The Changing Environment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T H E W O R L D L E A D E R I N B O V I N E G E N E T I C S ABS Global The World Leader in Bovine Genetics HB Genetics 2012.
Advertisements

Use of OPU-IVP and SO at CRV breeding program in the genomic era
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
 87 of the top 100 active proven TPI sires are descendants of Planet, O Man, Shottle and Goldwyn.  58 descendants of O Man  32 descendants of Shottle.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
December 2014 Proof Changes
2003 Rex L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Interbull as a Tool.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
Genetic Evaluation and Index Changes. HA-USA Fertility Index Fertility Index =.64 x PTA Daughter Pregnancy Rate (DPR).18 x PTA Cow Conception Rate (CCR).18.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA The use and.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD An Example from Dairy.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
2003 P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluations.
J. B. Cole *, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Norman, 2014ICAR / Interbull annual meeting, Berlin, Germany, May 20, 2014 (1) Dr. H. Duane Norman Interim Administrator Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding.
Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.
April 2010 (1) Prediction of Breed Composition & Multibreed Genomic Evaluations K. M. Olson and P. M. VanRaden.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Jeff O’Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland.
2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 John Cole, Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, and Melvin Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD,
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Biological Insights.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4, Paul VanRaden 1, Curt.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2014 Paul VanRaden Advancing.
2005 P.M. VanRaden and M.E. Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Effect.
My vision for dairy genomics
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Possibilities and requirements for organic dairy breeding lines
The Dairy Research Foundation 2017 Symposium Ian Halliday July 2017
Genetic diversity of sires used in the Irish dairy industry
Net Merit Changes April 2017.
Sijne van der Beek and Henk Geertsema
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
Y. Masuda1, I. Misztal1, P. M. VanRaden2, and T. J. Lawlor3
December 2016 Sire Summary Highlights
THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
Introducing CDCB Health Evaluations
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
A National Sire Fertility Index
Validation of genomic predictions and genomic reliability
Can you believe those genomic evaluations for young bulls?
Percent of total breedings
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Alternatives for evaluating daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations Abstr. #10.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
The effectiveness of the using bulls evaluated by different methods
Economics of Reproduction: the Quality of the Pregnancy
Presentation transcript:

The Changing Environment Steve Winnington – Area Director of Marketing

Dairymen Want Feed Efficient Trouble Free Cow

U.S. Holstein Genetic Trend for NM$ Year of birth Time Line Median Annual NM$ + 1985 - 1995 18 1996 - 2008 28 2009 - 2014 61 CDCB Apr. 2017

Genomic Predictions Started in 2009 and we have seen: Increases in the Selection Differential. Shortening of Generation Interval. Increased Accuracy (reliability) Over PA.

Creating more genetically superior Females * April 2017 High Ranking Holstein Genomic Tested Females: > +2763 GTPI ®TPI is a trademark of Holstein Association USA

Creating More Genetically superior females * April 2017 High Ranking Holstein Genomic Tested Females: > +883 GNM$

No Other Source Compares TPI Dominance: No Other Source Compares WWS claims 72% of the Top 25 TPI sires and more than 50% of the Top 100!

Top 100 TPI Proven Sires Over Time Well other people agreed with you…We developed this word cloud by asking some of your distributors from around the world what World Wide Sires Stands for and here is what they said… Time-tested Professional Great People Globally Known Quality Commitment Integrity Loyal Genetics These are their words, not mine

Your #1 Source for Elite TPI WWS is home to 9 of the top 10 TPI Breed Leaders,11 of the top 15, and 31 of the top 50! MONTROSS +2744 #1 YODER +2673 #2 SUPERSIRE +2603 #3 REFLECTOR +2590 #5 KINGBOY +2567 #6 BOB +2564 #7 ROOKIE +2555 #8 MAYFLOWER +2555 #9 MORGAN +2552 #10

Proven Leaders By Design Not Chance Top 100 TPI & NM$ Sires Source: HA USA, April 2017 * AG, SS, Genervations * Not official. Does not account for PTAT REL

Genomics For Future Success

The Male Side of the Equation 7HO8081 PLANET Born March 2003 The Male Side of the Equation 7HO10721 BOOKEM Born Feb. 2009 7HO11477 MCCUTCHEN Born Nov. 2010 7HO12198 KINGBOY Born Oct. 2012 507H12787 KING ROYAL Born: May 2015 507H12787 KING ROYAL Sons

Example from the SSI ART program Seagull-Bay Oman Mirror-ET Born: November 2004 Example from the SSI ART program 4 ½ Years Roylane Shot Mindy 2079-ET Born: May 2009 2 ¾ Years S-S-I Bookem Modesto 7269-ET Born: March 2011 1 ¾ Years DAM S-S-I Supersire Miri 8679-ET Born: December 2012 1 ½ Years S-S-I MONT 8679 10721-ET Born: May 2014 (dam of 507HO13597 PINNACLE & full sis to JEDI & JETT) S-S-I HEINZ 10721 11653-ET Born: November 2015 1 ½ Years

Genomic Greats For Future Success Top 200 TPI Genomic Young Sires Source: HA USA, April 2017 (Top 200 TPI Genomic Young Bulls: Semen Status is Genomic with no daughters in their proofs for Production or Type) * AG, SS, Genervations

Genomic Greats For Future Success Top 25 TPI Genomic Young Sires WWS is home to 23 of the top 25 TPI Genomic Young Sires! Source: HA USA, April 2017 * AG, SS, Genervations

>2800 TPI Genomic tested bulls born since 1/1/2014

Genomic Selection Impact on Production Traits Seven years after the introduction of genomic selection in the United States, it is now possible to evaluate the impact of this technology on the population. Genetic gains Per year for Milk, Fat Yield & Protein Yield http://www.pnas.org/content/113/28/E3995.full ©2016 by National Academy of Sciences Adriana García-Ruiz et al. PNAS 2016;113:E3995-E4004

Only possible if we have Good Records. Proper Environment Good Health. Proper Management.

Dairy Management Services are designed to address the other key factor to animal performance. WMS – corrective mating and Inbreeding Better management yields higher than estimated performance. Get more results (value) out of the Genetics. Poorer management limits the Genetic Expression. (Expected Results)

Better managed herds get more value from Genetics. 640 Below Average 960 Above Average 480 Bottom 20% 800 Average 1,120 Top 20%

The Breeding Revolution

The Evolution of the Dairy Industry

The Revolution of the Dairy Industry

More Efficient Cows and Farmers !!! Dairy cows will produce more kg of components, for a longer time, will be healthier, more fertile and more feed efficient Dairymen are becoming entrepreneurs and managers. They need to manage bigger teams of people who can control the reproduction of more efficient and higher producing cows Genetic Progress Management Progress

The Revolution of the AI industry The convergence of major technological breakthroughs that appeared in the last decade is accelerating the revolution of the breeding industry. Sorted Semen Cloud Based Apps Heat Detection Sensors Genomics IVF Robotics

The Revolution of the AI industry WWS and its owners & partners are active players in this revolution Genomics Designer CRM Sorted Semen Heat Detection WWS Breeding Revolution ART/PEAK Female Programs Dairy Mgt & Training Strategic Breeding Solutions

The WWS Breeding Revolution New Genetic Audit Capabilities allow to Change the Conversation! It’s not just about our bulls… It’s about the customer’s herd first ! Not just a parent average audit anymore…. Correlate herd’s phenotypic data with genetics used on farm Ability to segment the herd with great flexibility and define specific breeding strategies and levels for each segment Data imports and Data Reporting strongly improved to facilitate a new conversation with the dairyman. Best estimate of inbreeding levels & recessive management

Genetics Impacting Health 5,000 dairy in Northern Nevada Comparing cows PTA Productive Life (PL) PL Avg. Fresh Abort DNB Sold Died Injury Lame Mastitis Low PL Cows -0.7 1,421 281 479 568 185 39 243 774 High PL Cows 2.5 1,470 134 148 152 36 18 77 230 Example of some of the genetic tools to use for ongoing monitoring

Dairymen Want Feed Efficient Trouble Free Cow

Thank You!