Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Psychological Evaluations
Advertisements

Achievement Tests Designed to measure the skills and abilities acquired through direct instruction or intervention. Can measure both lower order and high.
Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised
Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance
Preparing You and Your Child for E.O.G. Testing FAQ About E.O.G. Testing Q: Why do the children have to take the E.O.G test? A: The North Carolina End-of-Grade.
Wide Range Achievement Test WRAT4 Authors: Gary S. Wilkinson, PhD Gary J. Robertson, PhD.
Author: Sabrina Hinton. Year and Publisher: American Guidance Service.
Assessment: Understanding the Psycho-Educational Evaluation Elizabeth A. Rizzi, MA NYS Certified School Psychologist John Jay High School.
Educational Assessment of Children
Benefits from Formal and Informal Assessments
Austin Elementary School August 20 and 27, 2015
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
EC CHAIRPERSON/PSYCHOLOGIST MEETING Helpful Tips re: Interventions.
SLD Academy 2.0 Houston Independent School District.
TACL-3 Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language
Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II Overview.
Diagnostics Mathematics Assessments: Main Ideas  Now typically assess the knowledge and skill on the subsets of the 10 standards specified by the National.
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents What does CogAT measure? CogAT measures cognitive development of a student in the areas of learned reasoning.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5: Introduction to Norm- Referenced.
Dyslexia: To Screen or Not to Screen Wendy Stovall, Ed.S., Keri Horn, Ed.S., Amber Broadway, Ed.S., & Mary Bryant, Ed.S. Crowley’s Ridge Education Service.
Changes to end of Key Stage assessment arrangements. Monday, November 16 th 2015.
Test of Early Reading Ability-3 (TERA-3) By: Jenna Ferrara.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
 The introduction of the new assessment framework in line with the new curriculum now that levels have gone.  Help parents understand how their children.
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
WIAT lll/ll By Christian, Reed, Mike and Madeline.
Key Stage 1 and 2 Tests 2016 Presentation to Parents and Carers Otterbourne Primary School April 2016.
A warm welcome! Purpose of the meeting: Update on national changes in Assessment arrangements Explain school arrangements for KS1 SATs Opportunity to look.
Downham Feoffees Primary School. What does SATs Stand For? Statutory Assessment Tasks and Tests (also includes Teacher Assessment). Usually taken at the.
ACCESS for ELLs Score Changes
Understanding Learning Disability Documentation
Preparation for End of Key Stage 1 Testing 2017
Key Stage 1 National Curriculum Assessments
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
KS2 SATS Guidance for Parents
An Information Evening for Parents
Charlton Kings Junior School
Assessment of Learning 1
CCMH 535 RANK Career Begins/cchm535rank.com
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Data Usage Response to Intervention
SATs Information Evening
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement - III
MEETING FOR YEAR 2 PARENTS/CARERS: SATs Information
Key Stage 1 Assessments March 2018
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Year 6 Parent Forum Amina Patel: Head Teacher
Information for Parents on Key Stage 2 SATs
Iowa Assessment Program
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)
Weschler Individual Achievement Test
Key Stage 1 SATs Marlborough Primary School
Key Stage One National Testing Arrangements
Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing-Second Edition CTOPP-2
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents
Prescriptive Teaching Plan
BURNSIDE ACADEMY INSPIRES KS2 SATS Guidance for Parents
An Information Evening for Parents
Chapter 10: Intelligence & Testing
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Chapter 4 Standardized Tests.
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Assessment Chapter 3.
Sats Information Session
KS1 SATS Guidance for Parents
What Do All These Numbers Mean? Interpreting Gifted Test Scores
Presentation transcript:

Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II Overview

WIAT-II 1-Consists of two forms: Comprehensive Battery and WIAT Screener 2-Comprehensive Battery consists of 9 subtests and requires 30-60 minutes to administer

WIAT-II 3-WIAT Screener consists of 3 subtests and requires 10-15 minutes to administer 4-Age range-5 years 0 months through 19 years 11 months

WIAT-II 5-Standard Score Mean of 100 6-Grade equivalents, percentile ranks are available 7-Uses easel format

WIAT-II 8-Test materials consist of two test easels, Comprehensive Battery Record Form, Response Booklet for Numerical Operations and Written Expression subtests. Blank paper must be provided.

WIAT-II 9-Complete all information in Record Booklet before beginning testing.

WIAT-II Starting Points-Based on grade level of the student-some flexibility is given

WIAT-II Reverse Rule-Designed to assure a minimum number of consecutive correct responses for all subtests except Oral Expression and Written Expression. If the student scores 0 on any one of the first five items administered, administer the preceding items in reverse order until the student makes five consecutive correct responses.

WIAT-II Discontinue Rule-vary by subtest and listed in record booklet

WIAT-II Comprehensive Battery Subtests 1-Word Reading: Assesses the student’s ability to read familiar words aloud from a list. Both accuracy and automaticity (speed of response) are measured. and

WIAT-II 2-Pseudword Decoding-Assesses the student’s ability to apply phonetic decoding skills.

WIAT-II 3-Reading Comprehension- Reflects the type of reading conducted in general education classrooms. Initial items include matching a written word with its representative picture. Students also read different types of passages and respond to questions involving comprehension of the content.

WIAT-II 4-Numerical Operations-Evaluates the student’s ability to identify and write dictated numerals and solve written calculation problems and equations involving all basic operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication and division

WIAT-II 5-Math Reasoning-Presents a series of problems both verbally and visually to assess the student’s ability to reason mathematically.

WIAT-II 6-Spelling-Evaluates the student’s ability to spell by writing dictated letters, letter blends, and words.

WIAT-II 7-Written Expression-Evaluates the student’s writing skills at the letter, word, sentence and text levels by asking him or her to write the alphabet from memory within a time limit, to demonstrate written word fluency, to combine sentences, to generate sentences from written cues, and to produce a well constructed paragraph

WIAT-II 8-Listening Comprehension-Measures the student’s ability to listen for details. 9-Oral Comprehension-Measures receptive and expressive vocabulary

WIAT-II Reading Word Reading Reading Comprehension Reasoning Pseudoword Reading

WIAT-II Mathematics Numerical Operations Math Reasoning

WIAT-II Written Language Spelling Written Expression

WIAT-II 1-The WIAT yields two types of scores-raw scores and standard scores 2-Raw scores reflect the number of points earned by the student on each subtest

WIAT-II 3-Raw scores are converted to standard scores for purposes of comparison with the general population 4-Each item (other than Written Expression) is scored as correct (1) or incorrect (0)

WIAT-II 3 Levels of Comparison a-Composite Comparisons b-Achievement level with cognitive level-discrepancy c-Examination of the student’s relative strengths and weaknesses through subtest comparisons and skill analysis

WIAT-II Goals of Interpretation a-To provide a comparison with peers b-To provide information on the individual student’s academic strengths and weaknesses and derive hypotheses to explain the student’s pattern of scores ( explored further through other test data, classroom products, teacher observation, classroom observation etc.)

WIAT-II 1-The Total Composite score is the most reliable and valid measure of the student’s overall achievement in the 9 areas tested

WIAT-II 2-It provides information on how the student’s performance compares to that of peers. Is the student functioning on, above or below level

WIAT-II Next we compare the individual Composite Scores with each other to determine whether the student’s academic skills are evenly or unevenly developed

WIAT-II EXAMINEE: Haley Keller REPORT DATE: 12/4/03 AGE: 11 years 9 months GRADE: Not Specified DATE OF BIRTH: 2/18/92 ETHNICITY: <Not Specified> EXAMINEE ID: Not Specified EXAMINER: Emily Martinez GENDER: Female Tests Administered: WISC-IV (6/12/03) WIAT-II (6/12/03) Age at Testing: WISC-IV (11 years 3 months) WIAT-II (11 years 3 months) Is this a retest? No

Example WIAT-II Results

WIAT-II Reason for Referral Referral information for Haley is unknown at this time. Home There is no data available regarding Haley’s parent(s), guardian(s), living arrangements, or family stressors. Language There is no data available regarding Haley's language. Development There is no data available regarding Haley's pregnancy, birth and developmental history.

WIAT-II Health There is no information available regarding Haley's sensory/motor status. There is no information or behavioral observations available regarding Haley’s medical, psychiatric, and neurological status. There is no data available regarding Haley's use of medication and substances.

WIAT-II School There is no information provided regarding Haley's early educational history. Haley's school performance with regard to her attendance, conduct, and academics are unknown at this time. Haley's past and recent performance on standardized achievement tests is unknown at this time.

WIAT-II Behavior Observation There are no additional behavioral observations regarding Haley's appearance, affect, test-taking attitude and behavior.

WIAT-II SUBTESTS* RAW STD 95% PR NCE S9 AGE/EQU GRADE/EQU Word Reading 79 72 67- 77 3 11 1 7:8 2:6 Reading Com 108** 83 76- 90 13 26 3 8:8 3:2 Pseudoword 12 75 70- 80 5 15 2 6:4 1:7 Numerical Op 28 103 94- 112 58 54 5 11:4 5:8 Math Reason 40 91 83- 99 27 37 4 10:0 4:8 Spelling 27 88 82- 94 21 33 3 9:4 3:8 Written Expres 12 78 65- 91 7 19 2 8:0 3:0 Listening Comp 22 84 70- 98 14 28 3 8:4 3:2 Oral Expression 20 83 71- 95 13 26 3 7:8 3:0

WIAT-II COMPOSITES* RAW STD INTERVAL PR NCE S9 Reading 230 75 71- 79 5 15 2 Mathematics 194 96 89- 103 39 44 4 Written Language 166 82 74- 90 12 25 3 Oral Language 167 81 70- 92 10 23 2 Total 757 80 76- 84 9 22 2

Interpretation of WIAT-II Results Reading Haley presents a diverse set of skills on different aspects of reading. She performed much better on tasks that assessed her capability to read sentences and paragraphs and answer questions about what was read (Reading Comprehension standard score = 83) than on tasks that required her to correctly read a series of printed words (Word Reading standard score = 72). A relative strength in comprehension skills as compared to reading words in isolation may indicate that

WIAT-II Haley is able to derive meaning from text using context clues but may not have learned vocabulary words to automaticity. For this reason, the Reading Composite score may not be the most accurate manner in which to summarize her reading skills. Her Reading Comprehension subtest score is higher than only approximately 13% of her peers, placing these skills in the Low Average range. Haley’s performance on Word Reading is within the Borderline range and exceeds that of approximately 3% of students her age.

WIAT-II Mathematics In overall mathematics skills Haley performed in the Average range, as indicated by her Mathematics Composite standard score (96). However, her skills in this area exceed that of only approximately 39% of students her age. Haley's performance on tasks that required her to add, subtract, multiple, and divide one- to three-digit numbers (Numerical Operations standard score = 103) is comparable to her performance on tasks that requires her to understand number, consumer math concepts, geometric measurement, basic graphs, and solve one-step word problems (Math Reasoning standard score = 91).

WIAT-II Haley performed in the Low Average range in overall language skills, as indicated by her standard score on the Oral Language Composite (81). Her skills in this area exceed those of only approximately 10% of students her age. Haley performed comparably on tasks that required her to identify the picture that best represents an orally presented descriptor or generate

WIAT-II a word that matches the picture (Listening Comprehension standard score = 84) and generate words within a category, describe scenes, and give directions (Oral Expression standard score =83).

WIAT-II Written Language In overall written language skills, Haley performed in the Low Average range, as indicated by her Written Language Composite standard score (82). Her achievement in this area is better than of only approximately 12% of students her age. Haley's performance on tasks that required her to generate words within a category, generate sentences to describe visual cues, combine sentences, and compose an organized paragraph (Written Expression standard score = 78) is comparable to her performance on tasks that required her to correctly spell verbally presented words (Spelling standard score = 88).

WIAT-II Strengths And Weaknesses Compared to Haley's mean score for all WIAT-II subtests, her performance is significantly better in Numerical Operations, indicating that this is an area of relative strength for her. Compared to those of other children her age, however, her skills in this area are in the Average range.

WIAT-II Word Reading and Pseudoword Decoding are notable weaknesses for Haley. Her scores on these subtests are significantly less than her mean score for all WIAT-II subtests, indicating that these are areas of lower performance relative to her other skills. She performed better than only approximately 3% and 5% of her peers on Word Reading and Pseudoword Decoding, respectively. Thus, Haley may experience great difficulty keeping up with other students when these skills are needed.