS Action 15: Multilateral Instrument
BEPS Action Plan 7 Preventing the Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status Prepared by: Jalaj Gupta Head – International Tax SP Chopra &
Entry into force between parties
ICJ – Reservations to the Convention on Genocide A.O. (1951)
Resource Capital Fund III LP v Commissioner of Taxation
Platform for Tax Good Governance
BEPS - Current Status of Implementation in EU Countries
Preliminary Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements United Arab Emirates and Mexico PCOF: 17 June 2008.
Hybrid mismatch arrangements
Presentation transcript:

Matching of reservations and notifications under the multilateral instrument (MLI) Provisions

About The extent to which the Multilateral Instrument (MLI) modifies an existing tax agreement depends on the MLI Positions of the Contracting Jurisdictions and the corresponding application of the mechanical provisions of the MLI. The interactive flowcharts included in this overview have been developed by the OECD Secretariat to illustrate the relevant notification clauses and other relevant mechanical provisions. The flowcharts should not be considered legal advice on the MLI or any other subject matter. For more information, please contact the OECD Secretariat at multilateralinstrument@oecd.org.

Table of Contents Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 – PPT Article 7 – S-LOB Article 8 Article 9 Article 10 Article 11 Article 12 Article 13 Article 14 Article 15 Article 16(1) – 1 Article 16(1) – 2 Article 16(2) Article 16(3) Article 17 Article 18 Article 19 Article 23 – 1 Article 23 – 2 Article 24 Article 28 Article 35 – 1 Article 35 – 2 Article 36 Entry into Force – 1 Entry into Force – 2

Article 2 Covered Tax Agreements (CTA) The agreement is a “Covered Tax Agreement” (CTA) Is the agreement in force? YES Do all parties to an income tax agreement notify the agreement under Art. 2(1)(a)(ii)? The agreement will be a “Covered Tax Agreement” (CTA) after its entry into force YES NO The agreement is not a “Covered Tax Agreement” (CTA) NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 3 Transparent Entities That provision is replaced by Art. 3(1) (as modified by Art.3(3)) Article 3(1): Art. 3(1) does not apply YES YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 11(3)(a)? Does either party make a reservation under Art. 3(5)(b)-(e) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? Art. 3(1) does not apply Art. 3 does not apply YES NO Does either party make a reservation under Art. 3(5)(g) and NOT notify that the CTA is within the reservation? NO YES That provision is replaced by Art. 3(1) Does either party make a reservation under Art. 3(5)(a)? YES NO Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 3(6)? NO - NO Art.3(1) (as modified by Art.3(3)) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility Article 3(2): Art. 3(2) does not apply YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 3(5)(f)? YES Does either party make a reservation under Art.11(3)(a)? NO NO Art. 3(2) applies Art. 3(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility Back to Table of Contents

Article 4 Dual Resident Entities Art. 4 does not apply Art. 4 does not apply YES YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 4(3)(a)? Does the other party make a reservation under Art. 4(3)(f)? Art. 4 does not apply That provision is replaced by Art. 4(1) NO YES YES NO The last sentence of Art. 4(1) is replaced with the text in Art. 4(3)(e); Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 4(4)? Does either party make a reservation under Art. 4(3)(b)-(d) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES NO NO Art. 4(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility Does either party make a reservation under Art. 4(3)(e)? NO That provision is replaced by Art. 4(1) Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 4(4)? YES NO Art. 4(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility Back to Table of Contents

Article 5 Methods for Elimination of Double Taxation The Option chosen by such party applies with respect to that provision Option C does not apply; Does the party that chooses the other Option notify an exiting provision under Art. 5(10)? Art. 5 does not apply YES Does the party that does NOT choose an Option make a reservation under Art. 5(8) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES YES The Option chosen by such party does not apply NO Does the party that does NOT choose Option C make a reservation under Art. 5(9) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? Does either party choose an Option under Art. 5(10)? YES NO NO NO Art. 5 does not apply The Option chosen by such party applies with respect to that provision Does the party that chooses an Option notify an existing provision under Art. 5(10)? YES The Option chosen by such party does not apply NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 6 Purpose of a Covered Tax Agreement Art. 6(1) does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 6(4) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES Such preamble language is replaced by the text in Art. 6(1) Do all parties notify the same preamble language under Art. 6(5)? NO YES The text in Art. 6(1) is included in addition to the existing preamble language NO The text in Art. 6(3) is included in the CTA Do all parties notify that the CTA does NOT already contain existing preamble language under Art. 6(6)? Article 6(3): YES Do all parties choose to apply Art. 6(3) under Art. 6(6)? Art. 6(3) does not apply YES NO Art. 6(3) does not apply NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 7 – PPT Prevention of Treaty Abuse Art. 7 does not apply That provision is replaced by Art. 7(1) and (4) Art. 7(1) and (4) do not apply Is Art. 7 opted out of entirely under Art. 7(16)? YES YES YES Art. 7(1) and (4) do not apply Do all parties choose to apply Art. 7(4) under Art. 7(17)(b)? Does either party make a reservation under Art. 7(15)(a)? NO YES Art. 7(4) does not apply; That provision is replaced by Art. 7(1) Does either party make a reservation under Art. 7(15)(b) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? NO NO YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 7(17)(a)? NO NO Art. 7(1) and (4) apply and supersede the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility YES Do all parties choose to apply Art. 7(4) under Art. 7(17)(b)? NO Art. 7(4) does not apply; Art.7(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility Back to Table of Contents

Article 7 – S-LOB Prevention of Treaty Abuse The S-LOB does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 7(15)(c) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES That provision is replaced by the S-LOB NO Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 7(17)(c)? YES YES (all) The S-LOB applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility NO The S-LOB does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 7(15)(c) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? Does either party choose to apply the S-LOB under Art. 7(17)(c)? YES That provision is replaced by the S-LOB YES (not all) YES NO YES (a) NO Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 7(17)(c) or (d)? The S-LOB applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility NO Do all of the parties that do NOT choose the S-LOB choose to apply Art. 7(7)(a) or (b) under Art. 7(17)(d)? The S-LOB does not apply NO Does either party make a reservation under Art. 7(15)(c) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES (b) That provision is replaced by the S-LOB (asymmetrically) YES YES NO Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 7(17)(c) or (d)? NO The S-LOB applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility (asymmetrically) The S-LOB does not apply Art. 7 does not apply Does either party that chooses to apply the S-LOB under Art. 7(17)(c) make a reservation under Art. 7(16)? YES Back to Table of Contents NO The S-LOB does not apply

Article 8 Dividend Transfer Transactions Art. 8(1) applies with respect to that provision Art. 8 does not apply to the extent that an existing provision includes a period described in the reservation; Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 8(4)? YES Art. 8 does not apply YES YES NO Does either party make a reservation under Art. 8(3)(a)? Art. 8(1) does not apply NO Does either party make a reservation under Art. 8(3)(b)(i), (ii) or (iii) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? NO Art. 8(1) applies with respect to that provision YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 8(4)? NO Art. 8(1) does not apply Back to Table of Contents

Article 9 Capital Gains from Alienation of Share or Interests of Entities Deriving their Value Principally from Immovable Property Art. 9(1)(b) does not apply Art. 9(1)(a) does not apply; Does either party make a reservation under Art. 9(6)(c), or make a reservation under Art. 9(6)(e) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES Art. 9(1)(b) applies with respect to that provision Art. 9(1) does not apply YES NO YES Article 9(1): Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 9(7)? YES NO Art. 9(4) does not apply; Does either party make a reservation under Art. 9(6)(a)? Art. 9(1)(b) does not apply NO Does either party make a reservation under Art. 9(6)(b), or make a reservation under Art. 9(6)(d) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? NO Art. 9(1)(a) applies with respect to that provision NO Art. 9(1)(b) does not apply; Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 9(7)? YES Do all parties choose to apply Art. 9(4) under Art. 9(8)? Does either party make a reservation under Art. 9(6)(c), or make a reservation under Art. 9(6)(e) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES NO Art. 9(1)(a) does not apply YES Article 9(4): NO Art. 9(1) applies with respect to that provision Art. 9(4) does not apply Art. 9(1) does not apply; Does either party make a reservation under Art. 9(6)(f) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 9(7)? YES That provision is replaced by Art. 9(4) NO Art. 9(1) does not apply NO YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 9(7) or (8)? NO Art. 9(4) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility Back to Table of Contents

Article 10 Anti-abuse Rule for Permanent Establishments Situated in Third Jurisdictions Art. 10 does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 10(5)(a)? Art. 10 does not apply YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 10(5)(b) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? NO YES Art. 10 does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 10(5)(c) and NOT notify that the CTA is within the reservation? That provision is replaced by Art. 10(1)-(3) NO YES NO Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 10(6)? YES Art. 10(1)-(3) apply and supersede the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 11 Application of Tax Agreements to Restrict a Party’s Right to Tax its Own Residents Art. 11 does not apply YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 11(3)(a)? Art. 11 does not apply NO YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 11(3)(b) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? That provision is replaced by Art. 11(1) NO YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 11(4)? NO Art. 11(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility NOTE: Where either party makes a reservation under Art. 11(3)(a), the provisions of Art. 3(1) will be modified under Art. 3(3) to ensure that its application will not interfere with the taxation by a Contracting Jurisdiction of its residents. Back to Table of Contents

Article 12 Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status through Commissionnaire Arrangements and Similar Strategies Art. 12(1) applies with respect to that provision Article 12(1): YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 12(5)? Art. 12 does not apply YES NO Does either party make a reservation under Art. 12(4)? Art. 12(1) does not apply NO - Art. 12(2) applies with respect to that provision Article 12(2): YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 12(6)? NO Art. 12(2) does not apply Back to Table of Contents

Article 13 Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status through the Specific Activity Exemptions Option A does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 13(6)(b) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES Option A applies with respect to that provision NO YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 13(7)? YES, A NO Option A does not apply Option A/B: Do all parties choose to apply the same Option under Art. 13(7)? Option B applies with respect to that provision NO YES Art. 13 does not apply YES, B Do all parties notify the same provision under Art.13(7)? YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 13(6)(a)? NO Option B does not apply NO - Neither Option applies Article 13(4): Art. 13(4) does not apply YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 13(6)(c)? Art. 13(4) applies with respect to that provision NO YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 13 (7) or (8)? NO Back to Table of Contents Art. 13(4) does not apply

Article 14 Splitting up of Contracts That provision is replaced by Art. 14(1) Art. 14 does not apply with respect to provisions relating to the exploration for or exploitation of natural resources; Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 14(4)? YES Art. 14 does not apply YES YES NO Does either party make a reservation under Art. 14(3)(a)? Art. 14(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility NO Does either party make a reservation under Art. 14(3)(b) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? NO That provision is replaced by Art. 14(1) YES Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 14(4)? NO Art. 14(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility Back to Table of Contents

Article 15 Definition of a Person Closely Related to an Enterprise Art. 15 does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 15(2)? YES Art. 15 applies Does either of Art. 12(2), 13(4) or 14(1) apply? NO YES Art. 15 does not apply NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 16(1) – 1 Mutual Agreement Procedure (1st sentence) The 1st sentence of Art. 16(1) does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 16(5)(a)? That provision is replaced by the 1st sentence of Art. 16(1) YES NO Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 16(6)(a)? YES The 1st sentence of Art. 16(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 16(1) – 2 Mutual Agreement Procedure (2nd sentence) The 2nd sentence of Art. 16(1) does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 16(5)(b) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES That provision is replaced by the 2nd sentence of Art. 16(1) NO Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 16(6)(b)(i)? (shorter than three years) The 2nd sentence of Art. 16(1) does not apply YES NO Does either party notify an existing provision under Art. 16(6)(b)(ii)? (at least three years) YES NO The 2nd sentence of Art. 16(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility Back to Table of Contents

Article 16(2) Mutual Agreement Procedure The 1st sentence of Art. 16(2) applies 1st sentence: Do all parties notify the absence of an existing provision under Art. 16(6)(c)(i)? YES The 1st sentence of Art. 16(2) does not apply NO The 2nd sentence of Art. 16(2) does not apply 2nd sentence: Does either party make a reservation under Art. 16(5)(c)? YES The 2nd sentence of Art. 16(2) applies Do all parties notify the absence of an existing provision under Art. 16(6)(c)(ii)? NO YES The 2nd sentence of Art. 16(2) dose not apply NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 16(3) Mutual Agreement Procedure The 1st sentence of Art. 16(3) applies 1st sentence: Do all parties notify the absence of an existing provision under Art. 16(6)(d)(i)? YES The 1st sentence of Art. 16(3) does not apply NO The 2nd sentence of Art. 16(3) applies 2nd sentence: Do all parties notify the absence of an existing provision under Art. 16(6)(d)(ii)? YES The 2nd sentence of Art. 16(3) does not apply NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 17 Corresponding Adjustments Art. 17 does not apply YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 17(3)(a) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? Art. 17 does not apply YES NO Does either party make a reservation under Art. 17(3)(b) or (c)? That provision is replaced by Art. 17(1) YES NO Do all parties notify the same provision under Art. 17(4)? NO Art. 17(1) applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility Back to Table of Contents

Article 18 Choice of Apply Part VI (and Compatibility) Part VI does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 26(4) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? Part VI does not apply YES Is Part VI opted out of under Art. 23(7)? NO YES Part VI does not apply Do both parties choose to apply Part VI under Art. 18? YES Is Part VI opted out of under Art. 28(2)? NO YES That provision is replaced by Part VI Part VI does not apply NO Do both parties notify the same provision under Art. 26(1)? NO YES Part VI applies and supersedes the provisions of the CTA to the extent of incompatibility NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 19 Mandatory Binding Arbitration The two-year period in Art. 19(1)(b) is replaced with a three-year period Period in Article 19(1)(b): Does either party make a reservation under Art. 19(11)? YES Nothing changes NO The rules in Art. 19(12) apply Rules in Article 19(12): Does either party make a reservation under Art. 19(12)? YES Nothing changes NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 23 – 1 Type of Arbitration Process Art. 19 does not apply until both competent authorities reach an agreement on the type of arbitration process Does either Party make a reservation under Art. 23(3)? YES Does either Party make a reservation under Art. 23(2)? YES NO Arbitration process in Art. 23(2) applies (“independent opinion”) Arbitration process in Art. 23(1) applies (“final offer”) NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 23 – 2 Type of Arbitration Process Part VI does not apply Does the other party that chooses to apply Art. 23(5) make a reservation under Art. 23(7)? Does either Party that does NOT choose to apply Art. 23(5) make a reservation under Art. 23(6) and notify that the CTA is within the reservation? YES Art. 23(5) does not apply NO YES Does either Party choose to apply Art. 23(5) under Art. 23(4)? Art. 23(5) applies YES NO Art. 23(5) does not apply NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 24 Agreement on a Different Resolution Art. 24(2) applies Does Art. 23(2) apply to the CTA? YES Does either party make a reservation under Art. 24(3)? YES Art. 24(2) does not apply NO Do both parties choose to apply Art. 24(2) under Art. 24(1)? YES NO Art. 24(2) applies Art. 24(2) does not apply NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 28 Reservation Formulated for Scope of Arbitration Part VI does not apply Does the other party object to the reservation under Art. 28(2)(b)? YES Does either party formulate a reservation under Art. 28(2)(a)? The reservation applies YES NO Nothing changes NO Back to Table of Contents

Article 35 – 1 Entry into Effect Period in Article 35(1)(b): Such shorter period applies Do all parties notify the same period as a shorter period than six calendar months under Art. 35(1)(b)? YES NO Nothing changes Article 35(2): For the purpose of the party’s application, “calendar year” applies Does either party choose to apply Art. 35(2)? YES NO Nothing changes Article 35(3): For the purpose of the party’s application, “1 January of the next year” applies Does either party choose to apply Art. 35(3)? YES NO Nothing changes Back to Table of Contents

Article 35 – 2 Entry into Effect Period in Article 35(5)(b): Such shorter period applies Do all parties notified the same period as a shorter period than nine calendar months under Art. 35(5)(b)? YES Nothing changes NO Article 35(4): Art. 35(4) does not apply Does either party make a reservation under Art. 35(6)? YES NO Nothing changes Article 35(7)(a): Entry into effect will depend on completion of internal procedures in the reserving party applies Does either party make a reservation under Art. 35(7)(a)? YES NO Nothing changes Back to Table of Contents

Article 36 Entry into Effect of Part VI Cases prior to entry into force of the Convention shall be considered to have been presented on the agreed date Do both parties notify a mutual agreement between competent authorities and the agreed date under Art. 36(1)(b)? YES NO Nothing changes Part VI applies retroactively only to the extent that the competent authorities agree Does either party make a reservation under Art. 36(2)? YES Nothing changes NO Back to Table of Contents

Entry into Force and Effect – Scenario 1 Jurisdiction A deposits its instrument of ratification of the MLI Jurisdiction B deposits its instrument of ratification of the MLI The new/modified provisions of the Covered Tax Agreement take effect according to Art. 35 of the MLI, the choices and reservations of the Contracting Jurisdictions Entry into force of the MLI itself (i.e. 5 jurisdictions have deposit) Entry into force of the MLI for Jurisdiction A Entry into force of the MLI for Jurisdiction B The Covered Tax Agreement between A and B is modified Back to Table of Contents

Entry into Force and Effect – Scenario 2 Jurisdiction A deposits its instrument of ratification of the MLI Jurisdiction B deposits its instrument of ratification of the MLI The new/modified provisions of the Covered Tax Agreement take effect according to Art. 35 of the MLI, the choices and reservations of the Contracting Jurisdictions Entry into force of the MLI itself Entry into force of the MLI for Jurisdiction A Entry into force of the MLI for Jurisdiction B The Covered Tax Agreement between A and B is modified Back to Table of Contents