Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Risk Management in Public-Private Partnerships TRB 88 th Annual Meeting January 14, 2009 Thomas W. Pelnik III, P.E. Director, Innovative Project Delivery.
Advertisements

I-4 Ultimate with Lanes Project Central Florida 1 May 21, 2013.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing
THE PRACTICE OF TOLLING Theory in Motion May 7, 2013 Michael Copeland Yagnesh Jarmarwala Justin Winn.
1. Virginia’s Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) Northern Border Finance Workshop December 11, 2006 Thomas W. Pelnik III, P.E. Director, Innovative.
Public Private Partnerships P3s What the Public Sector Considers When Selecting the Right Private Partner Jose A. Galan - Division Director Miami-Dade.
Structure of Project in PPP- (2) John Plumb. Agenda Following on from the Strategy and business case to develop the ideas Structure of PPP arrangements.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Public-Private Partnerships: State of Practice and Research Needs The 14 th Annual Public Private Partnership Conference World Bank, Washington, DC September.
Financing Urban Public Infrastructure
1 CMAA – OWNERS FORUM THE TRANSURBAN PERSPECTIVE Tony Adams May 3, 2010.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
1 The Evolution of Public-Private Partnerships & Best Practices for States The CSG Transportation Policy Academy Washington, DC September 17, 2014 Jonathan.
How a Value for Money Analysis is Integral to Your P3 Project Allan T. Marks Partner Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP July 20, 2015.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Privatizing for the Public Good “Role of Professional Advisors to State DOTs” April 27, 2007 Thomas W. Bradshaw, Jr. Managing Director Co-Head of Transportation.
1. Concession Agreements The Focus Georgia Conference Thomas W. Pelnik III, P.E. Director, Innovative Project Delivery Division April 26, 2007.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Legislative Opportunities and Impediments - The Virginia Experience Virginia Public Private Partnerships ATRA TECHNIX Program Phil Bomersheim “Activist”
1. 2 Route 895 PPTA (2002) 3 Communication Dilbertian [v. Newtonian] Logic: We know that communication is a problem, but the company is not going to.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
PPP International Best Practice and Regional Application Overview of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) April, 2008 Tegucigalpa, Honduras Filip Drapak.
Texas Turnpike Authority Division AASHTO Right of Way & Utilities Committee Conference Wednesday – April 22, 2009.
WVDOH Experience... thus far.  Public-Private Partnerships = PPP=3P = P3 ... Most folks in industry refer to them as P3, so that’s what I go with.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Some things can’t wait for traffic Capital Beltway HOT Lanes Project New Travel Choices Ahead.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Convergence of Transportation Policy and RFID Enabler of Future Transportation Policy Chris Body Mark IV Vice President, Business Development.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Under the Federal-aid Highway Program January 2006.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
III Astana Economic Forum. Ensuring Sustainable Economic Growth of Countries in Post-Crisis Period July 1-2, 2010 JSC «Kazakhstan public-private partnership.
ITS Georgia | June What is the role of ITS in the emerging public/private partnership transportation market in Georgia? ITS Georgia Monso_Julia.
Overview of PPI’s in Georgia April 26, 2006 Earl Mahfuz, Treasurer.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
MAKING IT HAPPEN. TRB 88 th Annual Meeting Risk Management in Public-Private Partnerships January 14, 2009 Statutory and Public Policy Approaches to PPP.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
CONFIDENTIAL Virginia’s PPEA, NC SB 822, and Lessons Learned Institute for Emerging Issues North Carolina State University.
DELIVERING ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE USING PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS – CAN TRANSPORT SHOW THE WAY? The OECD estimates that $53tn of investment is required.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
ITS VIRGINIA MEETING APRIL 19, EXPRESS LANES ITS APPLICATIONS OVERVIEW.
Michael Replogle Chairman, Partnership on Sustainable, Low Carbon Transport And Deputy Commissioner for Policy, New York City Department of Transportation.
Budget Workshop Capital Improvement Plan Presentation on Public Private Partnership and Strategy for Municipal Complex, HWY 50, and Coast to Coast Trail.
The Partnership between Transportation and Technology Jennifer Mitchell, Director Department of Rail and Public Transportation ITSVA Conference.
Stretching the limits of p3, Non-traditional applications ARTBA’s 28th Annual P3s in Transportation Conference Alexandra J. Lauzon July 15, 2016.
John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer
PPPs and Public Procurement
Englewood Mews HOA May 23, 2017 Michelle Holland, Megaprojects Communication Manager Virginia Department of Transportation John Morse, I-66 Project.
Finding the Revenue Stream to Make P3s Work
Evaluation of a New Approach to Address Metropolitan Congestion
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Morteza Farajian, Ph.D. Program Manager
Four Winds Condominium Association August 2, 2017
Sully District Council of Citizens Associations January 25, 2017 Susan Shaw, P.E., Megaprojects Director Virginia Department of Transportation.
“To inspire and influence the evolution of integrated mobility”
The Oakton Condominium Association September 12, 2017
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada Leveraging Infrastructure Funds
Finance and Risk Public-Private Partnerships
Virginia’s P3 Program Morteza Farajian, PhD.
The Oregon Approach to Innovation in Infrastructure
SR 400 Express Lanes: Market Sounding
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
Capital Improvement Plans
by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy
DESIGN-BUILD PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Sustainable Public Procurement
BASICS OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
Presentation transcript:

Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.

Overview of P3s Definition P3 Defined A P3 involves a partnership between the public and private sector to share the risk and rewards of constructing, financing, operating, and/or maintaining what are traditionally publicly-owned assets in order for projects to be completed faster, on budget, and at an enhanced value for money to the owner Why Utilize P3s? Innovation leading to more cost effective delivery and long term operations Flexibility through private financing and funding regimes Integrated services Outcome-based performance Budget certainty over the ‘whole life’ of an asset Accelerated project delivery Risk transfer to the private sector

Ingredients for a successful P3

P3 Guidance Documents Commonwealth’s PPTA Implementation Manual & Guidelines (2014) Increases Transparency Increases Competition Increases Public Engagement P3 Risk Management Guide P3 Value for Money Guide P3 Public Engagement Guide

P3 Project Delivery Framework

P3 Project Screening High-Level Criteria: Detail-Level Criteria: Ability to Transfer Risk Funding Requirement Ability to Raise Capital Complexity of Effectively Leveraging Private Sector Innovation/Expertise Addresses Priorities in State, Regional and/or Local Transportation Plan Project Efficiencies through P3 Delivery Detail-Level Criteria: Public Need and Benefits Economic Development Market Demand for P3 Delivery Stakeholder Support Technical Feasibility Systematic Interface and Compatibility Financial Feasibility Legal/Legislative Feasibility Project Risks

Case Study: Northern Virginia 495 Express Lanes

Northern Virginia Express Lanes Network A 90+ mile seamless network of express lanes will provide faster and more reliable trips for drivers, carpoolers, and transit users in Northern Virginia.

Typical Express Lanes Facility

How Northern Virginia’s Express Lanes Work I-495 Express Lanes: 14 miles of Express Lanes - 2 lanes in each direction I-95 Express Lanes: 29 miles of Express Lanes - reversible according to peak travel directions Dynamic system with variable tolls manages traffic Mandatory E-Z Pass for all users HOV-3, transit and motorcycles ride toll-free with E-ZPass Flex Rules of the road are in effect 24 hours a day, seven days a week

495 Express Lanes Partnership Nearly $2 billion transportation improvement project accelerated due to public-private partnership with Transurban-Fluor Funded by $1.5 billion in private equity and debt and state contribution of $409 million Key risks transferred to private partner, away from taxpayers 80-year partnership agreement shifting long-term operations and maintenance responsibilities Partnership agreement includes key provisions to protect public interest Revenue sharing No non-compete Transparency Long-term performance requirements

Key Benefits: 495 Express Lanes Began construction July 2008, opened Nov. 2012 – ahead of schedule Added 50% capacity to manage congestion Replaced $260M of local aging infrastructure First major improvement to the Capital Beltway in a generation First-time opportunity for ride-sharing, carpooling and use of mass transit Connected four major commuter routes creating seamless HOV and transit network Three new access points to major retail and employment centers

I-66 Outside the Beltway Express Lanes Recently Procured: I-66 Outside the Beltway Express Lanes

Project Scope

Summary of Requirements Maximum amount of Commonwealth contribution is $600M. Other sources of Project financing include: Private equity TIFIA Private Activity Bonds (PABs) Commonwealth receives funding (fixed amounts) for transit elements of Project. Commonwealth receives $350,000,000 in net present value over term of contract from the Developer that can be used for future corridor enhancements. Commonwealth will receive a share of the revenue if Project generates more revenue than expected.

Competitive Procurement Process

Preferred Proposer Best value proposal Express Mobility Partners Equity Investors Cintra Global LTD, Meridiam Infrastructure North American Fund II Design-Build Contractors Ferrovial Agroman US Corp, Allan Myers VA, Inc. $2.3 billion construction project Provides required transit payments and support of corridor improvements Will make concession fee payment ($500M) to Commonwealth Construction design provides innovative solutions to improve the physical quality and operations of the project

Other Benefits to the Commonwealth $500M now available for additional improvements to the I-66 Corridor subject to VA Code requirements (§33.2-1528) $300M will return to the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority for other key regional projects $300M will return to the High Priority Project Program in SMART SCALE for statewide competition

THANK YOU Morteza.Farajian@P3.virginia.gov VirginiaDOT.org