From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: * Listed is the primary reason for exclusion of each study. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: Quality of included studies.QUADAS = Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: Forest plot of sensitivity of gestalt and different decision rules. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: || Study with revised Geneva dichotomized cutoff. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: Forest plot of specificity of gestalt and different decision rules. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: || Study with revised Geneva dichotomized cutoff. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: Relationship between prevalence of pulmonary embolism and sensitivity, as derived from the bivariate model.Rule type and log-transformed prevalence were added as covariates. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: Relationship between prevalence of pulmonary embolism and specificity, as derived from the bivariate model.Rule type and log-transformed prevalence were added as covariates. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: || Study with revised Geneva dichotomized cutoff. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.
From: Clinical Decision Rules for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(7):448-460. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00007 Figure Legend: || Study with revised Geneva dichotomized cutoff. Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © American College of Physicians. All rights reserved.